|
Post by sdcoug on Oct 5, 2015 11:21:09 GMT -8
When you play a team that can't stop the run, you know what you do when you play that team?? Keep running the ball till they stop it. I don't see how that is difficult to understand After the first drive Fresno did stop it. We didn't score again in the first half. Maybe you missed the part about how we ran for 336 yards, or how playing calling in the first half can set up the 2nd half, etc. We had a terrific overall offensive game given our needs - 409 total yards. Or maybe you missed the part about how our defense completely dominated FSU, and no that's not the norm for FSU. We held them UNDER 100 yards, held their QB to a QBR under 10, and their running back to 20 yards!! They gained 300+ against Ole Miss, including 91 by Waller, and 365 against a very good Utah D when Greenlee had a QBR of 99.5 & Waller gained 62. We DESTROYED a team that has had some success offensively.
For MANY fans of football THAT alone is fun & exciting. True football fans actually enjoy seeing their D' holding their opponents to -29 yards over their 1st 3 possessions in the 2nd half! True football fans enjoy winning - others nitpick.
FSU's only score was set up by a ST mistake & a short field. They didn't have any drives. We also missed 2 makeable FG's as well, to go with the TD drives, and had another scoring opportunity called back due to penalty. When your D' is dominating the way ours was Saturday you play a little conservative. You play a field possession game. You game plan to your strengths & your opponents weaknesses. It's football 101!! If a fan can't comprehend that then its on THEM.
People talk about "predictability", but many of those are the same types who actually believe every running play is the same. They're not. We ran the ball the first 17 plays & look at the level of success - 1 77 yard TD drive & a 33-yard drive that resulted in a missed FG. Curious what you think we did on 1st down for the final 4 possessions? To save you the time, we PASSED twice & we ran twice. BALANCED play calling on 1st down. Over the final 4 drives of the 1st half we ran the ball 9 times & passed it 6 times, for 60/40 run/pass ratio. I think most would agree that's pretty ideal IMO, and that includes a 45 yard run that has us set up for another score that got called back. In my opinion we passed TOO MUCH down the stretch in the 1st half.
But don't let statistical let facts get in the way of a good rant though, right?
As for fans leaving, you don't think fans leaving had something to do with the game time? Also, why predict fans didn't "enjoy" a win or that they won't return for the next game when you have absolutely no idea if that is even true?
Why are you obsessed with looking at the negative side of every argument & speculating on things that haven't happened?
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Oct 5, 2015 11:22:22 GMT -8
If it works keep at it until they show they can stop it! Simple!
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 5, 2015 13:40:31 GMT -8
After the first drive Fresno did stop it. We didn't score again in the first half. Maybe you missed the part about how we ran for 336 yards, or how playing calling in the first half can set up the 2nd half, etc. We had a terrific overall offensive game given our needs - 409 total yards. Or maybe you missed the part about how our defense completely dominated FSU, and no that's not the norm for FSU. We held them UNDER 100 yards, held their QB to a QBR under 10, and their running back to 20 yards!! They gained 300+ against Ole Miss, including 91 by Waller, and 365 against a very good Utah D when Greenlee had a QBR of 99.5 & Waller gained 62. We DESTROYED a team that has had some success offensively.
For MANY fans of football THAT alone is fun & exciting. True football fans actually enjoy seeing their D' holding their opponents to -29 yards over their 1st 3 possessions in the 2nd half! True football fans enjoy winning - others nitpick.
FSU's only score was set up by a ST mistake & a short field. They didn't have any drives. We also missed 2 makeable FG's as well, to go with the TD drives, and had another scoring opportunity called back due to penalty. When your D' is dominating the way ours was Saturday you play a little conservative. You play a field possession game. You game plan to your strengths & your opponents weaknesses. It's football 101!! If a fan can't comprehend that then its on THEM.
People talk about "predictability", but many of those are the same types who actually believe every running play is the same. They're not. We ran the ball the first 17 plays & look at the level of success - 1 77 yard TD drive & a 33-yard drive that resulted in a missed FG. Curious what you think we did on 1st down for the final 4 possessions? To save you the time, we PASSED twice & we ran twice. BALANCED play calling on 1st down. Over the final 4 drives of the 1st half we ran the ball 9 times & passed it 6 times, for 60/40 run/pass ratio. I think most would agree that's pretty ideal IMO, and that includes a 45 yard run that has us set up for another score that got called back. In my opinion we passed TOO MUCH down the stretch in the 1st half.
But don't let statistical let facts get in the way of a good rant though, right?
As for fans leaving, you don't think fans leaving had something to do with the game time? Also, why predict fans didn't "enjoy" a win or that they won't return for the next game when you have absolutely no idea if that is even true?
Why are you obsessed with looking at the negative side of every argument & speculating on things that haven't happened?
Statistical fact - the halftime score was 7-7. Statistical fact - almost all of our rushing yardage came in between our 20 and their 30. We only got into the red zone once. Yardage piled up in the middle of the field is meaningless if you can't score. We hit two really good pass plays, but other than that our passing game was almost non-existent. This was not a good game offensively. You know that. Given the level of our competition we did poorly. In college football it's not just about wins and losses - it's about how you win (or lose). You don't get into the Top 25 by playing tough, hard fought, competitive games against bottom feeders, which is what we've been doing ever since Rocky took over. Like a lot of others my patience for Rocky has worn out. Year seven that he's been a major contributor to both the coaching, game planning, and recruiting, year five that he's been in complete control - and our team is noticeably weaker than it was three years ago. That's all on Rocky Long.
|
|
|
Post by gamer2101 on Oct 5, 2015 13:51:18 GMT -8
We won.....that beats losing 77 to 78 and getting 100,000 yds total offense to me.
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 5, 2015 14:03:29 GMT -8
We won.....that beats losing 77 to 78 and getting 100,000 yds total offense to me. Style points are a big deal in college football. A huge deal. It affects your rankings and it affects recruiting. Showing that you can dominate lesser teams indicates that you are an up and coming power team rather than just another bottom feeder that had a decent game.
|
|
|
Post by HighNTight on Oct 5, 2015 14:17:19 GMT -8
We won.....that beats losing 77 to 78 and getting 100,000 yds total offense to me. Style points are a big deal in college football. A huge deal. It affects your rankings and it affects recruiting. Showing that you can dominate lesser teams indicates that you are an up and coming power team rather than just another bottom feeder that had a decent game. Wins with style are worth a ton ... Wins without style points still go a long way towards recruiting and ranking Style points in a loss really don't get you much -- especially if those losses are numerous
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 5, 2015 14:22:00 GMT -8
Style points are a big deal in college football. A huge deal. It affects your rankings and it affects recruiting. Showing that you can dominate lesser teams indicates that you are an up and coming power team rather than just another bottom feeder that had a decent game. Wins with style are worth a ton ... Wins without style points still go a long way towards recruiting and ranking Style points in a loss really don't get you much -- especially if those losses are numerous The gap in terms of ranking and recruiting between wins with style points and wins without style points (tough, hard fought games against weak opponents) is huge. Blow out a bad team and you prove that you belong among the top programs in the country. Struggle to beat a bad team and all you've proven is that you're slightly less bad than they are. Losses hurt you with recruiting unless you look really good in almost knocking off a ranked opponent. With the rankings a loss is almost always going to lose you a significant number of votes.
|
|
|
Post by HighNTight on Oct 5, 2015 14:25:48 GMT -8
Wins with style are worth a ton ... Wins without style points still go a long way towards recruiting and ranking Style points in a loss really don't get you much -- especially if those losses are numerous The gap in terms of ranking and recruiting between wins with style points and wins without style points (tough, hard fought games against weak opponents) is huge. Blow out a bad team and you prove that you belong among the top programs in the country. Struggle to beat a bad team and all you've proven is that you're slightly less bad than they are. Losses hurt you with recruiting unless you look really good in almost knocking off a ranked opponent. With the rankings a loss is almost always going to lose you a significant number of votes. Fact ... you need to win to get ranked -- losers don't get ranked. Once you start winning, you can worry about winning with style ... Winning programs attract recruits and top coaching prospects as well as the deference of voters in polls
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on Oct 5, 2015 14:30:12 GMT -8
Maybe you missed the part about how we ran for 336 yards, or how playing calling in the first half can set up the 2nd half, etc. We had a terrific overall offensive game given our needs - 409 total yards. Or maybe you missed the part about how our defense completely dominated FSU, and no that's not the norm for FSU. We held them UNDER 100 yards, held their QB to a QBR under 10, and their running back to 20 yards!! They gained 300+ against Ole Miss, including 91 by Waller, and 365 against a very good Utah D when Greenlee had a QBR of 99.5 & Waller gained 62. We DESTROYED a team that has had some success offensively.
For MANY fans of football THAT alone is fun & exciting. True football fans actually enjoy seeing their D' holding their opponents to -29 yards over their 1st 3 possessions in the 2nd half! True football fans enjoy winning - others nitpick.
FSU's only score was set up by a ST mistake & a short field. They didn't have any drives. We also missed 2 makeable FG's as well, to go with the TD drives, and had another scoring opportunity called back due to penalty. When your D' is dominating the way ours was Saturday you play a little conservative. You play a field possession game. You game plan to your strengths & your opponents weaknesses. It's football 101!! If a fan can't comprehend that then its on THEM.
People talk about "predictability", but many of those are the same types who actually believe every running play is the same. They're not. We ran the ball the first 17 plays & look at the level of success - 1 77 yard TD drive & a 33-yard drive that resulted in a missed FG. Curious what you think we did on 1st down for the final 4 possessions? To save you the time, we PASSED twice & we ran twice. BALANCED play calling on 1st down. Over the final 4 drives of the 1st half we ran the ball 9 times & passed it 6 times, for 60/40 run/pass ratio. I think most would agree that's pretty ideal IMO, and that includes a 45 yard run that has us set up for another score that got called back. In my opinion we passed TOO MUCH down the stretch in the 1st half.
But don't let statistical let facts get in the way of a good rant though, right?
As for fans leaving, you don't think fans leaving had something to do with the game time? Also, why predict fans didn't "enjoy" a win or that they won't return for the next game when you have absolutely no idea if that is even true?
Why are you obsessed with looking at the negative side of every argument & speculating on things that haven't happened?
Statistical fact - the halftime score was 7-7. Statistical fact - almost all of our rushing yardage came in between our 20 and their 30. We only got into the red zone once. Yardage piled up in the middle of the field is meaningless if you can't score. We hit two really good pass plays, but other than that our passing game was almost non-existent. This was not a good game offensively. You know that. Given the level of our competition we did poorly. In college football it's not just about wins and losses - it's about how you win (or lose). You don't get into the Top 25 by playing tough, hard fought, competitive games against bottom feeders, which is what we've been doing ever since Rocky took over. Like a lot of others my patience for Rocky has worn out. Year seven that he's been a major contributor to both the coaching, game planning, and recruiting, year five that he's been in complete control - and our team is noticeably weaker than it was three years ago. That's all on Rocky Long. Did the game end at half - guess I missed that memo, and the memo about how the NCAA now gives you style points! Again, you're ignoring the fact we gained 400+ yards & outgained them by more than 4x, and playing position football is part of the game? Curious, when did the score begin not to matter? When did running the ball to within the 30 & scoring on a pass not count towards offensive scoring & total offense? Getting to the RZ is nice; getting THROUGH the RZ is even nicer. I'll take 3 plays of 26+ yards over 3 scores inside the RZ ANY DAY! If you don't think those passes were set up by the run you weren't paying attention.
BTW, how many times did THEY get into the RZ? Don't think that plays into the game day equation? 400 yards is a good day, even if you choose to turn a blind eye to it. Giving up less than 100 is even BETTER.
We know you hate Rocky - you only repeat yourself every day saying it. But don't pretend that Saturday's performance wasn't dominating in every aspect. It was. How many teams outgained their opponent 5:1 last week? How many coaches wouldn't take that type of performance?
Last I checked, FSU is in our conference & is the type of program we are judging ourselves against. We're not in the P12; we're not in the B12, nor are our resources anywhere near that level. We are a part of the FSU's, CSU's, BSU's, UM's, etc., whether you like it or not. It's the real world. Not too long ago many on this forum dubbed DeRuyter an "up & comer" on the coaching ranks, and FSU draws more fans than any program in the conference.
Finally, yes you can get into the top 25 playing hard nose football, no matter what conference you play in. You just need to win.
PS. On the recruiting front, how many OL & RB's wouldn't want to play for a team that rushes for over 300 yards, or how many HS defensive players wouldn't be excited by a team that absolutely shuts down their opponent? Players are smarter than most fans, and value more than how many points we score. Some look at that as an opportunity to play earlier. You can choose to only focus on the negative side, but don't think that's the only side of the coin by any means.
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 5, 2015 14:30:50 GMT -8
The gap in terms of ranking and recruiting between wins with style points and wins without style points (tough, hard fought games against weak opponents) is huge. Blow out a bad team and you prove that you belong among the top programs in the country. Struggle to beat a bad team and all you've proven is that you're slightly less bad than they are. Losses hurt you with recruiting unless you look really good in almost knocking off a ranked opponent. With the rankings a loss is almost always going to lose you a significant number of votes. Fact ... you need to win to get ranked -- losers don't get ranked. Once you start winning, you can worry about winning with style ... Winning programs attract recruits and top coaching prospects as well as the deference of voters in polls Dude, we were winning for five years and haven't even sniffed the Top 25! FIVE YEARS! Yes, you absolutely need to win to get ranked - but you also have to regularly beat tough opponents and blow out lesser opponents to get into the Top 25. Rocky hasn't done either one of those things. We were on cruise control for the first two years Rocky was in charge, but he accidentally bumped the control and turned it off and we've been slowing down for 2 1/2 seasons now.
|
|
|
Post by HighNTight on Oct 5, 2015 14:37:37 GMT -8
Fact ... you need to win to get ranked -- losers don't get ranked. Once you start winning, you can worry about winning with style ... Winning programs attract recruits and top coaching prospects as well as the deference of voters in polls Dude, we were winning for five years and haven't even sniffed the Top 25! FIVE YEARS! Yes, you absolutely need to win to get ranked - but you also have to regularly beat tough opponents and blow out lesser opponents to get into the Top 25. Rocky hasn't done either one of those things. We were on cruise control for the first two years Rocky was in charge, but he accidentally bumped the control and turned it off and we've been slowing down for 2 1/2 seasons now. DUDE ... How many times were we ranked in all those style losses that we racked up in the 3 decades prior to the last 5 years?
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 5, 2015 14:44:16 GMT -8
Did the game end at half - guess I missed that memo, and the memo about how the NCAA now gives you style points! Again, you're ignoring the fact we gained 400+ yards & outgained them by more than 4x, and playing position football is part of the game? Curious, when did the score begin not to matter? When did running the ball to within the 30 & scoring on a pass not count towards offensive scoring & total offense? Getting to the RZ is nice; getting THROUGH the RZ is even nicer. I'll take 3 plays of 26+ yards over 3 scores inside the RZ ANY DAY! If you don't think those passes were set up by the run you weren't paying attention. And how many points did we score against Fresno? 21. A lot less than San Jose State did (49). A lot less than Utah did (45). A hell of a lot less than Ole Miss did (73). Fresno has no defense. Not a real defense that can stop anyone. But they kept us out of the red zone all night long and held us to 21 points! And you need to WIN BIG! Win against tough teams. Win by four TD's or more against bad teams. Show that you BELONG in the Top 25. We haven't shown that since the Marshall Faulk era. And we're a lot farther away now than we were in 1995 & 1996. [/p]
PS. On the recruiting front, how many OL & RB's wouldn't want to play for a team that rushes for over 300 yards, or how many HS defensive players wouldn't be excited by a team that absolutely shuts down their opponent? Players are smarter than most fans, and value more than how many points we score. Some look at that as an opportunity to play earlier. You can choose to only focus on the negative side, but don't think that's the only side of the coin by any means.
[/quote] Those players want to WIN. And they want to win big! And they want to play for a nationally respected program. None of that applies to San Diego State football in the Rocky Long era. Your reluctance to admit that Rocky has us running in place (or, more accurately, walking ever so slightly backwards) is just indicative of a mindset that SDSU administrators are counting on. No pressure and a lot of patience. Under Rocky it will NEVER come (a Top 25 ranking). You damned well know that. He's never been that kind of coach, and he's never coached under a Top 25 type coach. He is a good, solid, win a couple more than you lose kind of coach. That's respectable, and even admirable, in a place like New Mexico, but here? Where we were the Boise State of the 70's? Where we were the school of Marshall Faulk? Where we were the school of multiple NFL players? It just doesn't fly. Look at all the empty seats. It isn't working.
|
|
|
Post by napo on Oct 5, 2015 14:46:02 GMT -8
Wins with style are worth a ton ... Wins without style points still go a long way towards recruiting and ranking Style points in a loss really don't get you much -- especially if those losses are numerous The gap in terms of ranking and recruiting between wins with style points and wins without style points (tough, hard fought games against weak opponents) is huge. Blow out a bad team and you prove that you belong among the top programs in the country. Struggle to beat a bad team and all you've proven is that you're slightly less bad than they are. Losses hurt you with recruiting unless you look really good in almost knocking off a ranked opponent. With the rankings a loss is almost always going to lose you a significant number of votes. To the statement in bold...do you really believe that? I guarantee you that if we blow out a team like unLv this board will be filled with, "Well we SHOULD beat that team so the win is meaningless" or "We only won by 30, should have been at least 45".
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 5, 2015 14:48:25 GMT -8
Dude, we were winning for five years and haven't even sniffed the Top 25! FIVE YEARS! Yes, you absolutely need to win to get ranked - but you also have to regularly beat tough opponents and blow out lesser opponents to get into the Top 25. Rocky hasn't done either one of those things. We were on cruise control for the first two years Rocky was in charge, but he accidentally bumped the control and turned it off and we've been slowing down for 2 1/2 seasons now. DUDE ... How many times were we ranked in all those style losses that we racked up in the 3 decades prior to the last 5 years? We were ranked in the Top 25 twice with Marshall Faulk. Granted, we didn't stay there, but we got in to the Top 25. With a mediocre offensive coordinator and less than average defensive coordinator! We got close in '95 & '96. But now? Not a chance. No way, no how. And we won't get there with Rocky. You and SDCoug both know that. We hit Rocky's ceiling in 2012. He has never and will never do better than that. His entire career has been no better, and usually worse, than that - both as a head coach AND as an assistant (coordinator or position coach). He's not suddenly going to learn how to build a Top 25 program. If he knew how to do it it would have been done by now. (Year 7/Year 5.)
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 5, 2015 14:50:40 GMT -8
To the statement in bold...do you really believe that? I guarantee you that if we blow out a team like unLv this board will be filled with, "Well we SHOULD beat that team so the win is meaningless" or "We only won by 30, should have been at least 45". When was the last time we won by 30? You're damned right I believe that there would be almost nothing but positive posts if that happened. We have been starved for a blowout win for years. This fanbase is dying to see one. No way in hell would we be upset about, "Only," winning by 30.... (Man, I STILL feel good about the late 80's blowout win over Utah here at home!)
|
|
|
Post by HighNTight on Oct 5, 2015 14:53:24 GMT -8
DUDE ... How many times were we ranked in all those style losses that we racked up in the 3 decades prior to the last 5 years? We were ranked in the Top 25 twice with Marshall Faulk. Granted, we didn't stay there, but we got in to the Top 25. With a mediocre offensive coordinator and less than average defensive coordinator! We got close in '95 & '96. But now? Not a chance. No way, no how. And we won't get there with Rocky. You and SDCoug both know that. We hit Rocky's ceiling in 2012. He has never and will never do better than that. His entire career has been no better, and usually worse, than that - both as a head coach AND as an assistant (coordinator or position coach). He's not suddenly going to learn how to build a Top 25 program. If he knew how to do it it would have been done by now. (Year 7/Year 5.) Like I said ... you can equate my support of the program with an affinity for Long if you wish, but it isn't the truth. I am a pragmatist that can see the actual flaws in the system and right now, Rocky is not one of them. You like to talk about how you hate the comparisons of Fisher to Long -- because Fisher has a better pedigree ... but here in year 5 of the building of a program -- they are tracking about the same. We could have replaced Fisher in Year 5 like you had called for because he "plateaued" and are now doing the same regarding Long (just this time the term is "regressed").
|
|
|
Post by tonatiuh on Oct 5, 2015 14:57:02 GMT -8
Simply boring football and not worth my money You know "giju" thats your opinion, and you're welcome to it! Sounds like you, and a good number of fans who left at half time missed the best part of the game which was the second half. Our Aztec QB even passed for two TD's in the second half, and both were Long passes. One for 33 yds to Penny, and one for 44 yds. to Judge. But, of course, you probably left, and that's OK. We won't miss you at the games, bye!
|
|
|
Post by napo on Oct 5, 2015 14:58:11 GMT -8
To the statement in bold...do you really believe that? I guarantee you that if we blow out a team like unLv this board will be filled with, "Well we SHOULD beat that team so the win is meaningless" or "We only won by 30, should have been at least 45". When was the last time we won by 30? You're damned right I believe that there would be almost nothing but positive posts if that happened. We have been starved for a blowout win for years. This fanbase is dying to see one. No way in hell would we be upset about, "Only," winning by 30.... (Man, I STILL feel good about the late 80's blowout win over Utah here at home!) We beat Northern Arizona and San Jose State LAST YEAR 38-7 in both games.
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 5, 2015 15:13:21 GMT -8
We were ranked in the Top 25 twice with Marshall Faulk. Granted, we didn't stay there, but we got in to the Top 25. With a mediocre offensive coordinator and less than average defensive coordinator! We got close in '95 & '96. But now? Not a chance. No way, no how. And we won't get there with Rocky. You and SDCoug both know that. We hit Rocky's ceiling in 2012. He has never and will never do better than that. His entire career has been no better, and usually worse, than that - both as a head coach AND as an assistant (coordinator or position coach). He's not suddenly going to learn how to build a Top 25 program. If he knew how to do it it would have been done by now. (Year 7/Year 5.) Like I said ... you can equate my support of the program with an affinity for Long if you wish, but it isn't the truth. I am a pragmatist that can see the actual flaws in the system and right now, Rocky is not one of them. You like to talk about how you hate the comparisons of Fisher to Long -- because Fisher has a better pedigree ... but here in year 5 of the building of a program -- they are tracking about the same. We could have replaced Fisher in Year 5 like you had called for because he "plateaued" and are now doing the same regarding Long (just this time the term is "regressed"). I never once called for Fisher to be replaced. EVER. Others did, and I argued that he took over a trainwreck of a program and because he did have 3 National Championship Games (and 1 Title) on his resume he had earned the benefit of the doubt. Rocky has never built a program better than we've seen in his tenure here. He never coached under a head coach who did better than 8-4 type seasons (with one exception of a 9-3 season, at UCLA if I remember correctly). Rocky never learned how to build and coach a dominant program. He doesn't have the ability to do it. Period. Rocky is clearly one of the BIGGEST flaws in the system. As I said before, you sound more scared than pragmatic. Afraid of change going bad. Afraid of taking a step backwards to where we were under Tom Craft (we'll never see another head coach at SDSU as bad as Chuck Long in our lifetimes, thankfully). But we're never going to take that first step up the ladder by trying to play it safe. It won't work - not with Rocky. If Rocky had done more somewhere at some time I would be willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. He hasn't. Not even as a coordinator or position coach. This is what he is, this is who he is, this is the best you're gonna get with Rocky. 7-5, 8-4, 7-5. That's it. And with his style of football it's killing attendance. It is no longer safe to keep him. He is hurting the perception of the program in the community. Don't talk to Aztec fans about it, talk to local fans who don't follow SDSU football. The locals who follow USC or UCLA. Ask them what they think about SDSU football. Small time is one answer you'll get. Loser is another (even though we've been winning - the perception is that we aren't because we lose almost as many games as we win and when we do win over bad teams it's a struggle). The truth is I like Rocky in a lot of ways. An old post was brought up where I was VERY supportive of Rocky early on in his tenure as head coach. But I can't support him being retained past this season as head coach. It just isn't working.
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 5, 2015 15:18:35 GMT -8
When was the last time we won by 30? You're damned right I believe that there would be almost nothing but positive posts if that happened. We have been starved for a blowout win for years. This fanbase is dying to see one. No way in hell would we be upset about, "Only," winning by 30.... (Man, I STILL feel good about the late 80's blowout win over Utah here at home!) We beat Northern Arizona and San Jose State LAST YEAR 38-7 in both games. I completely forgot about the SJSU game - the stench of the Poinsettia Bowl was the last thing I remembered about the 2014 season. Those were some great performances though. For both of those games. Will we see a score like that this year in our favor?
|
|