|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 24, 2021 0:05:35 GMT -8
Sorry, but when you tried to insinuate that split stats over a 30 day window had more validity than the entirety of a career, you lost me at that point. I'm not trying to be condescending; the logic you were using in multiple points was just faulty, in my view. I'm glad you think this production is good enough, as a zero win player, I happen to disagree, using the entirety of the data. At the end of the day, it's just about numbers, roles and values. Speaking of numbers, 36 games left. Crunch time has arrived. You don't mean to be condescending and yet you do it again. My logic was faulty, but yours can't be. Seriously? Your ego just can't take a step back can it. There was nothing "faulty" with my logic, especially when compared to your theories on why Hosmer is playing. You just sound like a complete jerk. And BTW, I never said 30 days is more relevant than a career. What I've said is the past 2 months, which includes the past 30 days, is more relevant at estimating the next 40 days than what someone did 2-3 years ago and I stand by that. IM0, when you're estimating how a player will do over the next 36 games the entire universe you're sampling is 162 games, not 1800 games, since we're not predicting what he'll do over the next 1000 games. Only 36. And the sample size we should be using to estimate is 126 games, not 1765. More so, looking at what Hosmers done over the past 2 years 2 is more than large enough to estimate how he may do over 36 games and it's just as relevant at doing so as games played 2-3 years ago. Why you can't even admit Hosmer has been a productive player lately, especially over the past 2 months, is beyond me. Instead its he's terrible at everything. Unbelievable, and only shows your bias. That's how bad it is. He doesn't even know when he's doing it, because that's just simply how he rolls. "I don't mean to be condescending." And then, bam!!! He's condescending right after saying that. It's fluid for him. Natural. It's really too bad.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 24, 2021 9:01:55 GMT -8
Sorry, but when you tried to insinuate that split stats over a 30 day window had more validity than the entirety of a career, you lost me at that point. I'm not trying to be condescending; the logic you were using in multiple points was just faulty, in my view. I'm glad you think this production is good enough, as a zero win player, I happen to disagree, using the entirety of the data. At the end of the day, it's just about numbers, roles and values. Speaking of numbers, 36 games left. Crunch time has arrived. You don't mean to be condescending and yet you do it again. My logic was faulty, but yours can't be. Seriously? Your ego just can't take a step back can it. There was nothing "faulty" with my logic, especially when compared to your theories on why Hosmer is playing. You just sound like a complete jerk. And BTW, I never said 30 days is more relevant than a career. What I've said is the past 2 months, which includes the past 30 days, is more relevant at estimating the next 40 days than what someone did 2-3 years ago and I stand by that. IM0, when you're estimating how a player will do over the next 36 games the entire universe you're sampling is 162 games, not 1800 games, since we're not predicting what he'll do over the next 1000 games. Only 36. And the sample size we should be using to estimate is 126 games, not 1765. More so, looking at what Hosmers done over the past 2 years 2 is more than large enough to estimate how he may do over 36 games and it's just as relevant at doing so as games played 2-3 years ago. Why you can't even admit Hosmer has been a productive player lately, especially over the past 2 months, is beyond me. Instead its he's terrible at everything. Unbelievable, and only shows your bias. Can we please stop stretching statements to not warp what I'm saying? A) You absolutely did try to use split stats over 30 days as a meaningful metric earlier in this thread: "You keep trying to make Hosmer out as the bad guy in all this, and keep ignoring the fact he's been an important part of the team over the past couple months. You keep putting it off as 'recency' bias, when recency has turned in a significant portion of the season. Just FYI, Hosmer's hitting .305 against LEFTIES over the past 30 days with a .367 OBP & a .794 OPS. The OPS is 4th best on the team over that period among guys currently on the roster!" B) I think we have far different methodologies of coming to different conclusions on what's good and what isn't. Merits on both sides and the beauty of statistics to present an argument that can be contexualized in different ways. C) I have said about six times now how he's improved at the plate to an extent, but I'm not going to completely ignore the elephant in the room that there isn't anything really meaningful behind the changes, outside of an improved walk rate. The soft contact rate is still high, the hard hit rate is still extremely low, the groundball rate is still 54%, the power production is AWOL, the strikeout rate is pretty much in line with his long-term data, the launch angle is still 3.8 degrees. What that leaves you with is a player who doesn't elevate the ball, doesn't contribute on the basepaths to any degree, who isn't making hard contact and is running a BABIP of nearly 90 points above league average. Leaving the clubhouse stuff aside, I think the Padres would be a much better team without him playing, especially defensively. I don't think the Padres have handled this particularly well, either, so they have to take some of the blame as well. I think we've run our course here. Let's beat the Dodgers.
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on Aug 24, 2021 9:58:34 GMT -8
You don't mean to be condescending and yet you do it again. My logic was faulty, but yours can't be. Seriously? Your ego just can't take a step back can it. There was nothing "faulty" with my logic, especially when compared to your theories on why Hosmer is playing. You just sound like a complete jerk. And BTW, I never said 30 days is more relevant than a career. What I've said is the past 2 months, which includes the past 30 days, is more relevant at estimating the next 40 days than what someone did 2-3 years ago and I stand by that. IM0, when you're estimating how a player will do over the next 36 games the entire universe you're sampling is 162 games, not 1800 games, since we're not predicting what he'll do over the next 1000 games. Only 36. And the sample size we should be using to estimate is 126 games, not 1765. More so, looking at what Hosmers done over the past 2 years 2 is more than large enough to estimate how he may do over 36 games and it's just as relevant at doing so as games played 2-3 years ago. Why you can't even admit Hosmer has been a productive player lately, especially over the past 2 months, is beyond me. Instead its he's terrible at everything. Unbelievable, and only shows your bias. Can we please stop stretching statements to not warp what I'm saying? A) You absolutely did try to use split stats over 30 days as a meaningful metric earlier in this thread: "You keep trying to make Hosmer out as the bad guy in all this, and keep ignoring the fact he's been an important part of the team over the past couple months. You keep putting it off as 'recency' bias, when recency has turned in a significant portion of the season. Just FYI, Hosmer's hitting .305 against LEFTIES over the past 30 days with a .367 OBP & a .794 OPS. The OPS is 4th best on the team over that period among guys currently on the roster!" B) I think we have far different methodologies of coming to different conclusions on what's good and what isn't. Merits on both sides and the beauty of statistics to present an argument that can be contexualized in different ways. C) I have said about six times now how he's improved at the plate to an extent, but I'm not going to completely ignore the elephant in the room that there isn't anything really meaningful behind the changes, outside of an improved walk rate. The soft contact rate is still high, the hard hit rate is still extremely low, the groundball rate is still 54%, the power production is AWOL, the strikeout rate is pretty much in line with his long-term data, the launch angle is still 3.8 degrees. What that leaves you with is a player who doesn't elevate the ball, doesn't contribute on the basepaths to any degree, who isn't making hard contact and is running a BABIP of nearly 90 points above league average. Leaving the clubhouse stuff aside, I think the Padres would be a much better team without him playing, especially defensively. I don't think the Padres have handled this particularly well, either, so they have to take some of the blame as well. I think we've run our course here. Let's beat the Dodgers. I used the 30 day stats specifically to talk about why he may be in the line-up vs. lefties (& that's a timeframe you can use to filter splits vs. lefties on the MLB website). When the manager is playing a guy against lefties and he delivers it's a factor as to whether to continue playing him at that spot. I never even referenced his career stats vs. lefties because I don't think it matters. If you're playing someone & they're hitting lefties as well if not better than most guys on the team at the time then you'd be dumb to bench him vs. lefties. That's simple logic. Benching him based on what he did 2, 3 or 4 years ago makes no sense. I wasn't downplaying his career stats, but IMO when you're deciding whether to play someone playing the "hot hand" is important, as Tingler's said often this year. "Hot hand' isn't defined by 2018, 2019 or 2020. BTW, Hosmer's SLG over the past 30 days is .462. Manny's - .463. Myers & Grisham - .441 & .440. You have this obsession that Hosmer needs to fit the mold of a typical 1B within our line-up. IMO he doesn't. Getting on base matters. Keeping the line moving matters. I worry less about his power & more about being productive overall. I'll live with his 7 XBH's in the past 30 days, or 9 since the AS break (only 4 players have more). If that means a ton of singles, great. I'll take it. Especially if they come with RISP (where Hosmer has a .886 OPS this season overall; better than Jake). Unfortunately it's hard to "leave the clubhouse stuff aside", since you keep twisting words & finding ways to trash Hosmer based on the "clubhouse stuff". When you decide to stop reading into things that aren't there, then we can gladly ignore that "stuff". The RHOSD would be happy to hear it. What I think you need to remember is you're just offering opinions, just like the rest of us. You're not Gospel, and far from it. Stats can be used in a variety of ways, and do agree that we draw different conclusions based on different (relevant) methodologies & arguments. You believe in one set of stats, others believe in other sets. BOTH are viable. You tend to forget that & think you're the end all of the argument, which is far from the truth.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 24, 2021 10:47:43 GMT -8
Can we please stop stretching statements to not warp what I'm saying? A) You absolutely did try to use split stats over 30 days as a meaningful metric earlier in this thread: "You keep trying to make Hosmer out as the bad guy in all this, and keep ignoring the fact he's been an important part of the team over the past couple months. You keep putting it off as 'recency' bias, when recency has turned in a significant portion of the season. Just FYI, Hosmer's hitting .305 against LEFTIES over the past 30 days with a .367 OBP & a .794 OPS. The OPS is 4th best on the team over that period among guys currently on the roster!" B) I think we have far different methodologies of coming to different conclusions on what's good and what isn't. Merits on both sides and the beauty of statistics to present an argument that can be contexualized in different ways. C) I have said about six times now how he's improved at the plate to an extent, but I'm not going to completely ignore the elephant in the room that there isn't anything really meaningful behind the changes, outside of an improved walk rate. The soft contact rate is still high, the hard hit rate is still extremely low, the groundball rate is still 54%, the power production is AWOL, the strikeout rate is pretty much in line with his long-term data, the launch angle is still 3.8 degrees. What that leaves you with is a player who doesn't elevate the ball, doesn't contribute on the basepaths to any degree, who isn't making hard contact and is running a BABIP of nearly 90 points above league average. Leaving the clubhouse stuff aside, I think the Padres would be a much better team without him playing, especially defensively. I don't think the Padres have handled this particularly well, either, so they have to take some of the blame as well. I think we've run our course here. Let's beat the Dodgers. I used the 30 day stats specifically to talk about why he may be in the line-up vs. lefties (& that's a timeframe you can use to filter splits vs. lefties on the MLB website). When the manager is playing a guy against lefties and he delivers it's a factor as to whether to continue playing him at that spot. I never even referenced his career stats vs. lefties because I don't think it matters. If you're playing someone & they're hitting lefties as well if not better than most guys on the team at the time then you'd be dumb to bench him vs. lefties. That's simple logic. Benching him based on what he did 2, 3 or 4 years ago makes no sense. I wasn't downplaying his career stats, but IMO when you're deciding whether to play someone playing the "hot hand" is important, as Tingler's said often this year. "Hot hand' isn't defined by 2018, 2019 or 2020. BTW, Hosmer's SLG over the past 30 days is .462. Manny's - .463. Myers & Grisham - .441 & .440. You have this obsession that Hosmer needs to fit the mold of a typical 1B within our line-up. IMO he doesn't. Getting on base matters. Keeping the line moving matters. I worry less about his power & more about being productive overall. I'll live with his 7 XBH's in the past 30 days, or 9 since the AS break (only 4 players have more). If that means a ton of singles, great. I'll take it. Especially if they come with RISP (where Hosmer has a .886 OPS this season overall; better than Jake). Unfortunately it's hard to "leave the clubhouse stuff aside", since you keep twisting words & finding ways to trash Hosmer based on the "clubhouse stuff". When you decide to stop reading into things that aren't there, then we can gladly ignore that "stuff". The RHOSD would be happy to hear it. What I think you need to remember is you're just offering opinions, just like the rest of us. You're not Gospel, and far from it. Stats can be used in a variety of ways, and do agree that we draw different conclusions based on different (relevant) methodologies & arguments. You believe in one set of stats, others believe in other sets. BOTH are viable. You tend to forget that & think you're the end all of the argument, which is far from the truth. That's right. We all have our own opinions and thoughts on things, and they should be RESPECTFULLY addressed. Some people say, this board is tame compared to other boards/schools, but that still doesn't make it right. I need to work on that as well sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 24, 2021 11:04:16 GMT -8
Can we please stop stretching statements to not warp what I'm saying? A) You absolutely did try to use split stats over 30 days as a meaningful metric earlier in this thread: "You keep trying to make Hosmer out as the bad guy in all this, and keep ignoring the fact he's been an important part of the team over the past couple months. You keep putting it off as 'recency' bias, when recency has turned in a significant portion of the season. Just FYI, Hosmer's hitting .305 against LEFTIES over the past 30 days with a .367 OBP & a .794 OPS. The OPS is 4th best on the team over that period among guys currently on the roster!" B) I think we have far different methodologies of coming to different conclusions on what's good and what isn't. Merits on both sides and the beauty of statistics to present an argument that can be contexualized in different ways. C) I have said about six times now how he's improved at the plate to an extent, but I'm not going to completely ignore the elephant in the room that there isn't anything really meaningful behind the changes, outside of an improved walk rate. The soft contact rate is still high, the hard hit rate is still extremely low, the groundball rate is still 54%, the power production is AWOL, the strikeout rate is pretty much in line with his long-term data, the launch angle is still 3.8 degrees. What that leaves you with is a player who doesn't elevate the ball, doesn't contribute on the basepaths to any degree, who isn't making hard contact and is running a BABIP of nearly 90 points above league average. Leaving the clubhouse stuff aside, I think the Padres would be a much better team without him playing, especially defensively. I don't think the Padres have handled this particularly well, either, so they have to take some of the blame as well. I think we've run our course here. Let's beat the Dodgers. I used the 30 day stats specifically to talk about why he may be in the line-up vs. lefties (& that's a timeframe you can use to filter splits vs. lefties on the MLB website). When the manager is playing a guy against lefties and he delivers it's a factor as to whether to continue playing him at that spot. I never even referenced his career stats vs. lefties because I don't think it matters. If you're playing someone & they're hitting lefties as well if not better than most guys on the team at the time then you'd be dumb to bench him vs. lefties. That's simple logic. Benching him based on what he did 2, 3 or 4 years ago makes no sense. I wasn't downplaying his career stats, but IMO when you're deciding whether to play someone playing the "hot hand" is important, as Tingler's said often this year. "Hot hand' isn't defined by 2018, 2019 or 2020. BTW, Hosmer's SLG over the past 30 days is .462. Manny's - .463. Myers & Grisham - .441 & .440. You have this obsession that Hosmer needs to fit the mold of a typical 1B within our line-up. IMO he doesn't. Getting on base matters. Keeping the line moving matters. I worry less about his power & more about being productive overall. I'll live with his 7 XBH's in the past 30 days, or 9 since the AS break (only 4 players have more). If that means a ton of singles, great. I'll take it. Especially if they come with RISP (where Hosmer has a .886 OPS this season overall; better than Jake). Unfortunately it's hard to "leave the clubhouse stuff aside", since you keep twisting words & finding ways to trash Hosmer based on the "clubhouse stuff". When you decide to stop reading into things that aren't there, then we can gladly ignore that "stuff". The RHOSD would be happy to hear it. What I think you need to remember is you're just offering opinions, just like the rest of us. You're not Gospel, and far from it. Stats can be used in a variety of ways, and do agree that we draw different conclusions based on different (relevant) methodologies & arguments. You believe in one set of stats, others believe in other sets. BOTH are viable. You tend to forget that & think you're the end all of the argument, which is far from the truth. Our expectations just differ wildly on a team that can't hit for any power on a regular basis. Having a pure singles hitter with no other baseballs tools is something I just won't get to as a net positive. Arguing in circles when traditional definitions are "stuck" and the metrics aren't good enough at the same time. So, old school versus new school might as well be the same campus. As long as we can back our position with relevant, clear data over sustainable sample sizes, I have no issue with any of it.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 24, 2021 11:06:46 GMT -8
I used the 30 day stats specifically to talk about why he may be in the line-up vs. lefties (& that's a timeframe you can use to filter splits vs. lefties on the MLB website). When the manager is playing a guy against lefties and he delivers it's a factor as to whether to continue playing him at that spot. I never even referenced his career stats vs. lefties because I don't think it matters. If you're playing someone & they're hitting lefties as well if not better than most guys on the team at the time then you'd be dumb to bench him vs. lefties. That's simple logic. Benching him based on what he did 2, 3 or 4 years ago makes no sense. I wasn't downplaying his career stats, but IMO when you're deciding whether to play someone playing the "hot hand" is important, as Tingler's said often this year. "Hot hand' isn't defined by 2018, 2019 or 2020. BTW, Hosmer's SLG over the past 30 days is .462. Manny's - .463. Myers & Grisham - .441 & .440. You have this obsession that Hosmer needs to fit the mold of a typical 1B within our line-up. IMO he doesn't. Getting on base matters. Keeping the line moving matters. I worry less about his power & more about being productive overall. I'll live with his 7 XBH's in the past 30 days, or 9 since the AS break (only 4 players have more). If that means a ton of singles, great. I'll take it. Especially if they come with RISP (where Hosmer has a .886 OPS this season overall; better than Jake). Unfortunately it's hard to "leave the clubhouse stuff aside", since you keep twisting words & finding ways to trash Hosmer based on the "clubhouse stuff". When you decide to stop reading into things that aren't there, then we can gladly ignore that "stuff". The RHOSD would be happy to hear it. What I think you need to remember is you're just offering opinions, just like the rest of us. You're not Gospel, and far from it. Stats can be used in a variety of ways, and do agree that we draw different conclusions based on different (relevant) methodologies & arguments. You believe in one set of stats, others believe in other sets. BOTH are viable. You tend to forget that & think you're the end all of the argument, which is far from the truth. That's right. We all have our own opinions and thoughts on things, and they should be RESPECTFULLY addressed. Some people say, this board is tame compared to other boards/schools, but that still doesn't make it right. I need to work on that as well sometimes. We all do. Like I've said, on this topic, I feel extremely comfortable with my position, despite it not always being conveyed in the most concise manner and the frustration sometimes seeping in. That's why I try to let the statistical stuff lead, because they don't have emotion. Baseball is weird. I would have bet the farm on a Wil Myers breakout this year, considering every single underlying metric last year and Statcast generated data was a positive indicator. Just hasn't come to fruition.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 24, 2021 12:31:03 GMT -8
That's right. We all have our own opinions and thoughts on things, and they should be RESPECTFULLY addressed. Some people say, this board is tame compared to other boards/schools, but that still doesn't make it right. I need to work on that as well sometimes. We all do. Like I've said, on this topic, I feel extremely comfortable with my position, despite it not always being conveyed in the most concise manner and the frustration sometimes seeping in. That's why I try to let the statistical stuff lead, because they don't have emotion. Baseball is weird. I would have bet the farm on a Wil Myers breakout this year, considering every single underlying metric last year and Statcast generated data was a positive indicator. Just hasn't come to fruition. There will always be differences of opinions and like you, myself and others, will feel very strongly about it, and not understand how others can come up with any other conclusion. Heck, look at my thoughts on Johnson!!! People think I'm crazy, and I get that. It's just when they use other names or ways to tell me I'm crazy. Don't like it. You're obviously very knowledgeable and I learn some things from you, and you make me look at things from different angles that I wouldn't have ever thought of before, but we all need to be as respectful as possible and not talk down to each other. Kumbaya moment, huh? Lol.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 24, 2021 13:39:23 GMT -8
We all do. Like I've said, on this topic, I feel extremely comfortable with my position, despite it not always being conveyed in the most concise manner and the frustration sometimes seeping in. That's why I try to let the statistical stuff lead, because they don't have emotion. Baseball is weird. I would have bet the farm on a Wil Myers breakout this year, considering every single underlying metric last year and Statcast generated data was a positive indicator. Just hasn't come to fruition. There will always be differences of opinions and like you, myself and others, will feel very strongly about it, and not understand how others can come up with any other conclusion. Heck, look at my thoughts on Johnson!!! People think I'm crazy, and I get that. It's just when they use other names or ways to tell me I'm crazy. Don't like it. You're obviously very knowledgeable and I learn some things from you, and you make me look at things from different angles that I wouldn't have ever thought of before, but we all need to be as respectful as possible and not talk down to each other. Kumbaya moment, huh? Lol. I'm happy either way. Paralympics start tonight and it'll be far more entertaining than the majority of the innings the Padres have.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 24, 2021 15:40:05 GMT -8
There will always be differences of opinions and like you, myself and others, will feel very strongly about it, and not understand how others can come up with any other conclusion. Heck, look at my thoughts on Johnson!!! People think I'm crazy, and I get that. It's just when they use other names or ways to tell me I'm crazy. Don't like it. You're obviously very knowledgeable and I learn some things from you, and you make me look at things from different angles that I wouldn't have ever thought of before, but we all need to be as respectful as possible and not talk down to each other. Kumbaya moment, huh? Lol. I'm happy either way. Paralympics start tonight and it'll be far more entertaining than the majority of the innings the Padres have. Cool. One of my daughter's competes in the Special Olympics. They're both very inspiring.
|
|
|
Post by junior on Aug 24, 2021 16:20:52 GMT -8
I'm happy either way. Paralympics start tonight and it'll be far more entertaining than the majority of the innings the Padres have. Cool. One of my daughter's competes in the Special Olympics. They're both very inspiring. Spent quite a few "formative" years working summers at Camp-a-Lot up at Cuyamaca and Palomar and volunteering with Special Olympics coaching and driving athletes on buses to Special Olympics events during the rest of the year. A group worth lifting up … there are so many more volunteers now, and with them come so many more opportunities for Special Olympians.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 24, 2021 16:33:38 GMT -8
Cool. One of my daughter's competes in the Special Olympics. They're both very inspiring. Spent quite a few "formative" years working summers at Camp-a-Lot up at Cuyamaca and Palomar and volunteering with Special Olympics coaching and driving athletes on buses to Special Olympics events during the rest of the year. A group worth lifting up … there are so many more volunteers now, and with them come so many more opportunities for Special Olympians. Highly encourage anyone and everyone everyone to watch the Paralympics coverage tonight. Women's wheelchair basketball starts against the defending world championship in the Netherlands, the US are the defending Paralympic gold medalists. One of my former teammates is on the squad.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 24, 2021 17:28:36 GMT -8
Spent quite a few "formative" years working summers at Camp-a-Lot up at Cuyamaca and Palomar and volunteering with Special Olympics coaching and driving athletes on buses to Special Olympics events during the rest of the year. A group worth lifting up … there are so many more volunteers now, and with them come so many more opportunities for Special Olympians. Highly encourage anyone and everyone everyone to watch the Paralympics coverage tonight. Women's wheelchair basketball starts against the defending world championship in the Netherlands, the US are the defending Paralympic gold medalists. One of my former teammates is on the squad. What channel? Thanks
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 24, 2021 17:31:34 GMT -8
Cool. One of my daughter's competes in the Special Olympics. They're both very inspiring. Spent quite a few "formative" years working summers at Camp-a-Lot up at Cuyamaca and Palomar and volunteering with Special Olympics coaching and driving athletes on buses to Special Olympics events during the rest of the year. A group worth lifting up … there are so many more volunteers now, and with them come so many more opportunities for Special Olympians. Thanks for your volunteer service!!! Yes, there are so many great people that volunteer their time. It's awesome. Such a good time at these events.
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on Aug 25, 2021 11:46:23 GMT -8
"Eric Hosmer was 1-for-3 with a double last night. His .324 batting average and .407 on-base percentage over his past 46 games (since June 29) lead the Padres in that span."
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 28, 2021 17:29:45 GMT -8
Nice pick Hos.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 28, 2021 19:35:59 GMT -8
Highly encourage anyone and everyone everyone to watch the Paralympics coverage tonight. Women's wheelchair basketball starts against the defending world championship in the Netherlands, the US are the defending Paralympic gold medalists. One of my former teammates is on the squad. What channel? Thanks NBCSN.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 28, 2021 19:52:47 GMT -8
Thanks!!! Perfect timing. The Pads are unwatchable right now.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 28, 2021 19:57:03 GMT -8
Looks like they're on at 10:00pm. Now I can at least keep track of it, now that I have the channel. Thanks again.
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on Aug 30, 2021 22:39:31 GMT -8
Monster homer tonight and ended up being huge!
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 31, 2021 0:07:06 GMT -8
Monster homer tonight and ended up being huge! Yep. That was a bomb!!!
|
|