|
Post by ptsdthor on Jun 30, 2020 6:04:34 GMT -8
The first thing guilty people to do is attack the source. The AP, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and the New York Times all corroborate the story. Sky News in the UK confirms British intelligence that said they were Taliban/Russian targets as well. But let's pretend in a perfect world the president had no advanced knowledge and saw this when it broke on Friday for the first time. He didn't order an investigation. He didn't convene the National Security Council. He didn't hold meetings with the DNI. He golfed. Well at least he didn't give the Taliban/Russians $1.7 Billion. Criminal leaks from low level resisters with the MSM using each others as corroboration is a farce we have seen before. Yawn.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 30, 2020 8:03:39 GMT -8
The first thing guilty people to do is attack the source. The AP, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and the New York Times all corroborate the story. Sky News in the UK confirms British intelligence that said they were Taliban/Russian targets as well. But let's pretend in a perfect world the president had no advanced knowledge and saw this when it broke on Friday for the first time. He didn't order an investigation. He didn't convene the National Security Council. He didn't hold meetings with the DNI. He golfed. He did order an investigation which is why we know about the document trail and the reason the President wasn't briefed originally. There is constant communication between the White House and the Director of National Intelligence and the NSC wasn't convened because the DNI's evaluation of the report. That never happened, but sure. The president said so himself.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 30, 2020 8:04:44 GMT -8
The first thing guilty people to do is attack the source. The AP, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and the New York Times all corroborate the story. Sky News in the UK confirms British intelligence that said they were Taliban/Russian targets as well. But let's pretend in a perfect world the president had no advanced knowledge and saw this when it broke on Friday for the first time. He didn't order an investigation. He didn't convene the National Security Council. He didn't hold meetings with the DNI. He golfed. Well at least he didn't give the Taliban/Russians $1.7 Billion. Criminal leaks from low level resisters with the MSM using each others as corroboration is a farce we have seen before. Yawn. Gullible people will believe anything their leader spoon feeds them.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Jun 30, 2020 8:36:37 GMT -8
Well at least he didn't give the Taliban/Russians $1.7 Billion. Criminal leaks from low level resisters with the MSM using each others as corroboration is a farce we have seen before. Yawn. Gullible people will believe anything the ir leader MSM spoon feeds them. Fixed it for ya.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 30, 2020 8:48:36 GMT -8
Gullible people will believe anything the ir leader MSM spoon feeds them. Fixed it for ya. Whatever helps your fragile narrative endorse lies, treason, murder, racism, hatred and a regressive society.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Jun 30, 2020 8:59:10 GMT -8
Whatever helps your fragile narrative endorse lies, treason, murder, racism, hatred and a regressive society. Exactly!
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 30, 2020 9:02:24 GMT -8
The first thing guilty people to do is attack the source. The AP, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and the New York Times all corroborate the story. Sky News in the UK confirms British intelligence that said they were Taliban/Russian targets as well. But let's pretend in a perfect world the president had no advanced knowledge and saw this when it broke on Friday for the first time. He didn't order an investigation. He didn't convene the National Security Council. He didn't hold meetings with the DNI. He golfed. Well at least he didn't give the Taliban/Russians $1.7 Billion. Criminal leaks from low level resisters with the MSM using each others as corroboration is a farce we have seen before. Yawn. Giving Iran their own money back is not in the same stratosphere as being aware for over a year that a foreign power was working in conjunction with a terror network to murder U.S. military members. But I'm sure we're trying to equate that here for some reason.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 30, 2020 10:41:14 GMT -8
So now they have a money trail.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jun 30, 2020 11:50:37 GMT -8
So now they have a money trail. Is there a possibility that the U.S. intel couldn't verify it, and it never got to Trump because of that? Could it be that the intel didn't do a thorough job? Does it have to be Trumps fault? I'm sure you're going to say, of course Trump was briefed, but maybe not? I'm playing devils advocate.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 30, 2020 11:56:34 GMT -8
So now they have a money trail. Is there a possibility that the U.S. intel couldn't verify it, and it never got to Trump because of that? Could it be that the intel didn't do a thorough job? Does it have to be Trumps fault? I'm sure you're going to say, of course Trump was briefed, but maybe not? I'm playing devils advocate. Again, it doesn't matter. One of two scenarios is a reality : He was briefed and took no action (as sources indicated already that there was knowledge in 2019) OR he has incompetent people vetting intelligence that resulted in the loss of life of American troops in combat, in which case he also took zero action to rectify that. The inaction is the damning part. The lack of response. The lack of fortitude. Now we're hearing today that he's not responsible for remembering everything he reads. And I'll say it again - Any time a U.S. serviceman or woman is killed in combat, the president IS briefed.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jun 30, 2020 12:12:20 GMT -8
Is there a possibility that the U.S. intel couldn't verify it, and it never got to Trump because of that? Could it be that the intel didn't do a thorough job? Does it have to be Trumps fault? I'm sure you're going to say, of course Trump was briefed, but maybe not? I'm playing devils advocate. Again, it doesn't matter. One of two scenarios is a reality : He was briefed and took no action (as sources indicated already that there was knowledge in 2019) OR he has incompetent people vetting intelligence that resulted in the loss of life of American troops in combat, in which case he also took zero action to rectify that. The inaction is the damning part. The lack of response. The lack of fortitude. Now we're hearing today that he's not responsible for remembering everything he reads. And I'll say it again - Any time a U.S. serviceman or woman is killed in combat, the president IS briefed. I agree. It's like an HC in sports, you're responsible for the whole program.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 30, 2020 12:35:53 GMT -8
Again, it doesn't matter. One of two scenarios is a reality : He was briefed and took no action (as sources indicated already that there was knowledge in 2019) OR he has incompetent people vetting intelligence that resulted in the loss of life of American troops in combat, in which case he also took zero action to rectify that. The inaction is the damning part. The lack of response. The lack of fortitude. Now we're hearing today that he's not responsible for remembering everything he reads. And I'll say it again - Any time a U.S. serviceman or woman is killed in combat, the president IS briefed. I agree. It's like an HC in sports, you're responsible for the whole program. The press secretary just confirmed the president does, in fact, know how to read.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 30, 2020 15:56:18 GMT -8
Again, it doesn't matter. One of two scenarios is a reality : He was briefed and took no action (as sources indicated already that there was knowledge in 2019) OR he has incompetent people vetting intelligence that resulted in the loss of life of American troops in combat, in which case he also took zero action to rectify that. The inaction is the damning part. The lack of response. The lack of fortitude. Now we're hearing today that he's not responsible for remembering everything he reads. And I'll say it again - Any time a U.S. serviceman or woman is killed in combat, the president IS briefed. I agree. It's like an HC in sports, you're responsible for the whole program. So the president is now cornered. He's been briefed, yet still has not issued any type of statement. But can he? This close to the election, can he retalliate? Or is it just more gaslighting of the American public? This is a national security nightmare and yet another failure of 45.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 1, 2020 8:48:25 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Jul 2, 2020 7:15:53 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 2, 2020 8:03:01 GMT -8
The Federalist is right wing toilet paper material. And who is president again? It's not Adam Schiff.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Jul 2, 2020 8:39:43 GMT -8
The Federalist is right wing toilet paper material. And who is president again? It's not Adam Schiff. And I quote: "The first thing guilty people to do is attack the source."
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 2, 2020 8:59:21 GMT -8
The Federalist is right wing toilet paper material. And who is president again? It's not Adam Schiff. And I quote: "The first thing guilty people to do is attack the source." I'm not "guilty" of anything, I'm not the story, genius. The real story has been corroborated by a half dozen sources, including now our own intelligence. It cannot be a hoax then. So if Schiff was "aware" and the president was "aware" - How is this not treason on the president's part?
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Jul 2, 2020 9:08:27 GMT -8
And I quote: "The first thing guilty people to do is attack the source." I'm not "guilty" of anything, I'm not the story, genius. The real story has been corroborated by a half dozen sources, including now our own intelligence. It cannot be a hoax then. So if Schiff was "aware" and the president was "aware" - How is this not treason on the president's part? Did you read it? Your obedient thinking is betrayed by the facts given by National Security Adviser Robert O'Brien. Is O'Brien a liar then in clueless leftist bizarro world?
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 2, 2020 10:33:18 GMT -8
I'm not "guilty" of anything, I'm not the story, genius. The real story has been corroborated by a half dozen sources, including now our own intelligence. It cannot be a hoax then. So if Schiff was "aware" and the president was "aware" - How is this not treason on the president's part? Did you read it? Your obedient thinking is betrayed by the facts given by National Security Adviser Robert O'Brien. Is O'Brien a liar then in clueless leftist bizarro world? Did you read it? Your obedient thinking is betrayed by the "facts" given by National Security Advisor Robert O'Brien. Is a Trump administtation official capable of lying then in bizzaro right-wing propaganda world? Just be quiet.
|
|