|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Dec 12, 2022 10:11:53 GMT -8
Anyone with any brains already knew there was political bias and censorship of opposing political voices within Twitter then. But when push came to shove (when that obvious bias and unequal censorship was pointed out), the typical response was "Its a commercial company and not bound by the 1st Amendment. If you don't like it, start your own social media platform." I get that but when you look into the details regarding Twitter's involvement with the FBI and it's obvious political bias, how does one go about "starting your own FBI"?
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 12, 2022 11:07:03 GMT -8
Anyone with any brains already knew there was political bias and censorship of opposing political voices within Twitter then. But when push came to shove (when that obvious bias and unequal censorship was pointed out), the typical response was "Its a commercial company and not bound by the 1st Amendment. If you don't like it, start your own social media platform." I get that but when you look into the details regarding Twitter's involvement with the FBI and it's obvious political bias, how does one go about "starting your own FBI"? Anyone who thinks this is an actual story is silly. It's Elon sewing discontent and using it as bait for conservative media outlets even though both sides had access. Much ado about nothing. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Dec 12, 2022 12:52:42 GMT -8
Anyone with any brains already knew there was political bias and censorship of opposing political voices within Twitter then. But when push came to shove (when that obvious bias and unequal censorship was pointed out), the typical response was "Its a commercial company and not bound by the 1st Amendment. If you don't like it, start your own social media platform." I get that but when you look into the details regarding Twitter's involvement with the FBI and it's obvious political bias, how does one go about "starting your own FBI"? Anyone who thinks this is an actual story is silly. It's Elon sewing discontent and using it as bait for conservative media outlets even though both sides had access. Much ado about nothing. A predictable response from you. This is just the tip of the iceberg btw, Google, Apple, Facebook and several other tech giants basically did the same shadow banning bit. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 12, 2022 12:59:40 GMT -8
Anyone who thinks this is an actual story is silly. It's Elon sewing discontent and using it as bait for conservative media outlets even though both sides had access. Much ado about nothing. A predictable response from you. This is just the tip of the iceberg btw, Google, Apple, Facebook and several other tech giants basically did the same shadow banning bit. No, it's a typical response from someone who knows Elon's record over the years and the real story behind his purchase of Twitter, along with this laughably absurd notion that censorship only happens on one side of the spectrum. With each release, the engagement has dropped substantially...I wonder why. Because nobody cares, maybe? Have you figured out what inflation is yet? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 12, 2022 13:49:25 GMT -8
If you want an actual story that matters:
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Dec 12, 2022 16:58:17 GMT -8
Let’s keep from steering the discussion away from the topic…at least for now.
The media and social media have the right to practice freedom of bias, but when it gets proven that democratic operatives influenced or encouraged the burying of certain stories (ie the Hunter Biden laptop) that is when the political fur is going to fly.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 12, 2022 21:51:40 GMT -8
Let’s keep from steering the discussion away from the topic…at least for now. The media and social media have the right to practice freedom of bias, but when it gets proven that democratic operatives influenced or encouraged the burying of certain stories (ie the Hunter Biden laptop) that is when the political fur is going to fly. There is no topic because there is no story. Elon sent out bait to a couple conservative reporters and they are finding what they want to find. I'll repeat that *both* political sides had access to the same technology and the Trump administration used it, too. There's no proof of anything and if that's what you gleaned from the file dump....lol? Hunter Biden's laptop says it's time for new material. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Dec 13, 2022 8:12:50 GMT -8
Anyone who thinks this is an actual story is silly. It's Elon sewing discontent and using it as bait for conservative media outlets even though both sides had access. Much ado about nothing. A predictable response from you. This is just the tip of the iceberg btw, Google, Apple, Facebook and several other tech giants basically did the same shadow banning bit. I know... "prosecute Fauci"..... and MTG for president. Most Americans hate the far right. The far Right is the minority.......I'm sure your views were very popular in the music business. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Dec 14, 2022 11:15:13 GMT -8
Anyone with any brains already knew there was political bias and censorship of opposing political voices within Twitter then. But when push came to shove (when that obvious bias and unequal censorship was pointed out), the typical response was "Its a commercial company and not bound by the 1st Amendment. If you don't like it, start your own social media platform." I get that but when you look into the details regarding Twitter's involvement with the FBI and it's obvious political bias, how does one go about "starting your own FBI"? Anyone who thinks this is an actual story is silly. It's Elon sewing discontent and using it as bait for conservative media outlets even though both sides had access. Much ado about nothing. The fact is that the FBI had custody of Hunter's Laptop by December, 2019 and they likely found out it was authentic in about as much time it took for them to figure out that Sussman's Trump/Russia/Alpha Bank conspiracy accusation was a lie (hours to days at most). But the Twitter files shows that the FBI gaslighted Twitter Execs with the inference that the report on Hunter's Lap Top was probably Russian Disinfo. BTW, Facebook Execs were also gaslighted by the FBI on that front (as reported by Zuckerberg himself on Rogan's podcast). So Agent Timothy Thibault resigned just because? Beyond the corruption of the then VP detailed within the correspondence on the laptop, the fact that the cream of our National Security community agreed to push the Russian Disinfo story in unison in an effort to provide cover for Biden lets everyone know that our Civil Servants are effectively for sale and/or woefully partisan. Also, the fact that Biden referenced the false claim of Russian Disinfo relating to his son's laptop in his Presidential debate (when he knew better) is an indication of guilt/criminality. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 14, 2022 11:17:49 GMT -8
Anyone who thinks this is an actual story is silly. It's Elon sewing discontent and using it as bait for conservative media outlets even though both sides had access. Much ado about nothing. The fact is that the FBI had custody of Hunter's Laptop by December, 2019 and they likely found out it was authentic in about as much time it took for them to figure out that Sussman's Trump/Russia/Alpha Bank conspiracy accusation was a lie (hours to days at most). But the Twitter files shows that the FBI gaslighted Twitter Execs with the inference that the report on Hunter's Lap Top was probably Russian Disinfo. BTW, Facebook Execs were also gaslighted by the FBI on that front (as reported by Zuckerberg himself on Rogan's podcast). So Agent Timothy Thibault resigned just because? Beyond the corruption of the then VP detailed within the correspondence on the laptop, the fact that the cream of our National Security community agreed to lie in unison in an effort to provide cover for Biden lets everyone know that our Civil Servants are effectively for sale and/or woefully partisan. Also, the fact that Biden referenced the false claim of Russian Disinfo relating to his son's laptop in his Presidential debate (when he knew better) is an indication of guilt/criminality. Fiction. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Dec 14, 2022 19:27:02 GMT -8
Anyone who thinks this is an actual story is silly. It's Elon sewing discontent and using it as bait for conservative media outlets even though both sides had access. Much ado about nothing. The fact is that the FBI had custody of Hunter's Laptop by December, 2019 and they likely found out it was authentic in about as much time it took for them to figure out that Sussman's Trump/Russia/Alpha Bank conspiracy accusation was a lie (hours to days at most). But the Twitter files shows that the FBI gaslighted Twitter Execs with the inference that the report on Hunter's Lap Top was probably Russian Disinfo. BTW, Facebook Execs were also gaslighted by the FBI on that front (as reported by Zuckerberg himself on Rogan's podcast). So Agent Timothy Thibault resigned just because? Beyond the corruption of the then VP detailed within the correspondence on the laptop, the fact that the cream of our National Security community agreed to push the Russian Disinfo story in unison in an effort to provide cover for Biden lets everyone know that our Civil Servants are effectively for sale and/or woefully partisan. Also, the fact that Biden referenced the false claim of Russian Disinfo relating to his son's laptop in his Presidential debate (when he knew better) is an indication of guilt/criminality. Typical Democrat strategy: 1). Cheat like hell and win by any means necessary. 2). Use the media to bury the stories/scandals until AFTER the election. 3). Deal with the fallout later (usually 1-3 years) and downplay the crime as “a nothing burger”. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 14, 2022 19:46:28 GMT -8
The fact is that the FBI had custody of Hunter's Laptop by December, 2019 and they likely found out it was authentic in about as much time it took for them to figure out that Sussman's Trump/Russia/Alpha Bank conspiracy accusation was a lie (hours to days at most). But the Twitter files shows that the FBI gaslighted Twitter Execs with the inference that the report on Hunter's Lap Top was probably Russian Disinfo. BTW, Facebook Execs were also gaslighted by the FBI on that front (as reported by Zuckerberg himself on Rogan's podcast). So Agent Timothy Thibault resigned just because? Beyond the corruption of the then VP detailed within the correspondence on the laptop, the fact that the cream of our National Security community agreed to push the Russian Disinfo story in unison in an effort to provide cover for Biden lets everyone know that our Civil Servants are effectively for sale and/or woefully partisan. Also, the fact that Biden referenced the false claim of Russian Disinfo relating to his son's laptop in his Presidential debate (when he knew better) is an indication of guilt/criminality. Typical Democrat strategy: 1). Cheat like hell and win by any means necessary. 2). Use the media to bury the stories/scandals until AFTER the election. 3). Deal with the fallout later (usually 1-3 years) and downplay the crime as “a nothing burger”. You don't really believe this, do you? Because there was a literal coup attempt less than two years ago to overthrow an election....and it wasn't engineered by Democrats. I assume you're unaware that Sean Hannity and Fox are accused of burying the laptop story in 2019? I'm pretty sure they don't fall on the side of the Democrats, either. Is this really the best you have? Because it's not enough. You'd be taken more seriously if you actually showed some process instead of quoting propagandistic headlines with no substance to them. Conspiracy theories are more attractive, I get it...but there's literally nothing there. Charge Hunter Biden with a crime if he has committed one, but he's a private citizen who isn't in public office. The Republican methodology (and that of its base) seems to just deny the existence of actual events and project blame to the other side of the aisle. And that's actually verifiable. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 15, 2022 21:39:36 GMT -8
But censorship is only because of the libs, I thought. Huh. Weird.
|
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 16, 2022 6:19:09 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 16, 2022 8:15:30 GMT -8
Learn what doxxing is before you're going to comment on something's accuracy. He's a pathetic, lying coward. Going into a Twitter Spaces and nuking it, scraping all the metadata and then banning reporters covering his made up story where no report was even filed. He's all for "free speech" until it affects him. Disgusting. |
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 16, 2022 12:32:19 GMT -8
Here is that bad man, that very bad man (twilight zone) talking to buzzfeed about it. (Elon apparently doesn't know what doxing is either).
So you think what the journalist are doing is fine? How about those headlines? Accurate?
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 16, 2022 12:46:29 GMT -8
Here is that bad man, that very bad man (twilight zone) talking to buzzfeed about it. (Elon apparently doesn't know what doxing is either). So you think what the journalist are doing is fine? How about those headlines? Accurate? What are they doing? Their job? Reporting information is literally their job. Why did Elon suspend a reporter who had previously criticized Tesla who wasn't even involved in the original story? He's a liar, plain and simple. He also has a personal history of actual doxxing people, including the reporter in question here. Flight records are public information, covered by the First Amendment. He's running Twitter into the ground, after he promised to run a platform built on free speech principles, even from his critics. That lasted all of a few weeks. |
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 16, 2022 12:52:20 GMT -8
So you agree? They should be reporting information about his exact location, it is their job and all...
And those headlines, those were completely fine, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 16, 2022 12:55:39 GMT -8
So you agree? They should be reporting information about his exact location, it is their job and all... And those headlines, those were completely fine, right? What headlines? Read the actual story. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 16, 2022 13:01:04 GMT -8
He later banned the account. He's free to do what he wants with a private company, but it's ridiculous to cry censorship as a Republican when it's literally happening out in the open *for you.*
|
|
