|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 5, 2024 20:05:13 GMT -8
Trump has no business talking about the stock market...when he was actively rooting for it to crash to exact a political vendetta against Biden and Harris. He wasn't exactly hiding it, either. He also has no business throwing stones when he owns 80% of the largest DJIA drops during his administration. So that's a bold strategy, but not one that is going to resonate with anyone who has the ability to use a computer. You need to actually do research on this stuff or you're just throwing out crap and seeing what sticks. The unemployment rate is 4.3%, it's gone up 0.6% since January. Unemployment under the Trump administration peaked at 14.8%, so yeah, another really bold strategy, but another fail. I've already talked about the debate enough, so not rehashing that. Was that high rate for unemployment during COVID? Also, I'm only mentioning what I think he'll try and use against Kamala. I'm not saying that it's a good strategy, but we all know he'll throw crap out there. So it's really not crap that I'm throwing out there because I'm sure he'll use it against her, and that administration, if he hasn't already. He'll say that it's the highest unemployment since 2021. It's up to people who are undecided to do research since he can throw some stuff out there that doesn't look good for the current administration at face value, and Kamala's past record, as well. Yes. But the *handling* of the pandemic resulted in catastrophic consequences through a serious of disastrous policy decisions that undermined public trust. Objectively, you're going to measure an administration based on the entirety of their term, where they started and where they finished, not a random snapshot in time. No administration or candidate is going to be perfect and satisfy the extreme tilting of both sides of the spectrum. There's no perfect candidate politically, economically, socially or any other determinative. If Trump wants to pull a battle of "pasts"....LOL. Good luck. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Aug 5, 2024 20:48:19 GMT -8
Was that high rate for unemployment during COVID? Also, I'm only mentioning what I think he'll try and use against Kamala. I'm not saying that it's a good strategy, but we all know he'll throw crap out there. So it's really not crap that I'm throwing out there because I'm sure he'll use it against her, and that administration, if he hasn't already. He'll say that it's the highest unemployment since 2021. It's up to people who are undecided to do research since he can throw some stuff out there that doesn't look good for the current administration at face value, and Kamala's past record, as well. Yes. But the *handling* of the pandemic resulted in catastrophic consequences through a serious of disastrous policy decisions that undermined public trust. Objectively, you're going to measure an administration based on the entirety of their term, where they started and where they finished, not a random snapshot in time. No administration or candidate is going to be perfect and satisfy the extreme tilting of both sides of the spectrum. There's no perfect candidate politically, economically, socially or any other determinative. If Trump wants to pull a battle of "pasts"....LOL. Good luck. Yeah, I agree that that's how a Presidents term should be judged. In totality. It just doesn't happen all the time. A lot of people will remember the gas prices and food prices under Trump, pre COVID and not take all of the mitigating factors into equation. I think it's still too early to tell who will win, since there hasn't been a debate (and yes I know your stance on debates) yet and/or a sit down interview asking Kamala some tough questions. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 6, 2024 7:20:06 GMT -8
Yes. But the *handling* of the pandemic resulted in catastrophic consequences through a serious of disastrous policy decisions that undermined public trust. Objectively, you're going to measure an administration based on the entirety of their term, where they started and where they finished, not a random snapshot in time. No administration or candidate is going to be perfect and satisfy the extreme tilting of both sides of the spectrum. There's no perfect candidate politically, economically, socially or any other determinative. If Trump wants to pull a battle of "pasts"....LOL. Good luck. Yeah, I agree that that's how a Presidents term should be judged. In totality. It just doesn't happen all the time. A lot of people will remember the gas prices and food prices under Trump, pre COVID and not take all of the mitigating factors into equation. I think it's still too early to tell who will win, since there hasn't been a debate (and yes I know your stance on debates) yet and/or a sit down interview asking Kamala some tough questions. You make a ton of speculative, general statements without any evidence to back it up. The reality is that the people you're talking about are likely Trump voters already, not anyone that's going to switch camps. Especially now, when Harris is polling better with certain demographics than Biden was. Simple math at this point, based on voter turnout participation, tells me that Trump needs to do a whole lot better with moderates than he currently is. And he has no real path to fix that, at this point. |
|
