|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 22, 2024 14:16:24 GMT -8
Matthew Colangelo is a current Manhattan prosecutor. He was hired in 2022 by Alvin Bragg. Stop with the fake outrage. It's honestly embarrassing, especially when you're blatantly misrepresenting the truth here. If you don't think people can think independently and use Google, you're wrong. Once again, the issue is we have never had a president as corrupt and felonious as Donald Trump. Truly embarrassing. I don't understand how else to convey this. Every president since the founding of this country has been granted some level of executive courtesy. Because when you are president, apparently you have to make some tough choices on who dies who gets in our country what countries get attacked, etc. etc. If a president has to worry about the ramifications of his actions after he leaves office, that may impact the decision-making process and potentially harm our country down the road. My question is, why is Donald Trump the first president who apparently is not extended this executive privilege? Nixon had it, Obama LBJ Eisenhower Wilson, Hoover. Each one of these presidents undoubtedly violated a law or two in the course of being president. Why is Trump different? Just because you personally don’t like him is not a valid answer. "Executive courtesy" isn't a thing. Executive "privilege" is, but you have to be the executive in order for it to work. Are you really trying to frame an argument that "courtesy" is somehow equal to just forgiving committing felonies? I've seen some crazy stuff in my life, but that's...up there on the list. To be 100% crystal and absolutely clear, the investigations (plural) into Trump's conduct have no bearing on presidential responsibility. He's accused of paying off a porn star he was having an affair with in the form of hush money and falsifying the records of that transaction. If you're arguing that the president should be allowed to do that....I mean, weird? And in this instance, the alleged crime took place BEFORE Trump became president. I can tell you've been watching Fox News because this has been their same exact diatribe on a continuous loop. In fact, Trump himself commented on it Friday, courtesy of Laura Loomer. And has done so repeatedly, uttering the same fallacies over and over again. Presidential immunity isn't needed if you just simply...don't commit crimes? There's already standing policy in place that prohibits the prosecution of a sitting president. The bar to both CHARGE and CONVICT a former president is high, on purpose. Why is Trump different? 91 felonies, four jurisdictions, a lifetime of getting away without being held accountable for anything. Nixon resigned before he could be impeached, or he probably would have been prosecuted, too. Ford granted him a presidential pardon to prevent any thought of that. Why do you insist on painting Trump as a victim? |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Apr 22, 2024 14:40:20 GMT -8
Matthew Colangelo is a current Manhattan prosecutor. He was hired in 2022 by Alvin Bragg. Stop with the fake outrage. It's honestly embarrassing, especially when you're blatantly misrepresenting the truth here. If you don't think people can think independently and use Google, you're wrong. Once again, the issue is we have never had a president as corrupt and felonious as Donald Trump. Truly embarrassing. I don't understand how else to convey this. Every president since the founding of this country has been granted some level of executive courtesy. Because when you are president, apparently you have to make some tough choices on who dies who gets in our country what countries get attacked, etc. etc. If a president has to worry about the ramifications of his actions after he leaves office, that may impact the decision-making process and potentially harm our country down the road. My question is, why is Donald Trump the first president who apparently is not extended this executive privilege? Nixon had it, Obama LBJ Eisenhower Wilson, Hoover. Each one of these presidents undoubtedly violated a law or two in the course of being president. Why is Trump different? Just because you personally don’t like him is not a valid answer. Can you see the world's smallest violin with a microscope? "Executive courtesy" LMFAO..like the courtesy he has extended others? Like saying one of his generals should be excuted, McCain in the 5.5 year hole, like he extends courtesy to previous presidents?..Dem and Republican. What goes around, comes around can't happen soon enough for the narcissistic man child. Will it be embarrasing for his blind followers, when the champagne sells out at Total Wine? Watever hate trump has generated, he deserves right back. If he cracks under this spotlight, his true nature will be revealed. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Apr 22, 2024 17:42:19 GMT -8
meanwhile, trump's loving wife is launching her $249 "mother's day necklace" . Can the cult at all see through these grifters? Are they that stoopid? "best first lady ever" over and over again on foxnews.com. I don't know, but my wife might show up if I was on trial. You know who are the dumbest people in America? those who are being played and don't know it.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 22, 2024 18:48:49 GMT -8
Every president since the founding of this country has been granted some level of executive courtesy. Because when you are president, apparently you have to make some tough choices on who dies who gets in our country what countries get attacked, etc. etc. If a president has to worry about the ramifications of his actions after he leaves office, that may impact the decision-making process and potentially harm our country down the road. My question is, why is Donald Trump the first president who apparently is not extended this executive privilege? Nixon had it, Obama LBJ Eisenhower Wilson, Hoover. Each one of these presidents undoubtedly violated a law or two in the course of being president. Why is Trump different? Just because you personally don’t like him is not a valid answer. "Executive courtesy" isn't a thing. Executive "privilege" is, but you have to be the executive in order for it to work. Are you really trying to frame an argument that "courtesy" is somehow equal to just forgiving committing felonies? I've seen some crazy stuff in my life, but that's...up there on the list. To be 100% crystal and absolutely clear, the investigations (plural) into Trump's conduct have no bearing on presidential responsibility. He's accused of paying off a porn star he was having an affair with in the form of hush money and falsifying the records of that transaction. If you're arguing that the president should be allowed to do that....I mean, weird? And in this instance, the alleged crime took place BEFORE Trump became president. I can tell you've been watching Fox News because this has been their same exact diatribe on a continuous loop. In fact, Trump himself commented on it Friday, courtesy of Laura Loomer. And has done so repeatedly, uttering the same fallacies over and over again. Presidential immunity isn't needed if you just simply...don't commit crimes? There's already standing policy in place that prohibits the prosecution of a sitting president. The bar to both CHARGE and CONVICT a former president is high, on purpose. Why is Trump different? 91 felonies, four jurisdictions, a lifetime of getting away without being held accountable for anything. Nixon resigned before he could be impeached, or he probably would have been prosecuted, too. Ford granted him a presidential pardon to prevent any thought of that. Why do you insist on painting Trump as a victim? Because he obviously is a victim. The politically motivated charges are brought up by democrats who hate the man. These prosecutions are ludicrous, statute of limitations are disregarded. The fines are ludicrous, figures in the hundreds of millions? It’s obviously intended to derail Trump’s presidential bid. Trump’s name REMOVED FROM BALLOTS?? This isn’t Venezuela or Honduras. Maybe that’s where you should retire since you seem to have an affinity for the banana republic style governance we are seeing from the Dems. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 22, 2024 19:10:40 GMT -8
"Executive courtesy" isn't a thing. Executive "privilege" is, but you have to be the executive in order for it to work. Are you really trying to frame an argument that "courtesy" is somehow equal to just forgiving committing felonies? I've seen some crazy stuff in my life, but that's...up there on the list. To be 100% crystal and absolutely clear, the investigations (plural) into Trump's conduct have no bearing on presidential responsibility. He's accused of paying off a porn star he was having an affair with in the form of hush money and falsifying the records of that transaction. If you're arguing that the president should be allowed to do that....I mean, weird? And in this instance, the alleged crime took place BEFORE Trump became president. I can tell you've been watching Fox News because this has been their same exact diatribe on a continuous loop. In fact, Trump himself commented on it Friday, courtesy of Laura Loomer. And has done so repeatedly, uttering the same fallacies over and over again. Presidential immunity isn't needed if you just simply...don't commit crimes? There's already standing policy in place that prohibits the prosecution of a sitting president. The bar to both CHARGE and CONVICT a former president is high, on purpose. Why is Trump different? 91 felonies, four jurisdictions, a lifetime of getting away without being held accountable for anything. Nixon resigned before he could be impeached, or he probably would have been prosecuted, too. Ford granted him a presidential pardon to prevent any thought of that. Why do you insist on painting Trump as a victim? Because he obviously is a victim. The charges are brought up by democrats who hate the man. These prosecutions are ludicrous, statute of limitations are disregarded. The fines are ludicrous, figures in the hundreds of millions? It’s obviously intended to derail Trump’s presidential bid. Trump’s name REMOVED FROM BALLOTS?? This isn’t Venezuela or Honduras. Maybe that’s where you retire since you seem to have an affinity for the banana republic style governance we are seeing from the Dems. Jack Smith isn't a Democrat. You're reciting the greatest (whining) hits again. Merrick Garland is an Independent. Can we stop with the ludicrous, easily fact-checked absurdity? Once again, Trump isn't paying his own fines, he doesn't even have the capital to do it. That's why he's getting bonds insured by third parties. His own PAC is paying his legal fees, so once again, not his money. Why are you so concerned about a "billionaire" fraud? It's odd. Do you ever get tired of repeating the same information? No, there's no intent to "derail" his bid. He RAN TO AVOID PROSECUTION. He declared his candidacy November 15th, 2002. www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/11/15/politics/trump-2024-presidential-bidThe Wall Street Journal broke the news of the Cohen payment in 2018. www.wsj.com/articles/trump-lawyer-arranged-130-000-payment-for-adult-film-stars-silence-1515787678Former Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance was investigating the case prior to Alvin Bragg even being in his position. www.nytimes.com/2023/03/31/nyregion/alvin-bragg-trump-investigation.htmlWe could go on, but the facts are not on your side. Your fake, misplaced outrage is amusing, but the act is tiresome. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 22, 2024 20:40:42 GMT -8
Because he obviously is a victim. The charges are brought up by democrats who hate the man. These prosecutions are ludicrous, statute of limitations are disregarded. The fines are ludicrous, figures in the hundreds of millions? It’s obviously intended to derail Trump’s presidential bid. Trump’s name REMOVED FROM BALLOTS?? This isn’t Venezuela or Honduras. Maybe that’s where you retire since you seem to have an affinity for the banana republic style governance we are seeing from the Dems. Jack Smith isn't a Democrat. You're reciting the greatest (whining) hits again. Merrick Garland is an Independent. Can we stop with the ludicrous, easily fact-checked absurdity? Once again, Trump isn't paying his own fines, he doesn't even have the capital to do it. That's why he's getting bonds insured by third parties. His own PAC is paying his legal fees, so once again, not his money. Why are you so concerned about a "billionaire" fraud? It's odd. Do you ever get tired of repeating the same information? No, there's no intent to "derail" his bid. He RAN TO AVOID PROSECUTION. He declared his candidacy November 15th, 2002. www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/11/15/politics/trump-2024-presidential-bidThe Wall Street Journal broke the news of the Cohen payment in 2018. www.wsj.com/articles/trump-lawyer-arranged-130-000-payment-for-adult-film-stars-silence-1515787678Former Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance was investigating the case prior to Alvin Bragg even being in his position. www.nytimes.com/2023/03/31/nyregion/alvin-bragg-trump-investigation.htmlWe could go on, but the facts are not on your side. Your fake, misplaced outrage is amusing, but the act is tiresome. It’s democrats who are going after Trump. Yes, there are anti Trumpers in the GOP, but the overwhelming majority are Dems. Trump is still a better candidate than his opponent, who seems to be destined to be taken out by the 25th Amendment. Oh right, Dem politicians don’t have the class to leave public service….they die while in office clutching onto the political power they have lusted for their entire lives. The bottom line, Donald Trump was not a career politician, he was a businessman. Much of the political class resents Trump as an outsider, that is why the Democratic politicians and media are going after him with such ferocity. The amount of Machiavellian dirty tricks and political and media pot shots taken at him is unprecedented. He still steps up to the microphone and answers questions. Biden, the few times he takes a question usually mumbles something incoherent. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 22, 2024 20:53:56 GMT -8
Jack Smith isn't a Democrat. You're reciting the greatest (whining) hits again. Merrick Garland is an Independent. Can we stop with the ludicrous, easily fact-checked absurdity? Once again, Trump isn't paying his own fines, he doesn't even have the capital to do it. That's why he's getting bonds insured by third parties. His own PAC is paying his legal fees, so once again, not his money. Why are you so concerned about a "billionaire" fraud? It's odd. Do you ever get tired of repeating the same information? No, there's no intent to "derail" his bid. He RAN TO AVOID PROSECUTION. He declared his candidacy November 15th, 2002. www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/11/15/politics/trump-2024-presidential-bidThe Wall Street Journal broke the news of the Cohen payment in 2018. www.wsj.com/articles/trump-lawyer-arranged-130-000-payment-for-adult-film-stars-silence-1515787678Former Manhattan DA Cyrus Vance was investigating the case prior to Alvin Bragg even being in his position. www.nytimes.com/2023/03/31/nyregion/alvin-bragg-trump-investigation.htmlWe could go on, but the facts are not on your side. Your fake, misplaced outrage is amusing, but the act is tiresome. It’s democrats who are going after Trump. Yes, there are anti Trumpers in the GOP, but the overwhelming majority are Dems. Trump is still a better candidate than his opponent, who seems to be destined to be taken out by the 25th Amendment. Oh right, Dem politicians don’t have the class to leave public service….they die while in office clutching onto the political power they have lusted for their entire lives. The bottom line, Donald Trump was not a career politician, he was a businessman. Much of the political class resents Trump as an outsider, that is why the Democratic politicians and media are going after him with such ferocity. The amount of Machiavellian dirty tricks and political and media pot shots taken at him is unprecedented. He still steps up to the microphone and answers questions. Biden, the few times he takes a question usually mumbles something incoherent. So, you have two options here. You can believe Democrats are going after Donald Trump to some sinister end, or you can believe that Republicans lack the integrity, the will, the gumption and the fortitude to investigate Donald Trump. Or, I guess you could believe that regardless of what the letter says next to a person's name...crimes are crimes, and criminals are prosecuted in the justice system. Unfortunately, I think you've been brainwashed to the point you no longer recognize truth from fiction, as your post indicates. I get it, but there is a way out. You just have to pull back from the propaganda. You're losing the information war here. The persecution complex you're seeking really doesn't exist. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 23, 2024 8:02:42 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Apr 23, 2024 11:38:11 GMT -8
It's apropos for this trials first witness to be the former CEO of The National Enquirer, since it ties in with the Circus Trump surrounds himself with. Couldn't get any better.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 23, 2024 11:48:44 GMT -8
This is both the beginning of a conspiracy and the element that was required to elevate the charge to a felony in the state of New York. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 23, 2024 12:05:35 GMT -8
It's apropos for this trials first witness to be the former CEO of The National Enquirer, since it ties in with the Circus Trump surrounds himself with. Couldn't be any better. Your question was finally answered. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 23, 2024 13:04:53 GMT -8
It’s democrats who are going after Trump. Yes, there are anti Trumpers in the GOP, but the overwhelming majority are Dems. Trump is still a better candidate than his opponent, who seems to be destined to be taken out by the 25th Amendment. Oh right, Dem politicians don’t have the class to leave public service….they die while in office clutching onto the political power they have lusted for their entire lives. The bottom line, Donald Trump was not a career politician, he was a businessman. Much of the political class resents Trump as an outsider, that is why the Democratic politicians and media are going after him with such ferocity. The amount of Machiavellian dirty tricks and political and media pot shots taken at him is unprecedented. He still steps up to the microphone and answers questions. Biden, the few times he takes a question usually mumbles something incoherent. So, you have two options here. You can believe Democrats are going after Donald Trump to some sinister end, or you can believe that Republicans lack the integrity, the will, the gumption and the fortitude to investigate Donald Trump. Or, I guess you could believe that regardless of what the letter says next to a person's name...crimes are crimes, and criminals are prosecuted in the justice system. Unfortunately, I think you've been brainwashed to the point you no longer recognize truth from fiction, as your post indicates. I get it, but there is a way out. You just have to pull back from the propaganda. You're losing the information war here. The persecution complex you're seeking really doesn't exist. “I have two options here?”🤣 You are so full of yourself. Your agree with me or go away mindset is laughable. Once again, you would never say something like this to my face you beta male. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 23, 2024 13:13:07 GMT -8
So, you have two options here. You can believe Democrats are going after Donald Trump to some sinister end, or you can believe that Republicans lack the integrity, the will, the gumption and the fortitude to investigate Donald Trump. Or, I guess you could believe that regardless of what the letter says next to a person's name...crimes are crimes, and criminals are prosecuted in the justice system. Unfortunately, I think you've been brainwashed to the point you no longer recognize truth from fiction, as your post indicates. I get it, but there is a way out. You just have to pull back from the propaganda. You're losing the information war here. The persecution complex you're seeking really doesn't exist. “I have two options here?”🤣 You are so full of yourself. Your agree with me or go away mindset is laughable. Once again, you would never say something like this to my face you beta male. It has nothing to do with "agreeing" with me. How many real options to a yes or no question are there? Either you think the Dems (which neither Garland or Smith are actually a Democrat) are viciously making up lies to defeat a candidate who has lost the popular vote twice? Or you think that Trump's admission of his own guilt is real and he should be prosecuted. And I'd have no problem telling you this directly, but that's not the real point here. The irony of you calling someone a "beta" when you're endlessly simping for a fraud/con artist/grifter/rapist isn't lost. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 23, 2024 14:33:14 GMT -8
“I have two options here?”🤣 You are so full of yourself. Your agree with me or go away mindset is laughable. Once again, you would never say something like this to my face you beta male. It has nothing to do with "agreeing" with me. How many real options to a yes or no question are there? Either you think the Dems (which neither Garland or Smith are actually a Democrat) are viciously making up lies to defeat a candidate who has lost the popular vote twice? Or you think that Trump's admission of his own guilt is real and he should be prosecuted. And I'd have no problem telling you this directly, but that's not the real point here. The irony of you calling someone a "beta" when you're endlessly simping for a fraud/con artist/grifter/rapist isn't lost. My opinion is Trump is clearly a better option than the confused senile Democrat with his psychopathic retainers and handlers. There is no possible way a Republican candidate could be this flawed and incoherent, such candidate would be laughed out of politics by the leering Democrat media and given the boot by concerned conservatives. You will notice, after a full day in the court room Trump is addressing the media, making statements and answering questions in spite of a laughable gag order. Biden can barely talk without a teleprompter. The incredibly low standards the Democrats allow for their candidates is pathetic. Without the wholesale skulduggery and viscous violence the party founded by Andrew Jackson would be out of power based on sheer incompetence. The fact that there are wars erupting everywhere AND our economic system is now crippled by inflation is evidence of that incompetence. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 23, 2024 14:52:26 GMT -8
It has nothing to do with "agreeing" with me. How many real options to a yes or no question are there? Either you think the Dems (which neither Garland or Smith are actually a Democrat) are viciously making up lies to defeat a candidate who has lost the popular vote twice? Or you think that Trump's admission of his own guilt is real and he should be prosecuted. And I'd have no problem telling you this directly, but that's not the real point here. The irony of you calling someone a "beta" when you're endlessly simping for a fraud/con artist/grifter/rapist isn't lost. My opinion is Trump is clearly a better option than the confused senile Democrat with his psychopathic retainers and handlers. There is no possible way a Republican candidate could be this flawed and incoherent, such candidate would be laughed out of politics by the leering Democrat media and given the boot by concerned conservatives. You will notice, after a full day in the court room Trump is addressing the media, making statements and answering questions in spite of a laughable gag order. Biden can barely talk without a teleprompter. The incredibly low standards the Democrats allow for their candidates is pathetic. Without the wholesale skulduggery and viscous violence the party founded by Andrew Jackson would be out of power based on sheer incompetence. The fact that there are wars erupting everywhere AND our economic system is now crippled by inflation is evidence of that incompetence. How do you come to that opinion when Trump clearly illustrates similar cognitive deficits? It shows obvious bias/denial/skewed theory. Biden can't talk without a teleprompter? Every president uses a teleprompter, it's how you get moments like this. The Republicans had a choice. They could have nominated someone else - They knew they had no pathway to the White House without Donald, though. They sold their souls, embarrassingly so, to get to this point. They know their only path to relevance is through Trump, despite him being a two time popular vote loser. The gag order doesn't prevent Trump from addressing the media. Court adjourned at 2PM Eastern, so it was hardly a full day. I know he can't be bothered to stay awake, but still....let's be truthful here. Crippling inflation? Lol. Step outside. |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Apr 23, 2024 16:13:53 GMT -8
Oh don't forget to order your Melania Trump Mother's Day necklce for $249. It's made of pot metal and probably worth 10 bucks or less. Don't look for any fine print regarding any donations to Women's groups. "In Grift we trust!"
In the words of Yackov Smirnoff: "what a country".
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Apr 23, 2024 17:20:57 GMT -8
So, you have two options here. You can believe Democrats are going after Donald Trump to some sinister end, or you can believe that Republicans lack the integrity, the will, the gumption and the fortitude to investigate Donald Trump. Or, I guess you could believe that regardless of what the letter says next to a person's name...crimes are crimes, and criminals are prosecuted in the justice system. Unfortunately, I think you've been brainwashed to the point you no longer recognize truth from fiction, as your post indicates. I get it, but there is a way out. You just have to pull back from the propaganda. You're losing the information war here. The persecution complex you're seeking really doesn't exist. “I have two options here?”🤣 You are so full of yourself. Your agree with me or go away mindset is laughable. Once again, you would never say something like this to my face you beta male. Be careful what you wish for Musician. None of us wants to meet a stranger we interact with online! Many years ago "Crazy Joe" was a regular here. He was marketing his conspiracy theory book, and I thought I should support a fellow creator on Aztectalk....so I sent him a check, with my address on it of course. Well, a week later I get a knock at my door..and it's Crazy Joe hand delivering his book to me! Let's just say it was an awkward moment. Having said that, I have fished a couple times with "Fishin", who is a cool dude. ...I knew that would be a positive meeting because anybody who is a biologist and fishes ..is a safe bet. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 24, 2024 20:16:33 GMT -8
“I have two options here?”🤣 You are so full of yourself. Your agree with me or go away mindset is laughable. Once again, you would never say something like this to my face you beta male. Be careful what you wish for Musician. None of us wants to meet a stranger we interact with online! Many years ago "Crazy Joe" was a regular here. He was marketing his conspiracy theory book, and I thought I should support a fellow creator on Aztectalk....so I sent him a check, with my address on it of course. Well, a week later I get a knock at my door..and it's Crazy Joe hand delivering his book to me! Let's just say it was an awkward moment. Having said that, I have fished a couple times with "Fishin", who is a cool dude. ...I knew that would be a positive meeting because anybody who is a biologist and fishes ..is a safe bet. My interactions on this board usually go like this: I post a political opinion. I get personally attacked and called very unflattering names. I do hit back, usually in the form of a counterpunch argument. (I have lost my patience once or twice) The people who attack me/disagree with me claim I am overreacting. I remember Aztec Joe, we never had any issues. His football takes were usually pretty good. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Apr 24, 2024 20:23:56 GMT -8
“I have two options here?”🤣 You are so full of yourself. Your agree with me or go away mindset is laughable. Once again, you would never say something like this to my face you beta male. Be careful what you wish for Musician. None of us wants to meet a stranger we interact with online! Many years ago "Crazy Joe" was a regular here. He was marketing his conspiracy theory book, and I thought I should support a fellow creator on Aztectalk....so I sent him a check, with my address on it of course. Well, a week later I get a knock at my door..and it's Crazy Joe hand delivering his book to me! Let's just say it was an awkward moment. Having said that, I have fished a couple times with "Fishin", who is a cool dude. ...I knew that would be a positive meeting because anybody who is a biologist and fishes ..is a safe bet. "Crazy Joe." I think he confronted a poster at the airport, or something like that and wanted to fight him. He was very entertaining, but at a distance. Lol. Good on you with your intentions, though. I'm not surprised you would do that. Cheers. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 25, 2024 9:34:35 GMT -8
Matthew Colangelo is a current Manhattan prosecutor. He was hired in 2022 by Alvin Bragg. Stop with the fake outrage. It's honestly embarrassing, especially when you're blatantly misrepresenting the truth here. If you don't think people can think independently and use Google, you're wrong. Once again, the issue is we have never had a president as corrupt and felonious as Donald Trump. Truly embarrassing. I don't understand how else to convey this. Every president since the founding of this country has been granted some level of executive courtesy. Because when you are president, apparently you have to make some tough choices on who dies who gets in our country what countries get attacked, etc. etc. If a president has to worry about the ramifications of his actions after he leaves office, that may impact the decision-making process and potentially harm our country down the road. My question is, why is Donald Trump the first president who apparently is not extended this executive privilege? Nixon had it, Obama LBJ Eisenhower Wilson, Hoover. Each one of these presidents undoubtedly violated a law or two in the course of being president. Why is Trump different? Just because you personally don’t like him is not a valid answer. From today's hearing: The things you're referring to are called "official acts." What's actually being adjudicated here is the opposite of that, things that don't fall into the category of official acts. |
|
