|
|
Post by steveaztec on Jul 18, 2010 10:41:10 GMT -8
OK, kids, let's play nice. If this is all that's left of this thread I could just kill it... (I know that this is largely the result of 11 years of underachieving -and occasionally bad- football, but let's not take it out on each other.) Erik, I admit that I got sucked in once again and my pissy response to Ken was the result at anger at myself for allowing it to occur. So being thereby embarrassed, I wish you would "just kill it." First of all, don't worry about it SGF. It happens to most all of us who frequent the board often. I would like to make one correction on your comment above. You didn't get "sucked" in......You "sucked" everybody else in. Anyway....Go Aztecs!!!! Go Hoke!!! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2010 11:09:13 GMT -8
I laughed out loud. So true. Wrong. Daffy Duck would have been a lateral hire. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2010 11:11:31 GMT -8
the difference between 2008 and 2009 was leaps and bounds. It wasn't a "lateral" hire? Then how come we were 4-8 last year, blew 3 games we should have won and attendance was down? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 18, 2010 11:15:27 GMT -8
occasionally? the result of 11 years of underachieving -and occasionally bad- football, |
|
|
|
Post by steveaztec on Jul 18, 2010 11:26:18 GMT -8
I laughed out loud. So true. Wrong. Daffy Duck would have been a lateral hire. Yes, pretty funny comment.  One thing though... Daffy Duck beat Idaho by 28 points.....And we couldn't beat Idaho the very next year. |
|
|
|
Post by monty on Jul 18, 2010 11:44:34 GMT -8
I laughed out loud. So true. Yes, pretty funny comment. One thing though... Daffy Duck beat Idaho by 28 points.....And we couldn't beat Idaho the very next year. That might be really important if Daffy Duck didn't lose to WAC teams on the road everytime he played them and if Daffy Duck didn't beat by 63 points to a team we beat the next year. |
|
|
|
Post by steveaztec on Jul 18, 2010 11:56:17 GMT -8
Yes, pretty funny comment. One thing though... Daffy Duck beat Idaho by 28 points.....And we couldn't beat Idaho the very next year. That might be really important if Daffy Duck didn't lose to WAC teams on the road everytime he played them and if Daffy Duck didn't beat by 63 points to a team we beat the next year. Do you REALLY want to continue this? The MOD has asked to cool it on the topic and Andre and yourself are electing to continue? Why? Monty, I will go for the next 6 months on this if you want.....but that is up to you guys and the MOD. |
|
|
|
Post by monty on Jul 18, 2010 12:04:12 GMT -8
That might be really important if Daffy Duck didn't lose to WAC teams on the road everytime he played them and if Daffy Duck didn't beat by 63 points to a team we beat the next year. Do you REALLY want to continue this? The MOD has asked to cool it on the topic and Andre and yourself are electing to continue? Why? Monty, I will go for the next 6 months on this if you want.....but that is up to you guys and the MOD. you obviously do - you always respond or make a statement explicit or implicit on it and then play the victim that it is continuing. And don't kid yourself, you won't go for the next 6 months, you will go for the next years. continue it or don't, i don't care either way, but dude was a coach here, a colossal failure and fair game. |
|
|
|
Post by steveaztec on Jul 18, 2010 12:09:21 GMT -8
Do you REALLY want to continue this? The MOD has asked to cool it on the topic and Andre and yourself are electing to continue? Why? Monty, I will go for the next 6 months on this if you want.....but that is up to you guys and the MOD. you obviously do - you always respond or make a statement explicit or implicit on it and then play the victim that it is continuing. And don't kid yourself, you won't go for the next 6 months, you will go for the next years. continue it or don't, i don't care either way, but dude was a coach here, a colossal failure and fair game. I always respond? To respond, there has to be a comment to respond to. Who am I responding too and why are they continuing the topic that the MOD asked to be cooled? ***As far as you saying Chuck Long is on topic, I agree. Apparently some don't like the topic and complain to the MOD. Hey, its the MOD's board. We all go by his rules. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecgold on Jul 18, 2010 14:32:10 GMT -8
I am going for 4th or 5th.
|
|
|
|
Post by steveaztec on Jul 18, 2010 16:25:23 GMT -8
I am going for 4th or 5th. Good call Gold. I'm thinking 6th at the very least, which would make 4th possible with a couple breaks... And ohhh myyy how we are due for some. |
|
|
|
Post by monty on Jul 18, 2010 16:51:46 GMT -8
you obviously do - you always respond or make a statement explicit or implicit on it and then play the victim that it is continuing. And don't kid yourself, you won't go for the next 6 months, you will go for the next years. continue it or don't, i don't care either way, but dude was a coach here, a colossal failure and fair game. I always respond? To respond, there has to be a comment to respond to. Who am I responding too and why are they continuing the topic that the MOD asked to be cooled? ***As far as you saying Chuck Long is on topic, I agree. Apparently some don't like the topic and complain to the MOD. Hey, its the MOD's board. We all go by his rules. There are too many whiners that complain to the mods - if they don't like the topic they can move along to another topic. You bring it up often either directly or indirectly as well as respond, so don't act so innocent on the matter. |
|
|
|
Post by steveaztec on Jul 18, 2010 16:57:10 GMT -8
I always respond? To respond, there has to be a comment to respond to. Who am I responding too and why are they continuing the topic that the MOD asked to be cooled? ***As far as you saying Chuck Long is on topic, I agree. Apparently some don't like the topic and complain to the MOD. Hey, its the MOD's board. We all go by his rules. There are too many whiners that complain to the mods - if they don't like the topic they can move along to another topic. You bring it up often either directly or indirectly as well as respond, so don't act so innocent on the matter. Why should I not bring it up? I don't act innoncent to anything. Chuck Long is an Aztec topic and should be talked about. The problem is that many of you try to blame me for topic. You guys want to talk about Chuck Long more than I do.  |
|
|
|
Post by Cwag on Jul 18, 2010 17:00:57 GMT -8
Who's Chuck Long?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Jul 18, 2010 17:37:51 GMT -8
All Aztec coaches are fair game. Other board members are not fair game.
So let's just try to keep it on topic, ok? Thanks.
|
|
