|
Post by Steve Aztec on Jan 22, 2011 11:36:12 GMT -8
Hey man, no need to be a cry baby. You sure don't mind dishing it out, so you should be able to take it too. You know the saying, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Not crying at all Campy. Just saying you sure do take a lot of personal shots. Merry Christmas.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jan 22, 2011 16:46:15 GMT -8
You got called out by Steve and others on your sh**ty post to Steve, in response to the uniform, and now you're back peddling. Incredible, you say that Steve wasn't clear from the BEGINNING, yet you chose to slam him in your initial post about the uniform. Just like you said, a new uniform could mean alot of different things, but you decided to jump on the keyboard and slam Steve as fast as you can. Now, just because you look like the idiot that you are by responding to Steve's post in a derogatory way, you're trying to save face. Face it, you got called on it by assuming, so stop backpeddling, ding dong. Did you just call me a ding dong? Ha haaa! That's so lame. "Ding dong"... that's what little girls call each other. OK, two can play that game, my fine feathered friend.... You're a ding-a-ling! ;D Anywho... I simply misunderstood Stevie because he's an ineffective communicator. Based on his previous complaints regarding the New Aztec Warrior, and his hard-on for the Monty costume I figured he was making a statement about the uniform. Why? Because He didn't bother to fill us in on the simple yet significant detail that the uniform is worn out. Steve only gave us half the information! As I've said before, I'm not a mind reader, ding-a-ling. ;D As for being "called out", what does that mean and why should I care? You can ineffectively call me out all you want, it means nothing. I'm going to call you out then. There, consider yourself called out. ![::)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/eyesroll.png) And you still don't know what "assume" means. You should look that up. Hey Ding Dong, You're the one that said that the uniform subject could have meant MANY different things. You decided to take a stab at what Steve meant by it, and you turned out looking like a fool, so you're trying to save face and failing at it. ONCE AGAIN. PITIFUL. You ASSUMED that he meant it to be a changed uniform, and you dove feet first with it by ripping Steve a new one, and in turn, you look like the idiot for being wrong. So when you rip someone and you're wrong about it, expect consequences, IDIOT.
|
|
|
Post by campanile on Jan 22, 2011 22:08:56 GMT -8
Hey Ding Dong, You're the one that said that the uniform subject could have meant MANY different things. You decided to take a stab at what Steve meant by it, and you turned out looking like a fool, so you're trying to save face and failing at it. ONCE AGAIN. PITIFUL. You ASSUMED that he meant it to be a changed uniform, and you dove feet first with it by ripping Steve a new one, and in turn, you look like the idiot for being wrong. So when you rip someone and you're wrong about it, expect consequences, IDIOT. Nope. You're wrong again. Based on the limited information provided by your boyfriend Steve, and coupled with his past statements regarding the Monty uniform, several of us made an honest misinterpretation of his meaning. It's called putting 2 and 2 together to make 4, fool. And only after receiving similar responses as mine did Steve finally clarify that the uniform is simply worn out. Based on that key missing information it became clear why several of us misinterpreted Steve's original comment. It was a misunderstanding because Steve didn't give us all the information in his original comment leaving us to logically conclude that he does not favor the current Aztec Warrior's uniform. Can-you-fathom-this-explanation, or-is-it-going-over-your head? There-were-no-assumptions-by-anyone, only-a-logical interpretation-derived-from-the-information-provided-by-Steve. This little mountain you're trying to make of a mole hill is pretty pathetic. The only assumption anyone might have made, was that Steve actually gave us ALL the information in the first place. Ok, dimbulb?
|
|
|
Post by JOCAZTEC on Jan 22, 2011 22:13:51 GMT -8
If there was one Aztec who I liked the most aside from BruceAztec, it would be...
I LOVE STEVE AZTEC.
I do.
And..........so does Jahono.
HAM
|
|
|
Post by Steve Aztec on Jan 23, 2011 9:26:33 GMT -8
If there was one Aztec who I liked the most aside from BruceAztec, it would be... I LOVE STEVE AZTEC. I do. And..........so does Jahono. HAM I miss the old days JOC when the board was civil.
|
|
|
Post by JOCAZTEC on Jan 23, 2011 10:06:35 GMT -8
It's just distributing that very few people ask questions, particularly amoungst under 40 year olds. Civility would return if instead of a personal and immediate attack on someone who posts a line or word that you find is unattractive, troublesome, or against your own stubborn opinion, you would make an effort, and do the work of pulling together a thought out question specifically asking why, what, where etc. the word or phrase was posted.
Why does JOC post stuff you can't understand?
Or, are the postings of JOC intended for those who have as much or greater history of SDSU, Aztec sports, and Southern California sports and academics?
Or, like you who like to attack just because it's easier than asking, "What does the "fudge" mean when you post, "pac-fudge"?
Not only does a good question help return civility but it offers the poster who receives the question a chance to offer an apology...like if you all who don't like, "fudge" might receive...
Fudge is used solely as a word for cheating, "to fudge the numbers"...oh, and since you asked, would you like me to stop using it (accept on pac-f'n elf fans)?
Is this the civility you are speaking about Steve the Great Aztec fan?
HAM
|
|
|
Post by JOCAZTEC on Jan 23, 2011 10:09:58 GMT -8
Do pac-fudge fans eat Ding-dongs?
Hmm
HAM
|
|
|
Post by Steve Aztec on Jan 23, 2011 10:32:55 GMT -8
It's just distributing that very few people ask questions, particularly amoungst under 40 year olds. Civility would return if instead of a personal and immediate attack on someone who posts a line or word that you find is unattractive, troublesome, or against your own stubborn opinion, you would make an effort, and do the work of pulling together a thought out question specifically asking why, what, where etc. the word or phrase was posted. Why does JOC post stuff you can't understand? Or, are the postings of JOC intended for those who have as much or greater history of SDSU, Aztec sports, and Southern California sports and academics? Or, like you who like to attack just because it's easier than asking, "What does the "fudge" mean when you post, "pac-fudge"? Not only does a good question help return civility but it offers the poster who receives the question a chance to offer an apology...like if you all who don't like, "fudge" might receive... Fudge is used solely as a word for cheating, "to fudge the numbers"...oh, and since you asked, would you like me to stop using it (accept on pac-f'n elf fans)? Is this the civility you are speaking about Steve the Great Aztec fan? HAM Yes JOC, something like this... SteveAztec says....We need to watch this Zuma thing. I think Zuma is more than a supplemental mascot. Poster responds....Why do you think that Steve? He seems cuddly and fan friendly. Instead of... ______________________________________________________ SteveAztec says....We need to watch this Zuma thing. I think Zuma is more than a supplemental mascot. Ramrodd23...SteveAztec is a jerk. Campy...Prove it ahole. You didn't graduate and aren't even an Aztec alum. TecPride...SteveAztec is the biggest downer on the board.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jan 23, 2011 12:27:30 GMT -8
Hey Ding Dong, You're the one that said that the uniform subject could have meant MANY different things. You decided to take a stab at what Steve meant by it, and you turned out looking like a fool, so you're trying to save face and failing at it. ONCE AGAIN. PITIFUL. You ASSUMED that he meant it to be a changed uniform, and you dove feet first with it by ripping Steve a new one, and in turn, you look like the idiot for being wrong. So when you rip someone and you're wrong about it, expect consequences, IDIOT. Nope. You're wrong again. Based on the limited information provided by your boyfriend Steve, and coupled with his past statements regarding the Monty uniform, several of us made an honest misinterpretation of his meaning. It's called putting 2 and 2 together to make 4, fool. And only after receiving similar responses as mine did Steve finally clarify that the uniform is simply worn out. Based on that key missing information it became clear why several of us misinterpreted Steve's original comment. It was a misunderstanding because Steve didn't give us all the information in his original comment leaving us to logically conclude that he does not favor the current Aztec Warrior's uniform. Can-you-fathom-this-explanation, or-is-it-going-over-your head? There-were-no-assumptions-by-anyone, only-a-logical interpretation-derived-from-the-information-provided-by-Steve. This little mountain you're trying to make of a mole hill is pretty pathetic. The only assumption anyone might have made, was that Steve actually gave us ALL the information in the first place. Ok, dimbulb? Several of us? What you meant to say was that several of us didn't respond because it wasn't clear YET what he meant. But OH NOOOO, Campy boy had to jump right in there and bash people, just as soon as he could, and then in return, as usual, he makes an idiot of himself, and then starts back peddling, AGAIN. Your lack of discipline comes to the forefront once again, and exposes you as the troll idiot basher that you are. You looked bad after bashing Steve by ASSUMING he meant a whole new uniform, instead doing what SEVERAL of us did, and that was to not respond to it until it became clear what he meant. And the one or two, not several, that did respond, it wasn't the jackass way that you did. You have such a happy troll trigger people bashing finger, you couldn't wait to jump on him. I get it, there's a heck of alot of people in the world out there like you. No surprise. ![::)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/eyesroll.png)
|
|
|
Post by Steve Aztec on Jan 24, 2011 13:28:50 GMT -8
Nope. You're wrong again. Based on the limited information provided by your boyfriend Steve, and coupled with his past statements regarding the Monty uniform, several of us made an honest misinterpretation of his meaning. It's called putting 2 and 2 together to make 4, fool. And only after receiving similar responses as mine did Steve finally clarify that the uniform is simply worn out. Based on that key missing information it became clear why several of us misinterpreted Steve's original comment. It was a misunderstanding because Steve didn't give us all the information in his original comment leaving us to logically conclude that he does not favor the current Aztec Warrior's uniform. Can-you-fathom-this-explanation, or-is-it-going-over-your head? There-were-no-assumptions-by-anyone, only-a-logical interpretation-derived-from-the-information-provided-by-Steve. This little mountain you're trying to make of a mole hill is pretty pathetic. The only assumption anyone might have made, was that Steve actually gave us ALL the information in the first place. Ok, dimbulb? Several of us? What you meant to say was that several of us didn't respond because it wasn't clear YET what he meant. But OH NOOOO, Campy boy had to jump right in there and bash people, just as soon as he could, and then in return, as usual, he makes an idiot of himself, and then starts back peddling, AGAIN. Your lack of discipline comes to the forefront once again, and exposes you as the troll idiot basher that you are. You looked bad after bashing Steve by ASSUMING he meant a whole new uniform, instead doing what SEVERAL of us did, and that was to not respond to it until it became clear what he meant. And the one or two, not several, that did respond, it wasn't the jackass way that you did. You have such a happy troll trigger people bashing finger, you couldn't wait to jump on him. I get it, there's a heck of alot of people in the world out there like you. No surprise. ![::)](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/eyesroll.png) This has been his (Campy) MO forever and why he has been banned from multiple boards.
|
|
|
Post by Pssst13 on Jan 24, 2011 14:21:01 GMT -8
Ok, Campanile... You don't believe that Zuma is here to phaseout Monty and on the other hand we believe Steve when he says the ultimate plan is for Zuma to be the mascot and retire Monty, right? And from what I understand is you prefer Monty, right? Now, I'm confused. If you prefer Monty, why do you spend so much energy in proving Steve is wrong? Why do you care if Steve's story is bogus? Steve's ultimate goal is to keep Monty which you are in favor of. This seems to me more and more of your dislike of Steve because he loves the AZTECS so much (more than you) and he doesn't even hold a Diploma. I don't care if someone only took a semester - Once an AZTEC, always an AZTEC. Heck, we've got big money donors who didn't attend state. What matters is they care about San Diego State.
Most SEC school fans never even finished high school, so should school hate on half of its fan base because they didn't graduate or go to that school?
YOu are so confusing!
|
|
|
Post by Steve Aztec on Jan 24, 2011 15:38:02 GMT -8
Campanile, I have a deal for you.
AztecBruce and I were talking today about this thread and you specifically. And as Psst13 says...You are very confusing.
On behalf of the Aztec Warrior Foundation, Bruce and I would like to meet with you in person sometime soon. At that meeting Bruce and I are putting in $50 each for a total of a $100 refund from the Aztec Warrior Foundation to you.
We would like to refund your $100 donation from a few years back
We DO NOT want anyone thinking that you donated to our cause or that you have ANYTHING in common with those who started and worked so hard to fight for our beloved mascot to be returned.
When do you want to meet and where? You can PM me with the info.
Please meet soon. I do not want to EVER have my name associated with you in any way shape or form.
|
|
|
Post by RockNFish on Jan 24, 2011 18:35:48 GMT -8
Wow this is like reality TV - who's gonna win the next cat fight? Stay tuned...
|
|
|
Post by socal on Jan 24, 2011 22:18:15 GMT -8
Does that really surprise you. The only one that believes what they say is Campy. That's not at all true. There are many like me who aren't buying into the "Zuma is phasing the Warrior out" mumbo-jumbo being pushed by a minority group on this message board. You should get out more often; according to the poll, you are in the minority... www.aztecmesa.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=ats&action=display&thread=6430Are you looking at the SAME poll? Its SPLIT. Half of the posters want Zuma (G-damn BYU mascot) OUT.
|
|
|
Post by JOCAZTEC on Jan 24, 2011 22:42:01 GMT -8
The only reason the poll is split is that the one person who wants Montezuma as a stuffed animal has signed up on all the computers on campus under many different user names to vote...
Ya think?
RRR
HAM
|
|
|
Post by campanile on Jan 25, 2011 0:07:26 GMT -8
Ok, Campanile... You don't believe that Zuma is here to phaseout Monty and on the other hand we believe Steve when he says the ultimate plan is for Zuma to be the mascot and retire Monty, right? And from what I understand is you prefer Monty, right? Now, I'm confused. If you prefer Monty, why do you spend so much energy in proving Steve is wrong? Why do you care if Steve's story is bogus? Steve's ultimate goal is to keep Monty which you are in favor of. This seems to me more and more of your dislike of Steve because he loves the AZTECS so much (more than you) and he doesn't even hold a Diploma. I don't care if someone only took a semester - Once an AZTEC, always an AZTEC. Heck, we've got big money donors who didn't attend state. What matters is they care about San Diego State. Most SEC school fans never even finished high school, so should school hate on half of its fan base because they didn't graduate or go to that school? YOu are so confusing! It is possible to support the Aztec Warrior without spreading lies and promoting fear through bogus and manufactured threats. I like the Aztec Warrior, but I don't like being manipulated. Steve has made many claims and proved nothing. There's the statement that Zuma is phasing out the Warrior. Never mind the Warrior is front and center all the time. Never mind that the university has indicated that the Warrior is to remain our primary mascot. Then we hear from Steve that the school will not replace the out-going Warrior. But wait, the school says they will be conducting a search after all! Then Steve delivers the coup de grĂ¢ce, Zuma is funded by the school while the Warrior is not! But wait! That may not be true! Evidently one mascot is funded by the Student Assn. while the other is funded by the Alumni Assn. So, what's that about one being funded while the other is not? Where's the beef man? Where's the proof that Zuma is phasing out the Warrior? There isn't even any evidence let alone proof. I don't like being lied to and manipulated just because some old fart has a problem with the SECONDARY MASCOT. I don't like it when he lies about long-time and loyal SDSU employees just because he doesn't like the SECONDARY MASCOT. Furthermore, my love of SDSU cannot be measured by a stupid debate about a mascot. I put blood, sweat, and tears into that school in ways that Steve will never know. Unlike Steve, who is just a sports fan, I am one of thousands tied academically to the school. Like my mother and father before me, I've invested the countless hours there studying, stressing, attending classes, preparing for finals, and turning in research papers. I loved SDSU so much that I jumped through all the hoops to graduate while working full time. I owe much of who I am and what I have in life to SDSU. It was my generation of students who paid for the library extension, Viejas Arena, and a bunch of other buildings that make up what SDSU is today. We were there with the construction hassles, fee increases, and cuts in classes. I paid my dues at SDSU and I have the credentials to prove it. You going to lecture me about Steve loving the school more just because he manufactured a threat to the Warrior mascot? Because he fiddles with the mascots all day? You've been snowed. Steve is not a fan of SDSU! He's a sports fan who by most accounts despises much of the good folks running the school. He has certainly mocked and made fun of my SDSU degrees. This guy is all about mascots and sporting events, so don't try to tell me he loves the school more. Ha! There is no threat to the Warrior! He just doesn't like the Cat. I pay my alumni dues, traveled by plain, trains, and automobile thousands of miles to support my team, and I've even supported AWF. You don't know anything about my relationship and appreciation of/with SDSU. Yeah, you are confused. One confused and easily manipulated dude, no doubt.
|
|
|
Post by campanile on Jan 25, 2011 0:13:30 GMT -8
Are you looking at the SAME poll? Its SPLIT. Half of the posters want Zuma (G-damn BYU mascot) OUT. Not quite split down the middle though, is it. I don't care if he stays or goes. Just don't try to tell me he's there to replace the Warrior just because you don't like him... unless you have some proof.
|
|
|
Post by sectionq on Jan 25, 2011 6:00:37 GMT -8
Hi All-
New to the board, and I have to admit new to the Zuma issue, so I I'm not aware of all of the details. I am a b-ball season ticket holder, however- a "customer" if you will. And as a customer my opinion is that Zuma is a distraction and confusing. We should have one mascot (Zuma is cheerleading around the games- how can it be considered not a mascot?). SDSU already struggles with consistency and simplicity in their branding (too many logos, too many color and font combinations). Having a second mascot only further confuses the branding of the school.
Thanks to everyone for putting your time and energy to this issue. Good to see some passion for the Aztecs!
|
|
|
Post by Cwag on Jan 25, 2011 6:44:44 GMT -8
Zuma.....bringing fans together since 2010.. ![:-/](//storage.proboards.com/forum/images/smiley/undecided.png)
|
|
|
Post by AzTX on Jan 25, 2011 6:46:41 GMT -8
I wish there was something to do the opposite of "ttt".
|
|