|
|
Post by Den60 on Sept 2, 2024 9:48:07 GMT -8
I see people mentioning OSU/Wazzu going to a P4 conference all the time and I just ask them "why?" They were left behind for a reason. They are a MWC/WAC school if not for their more the 100 year stint with the PAC. The B12 is their only hope and if the B12 looks west again it will be SDSU taken first. I think UNLV would be second. It's a stinging ego thing. Aren't they the only modern day former P5 schools who were lefy abandoned by their coherts? I would hope they are being led with people who have more sense than be led be their emotions. |
|
|
|
Post by Den60 on Sept 2, 2024 9:53:14 GMT -8
Sets the table for the PAC 2 to take the top 6 MW schools. OSU/Wazzu both have 7 games on the table for 2025 (if they play each other twice). So getting 4 more shouldn't be too difficult without paying the MWC a bunch of money. They will want a couple of gimmies at home anyway. Have to wonder if they are trying to show that the MWC has been taking advantage of their situation to help reduce whatever "poaching" or "exit" fees they're due. Would help solidify their case if 5 of 6 MWC schools were to confirm that claim. |
|
|
|
Post by FULL_MONTY on Sept 2, 2024 9:53:18 GMT -8
Where does this all go from here? the pac may be over the tip of their skis. |
|
|
|
Post by Cwag on Sept 2, 2024 13:51:52 GMT -8
Oregon State
Washington State
San Diego State
Boise State
Colorado State
UNLV
Fresno State
UTSA
Tulane
Memphis
This would be the best 10 team group in my opinion
|
|
|
|
Post by laaztec on Sept 2, 2024 13:53:58 GMT -8
Oregon State Washington State San Diego State Boise State Colorado State UNLV Fresno State UTSA Tulane Memphis This would be the best 10 team group in my opinion It’s going to be 8 schools and then wait to see what happens with Calford and the ACC. |
|
|
|
Post by Gundo on Sept 2, 2024 14:34:59 GMT -8
As of today the PAC 2 has not renewed the full-blown partnership between the MWC & PAC conferences didn’t materialize before the Sunday deadline. Some sources say the PAC schools are looking for a P4/5 scheduling agreement.
Oregon State 1-0
08/31 - Idaho State (W) 38-15
09/07 - at San Diego State
09/14 - Oregon
09/21 - Purdue
10/05 - Colorado State
10/12 - at Nevada
10/19 - UNLV
10/26 - at California
11/09 - San Jose State
11/16 - at Air Force
11/29 - at Boise State
Washington State 1-0
08/31 - Portland State (W) 70-30
09/07 - Texas Tech
09/14 - vs Washington (in Seattle, WA)
09/20 - San Jose State
09/28 - at Boise State
10/12 - at Fresno State
10/19 - Hawaii
10/26 - at San Diego State
11/09 - Utah State
11/16 - at New Mexico
11/30 - Wyoming
|
|
|
|
Post by Cwag on Sept 2, 2024 14:37:02 GMT -8
Oregon State Washington State San Diego State Boise State Colorado State UNLV Fresno State UTSA Tulane Memphis This would be the best 10 team group in my opinion It’s going to be 8 schools and then wait to see what happens with Calford and the ACC. OK let's go with: Oregon State Washington State San Diego State Colorado State UNLV UTSA Tulane Memphis |
|
|
|
Post by Gundo on Sept 2, 2024 14:46:49 GMT -8
As of today the PAC 2 has not renewed the full-blown partnership between the MWC & PAC conferences didn’t materialize before the Sunday deadline. Some sources say the PAC schools are looking for a P4/5 scheduling agreement. Oregon State 1-008/31 - Idaho State (W) 38-15 09/07 - at San Diego State09/14 - Oregon 09/21 - Purdue 10/05 - Colorado State 10/12 - at Nevada
10/19 - UNLV10/26 - at California 11/09 - San Jose State
11/16 - at Air Force
11/29 - at Boise State
Washington State 1-008/31 - Portland State (W) 70-30 09/07 - Texas Tech 09/14 - vs Washington (in Seattle, WA) 09/20 - San Jose State
09/28 - at Boise State
10/12 - at Fresno State
10/19 - Hawaii
10/26 - at San Diego State
11/09 - Utah State
11/16 - at New Mexico
11/30 - WyomingPer John Canzano, " it's possible the Pac-12 and ACC (or another P4 conference) could be eyeing some kind of football scheduling partnership for 2025? Sure. That’s where my mind went on Sunday, but I’m being told that whatever comes next could take some time to put together." This make sense as the CW is airing both the PAC and ACC football. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecfred on Sept 2, 2024 15:58:07 GMT -8
Oregon State Washington State San Diego State Boise State Colorado State UNLV Fresno State UTSA Tulane Memphis This would be the best 10 team group in my opinion It’s going to be 8 schools and then wait to see what happens with Calford and the ACC. Wait for Calford. Drop Tulane and Memphis for now, and Boise if we can find another TX school. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecfred on Sept 2, 2024 16:01:40 GMT -8
It’s going to be 8 schools and then wait to see what happens with Calford and the ACC. OK let's go with: Oregon State Washington State San Diego State Colorado State UNLV UTSA Tulane Memphis Yes! Let Boise JC continue to get their extra money in the MWC. |
|
|
|
Post by chris92065 on Sept 2, 2024 16:14:32 GMT -8
Oregon state
Wash state
Fresno
Sdsu
Unlv
Colo state
Utah state
Reno or airforce
Cuts way down on travel costs.
|
|
|
|
Post by chris92065 on Sept 2, 2024 16:19:07 GMT -8
Also.
What are we waiting for?
Lets split from this conference while we can.
F these dudes.
|
|
|
|
Post by laaztec on Sept 2, 2024 16:52:45 GMT -8
It’s going to be 8 schools and then wait to see what happens with Calford and the ACC. OK let's go with: Oregon State Washington State San Diego State Colorado State UNLV UTSA Tulane Memphis I like that. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Sept 2, 2024 17:13:35 GMT -8
If you want people that need to take the conference seriously athletically to take the conference seriously you have to include Boise.
|
|
|
|
Post by TruAztec on Sept 2, 2024 18:28:07 GMT -8
Sets the table for the PAC 2 to take the top 6 MW schools. My guess is the reason this did not happen was the MWC was talking about taking everyone once TV contract ends next year and the PAC2 only wanted a few. Less connection with them next year is better for us moving the a version of the PAC with less baggage. |
|
|
|
Post by Cwag on Sept 2, 2024 18:48:25 GMT -8
If you want people that need to take the conference seriously athletically to take the conference seriously you have to include Boise. If you are hoping for a Cal and Stanford rebound then Boise at and Fresno State cannot be there |
|
|
|
Post by missiontrails on Sept 2, 2024 19:36:55 GMT -8
If you want people that need to take the conference seriously athletically to take the conference seriously you have to include Boise. If you are hoping for a Cal and Stanford rebound then Boise at and Fresno State cannot be there Perhaps, but "beggers can't be choosers" might apply very soon for those two PAC runaways. They might be weighing a short jaunt down to Fresno or up to Boise vs cross country trips for their Oly sports that those schools tend to value more than most. Especially Cal with their money problems. |
|
|
|
Post by laaztec on Sept 2, 2024 20:00:59 GMT -8
If you want people that need to take the conference seriously athletically to take the conference seriously you have to include Boise. If you are hoping for a Cal and Stanford rebound then Boise at and Fresno State cannot be there Correct |
|
|
|
Post by Den60 on Sept 3, 2024 7:56:58 GMT -8
If you want people that need to take the conference seriously athletically to take the conference seriously you have to include Boise. However, if the PAC2 thinks there is a chance one or both of Calford were to come back, you cannot include Boise or Fresno. I guess I shoulda scrolled down.  |
|
