|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 16, 2022 13:37:16 GMT -8
The headlines in the UT and CNN (the only two I checked).
So again, you agree? They should be reporting information about his exact location, it is their job and all...
And those headlines, those were completely fine, right?
|
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Dec 16, 2022 14:01:32 GMT -8
The headlines in the UT and CNN (the only two I checked). So again, you agree? They should be reporting information about his exact location, it is their job and all... And those headlines, those were completely fine, right? No bueno, especially when it affects his, or anybody's kids/family. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 16, 2022 14:59:48 GMT -8
The headlines in the UT and CNN (the only two I checked). So again, you agree? They should be reporting information about his exact location, it is their job and all... And those headlines, those were completely fine, right? Laziness. |
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 16, 2022 17:02:27 GMT -8
Good read on this subject. Although, she doesn't know the definition of doxing either, so she shouldn't be commenting on this... Real time doxxing and the littlest Musk abigailshrier.substack.com/p/real-time-doxxing-and-the-littlest"We discovered evidence of a secret committee that systemically suppressed the visibility of disfavored speech" "The Twitter Files remain a vital revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes." "For political conservatives, Covid vaccine skeptics, and critics of gender medicine, the revelations came as proof that their voices had been suppressed sub rosa. Proof that millions of Americans who believed their perspectives were being unfairly disregarded weren’t in the grips of a paranoid fantasy." |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 18, 2022 11:03:43 GMT -8
Now Twitter is banning accounts that link to third party promotion websites, but only *certain* third party promotion websites. Free speech loses again and it's likely illegal at the same time, in violation of federal antitrust laws.
|
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 18, 2022 13:56:38 GMT -8
Now Twitter is banning accounts that link to third party promotion websites, but only *certain* third party promotion websites. Free speech loses again and it's likely illegal at the same time, in violation of federal antitrust laws. Yeah, maybe that will be a problem, maybe not. Do you agree that the headline framing of the "censorship" was biased? What do you think about "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes."? Do you think that is happening at facebook, google, etc? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 18, 2022 15:14:55 GMT -8
Now Twitter is banning accounts that link to third party promotion websites, but only *certain* third party promotion websites. Free speech loses again and it's likely illegal at the same time, in violation of federal antitrust laws. Yeah, maybe that will be a problem, maybe not. Do you agree that the headline framing of the "censorship" was biased? What do you think about "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes."? Do you think that is happening at facebook, google, etc? Violating antitrust laws might be a big deal? Lol. Yeah, it's a direct violation of EU law as well. No, I don't agree with the headline framing as biased - Reporting on a story is the job of a reporter, there was no doxxing of Musk and none of the reporters he banned shared anything illegal. He is banning his own personal critics, including a BI reporter that has a long history of reporting on Musk's shady business practices and his own personal history with actually doxxing people. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 18, 2022 15:28:45 GMT -8
LOL.
|
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 18, 2022 15:42:17 GMT -8
Aztecryan, you are such a true believer. This is why I want nothing to do with people like you in power. If the party told you to think differently, you would follow suit.
He banned people that were doxxing. Why would they do that?
Again, again, and I say again, What do you think about "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes."?
Do you think that is happening at facebook, google, etc?
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 18, 2022 16:05:07 GMT -8
Aztecryan, you are such a true believer. This is why I want nothing to do with people like you in power. If the party told you to think differently, you would follow suit. He banned people that were doxxing. Why would they do that? Again, again, and I say again, What do you think about "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes."? Do you think that is happening at facebook, google, etc? You realize that you're believing the word of Musk without any evidence what he's saying is true? "True believer" is a lame, sophomoric term used by right-wing fish because they are gullible and easily baited into believing everything they see. Nobody. Doxxed. Him. He created an arbitrary policy (one in which he's violated it multiple times since enacting it) because he's a bully, plainly stated, with an agenda. Why were the reporters (at least some) immediately reinstated if Elon was so worried about doxxing as a policy? Come on. You have to be smarter and see through the nonsense. I answered your question already. I don't agree with her stance at all. |
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 18, 2022 16:41:52 GMT -8
Here is your boy Aaron Rupar admitting he shared the link that was tracking Elon. aaronrupar.substack.com/p/aaron-rupar-twitter-suspension-atrupar?r=1bdg2Go to the first update. Why would he do that? And you know, it's not that hard to have a non-biased headline: Twitter suspends several journalists, Musk cites 'doxxing' of his jet www.reuters.com/technology/twitter-suspends-accounts-several-journalists-2022-12-16/Little more clear than ""Twitter suspends journalists who wrote about owner Elon Musk". UT and "Elon Musk censors the press" CNN. Never mind, you have already stated those headlines are clear and not biased. Of course you don't agree with the "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes." Because that would go against the party, and you can't have that. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 18, 2022 16:59:16 GMT -8
Here is your boy Aaron Rupar admitting he shared the link that was tracking Elon. aaronrupar.substack.com/p/aaron-rupar-twitter-suspension-atrupar?r=1bdgGo to the first update. Why would he do that? And you know, it's not that hard to have a non-biased headline: Twitter suspends several journalists, Musk cites 'doxxing' of his jet www.reuters.com/technology/twitter-suspends-accounts-several-journalists-2022-12-16/Little more clear than ""Twitter suspends journalists who wrote about owner Elon Musk". UT and "Elon Musk censors the press" CNN. Never mind, you have already stated those headlines are clear and not biased. Of course you don't agree with the "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes." Because that would go against the party, and you can't have that. My boy? Lol. Trying way too hard here. So sharing a report on a story is considered doxxing now? Yeah, sounds like shifting goalposts, just like Elon. You don't have to simp for billionaire bullies, they don't care about you. I'm just laughing at your inability to see through the charade. He's a fraud. Wake up. |
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 18, 2022 17:41:07 GMT -8
All I was doing is sharing a report on a story...that has the link in it to track Elon...why would they do that?
Oh, I forgot, "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes."
He is a bad man a very bad man AND a fraud, AND a threat to democracy, he needs to be STOPPED!...yeah, I need to wake up...
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 18, 2022 17:52:14 GMT -8
All I was doing is sharing a report on a story...that has the link in it to track Elon...why would they do that? Oh, I forgot, "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes." He is a bad man a very bad man AND a fraud, AND a threat to democracy, he needs to be STOPPED!...yeah, I need to wake up... Because it's the #1 story on Twitter...? Man, you're bad at this. Why would a reporter share a report of a story? Mind-blowing. You characterized it as he admitted to doxxing Musk....which is nowhere in that article at all. Now you're back to defending Trump. The desperation is hilarious. Why did Elon reinstate the reporters immediately after the EU report came out? Think for yourself, please. Why is he shifting policy seemingly by the hour? He suspended another reporter today for "previous" doxxing action before he even had ownership of the company. He's promoting an era of free speech and then he targets specific people with an axe to grind. He's a coward. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 18, 2022 18:05:24 GMT -8
The narcissism is boundless.
|
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 18, 2022 18:10:50 GMT -8
Yes, the #1 story, so I must share the link...I mean, it is news and all...
Not sure how you see Trump in this, but that man is everywhere...in your head...
Anyway, Elon's a coward and a narcissist, I'm bad at this and desperate...and you...you are a true believer, a man of the party.
The party says this is nothing: "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes."
And so it is.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 18, 2022 18:21:13 GMT -8
Yes, the #1 story, so I must share the link...I mean, it is news and all... Not sure how you see Trump in this, but that man is everywhere...in your head... Anyway, Elon's a coward and a narcissist, I'm bad at this and desperate...and you...you are a true believer, a man of the party. The party says this is nothing: "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes." And so it is. I assumed the person you were referring to mockingly as a threat to democracy was Trump. "He must be stopped." Because you defended Trump earlier in the same exact context, which shows a serious lack of understanding of actual threats to democracy. Do you think a random reporter who somehow got a look behind the curtain is infallible? You think Twitter was used to weaponize elections? What about the involvement from Russia on the GOP side? Rules apply to thee and not me? Notice how you can't answer any of the questions I've posed....at all? And so it is. |
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 18, 2022 18:52:37 GMT -8
No, I don't think a reporter is infallible. But you know the reporter must be wrong, because it doesn't align with the party.
I think this is true in regard to twitter: "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes."
After two years of investigating Trump, I don't believe they demonstrated that he colluded with Russia, but that is a different topic and has nothing to do with what we are talking about.
In regard to twitter, the idea is it would become a level playing field, which wasn't the case before. And if there was undo influence by the Government, it would come to light. This is why there is so much angst. Concerns that it will become slanted the other direction are warranted. Making Elon out to be the devil is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 18, 2022 21:29:57 GMT -8
No, I don't think a reporter is infallible. But you know the reporter must be wrong, because it doesn't align with the party. I think this is true in regard to twitter: "revelation—evidence of a systemic attempt by Twitter executives to shape public debate and even political outcomes." After two years of investigating Trump, I don't believe they demonstrated that he colluded with Russia, but that is a different topic and has nothing to do with what we are talking about. In regard to twitter, the idea is it would become a level playing field, which wasn't the case before. And if there was undo influence by the Government, it would come to light. This is why there is so much angst. Concerns that it will become slanted the other direction are warranted. Making Elon out to be the devil is ridiculous. Has nothing to do with any party - I don't believe the agenda of the author is transparent when it's filled with buzzwords that are used over and over - "Anti-woke" is a dead giveaway to a source I won't give the benefit of the doubt to. It's tired, honestly, and it's overplayed. I'm not saying her entire premise is wrong, but I think the conclusions are shaky at best. The Mueller Report concluded that Russia interfered in the election on behalf of Donald Trump. Mueller wouldn't use the word "collusion" because William Barr obstructed the process and hindered the investigation. Barr was never going to prosecute Trump, as it turns out, after a federal judge called him out for it (Surprise to nobody?) And no, that's not the thought process at all. Elon Musk has made NO qualms about his agenda, hiding behind free speech promotion while amplifying hate speech, calling for the prosecution of Anthony Fauci and creating arbitrary policies that are making Twitter a GOP hellscape. I'm not making him out to be anything - He's showing you in plain sight. Here, here's more. Same reporter he suspended yesterday for asking for a comment on a story. Elon is a fragile egomaniac, nothing more. His money is his power. He's always been a bully, as the documented evidence against him shows. Now, he's just a liar on top of it. |
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Dec 19, 2022 8:04:33 GMT -8
Do you get your idea's straight from some talking points?
You really believe twitter didn't shape public debate? That there was no bias?
And now Twitter is just "amplifying hate speech, calling for the prosecution of Anthony Fauci and creating arbitrary policies that are making Twitter a GOP hellscape."
Wow! Elon really is THE DEVIL!
It's funny how anyone who goes against your party becomes THE DEVIL! I can't believe anyone takes you seriously.
I'm done...
|
|
