|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 27, 2024 11:33:14 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 14, 2024 9:53:23 GMT -8
I would like to think Trump is pulling away, but recent history suggests the following:
1). Most poles are usually skewed by one to three points against Trump. Maybe this bias has been corrected, but usually the polling doesn’t match the actual results with Trump.
2). The Democrats have a huge advantage when you factor in media coverage. It seems like all ties generally fall to the Democratic candidate, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin. Fetterman, and once that slender margin is attained, the media declares the contest over and the Democrat wins.
3). While I expect a better performance from Trump in 2024, the reality is the Democrats are just better at running campaigns and massaging the vote to favor them. They always seem to be overseeing counting the votes in the absolute crucial districts, and their vote harvesting schemes obviously work. If it is close, I would have to favor Biden.
The main issue right now the Democrats are dealing with, is a faulty failing candidate. Joe Biden looks frail, and appears to be confused during many presidential functions. That is not a presidential look. Unfortunately, for him and the Democrats, who very clearly see this, this will probably mean most of the undecided voters will lean towards Trump. Series of gaffes (A weekly occurrence with Biden) or a weak debate performance will likely doom his chances for a second term. Biden’s performance on the border, the economy, Israel, and Ukraine, along with the litany of dirty political tricks against Trump seem to be bolstering Donald Trump’s numbers.
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jun 14, 2024 10:24:24 GMT -8
I would like to think Trump is pulling away, but recent history suggests the following: 1). Most poles are usually skewed by one to three points against Trump. Maybe this bias has been corrected, but usually the polling doesn’t match the actual results with Trump. 2). The Democrats have a huge advantage when you factor in media coverage. It seems like all ties generally fall to the Democratic candidate, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin. Fetterman, and once that slender margin is attained, the media declares the contest over and the Democrat wins. 3). While I expect a better performance from Trump in 2024, the reality is the Democrats are just better at running campaigns and massaging the vote to favor them. They always seem to be overseeing counting the votes in the absolute crucial districts, and their vote harvesting schemes obviously work. If it is close, I would have to favor Biden. The main issue right now the Democrats are dealing with, is a faulty failing candidate. Joe Biden looks frail, and appears to be confused during many presidential functions. That is not a presidential look. Unfortunately, for him and the Democrats, who very clearly see this, this will probably mean most of the undecided voters will lean towards Trump. Series of gaffes (A weekly occurrence with Biden) or a weak debate performance will likely doom his chances for a second term. Biden’s performance on the border, the economy, Israel, and Ukraine, along with the litany of dirty political tricks against Trump seem to be bolstering Donald Trump’s numbers. Damn, you put out a lot of caca. Let's see if you can go deeper. What would trump have done different in Isreal? Ukraine? (I know what he would have done in Ukraine)...not necessarily great for Ukrainians. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 14, 2024 10:35:01 GMT -8
I would like to think Trump is pulling away, but recent history suggests the following: 1). Most poles are usually skewed by one to three points against Trump. Maybe this bias has been corrected, but usually the polling doesn’t match the actual results with Trump. 2). The Democrats have a huge advantage when you factor in media coverage. It seems like all ties generally fall to the Democratic candidate, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin. Fetterman, and once that slender margin is attained, the media declares the contest over and the Democrat wins. 3). While I expect a better performance from Trump in 2024, the reality is the Democrats are just better at running campaigns and massaging the vote to favor them. They always seem to be overseeing counting the votes in the absolute crucial districts, and their vote harvesting schemes obviously work. If it is close, I would have to favor Biden. The main issue right now the Democrats are dealing with, is a faulty failing candidate. Joe Biden looks frail, and appears to be confused during many presidential functions. That is not a presidential look. Unfortunately, for him and the Democrats, who very clearly see this, this will probably mean most of the undecided voters will lean towards Trump. Series of gaffes (A weekly occurrence with Biden) or a weak debate performance will likely doom his chances for a second term. Biden’s performance on the border, the economy, Israel, and Ukraine, along with the litany of dirty political tricks against Trump seem to be bolstering Donald Trump’s numbers. 1). No, it's the exact opposite. Trump was overpolled and is continually overpolled, which is why he lost in 2020. His voters don't show up at the ballot box, they are overestimated routinely. 2). Again, false. Fox routinely draws more viewers and higher ratings than MSNBC. CNN isn't what it used to be, but Fox outdraws both. Georgia was Republican from 1972 through 2016, with the exception of a Southern Democrat on the ticket. Arizona had gone Republican in nine of the last ten elections prior to 2020. Wisconsin is the exact opposite, it's usually a blue state. (None of this has anything to do with the media consumption in individual states.) And yes, once enough votes are tallied, networks call the election. That's how voting works? 3). Thinly veiled allegations of cheating? How creative. Georgia's Secretary of State, the one Trump threatened? Republican, not a Democrat. The Arizona Senate, under Republican control, launched an investigation....and it ended with more Biden votes. The overseeing of elections is just the first step in the process, most states have a recount clause built in where a full audit takes place. 4). Yes, we know, you've said this 50 times. We know where your news is consumed. We know about doctored videos and manipulated images to make Biden appear worse. We know about selective edits and disingenuous comparisons. We also know that your 78 year old (I'm surprised you're not out celebrating his birthday?) candidate is losing his mind, incoherently rambling about things that should be kept in the closet. He's running an incredibly weak campaign, flip-flopping on endorsements right and left because he can't secure enough funding without grifting to remain in control. It's okay to bring new material once in a while? |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jun 14, 2024 10:57:29 GMT -8
I would like to think Trump is pulling away, but recent history suggests the following: 1). Most poles are usually skewed by one to three points against Trump. Maybe this bias has been corrected, but usually the polling doesn’t match the actual results with Trump. 2). The Democrats have a huge advantage when you factor in media coverage. It seems like all ties generally fall to the Democratic candidate, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin. Fetterman, and once that slender margin is attained, the media declares the contest over and the Democrat wins. 3). While I expect a better performance from Trump in 2024, the reality is the Democrats are just better at running campaigns and massaging the vote to favor them. They always seem to be overseeing counting the votes in the absolute crucial districts, and their vote harvesting schemes obviously work. If it is close, I would have to favor Biden. The main issue right now the Democrats are dealing with, is a faulty failing candidate. Joe Biden looks frail, and appears to be confused during many presidential functions. That is not a presidential look. Unfortunately, for him and the Democrats, who very clearly see this, this will probably mean most of the undecided voters will lean towards Trump. Series of gaffes (A weekly occurrence with Biden) or a weak debate performance will likely doom his chances for a second term. Biden’s performance on the border, the economy, Israel, and Ukraine, along with the litany of dirty political tricks against Trump seem to be bolstering Donald Trump’s numbers. 1). No, it's the exact opposite. Trump was overpolled and is continually overpolled, which is why he lost in 2020. His voters don't show up at the ballot box, they are overestimated routinely. 2). Again, false. Fox routinely draws more viewers and higher ratings than MSNBC. CNN isn't what it used to be, but Fox outdraws both. Georgia was Republican from 1972 through 2016, with the exception of a Southern Democrat on the ticket. Arizona had gone Republican in nine of the last ten elections prior to 2020. Wisconsin is the exact opposite, it's usually a blue state. (None of this has anything to do with the media consumption in individual states.) And yes, once enough votes are tallied, networks call the election. That's how voting works? 3). Thinly veiled allegations of cheating? How creative. Georgia's Secretary of State, the one Trump threatened? Republican, not a Democrat. The Arizona Senate, under Republican control, launched an investigation....and it ended with more Biden votes. The overseeing of elections is just the first step in the process, most states have a recount clause built in where a full audit takes place. 4). Yes, we know, you've said this 50 times. We know where your news is consumed. We know about doctored videos and manipulated images to make Biden appear worse. We know about selective edits and disingenuous comparisons. We also know that your 78 year old (I'm surprised you're not out celebrating his birthday?) candidate is losing his mind, incoherently rambling about things that should be kept in the closet. He's running an incredibly weak campaign, flip-flopping on endorsements right and left because he can't secure enough funding without grifting to remain in control. It's okay to bring new material once in a while? "incoherently rambling" you mean like sinking electric boats, sharks and guillotines? (to name a few) maybe we can bring back nuking hurricanes. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 14, 2024 11:02:00 GMT -8
This does bring up the point though that media can be partisan in both directions and even against their own predispositions. It's happened multiple times on "liberal" MSNBC, like this exchange.
The Special Counsel (Weiss) reneged on the plea deal after a Trump appointed judge found it to be "overlapping" in nature. I don't think any network is infallible when it comes to what they truly desire: Ratings and clicks.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 14, 2024 11:16:35 GMT -8
I would like to think Trump is pulling away, but recent history suggests the following: 1). Most poles are usually skewed by one to three points against Trump. Maybe this bias has been corrected, but usually the polling doesn’t match the actual results with Trump. 2). The Democrats have a huge advantage when you factor in media coverage. It seems like all ties generally fall to the Democratic candidate, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin. Fetterman, and once that slender margin is attained, the media declares the contest over and the Democrat wins. 3). While I expect a better performance from Trump in 2024, the reality is the Democrats are just better at running campaigns and massaging the vote to favor them. They always seem to be overseeing counting the votes in the absolute crucial districts, and their vote harvesting schemes obviously work. If it is close, I would have to favor Biden. The main issue right now the Democrats are dealing with, is a faulty failing candidate. Joe Biden looks frail, and appears to be confused during many presidential functions. That is not a presidential look. Unfortunately, for him and the Democrats, who very clearly see this, this will probably mean most of the undecided voters will lean towards Trump. Series of gaffes (A weekly occurrence with Biden) or a weak debate performance will likely doom his chances for a second term. Biden’s performance on the border, the economy, Israel, and Ukraine, along with the litany of dirty political tricks against Trump seem to be bolstering Donald Trump’s numbers. Damn, you put out a lot of caca. Let's see if you can go deeper. What would trump have done different in Isreal? Ukraine? (I know what he would have done in Ukraine)...not necessarily great for Ukrainians. Putin most likely would not have gone into Ukraine with Trump in charge. Putin took the Crimea while Obama was President, took a 4 year nap under Trump, then went after The Ukraine when Biden became Commander in Chief. Coincidence? Hardly. Putin sees Trump as a strong leader, not to be fu#3&% with. Putin sees Biden as a week old man, an open invitation to do whatever he wants in Eastern Europe, which he did. Of course you’re going to disagree with that, once again you like the flavor of your $#!+ sandwiches that the Democrats serve up. But it is pretty damn clear, Obama green light, Trump, red light, Biden green light . It really can’t be interpreted any other way, but I’m sure you are going to try. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 14, 2024 11:20:45 GMT -8
1). No, it's the exact opposite. Trump was overpolled and is continually overpolled, which is why he lost in 2020. His voters don't show up at the ballot box, they are overestimated routinely. 2). Again, false. Fox routinely draws more viewers and higher ratings than MSNBC. CNN isn't what it used to be, but Fox outdraws both. Georgia was Republican from 1972 through 2016, with the exception of a Southern Democrat on the ticket. Arizona had gone Republican in nine of the last ten elections prior to 2020. Wisconsin is the exact opposite, it's usually a blue state. (None of this has anything to do with the media consumption in individual states.) And yes, once enough votes are tallied, networks call the election. That's how voting works? 3). Thinly veiled allegations of cheating? How creative. Georgia's Secretary of State, the one Trump threatened? Republican, not a Democrat. The Arizona Senate, under Republican control, launched an investigation....and it ended with more Biden votes. The overseeing of elections is just the first step in the process, most states have a recount clause built in where a full audit takes place. 4). Yes, we know, you've said this 50 times. We know where your news is consumed. We know about doctored videos and manipulated images to make Biden appear worse. We know about selective edits and disingenuous comparisons. We also know that your 78 year old (I'm surprised you're not out celebrating his birthday?) candidate is losing his mind, incoherently rambling about things that should be kept in the closet. He's running an incredibly weak campaign, flip-flopping on endorsements right and left because he can't secure enough funding without grifting to remain in control. It's okay to bring new material once in a while? "incoherently rambling" you mean like sinking electric boats, sharks and guillotines? (to name a few) maybe we can bring back nuking hurricanes. Yes, incoherent rambling. Do you even watch anything else other than the Biden friendly media coverage? Off the teleprompter Biden is like Porky Pig after half a bottle of Jack Daniels |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jun 14, 2024 11:23:17 GMT -8
Damn, you put out a lot of caca. Let's see if you can go deeper. What would trump have done different in Isreal? Ukraine? (I know what he would have done in Ukraine)...not necessarily great for Ukrainians. Putin most likely would not have gone into Ukraine with Trump in charge. Putin took the Crimea while Obama was President, took a 4 year nap under Trump, then went after The Ukraine when Biden became Commander in Chief. Coincidence? Hardly. Putin sees Trump as a strong leader, not to be fu#3&% with. Putin sees Biden as a week old man, an open invitation to do whatever he wants in Eastern Europe, which he did. Of course you’re going to disagree with that, once again you like the flavor of your $#!+ sandwiches that the Democrats serve up. But it is pretty damn clear, Obama green light, Trump, red light, Biden green light . It really can’t be interpreted any other way, but I’m sure you are going to try. Well...even you know trump woulda knee capped NATO for putin. ..and he woulda looked the other way as putin incrementally took parts of Ukraine..slower, but with the same result. trump, big green light for putin. If trump is so tough on Russia, why do they want him so bad? Well, my former musical hero (best show I ever saw, front row center) Eric Clapton, has joined the magas making pro putin noise. Another misguided musician.. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 14, 2024 11:29:53 GMT -8
Damn, you put out a lot of caca. Let's see if you can go deeper. What would trump have done different in Isreal? Ukraine? (I know what he would have done in Ukraine)...not necessarily great for Ukrainians. Putin most likely would not have gone into Ukraine with Trump in charge. Putin took the Crimea while Obama was President, took a 4 year nap under Trump, then went after The Ukraine when Biden became Commander in Chief. Coincidence? Hardly. Putin sees Trump as a strong leader, not to be fu#3&% with. Putin sees Biden as a week old man, an open invitation to do whatever he wants in Eastern Europe, which he did. Of course you’re going to disagree with that, once again you like the flavor of your $#!+ sandwiches that the Democrats serve up. But it is pretty damn clear, Obama green light, Trump, red light, Biden green light . It really can’t be interpreted any other way, but I’m sure you are going to try. It really can, if you use your brain. "Speaking at a rally in Conway, South Carolina, Trump recalled how as president he told an unidentified NATO member that he would withhold U.S. help and "encourage" Russia to do as it wishes with allies that do not contribute enough to military spending. "'You didn't pay? You're delinquent?'" Trump recounted saying. "'No, I would not protect you. In fact, I would encourage them to do whatever the hell they want. You gotta pay. You gotta pay your bills.'" NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg shot back with an unusually strong statement saying that Trump was threatening the security of the entire trans-Atlantic alliance." Why didn't Putin invade Ukraine under Trump? Simple. Trump has been a Russian asset for decades. Putin was satisfied with the direction the US was moving in under Trump, so he held his ground. "The standard line from the right is built on two pillars. The first is the idea that Trump was so strong and unpredictable, the Russian authoritarian was simply too afraid to provoke the Republican. The second is the belief that when the United States withdrew from Afghanistan, it signaled to Moscow that we’re weak and indifferent to international military offenses. The former argument is so plainly ridiculous, it’s surprising Republicans would even peddle it. Trump spent four years going to almost comical lengths to make Putin happy, to the point that the then-American president’s own director of national intelligence later admitted he feared Trump had been compromised by the Kremlin." www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/09/15/woodward-book-former-intelligence-director-dan-coats-concluded-would-useless-speak-out-against-donal/5803115002/"Woodward writes that Coats believed Trump has no moral compass, couldn’t shake the suspicion that Trump must be beholden to Russian President Vladimir Putin, and that he – along with former Defense Secretary Jim Mattis and former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson – thought Trump was an “unstable threat to their country." Took me less than five minutes to find all that information. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 14, 2024 11:32:10 GMT -8
"incoherently rambling" you mean like sinking electric boats, sharks and guillotines? (to name a few) maybe we can bring back nuking hurricanes. Yes, incoherent rambling. Do you even watch anything else other than the Biden friendly media coverage? Off the teleprompter Biden is like Porky Pig after half a bottle of Jack Daniels Do you even watch anything other than Fox fodder? Off the teleprompter, Trump is like an uncle with a drinking problem, mixed in with a cognitive impairment of alarming proportions at this rate. You think everyone else is in a cult, but the reality is it's just...you. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jun 14, 2024 11:34:05 GMT -8
Damn, you put out a lot of caca. Let's see if you can go deeper. What would trump have done different in Isreal? Ukraine? (I know what he would have done in Ukraine)...not necessarily great for Ukrainians. Putin most likely would not have gone into Ukraine with Trump in charge. Putin took the Crimea while Obama was President, took a 4 year nap under Trump, then went after The Ukraine when Biden became Commander in Chief. Coincidence? Hardly. Putin sees Trump as a strong leader, not to be fu#3&% with. Putin sees Biden as a week old man, an open invitation to do whatever he wants in Eastern Europe, which he did. Of course you’re going to disagree with that, once again you like the flavor of your $#!+ sandwiches that the Democrats serve up. But it is pretty damn clear, Obama green light, Trump, red light, Biden green light . It really can’t be interpreted any other way, but I’m sure you are going to try. ps, If you don't understand that trump is a useful idiot for putin, perhaps you can explain why trump took putins word over our own intelligence agencies for all the world to see! maybe you should give your SDSU degree back. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 14, 2024 11:37:10 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 14, 2024 12:13:59 GMT -8
I would like to think Trump is pulling away, but recent history suggests the following: 1). Most poles are usually skewed by one to three points against Trump. Maybe this bias has been corrected, but usually the polling doesn’t match the actual results with Trump. 2). The Democrats have a huge advantage when you factor in media coverage. It seems like all ties generally fall to the Democratic candidate, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin. Fetterman, and once that slender margin is attained, the media declares the contest over and the Democrat wins. 3). While I expect a better performance from Trump in 2024, the reality is the Democrats are just better at running campaigns and massaging the vote to favor them. They always seem to be overseeing counting the votes in the absolute crucial districts, and their vote harvesting schemes obviously work. If it is close, I would have to favor Biden. The main issue right now the Democrats are dealing with, is a faulty failing candidate. Joe Biden looks frail, and appears to be confused during many presidential functions. That is not a presidential look. Unfortunately, for him and the Democrats, who very clearly see this, this will probably mean most of the undecided voters will lean towards Trump. Series of gaffes (A weekly occurrence with Biden) or a weak debate performance will likely doom his chances for a second term. Biden’s performance on the border, the economy, Israel, and Ukraine, along with the litany of dirty political tricks against Trump seem to be bolstering Donald Trump’s numbers. 1). No, it's the exact opposite. Trump was overpolled and is continually overpolled, which is why he lost in 2020. His voters don't show up at the ballot box, they are overestimated routinely. 2). Again, false. Fox routinely draws more viewers and higher ratings than MSNBC. CNN isn't what it used to be, but Fox outdraws both. Georgia was Republican from 1972 through 2016, with the exception of a Southern Democrat on the ticket. Arizona had gone Republican in nine of the last ten elections prior to 2020. Wisconsin is the exact opposite, it's usually a blue state. (None of this has anything to do with the media consumption in individual states.) And yes, once enough votes are tallied, networks call the election. That's how voting works? 3). Thinly veiled allegations of cheating? How creative. Georgia's Secretary of State, the one Trump threatened? Republican, not a Democrat. The Arizona Senate, under Republican control, launched an investigation....and it ended with more Biden votes. The overseeing of elections is just the first step in the process, most states have a recount clause built in where a full audit takes place. 4). Yes, we know, you've said this 50 times. We know where your news is consumed. We know about doctored videos and manipulated images to make Biden appear worse. We know about selective edits and disingenuous comparisons. We also know that your 78 year old (I'm surprised you're not out celebrating his birthday?) candidate is losing his mind, incoherently rambling about things that should be kept in the closet. He's running an incredibly weak campaign, flip-flopping on endorsements right and left because he can't secure enough funding without grifting to remain in control. It's okay to bring new material once in a while? Hillary Clinton’s claims of election fraud were taken very seriously by the mainstream media, Trump’s concerns? Just brushed off like it was nothing, later attacked when the President took his case to the people.. The Democrat Media already had the result they wanted, so Trump’s claims were called insurrection and treason. Complete double standard. Trump seems get stronger with every underhanded attack against him. Biden needs to step up his energy and regain momentum. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 14, 2024 12:43:24 GMT -8
1). No, it's the exact opposite. Trump was overpolled and is continually overpolled, which is why he lost in 2020. His voters don't show up at the ballot box, they are overestimated routinely. 2). Again, false. Fox routinely draws more viewers and higher ratings than MSNBC. CNN isn't what it used to be, but Fox outdraws both. Georgia was Republican from 1972 through 2016, with the exception of a Southern Democrat on the ticket. Arizona had gone Republican in nine of the last ten elections prior to 2020. Wisconsin is the exact opposite, it's usually a blue state. (None of this has anything to do with the media consumption in individual states.) And yes, once enough votes are tallied, networks call the election. That's how voting works? 3). Thinly veiled allegations of cheating? How creative. Georgia's Secretary of State, the one Trump threatened? Republican, not a Democrat. The Arizona Senate, under Republican control, launched an investigation....and it ended with more Biden votes. The overseeing of elections is just the first step in the process, most states have a recount clause built in where a full audit takes place. 4). Yes, we know, you've said this 50 times. We know where your news is consumed. We know about doctored videos and manipulated images to make Biden appear worse. We know about selective edits and disingenuous comparisons. We also know that your 78 year old (I'm surprised you're not out celebrating his birthday?) candidate is losing his mind, incoherently rambling about things that should be kept in the closet. He's running an incredibly weak campaign, flip-flopping on endorsements right and left because he can't secure enough funding without grifting to remain in control. It's okay to bring new material once in a while? Hillary Clinton’s claims of election fraud were taken very seriously by the mainstream media, Trump’s concerns? Just brushed off like it was nothing, later attacked when the President took his case to the people.. The Democrat Media already had the result they wanted, so Trump’s claims were called insurrection and treason. Complete double standard. Trump seems get stronger with every underhanded attack against him. Biden needs to step up his energy and regain momentum. False. Egregiously false. Bordering on a lie. Exhausting correcting your blatant attempts to spread misinformation. Hillary Clinton's concession speech from November 9th, 2016: www.npr.org/2016/11/09/501425243/watch-live-hillary-clinton-concedes-presidential-race-to-donald-trumpTrump's concession speech from JANUARY 7th, 2021: www.google.com/amp/s/en.as.com/en/2021/01/08/latest_news/1610143252_798387.html%3foutputType=ampTrump's concerns, brushed off like it was nothing? Every major news outlet covered the 2020 election. Every single one. His "concerns" were adjudicated in courts all over the country, with no evidence to be found. Imagine being in 2024 and you still think the election was stolen without any proof. 2,000 Mules? Pulled. Fake electors? Indicted. Clinton? Oh, turns out she was right. Russia DID interfere with the 2016 election, Trump's own advisor Paul Manafort DID sell polling data to Russian operatives and he DID go to prison. Whoops. Trump was "attacked" because he sought to overturn an election by force. He conspired to delay the certification of votes, he conspired to have fake electors replace legitimate electors in the hopes their votes would be legitimized. He lost. He knows he lost. Trump's *actions* were called insurrectionist....because they were. He incited violence against a body of government to overturn an election he lost. You can think Trump is getting stronger, he isn't. He's 78, he's still a rapist, still a misogynist, still hates immigrants (even though his wife is an immigrant?) and he's still the worst president in modern history, according to presidential historians and scholars. The polls show Biden IS gaining momentum, but you won't hear that from the drunken Judge Pirro and Kayleigh, of course. It's entertainment, not real news. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 14, 2024 18:41:25 GMT -8
Hillary Clinton’s claims of election fraud were taken very seriously by the mainstream media, Trump’s concerns? Just brushed off like it was nothing, later attacked when the President took his case to the people.. The Democrat Media already had the result they wanted, so Trump’s claims were called insurrection and treason. Complete double standard. Trump seems get stronger with every underhanded attack against him. Biden needs to step up his energy and regain momentum. False. Egregiously false. Bordering on a lie. Exhausting correcting your blatant attempts to spread misinformation. Hillary Clinton's concession speech from November 9th, 2016: www.npr.org/2016/11/09/501425243/watch-live-hillary-clinton-concedes-presidential-race-to-donald-trumpTrump's concession speech from JANUARY 7th, 2021: www.google.com/amp/s/en.as.com/en/2021/01/08/latest_news/1610143252_798387.html%3foutputType=ampTrump's concerns, brushed off like it was nothing? Every major news outlet covered the 2020 election. Every single one. His "concerns" were adjudicated in courts all over the country, with no evidence to be found. Imagine being in 2024 and you still think the election was stolen without any proof. 2,000 Mules? Pulled. Fake electors? Indicted. Clinton? Oh, turns out she was right. Russia DID interfere with the 2016 election, Trump's own advisor Paul Manafort DID sell polling data to Russian operatives and he DID go to prison. Whoops. Trump was "attacked" because he sought to overturn an election by force. He conspired to delay the certification of votes, he conspired to have fake electors replace legitimate electors in the hopes their votes would be legitimized. He lost. He knows he lost. Trump's *actions* were called insurrectionist....because they were. He incited violence against a body of government to overturn an election he lost. You can think Trump is getting stronger, he isn't. He's 78, he's still a rapist, still a misogynist, still hates immigrants (even though his wife is an immigrant?) and he's still the worst president in modern history, according to presidential historians and scholars. The polls show Biden IS gaining momentum, but you won't hear that from the drunken Judge Pirro and Kayleigh, of course. It's entertainment, not real news. Biden’s nosedive is gaining momentum, he is down in Georgia (5-6) Pennsylvania (2-3) and even Virginia and Nevada are slipping…only Florida (down 3) is slightly encouraging for the President. Trump had tens of thousands of supporters/spectators in The Bronx last week and all of his events are off the hook popular. The boastful Trump has tons of energy and only a court ga order can almost get him to shut up. Biden can barely stay awake for a short speech in Normandy and almost wandered off into a field. Biden insiders talk about the president’s “high energy level”, but then again they could be referring to our gas prices. We shall see what happens during the debates, maybe they load Biden up with some kind of stims, but I expect Trump to do very well. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 14, 2024 19:51:13 GMT -8
False. Egregiously false. Bordering on a lie. Exhausting correcting your blatant attempts to spread misinformation. Hillary Clinton's concession speech from November 9th, 2016: www.npr.org/2016/11/09/501425243/watch-live-hillary-clinton-concedes-presidential-race-to-donald-trumpTrump's concession speech from JANUARY 7th, 2021: www.google.com/amp/s/en.as.com/en/2021/01/08/latest_news/1610143252_798387.html%3foutputType=ampTrump's concerns, brushed off like it was nothing? Every major news outlet covered the 2020 election. Every single one. His "concerns" were adjudicated in courts all over the country, with no evidence to be found. Imagine being in 2024 and you still think the election was stolen without any proof. 2,000 Mules? Pulled. Fake electors? Indicted. Clinton? Oh, turns out she was right. Russia DID interfere with the 2016 election, Trump's own advisor Paul Manafort DID sell polling data to Russian operatives and he DID go to prison. Whoops. Trump was "attacked" because he sought to overturn an election by force. He conspired to delay the certification of votes, he conspired to have fake electors replace legitimate electors in the hopes their votes would be legitimized. He lost. He knows he lost. Trump's *actions* were called insurrectionist....because they were. He incited violence against a body of government to overturn an election he lost. You can think Trump is getting stronger, he isn't. He's 78, he's still a rapist, still a misogynist, still hates immigrants (even though his wife is an immigrant?) and he's still the worst president in modern history, according to presidential historians and scholars. The polls show Biden IS gaining momentum, but you won't hear that from the drunken Judge Pirro and Kayleigh, of course. It's entertainment, not real news. Biden’s nosedive is gaining momentum, he is down in Georgia (5-6) Pennsylvania (2-3) and even Virginia and Nevada are slipping…only Florida (down 3) is slightly encouraging for the President. Trump had tens of thousands of supporters/spectators in The Bronx last week and all of his events are off the hook popular. The boastful Trump has tons of energy and only a court ga order can almost get him to shut up. Biden can barely stay awake for a short speech in Normandy and almost wandered off into a field. Biden insiders talk about the president’s “high energy level”, but then again they could be referring to our gas prices. We shall see what happens during the debates, maybe they load Biden up with some kind of stims, but I expect Trump to do very well. Tens of thousands of supporters in a venue that holds...3,500. Nope. Not even close. Common sense should tell you that, but Fox won't. All of Trump's events are popular. Hm. Well, he did pay people to attend them, so who knows? He also claimed he didn't need their votes and complained about his teleprompter when people were collapsing due to heat exhaustion. Dying to own the libs, I guess. Biden didn't wander off anywhere, by the way. You would know that, if you didn't absorb propaganda like a sponge. Fox manipulated the footage. Common sense again lacking, I'm noticing a pattern, dare I say it... Trump can't even speak, so I don't expect him to debate at all. If he has to stick to a script, he's doomed. My grandmother had Alzheimer's. My grandfather had dementia. My dad was in early onset dementia when he passed away. I recognize the symptoms of neurological decline pretty well. Trump's in the midst of it. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jun 14, 2024 20:28:06 GMT -8
Biden’s nosedive is gaining momentum, he is down in Georgia (5-6) Pennsylvania (2-3) and even Virginia and Nevada are slipping…only Florida (down 3) is slightly encouraging for the President. Trump had tens of thousands of supporters/spectators in The Bronx last week and all of his events are off the hook popular. The boastful Trump has tons of energy and only a court ga order can almost get him to shut up. Biden can barely stay awake for a short speech in Normandy and almost wandered off into a field. Biden insiders talk about the president’s “high energy level”, but then again they could be referring to our gas prices. We shall see what happens during the debates, maybe they load Biden up with some kind of stims, but I expect Trump to do very well. Tens of thousands of supporters in a venue that holds...3,500. Nope. Not even close. Common sense should tell you that, but Fox won't. All of Trump's events are popular. Hm. Well, he did pay people to attend them, so who knows? He also claimed he didn't need their votes and complained about his teleprompter when people were collapsing due to heat exhaustion. Dying to own the libs, I guess. Biden didn't wander off anywhere, by the way. You would know that, if you didn't absorb propaganda like a sponge. Fox manipulated the footage. Common sense again lacking, I'm noticing a pattern, dare I say it... Trump can't even speak, so I don't expect him to debate at all. If he has to stick to a script, he's doomed. My grandmother had Alzheimer's. My grandfather had dementia. My dad was in early onset dementia when he passed away. I recognize the symptoms of neurological decline pretty well. Trump's in the midst of it. First off, Im sorry your family has been touched by Alzheimer’s. If Trump was afflicted, the media would be all over it. Your personal non medical opinion means nothing. The photo…..is that a Trump rally? There is no signage, and the photo taken by a drone camera from 300’ up. You buy into it like the gullible lemming you are, but it seems kind of suspicious. That photo is far from proving anything….besides there are dozens of Trump rallies within the past few months with huge crowds, verified by both sides of the political spectrum. Once again, sorry about your father. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jun 14, 2024 20:45:47 GMT -8
Tens of thousands of supporters in a venue that holds...3,500. Nope. Not even close. Common sense should tell you that, but Fox won't. All of Trump's events are popular. Hm. Well, he did pay people to attend them, so who knows? He also claimed he didn't need their votes and complained about his teleprompter when people were collapsing due to heat exhaustion. Dying to own the libs, I guess. Biden didn't wander off anywhere, by the way. You would know that, if you didn't absorb propaganda like a sponge. Fox manipulated the footage. Common sense again lacking, I'm noticing a pattern, dare I say it... Trump can't even speak, so I don't expect him to debate at all. If he has to stick to a script, he's doomed. My grandmother had Alzheimer's. My grandfather had dementia. My dad was in early onset dementia when he passed away. I recognize the symptoms of neurological decline pretty well. Trump's in the midst of it. First off, Im sorry your family has been touched by Alzheimer’s. If Trump was afflicted, the media would be all over it. Your personal non medical opinion means nothing. The photo…..is that a Trump rally? There is no signage, and the photo taken by a drone camera from 300’ up. You buy into it like the gullible lemming you are, but it seems kind of suspicious. That photo is far from proving anything….besides there are dozens of Trump rallies within the past few months with huge crowds, verified by both sides of the political spectrum. Once again, sorry about your father. The media hasn't covered Trump's age...at all. Not MSNBC, not CNN, not Fox....nobody. The headline of the New York Post today talked about Biden "meandering" away at the G7 meeting...which we know is complete nonsense now, with the actual non-edited footage. The media has created a sizable double standard portraying Biden as weak and feeble, but hasn't referenced Trump's age or initial mental decline until literally the last couple of days. Who has covered it? Physicians, psychiatrists, people who see this condition daily. Limited vocabulary? Check. Repetition of phrases? Check. An inability to finish sentences coherently? Check. This is textbook neurological decline. It's called phenomic paraphasia. news.cornell.edu/media-relations/tip-sheets/cornell-expert-says-trumps-frequent-phonemic-paraphasia-are-signs-earlyMy grandmother's deterioration was slow at first. She was diagnosed at 64. It started the same way, trailing off mid-sentence, an inability to form complete thoughts, misidentifying things. She died on her 73rd birthday, the last two years of her life she was unable to speak at all. Trust me, it gives me zero joy to have to witness stuff like this in another human being. Short of ALS, it's among the worst things a person can have to deal with. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jun 15, 2024 4:03:46 GMT -8
First off, Im sorry your family has been touched by Alzheimer’s. If Trump was afflicted, the media would be all over it. Your personal non medical opinion means nothing. The photo…..is that a Trump rally? There is no signage, and the photo taken by a drone camera from 300’ up. You buy into it like the gullible lemming you are, but it seems kind of suspicious. That photo is far from proving anything….besides there are dozens of Trump rallies within the past few months with huge crowds, verified by both sides of the political spectrum. Once again, sorry about your father. The media hasn't covered Trump's age...at all. Not MSNBC, not CNN, not Fox....nobody. The headline of the New York Post today talked about Biden "meandering" away at the G7 meeting...which we know is complete nonsense now, with the actual non-edited footage. The media has created a sizable double standard portraying Biden as weak and feeble, but hasn't referenced Trump's age or initial mental decline until literally the last couple of days. Who has covered it? Physicians, psychiatrists, people who see this condition daily. Limited vocabulary? Check. Repetition of phrases? Check. An inability to finish sentences coherently? Check. This is textbook neurological decline. It's called phenomic paraphasia. news.cornell.edu/media-relations/tip-sheets/cornell-expert-says-trumps-frequent-phonemic-paraphasia-are-signs-earlyMy grandmother's deterioration was slow at first. She was diagnosed at 64. It started the same way, trailing off mid-sentence, an inability to form complete thoughts, misidentifying things. She died on her 73rd birthday, the last two years of her life she was unable to speak at all. Trust me, it gives me zero joy to have to witness stuff like this in another human being. Short of ALS, it's among the worst things a person can have to deal with. I know all I want to know about Alzheimer's. My mother (I'm 70, she's 94) is in a memory care facility. The Masters degree from Berkeley and 1948 Olympic (London) alternate in the 80-meter hurdles doesn't know who I am. |
|
