|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 10, 2022 13:21:11 GMT -8
A movie about people dropping off stacks of ballots at 3:00 AM wearing latex gloves taking a picture of the stack just as they put them in the drop box. Of course, the people likely work the night shift and only had ballots from their very large families and, after all, it was during the Covid pandemic (so they needed gloves) and were all just anxious to share a pic on Twitter that they had voted. If not for the Ministry of Truth, one might mistakenly think that some illegalities were going on.  |
|
|
|
2000 Mules
May 10, 2022 15:21:02 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by uwphoto on May 10, 2022 15:21:02 GMT -8
A movie about people dropping off stacks of ballots at 3:00 AM wearing latex gloves taking a picture of the stack just as they put them in the drop box. Of course, the people likely work the night shift and only had ballots from their very large families and, after all, it was during the Covid pandemic (so they needed gloves) and were all just anxious to share a pic on Twitter that they had voted. If not for the Ministry of Truth, one might mistakenly think that some illegalities were going on. Where'd you get that? Sydney Powell...My Pillow Guy...some other paragon of virtue?..roll eyes.. |
|
|
|
Post by bnastyaztecs on May 10, 2022 18:03:30 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
2000 Mules
May 11, 2022 16:32:57 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by ptsdthor on May 11, 2022 16:32:57 GMT -8
A movie about people dropping off stacks of ballots at 3:00 AM wearing latex gloves taking a picture of the stack just as they put them in the drop box. Of course, the people likely work the night shift and only had ballots from their very large families and, after all, it was during the Covid pandemic (so they needed gloves) and were all just anxious to share a pic on Twitter that they had voted. If not for the Ministry of Truth, one might mistakenly think that some illegalities were going on. Where'd you get that? Sydney Powell...My Pillow Guy...some other paragon of virtue?..roll eyes.. ?? Politifact assured us that there was no illegal ballot harvesting/trafficking. Just mere cowikidink. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 12, 2022 7:21:45 GMT -8
Where'd you get that? Sydney Powell...My Pillow Guy...some other paragon of virtue?..roll eyes.. ?? Politifact assured us that there was no illegal ballot harvesting/trafficking. Just mere cowikidink. So did common sense. |
|
|
|
2000 Mules
May 12, 2022 14:14:11 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by uwphoto on May 12, 2022 14:14:11 GMT -8
Where'd you get that? Sydney Powell...My Pillow Guy...some other paragon of virtue?..roll eyes.. ?? Politifact assured us that there was no illegal ballot harvesting/trafficking. Just mere cowikidink. Troll Meister getting bored? Maybe you could go over to Foxnews.com and help the other brain dead magas posting on the Laguna Fire. Mostly cheering on the destruction of 20 homes and "burn up the Libs" stuff. Oh and they deserve it cause of "poor forest management". Hate to inform the brain dead incapable of critical thought...but there isn't a forest withn 50 miles of Laguna. And here's the ironic part..the rich people in Laguna, Newport and Dana Point are mostly Republicans. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 12, 2022 16:48:06 GMT -8
2000 Imbeciles.
The title of the next Trump rally.
|
|
|
|
2000 Mules
May 12, 2022 20:20:08 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by ptsdthor on May 12, 2022 20:20:08 GMT -8
Do you claim the raw Geospatial data given to True the Vote was bad? Do you claim the analysis (aka Science) of the Geospatial data is bad? Do you think the conclusions drawn from the analyzed Geospatial data and videos reviewed is flawed?
If your answer to any of these questions is "yes", please detail the basis of your positions (and please go beyond just not being convinced) and give us the verifiable data that contradicts the facts presented in the movie that would convice all that NO ballot harvesting and trafficking occured to the levels as claimed in the movie.
Or is ignorance bliss?
|
|
|
|
Post by bnastyaztecs on May 13, 2022 12:28:55 GMT -8
Do you claim the raw Geospatial data given to True the Vote was bad? Do you claim the analysis (aka Science) of the Geospatial data is bad? Do you think the conclusions drawn from the analyzed Geospatial data and videos reviewed is flawed? If your answer to any of these questions is "yes", please detail the basis of your positions (and please go beyond just not being convinced) and give us the verifiable data that contradicts the facts presented in the movie that would convice all that NO ballot harvesting and trafficking occured to the levels as claimed in the movie. Or is ignorance bliss? Yes...all of it is flawed...that's why all the data is in the court of right-wing public opinion...and not an opinion of the court...if all that is claimed in the for-profit grift documentary is factual...then it would be no problem for it to be held under the scrutiny of cross-examination..... |
|
|
|
2000 Mules
May 13, 2022 13:48:13 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by uwphoto on May 13, 2022 13:48:13 GMT -8
Do you claim the raw Geospatial data given to True the Vote was bad? Do you claim the analysis (aka Science) of the Geospatial data is bad? Do you think the conclusions drawn from the analyzed Geospatial data and videos reviewed is flawed? If your answer to any of these questions is "yes", please detail the basis of your positions (and please go beyond just not being convinced) and give us the verifiable data that contradicts the facts presented in the movie that would convice all that NO ballot harvesting and trafficking occured to the levels as claimed in the movie. Or is ignorance bliss? D'Souza rabbit hole, Alex Jones, Steve Bannon, orange man himself..the list is endless. The maga base is easy money...like candy from a baby. If I had no morals or integrity, I'd be filthy rich as well. Its boiler plate stuff and "dittos" all the way to the bank. |
|
|
|
2000 Mules
May 13, 2022 16:06:14 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by ptsdthor on May 13, 2022 16:06:14 GMT -8
Thought so.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on May 23, 2022 22:37:31 GMT -8
OK, I did some reasearch on this, "Documentary," and found that, while they present what they have in a compelling fashion, they present almost NOTHING to back up their claims.
So, wait - they've got time codes on the millions of minutes of video footage (to match it up with the cell phone tracking data), and yet they don't show ANY of those people dropping off ballots at multiple locations? They sure IMPLY that they've got that evidence, but watch it again - they don't show the any one person at any more than one location. And they're dropping off what looks like 2 or 3 ballots. 4 tops.
Also, the group that put this documentary together has it's roots as a far right organization. Hmmmm...
Also, they never, ever, ever mention that they investigated the Republicans for the same thing. You know, just to clear them and prove that they're the good guys, and the Democrats are the bad guys. They completely failed to do that. Hmmm...
So, in the end, it's a bunch of really weak evidence, that isn't corroborated the way they claim it is.
Sorry. 2000 Mules is an EPIC FAIL.
Here's a great review - non partisan, down the middle. Great breakdown, too, going over it's strengths and weaknesses.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on May 25, 2022 0:52:41 GMT -8
So, only Hillary and the Dems can contest election results? When the other side raises concerns it is ridiculed and not meant to be taken seriously?
Typical.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on May 25, 2022 7:41:20 GMT -8
So, only Hillary and the Dems can contest election results? When the other side raises concerns it is ridiculed and not meant to be taken seriously? Typical. Anyone can contest election results. Trump's people got the same recounts that Gore got. More, really. However, Hillary didn't claim that Trump won through cheating and go on calling it a stolen election - even though she got more votes, overall. This is something that even Nixon didn't do when he barely lost to Kennedy and there were claims of fraud there (and quite possibly WAS fraud). Nixon had more grounds than Trump, and he let it go pretty quickly, whereas Trump is undermining the faith in our electoral system and setting up a mindset among much of his following that a CIVIL f****** WAR is needed. So I'd say there's a bit of a difference between how the two parties have handled this kind of thing, and even a big difference between how Richard Nixon handled it and how Trump has been handling it. When Nixon showed more restraint and concern for the welfare of the country than Trump and the modern Republicans have you know you've got a serious problem. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 25, 2022 8:24:49 GMT -8
So, only Hillary and the Dems can contest election results? When the other side raises concerns it is ridiculed and not meant to be taken seriously? Typical. Typical false equivalence. Might want to check what's going on in Michigan right now, for example. And I don't recall Hillary invoking an insurrection. |
|
|
|
Post by La Mesa Aztec on May 25, 2022 22:45:08 GMT -8
So, only Hillary and the Dems can contest election results? When the other side raises concerns it is ridiculed and not meant to be taken seriously? Typical. Hillary conceded the day after the election. The day after that Obama was welcoming Trump at the White House. Where is the similarity exactly? |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on May 26, 2022 4:27:53 GMT -8
So, only Hillary and the Dems can contest election results? When the other side raises concerns it is ridiculed and not meant to be taken seriously? Typical. Hillary conceded the day after the election. The day after that Obama was welcoming Trump at the White House. Where is the similarity exactly? When arguing with these people, you have to set up a baseline of reality. Starting with: is the Earth flat? Was the moon landing faked? Are frogs amphibians or reptiles? You get to question 4 or 5 and any discussion goes completely off the rails...because they beleive complete and utter bull$#!+. They are as easy to make money from, and manipulate, as a member of the Peoples Temple. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on May 27, 2022 16:49:36 GMT -8
So, only Hillary and the Dems can contest election results? When the other side raises concerns it is ridiculed and not meant to be taken seriously? Typical. Hillary conceded the day after the election. The day after that Obama was welcoming Trump at the White House. Where is the similarity exactly? Hillary still to this day claims the 2016 election was stolen from her. Her concerns were taken seriously by Congress (The now disproven Russian collusion hoax) and the liberal controlled media (The fraudulent investigation was THE LEDE STORY for most of 2017-18). No retractions or apologies were issued from those slugs. Trump’s concerns over voting irregularities in 2020 were pretty much ignored by Congress and absolutely demonized by the same discredited media. Their explanation was….hey, it’s Trump, he must be up to no good. I’m glad there is a documentary. I can’t trust anything the mainstreamers broadcast, their credibility is shot. |
|
|
|
2000 Mules
May 27, 2022 17:45:26 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by uwphoto on May 27, 2022 17:45:26 GMT -8
Hillary conceded the day after the election. The day after that Obama was welcoming Trump at the White House. Where is the similarity exactly? Hillary still to this day claims the 2016 election was stolen from her. Her concerns were taken seriously by Congress (The now disproven Russian collusion hoax) and the liberal controlled media (The fraudulent investigation was THE LEDE STORY for most of 2017-18). No retractions or apologies were issued from those slugs. Trump’s concerns over voting irregularities in 2020 were pretty much ignored by Congress and absolutely demonized by the same discredited media. Their explanation was….hey, it’s Trump, he must be up to no good. I’m glad there is a documentary. I can’t trust anything the mainstreamers broadcast, their credibility is shot. Discredited trump lawyer, Sidney Powell, defense against false claims she made regarding election results were "No reasonable person would believe" the claims she made. Not surprised you were one. Of course you had my pillow guy as well..talk about no credibility!! LMFAO. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 27, 2022 18:04:37 GMT -8
Hillary conceded the day after the election. The day after that Obama was welcoming Trump at the White House. Where is the similarity exactly? Hillary still to this day claims the 2016 election was stolen from her. Her concerns were taken seriously by Congress (The now disproven Russian collusion hoax) and the liberal controlled media (The fraudulent investigation was THE LEDE STORY for most of 2017-18). No retractions or apologies were issued from those slugs. Trump’s concerns over voting irregularities in 2020 were pretty much ignored by Congress and absolutely demonized by the same discredited media. Their explanation was….hey, it’s Trump, he must be up to no good. I’m glad there is a documentary. I can’t trust anything the mainstreamers broadcast, their credibility is shot. Man, the false equivalence in here is rampant... |
|
