|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on May 27, 2022 18:58:13 GMT -8
Hillary conceded the day after the election. The day after that Obama was welcoming Trump at the White House. Where is the similarity exactly? Hillary still to this day claims the 2016 election was stolen from her. Her concerns were taken seriously by Congress (The now disproven Russian collusion hoax) and the liberal controlled media (The fraudulent investigation was THE LEDE STORY for most of 2017-18). No retractions or apologies were issued from those slugs. Trump’s concerns over voting irregularities in 2020 were pretty much ignored by Congress and absolutely demonized by the same discredited media. Their explanation was….hey, it’s Trump, he must be up to no good. I’m glad there is a documentary. I can’t trust anything the mainstreamers broadcast, their credibility is shot. Did Hillary attempt a coup? Foment an insurrection? Go on social media 20 times a day shouting how she was robbed and Trump was not a legitimate President? Nope, Nope, and Nope. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on May 28, 2022 0:36:10 GMT -8
Hillary still to this day claims the 2016 election was stolen from her. Her concerns were taken seriously by Congress (The now disproven Russian collusion hoax) and the liberal controlled media (The fraudulent investigation was THE LEDE STORY for most of 2017-18). No retractions or apologies were issued from those slugs. Trump’s concerns over voting irregularities in 2020 were pretty much ignored by Congress and absolutely demonized by the same discredited media. Their explanation was….hey, it’s Trump, he must be up to no good. I’m glad there is a documentary. I can’t trust anything the mainstreamers broadcast, their credibility is shot. Did Hillary attempt a coup? Foment an insurrection? Go on social media 20 times a day shouting how she was robbed and Trump was not a legitimate President? Nope, Nope, and Nope. There certainly was a 4 year long democrat mass temper tantrum during Trump’s tenure. Complete with mass assault, vandalism, arson, theft, murder, unlawful assembly, rape, buggery (I hear you guys like buggery) rioting, destruction of police property ect. This happened in nearly every major city, perpetrated (though generally unprosecuted) by Dem supporters and egged on by Maxine Waters, Gerold Nagler, Charles Schumer and a host of others. How many businesses did these animals destroy? How much Covid-19 did these idiots spread? |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on May 28, 2022 4:54:39 GMT -8
Did Hillary attempt a coup? Foment an insurrection? Go on social media 20 times a day shouting how she was robbed and Trump was not a legitimate President? Nope, Nope, and Nope. There certainly was a 4 year long democrat mass temper tantrum during Trump’s tenure. Complete with mass assault, vandalism, arson, theft, murder, unlawful assembly, rape, buggery (I hear you guys like buggery) rioting, destruction of police property ect. This happened in nearly every major city, perpetrated (though generally unprosecuted) by Dem supporters and egged on by Maxine Waters, Gerold Nagler, Charles Schumer and a host of others. How many businesses did these animals destroy? How much Covid-19 did these idiots spread? "We like buggery", no...thats the southern Baptists... your brethren. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 28, 2022 8:02:49 GMT -8
Did Hillary attempt a coup? Foment an insurrection? Go on social media 20 times a day shouting how she was robbed and Trump was not a legitimate President? Nope, Nope, and Nope. There certainly was a 4 year long democrat mass temper tantrum during Trump’s tenure. Complete with mass assault, vandalism, arson, theft, murder, unlawful assembly, rape, buggery (I hear you guys like buggery) rioting, destruction of police property ect. This happened in nearly every major city, perpetrated (though generally unprosecuted) by Dem supporters and egged on by Maxine Waters, Gerold Nagler, Charles Schumer and a host of others. How many businesses did these animals destroy? How much Covid-19 did these idiots spread? Let's not let facts get in the way of radical idiocy and racism. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on May 28, 2022 8:05:00 GMT -8
Did Hillary attempt a coup? Foment an insurrection? Go on social media 20 times a day shouting how she was robbed and Trump was not a legitimate President? Nope, Nope, and Nope. There certainly was a 4 year long democrat mass temper tantrum during Trump’s tenure. Complete with mass assault, vandalism, arson, theft, murder, unlawful assembly, rape, buggery (I hear you guys like buggery) rioting, destruction of police property ect. This happened in nearly every major city, perpetrated (though generally unprosecuted) by Dem supporters and egged on by Maxine Waters, Gerold Nagler, Charles Schumer and a host of others. How many businesses did these animals destroy? How much Covid-19 did these idiots spread? Ummm... The rioting, assaults, vandalism, etc, were precipitated/caused by police killing black suspects that didn't need to be killed. After decades of that kind of behavior that community got fed up. If the shoe were on the other foot you'd have gotten fed up, too. That's how I look at these things. If it had been Hillary who attempted a coup and incited an insurrection, how would the Republicans have responded? There would have been calls for her execution for sure, and her life would have been at risk as some average Republican voters would have felt justified in killing her for what she did. IF the roles had been reversed. The incidents you refer to had ZERO to do with Donald Trump. I can't even say, "Nice try," because it was so dishonest and manipulative. Weak. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 28, 2022 8:10:10 GMT -8
There certainly was a 4 year long democrat mass temper tantrum during Trump’s tenure. Complete with mass assault, vandalism, arson, theft, murder, unlawful assembly, rape, buggery (I hear you guys like buggery) rioting, destruction of police property ect. This happened in nearly every major city, perpetrated (though generally unprosecuted) by Dem supporters and egged on by Maxine Waters, Gerold Nagler, Charles Schumer and a host of others. How many businesses did these animals destroy? How much Covid-19 did these idiots spread? Ummm... The rioting, assaults, vandalism, etc, were precipitated/caused by police killing black suspects that didn't need to be killed. After decades of that kind of behavior that community got fed up. If the shoe were on the other foot you'd have gotten fed up, too. That's how I look at these things. If it had been Hillary who attempted a coup and incited an insurrection, how would the Republicans have responded? There would have been calls for her execution for sure, and her life would have been at risk as some average Republican voters would have felt justified in killing her for what she did. IF the roles had been reversed. The incidents you refer to had ZERO to do with Donald Trump. I can't even say, "Nice try," because it was so dishonest and manipulative. Weak. It's ironic that conservatives care about buildings more than they do about societal injustice, mass incarceration, violations of human rights, systemic racism and outright lynchings of people of color. Imagine if a building could breathe, talk or live. They are pro-building, certainly. Pro-life? Not so much. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on May 28, 2022 15:40:00 GMT -8
Four very weak attempts to explain away and justify months of rape, arson, theft and murder.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on May 28, 2022 16:25:10 GMT -8
Four very weak attempts to explain away and justify months of rape, arson, theft and murder. Ummmm... First, you're WAY exaggerating events. Second, the events in question had NOTHING to do with Trump. Get a clue. It was the murder of black men by police, after decades of abuse and mistreatment of blacks by the police in an era where civil rights were supposedly protected. If you really don't undertand that then you are sorely lacking in empathy and compassion. Humanity is supposed to be about empathy and compassion. Caring about people other than yourself and your immediate family. Perhaps you should stop trying to make political points when the events through which you try to score points in the debate had nothing to do with the root cause you claim they do. You're twisting things at best, lying at worst. That's a bad look, and certainly not one that wins debates. |
|
|
|
2000 Mules
May 28, 2022 16:42:03 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by uwphoto on May 28, 2022 16:42:03 GMT -8
Four very weak attempts to explain away and justify months of rape, arson, theft and murder. Go bugger yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 28, 2022 19:48:10 GMT -8
Four very weak attempts to explain away and justify months of rape, arson, theft and murder. Ummmm... First, you're WAY exaggerating events. Second, the events in question had NOTHING to do with Trump. Get a clue. It was the murder of black men by police, after decades of abuse and mistreatment of blacks by the police in an era where civil rights were supposedly protected. If you really don't undertand that then you are sorely lacking in empathy and compassion. Humanity is supposed to be about empathy and compassion. Caring about people other than yourself and your immediate family. Perhaps you should stop trying to make political points when the events through which you try to score points in the debate had nothing to do with the root cause you claim they do. You're twisting things at best, lying at worst. That's a bad look, and certainly not one that wins debates. Right-wing folks will point at everything they can...except the truth. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 30, 2022 6:31:52 GMT -8
OK, I did some reasearch on this, "Documentary," and found that, while they present what they have in a compelling fashion, they present almost NOTHING to back up their claims. So, wait - they've got time codes on the millions of minutes of video footage (to match it up with the cell phone tracking data), and yet they don't show ANY of those people dropping off ballots at multiple locations? They sure IMPLY that they've got that evidence, but watch it again - they don't show the any one person at any more than one location. And they're dropping off what looks like 2 or 3 ballots. 4 tops. Also, the group that put this documentary together has it's roots as a far right organization. Hmmmm... Also, they never, ever, ever mention that they investigated the Republicans for the same thing. You know, just to clear them and prove that they're the good guys, and the Democrats are the bad guys. They completely failed to do that. Hmmm... So, in the end, it's a bunch of really weak evidence, that isn't corroborated the way they claim it is. Sorry. 2000 Mules is an EPIC FAIL. Here's a great review - non partisan, down the middle. Great breakdown, too, going over it's strengths and weaknesses. Do you dispute the Geospatial data that locates the cellphones in question at at least 10 drop boxes during the elections? If so, what evidence does anyone have that that it is not the case except for blind skepticism? Oh, might they just be passing by 10 times for unknown reasons or the drop box was by their favorite public library where they go to read the paper? They have big families and that is why they have stacks of ballots.  Must the movie include footage of the 10 instances for the Geospatial data to be true? Why? Not all drop boxes in question had video. Not all video from those that did was good quality. Mindless gainsaying. Sleepy Joe was the most popular presidential candidate in our history yet could barely fill a phone booth with a campaign rally. The money to pay for the organizations and people involved in this scheme arrived just at the right time and at the right places thank you Mr. and Mrs. Zuckerberg. If not for ballot harvesting and trafficking, we would be into Trump's second term. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 30, 2022 7:32:12 GMT -8
OK, I did some reasearch on this, "Documentary," and found that, while they present what they have in a compelling fashion, they present almost NOTHING to back up their claims. So, wait - they've got time codes on the millions of minutes of video footage (to match it up with the cell phone tracking data), and yet they don't show ANY of those people dropping off ballots at multiple locations? They sure IMPLY that they've got that evidence, but watch it again - they don't show the any one person at any more than one location. And they're dropping off what looks like 2 or 3 ballots. 4 tops. Also, the group that put this documentary together has it's roots as a far right organization. Hmmmm... Also, they never, ever, ever mention that they investigated the Republicans for the same thing. You know, just to clear them and prove that they're the good guys, and the Democrats are the bad guys. They completely failed to do that. Hmmm... So, in the end, it's a bunch of really weak evidence, that isn't corroborated the way they claim it is. Sorry. 2000 Mules is an EPIC FAIL. Here's a great review - non partisan, down the middle. Great breakdown, too, going over it's strengths and weaknesses. Do you dispute the Geospatial data that locates the cellphones in question at at least 10 drop boxes during the elections? If so, what evidence does anyone have that that it is not the case except for blind skepticism? Oh, might they just be passing by 10 times for unknown reasons or the drop box was by their favorite public library where they go to read the paper? They have big families and that is why they have stacks of ballots. Must the movie include footage of the 10 instances for the Geospatial data to be true? Why? Not all drop boxes in question had video. Not all video from those that did was good quality. Mindless gainsaying. Sleepy Joe was the most popular presidential candidate in our history yet could barely fill a phone booth with a campaign rally. The money to pay for the organizations and people involved in this scheme arrived just at the right time and at the right places thank you Mr. and Mrs. Zuckerberg. If not for ballot harvesting and trafficking, we would be into Trump's second term. He lost. Move on. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on May 30, 2022 7:50:30 GMT -8
OK, I did some reasearch on this, "Documentary," and found that, while they present what they have in a compelling fashion, they present almost NOTHING to back up their claims. So, wait - they've got time codes on the millions of minutes of video footage (to match it up with the cell phone tracking data), and yet they don't show ANY of those people dropping off ballots at multiple locations? They sure IMPLY that they've got that evidence, but watch it again - they don't show the any one person at any more than one location. And they're dropping off what looks like 2 or 3 ballots. 4 tops. Also, the group that put this documentary together has it's roots as a far right organization. Hmmmm... Also, they never, ever, ever mention that they investigated the Republicans for the same thing. You know, just to clear them and prove that they're the good guys, and the Democrats are the bad guys. They completely failed to do that. Hmmm... So, in the end, it's a bunch of really weak evidence, that isn't corroborated the way they claim it is. Sorry. 2000 Mules is an EPIC FAIL. Here's a great review - non partisan, down the middle. Great breakdown, too, going over it's strengths and weaknesses. Do you dispute the Geospatial data that locates the cellphones in question at at least 10 drop boxes during the elections? If so, what evidence does anyone have that that it is not the case except for blind skepticism? Oh, might they just be passing by 10 times for unknown reasons or the drop box was by their favorite public library where they go to read the paper? They have big families and that is why they have stacks of ballots. Must the movie include footage of the 10 instances for the Geospatial data to be true? Why? Not all drop boxes in question had video. Not all video from those that did was good quality. Mindless gainsaying. Sleepy Joe was the most popular presidential candidate in our history yet could barely fill a phone booth with a campaign rally. The money to pay for the organizations and people involved in this scheme arrived just at the right time and at the right places thank you Mr. and Mrs. Zuckerberg. If not for ballot harvesting and trafficking, we would be into Trump's second term. If you're making an argument that something happened, claim to have the evidence, but then only give the circumstantial evidence and don't show the evidence - that you claim to have - that would be the conclusive, incontrovertible evidence, that undermines your entire claim. You've made the claim that you have this absolute evidence that proves your charges, but you don't show it. Why? Because you don't really have the evidence, and you're just trying to obfuscate that fact? You're trying to stick with the circumstantial evidence and then provide other details to make it APPEAR that you're presenting absolute concrete evidence when you're really not. Why be manipulative and dishonest like that? It makes the whole thing look faked. And the fact that they didn't even investigate the Republicans for the same thing just proves that it's a hit piece with an agenda. In this case a very DANGEROUS agenda - discrediting the entire electoral process in this country. When one side believes that elections cannot be valid, how long do you think it takes before another coup/insurrection is attempted? This entire process can do nothing but justify the Republicans overturning elections and creating a totalitarian/authoritarian state where they hold on to power indefinitely because they claim that the electoral process is fraudulent. The only thing that stopped that in January 2021 was the letter from every living former Secretary of Defense, warning EVERYONE in the military that backing Trump's coup attempt would be treason and punishable as such. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on May 30, 2022 8:52:57 GMT -8
OK, I did some reasearch on this, "Documentary," and found that, while they present what they have in a compelling fashion, they present almost NOTHING to back up their claims. So, wait - they've got time codes on the millions of minutes of video footage (to match it up with the cell phone tracking data), and yet they don't show ANY of those people dropping off ballots at multiple locations? They sure IMPLY that they've got that evidence, but watch it again - they don't show the any one person at any more than one location. And they're dropping off what looks like 2 or 3 ballots. 4 tops. Also, the group that put this documentary together has it's roots as a far right organization. Hmmmm... Also, they never, ever, ever mention that they investigated the Republicans for the same thing. You know, just to clear them and prove that they're the good guys, and the Democrats are the bad guys. They completely failed to do that. Hmmm... So, in the end, it's a bunch of really weak evidence, that isn't corroborated the way they claim it is. Sorry. 2000 Mules is an EPIC FAIL. Here's a great review - non partisan, down the middle. Great breakdown, too, going over it's strengths and weaknesses. Do you dispute the Geospatial data that locates the cellphones in question at at least 10 drop boxes during the elections? If so, what evidence does anyone have that that it is not the case except for blind skepticism? Oh, might they just be passing by 10 times for unknown reasons or the drop box was by their favorite public library where they go to read the paper? They have big families and that is why they have stacks of ballots. Must the movie include footage of the 10 instances for the Geospatial data to be true? Why? Not all drop boxes in question had video. Not all video from those that did was good quality. Mindless gainsaying. Sleepy Joe was the most popular presidential candidate in our history yet could barely fill a phone booth with a campaign rally. The money to pay for the organizations and people involved in this scheme arrived just at the right time and at the right places thank you Mr. and Mrs. Zuckerberg. If not for ballot harvesting and trafficking, we would be into Trump's second term. You are a prime example of how Steve Bannon, info wars, D'Souza, trump stay in business... laughing all the way to the bank. Speaking of laughing..and crying, that's what the rest of the civilized World is doing from the outside.. looking at us. "They coulda just used a baseball bat and killed as many kids". Here's what the Right doesn't want to know..they are more secular than us ..and more educated. So...keep cheering God and Guns as your mantra. Stoopid as f x x x . |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 30, 2022 9:09:22 GMT -8
OK, I did some reasearch on this, "Documentary," and found that, while they present what they have in a compelling fashion, they present almost NOTHING to back up their claims. So, wait - they've got time codes on the millions of minutes of video footage (to match it up with the cell phone tracking data), and yet they don't show ANY of those people dropping off ballots at multiple locations? They sure IMPLY that they've got that evidence, but watch it again - they don't show the any one person at any more than one location. And they're dropping off what looks like 2 or 3 ballots. 4 tops. Also, the group that put this documentary together has it's roots as a far right organization. Hmmmm... Also, they never, ever, ever mention that they investigated the Republicans for the same thing. You know, just to clear them and prove that they're the good guys, and the Democrats are the bad guys. They completely failed to do that. Hmmm... So, in the end, it's a bunch of really weak evidence, that isn't corroborated the way they claim it is. Sorry. 2000 Mules is an EPIC FAIL. Here's a great review - non partisan, down the middle. Great breakdown, too, going over it's strengths and weaknesses. Do you dispute the Geospatial data that locates the cellphones in question at at least 10 drop boxes during the elections? If so, what evidence does anyone have that that it is not the case except for blind skepticism? Oh, might they just be passing by 10 times for unknown reasons or the drop box was by their favorite public library where they go to read the paper? They have big families and that is why they have stacks of ballots. Must the movie include footage of the 10 instances for the Geospatial data to be true? Why? Not all drop boxes in question had video. Not all video from those that did was good quality. Mindless gainsaying. Sleepy Joe was the most popular presidential candidate in our history yet could barely fill a phone booth with a campaign rally. The money to pay for the organizations and people involved in this scheme arrived just at the right time and at the right places thank you Mr. and Mrs. Zuckerberg. If not for ballot harvesting and trafficking, we would be into Trump's second term. D'Souza claimed that the Geospatial data was accurate within 12-18 inches (That's almost unheard of in studies) so right off the bat there's extreme skepticism. D'Souza said that Geospatial data tracking had the reliability of a fingerprint. That's laughable and extremely false. Cell phone tracking data lacks granularity. They also couldn't show any direct evidence of the same person going to the same dropbox multiple times. It's a complete fabrication. And your false causation/correlation analysis about Biden's popularity is as hollow as D'Souza half-baked fraud theory. |
|
|
|
Post by sdsuball on May 30, 2022 21:05:20 GMT -8
Did Hillary attempt a coup? Foment an insurrection? Go on social media 20 times a day shouting how she was robbed and Trump was not a legitimate President? Nope, Nope, and Nope. How many businesses did these animals destroy? So you're dehumanizing people now.. classy. |
|
|
|
Post by La Mesa Aztec on May 31, 2022 7:55:42 GMT -8
Sleepy Joe was the most popular presidential candidate in our history yet could barely fill a phone booth with a campaign rally. LOL "Trump gets 30,000 people at his rallies and Biden could barely get 30 so of course Trump won". By that logic Trump should have gotten 1,000 times as many votes. Around here (corner of Pomerado and Twin Peaks in Poway) there were large Trump groups gathering every Sunday morning for years. Trump territory right? I live 2 miles from there and EVERY elected representative for my area is a Democrat. BTW Biden didn't attempt to hold large rallies in case you've forgotten. He knew there was a pandemic going on. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on May 31, 2022 8:25:24 GMT -8
Sleepy Joe was the most popular presidential candidate in our history yet could barely fill a phone booth with a campaign rally. LOL "Trump gets 30,000 people at his rallies and Biden could barely get 30 so of course Trump won". By that logic Trump should have gotten 1,000 times as many votes. Around here (corner of Pomerado and Twin Peaks in Poway) there were large Trump groups gathering every Sunday morning for years. Trump territory right? I live 2 miles from there and EVERY elected representative for my area is a Democrat. BTW Biden didn't attempt to hold large rallies in case you've forgotten. He knew there was a pandemic going on. People who are centrists, or leaning left are very diverse in their thought process and life experiences. It is generally much more difficult to get them on the same page to attend political fire brand like rallies. Perhaps a U2, Dead & Company or Stones concert..or a David Attenborough presentation is much easier. If there is a Democrat cult figure who followers will not question, and blindly follow... can you tell me who that is? |
|
|
|
2000 Mules
May 31, 2022 18:04:52 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by ptsdthor on May 31, 2022 18:04:52 GMT -8
Do you dispute the Geospatial data that locates the cellphones in question at at least 10 drop boxes during the elections? If so, what evidence does anyone have that that it is not the case except for blind skepticism? Oh, might they just be passing by 10 times for unknown reasons or the drop box was by their favorite public library where they go to read the paper? They have big families and that is why they have stacks of ballots. Must the movie include footage of the 10 instances for the Geospatial data to be true? Why? Not all drop boxes in question had video. Not all video from those that did was good quality. Mindless gainsaying. Sleepy Joe was the most popular presidential candidate in our history yet could barely fill a phone booth with a campaign rally. The money to pay for the organizations and people involved in this scheme arrived just at the right time and at the right places thank you Mr. and Mrs. Zuckerberg. If not for ballot harvesting and trafficking, we would be into Trump's second term. If you're making an argument that something happened, claim to have the evidence, but then only give the circumstantial evidence and don't show the evidence - that you claim to have - that would be the conclusive, incontrovertible evidence, that undermines your entire claim. You've made the claim that you have this absolute evidence that proves your charges, but you don't show it. Why? Because you don't really have the evidence, and you're just trying to obfuscate that fact? You're trying to stick with the circumstantial evidence and then provide other details to make it APPEAR that you're presenting absolute concrete evidence when you're really not. Why be manipulative and dishonest like that? It makes the whole thing look faked. And the fact that they didn't even investigate the Republicans for the same thing just proves that it's a hit piece with an agenda. In this case a very DANGEROUS agenda - discrediting the entire electoral process in this country. When one side believes that elections cannot be valid, how long do you think it takes before another coup/insurrection is attempted? This entire process can do nothing but justify the Republicans overturning elections and creating a totalitarian/authoritarian state where they hold on to power indefinitely because they claim that the electoral process is fraudulent. The only thing that stopped that in January 2021 was the letter from every living former Secretary of Defense, warning EVERYONE in the military that backing Trump's coup attempt would be treason and punishable as such. Many people believe that the Covid 19 outbreak was the fault of a CCP Bio Lab leak and likely not caused by menu item #2, the Bat & Pangolin Soup. While Jon Stewart, for example, believes that too and, while he has no "absolute evidence" for that belief, he does have at least half a brain IMO and that is enough. We live in a world where some lies offered by a Russian stooge over drinks in a bar gets an FBI surveillance warrant authorized against an entirely innocent Carter Page, so why not empanel a Grand Jury to ask questions of, let say, the cell phone owners most implicated by the Geospatial data (like anyone who went to over 20 drop box and 3 NGOs locations per the data) and see where it goes? And some speak of Geospatial data accuracy (or inaccuracies), I've heard people say the technique is on par with tracking the location of people with ankle bracelets. And people go back to jail with those accuracies. True the Vote does not have the force of the law behind them. They can't subpoena anyone, so they give us the raw data and let reason take over. But for the True Believers, they are loathe to investigate this with any seriousness. Its like any reasonable doubt, no matter how small, is enough for them to make claims that the premise is rediculous or worse. Its the Emperor has no Clothes meets the True Believers. Nothing will ever let them see anything that corroborates Trump's assertion of a tainted election. But take a look at HR1. The Democrats want to codify and legalize ballot harvesting everywhere. They know how the election was won and want to make sure they can do it again in the future without their operatives having to wear latex gloves as they drop off the ballots. |
|
|
|
2000 Mules
May 31, 2022 19:03:38 GMT -8
via mobile
Post by uwphoto on May 31, 2022 19:03:38 GMT -8
If you're making an argument that something happened, claim to have the evidence, but then only give the circumstantial evidence and don't show the evidence - that you claim to have - that would be the conclusive, incontrovertible evidence, that undermines your entire claim. You've made the claim that you have this absolute evidence that proves your charges, but you don't show it. Why? Because you don't really have the evidence, and you're just trying to obfuscate that fact? You're trying to stick with the circumstantial evidence and then provide other details to make it APPEAR that you're presenting absolute concrete evidence when you're really not. Why be manipulative and dishonest like that? It makes the whole thing look faked. And the fact that they didn't even investigate the Republicans for the same thing just proves that it's a hit piece with an agenda. In this case a very DANGEROUS agenda - discrediting the entire electoral process in this country. When one side believes that elections cannot be valid, how long do you think it takes before another coup/insurrection is attempted? This entire process can do nothing but justify the Republicans overturning elections and creating a totalitarian/authoritarian state where they hold on to power indefinitely because they claim that the electoral process is fraudulent. The only thing that stopped that in January 2021 was the letter from every living former Secretary of Defense, warning EVERYONE in the military that backing Trump's coup attempt would be treason and punishable as such. Many people believe that the Covid 19 outbreak was the fault of a CCP Bio Lab leak and likely not caused by menu item #2, the Bat & Pangolin Soup. While Jon Stewart, for example, believes that too and, while he has no "absolute evidence" for that belief, he does have at least half a brain IMO and that is enough. We live in a world where some lies offered by a Russian stooge over drinks in a bar gets an FBI surveillance warrant authorized against an entirely innocent Carter Page, so why not empanel a Grand Jury to ask questions of, let say, the cell phone owners most implicated by the Geospatial data (like anyone who went to over 20 drop box and 3 NGOs locations per the data) and see where it goes? And some speak of Geospatial data accuracy (or inaccuracies), I've heard people say the technique is on par with tracking the location of people with ankle bracelets. And people go back to jail with those accuracies. True the Vote does not have the force of the law behind them. They can't subpoena anyone, so they give us the raw data and let reason take over. But for the True Believers, they are loathe to investigate this with any seriousness. Its like any reasonable doubt, no matter how small, is enough for them to make claims that the premise is rediculous or worse. Its the Emperor has no Clothes meets the True Believers. Nothing will ever let them see anything that corroborates Trump's assertion of a tainted election. But take a look at HR1. The Democrats want to codify and legalize ballot harvesting everywhere. They know how the election was won and want to make sure they can do it again in the future without their operatives having to wear latex gloves as they drop off the ballots. "Just find me 11,780 votes"! |
|
