|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 18, 2024 13:34:12 GMT -8
Trump cancels NRA speech...he's lost his stamina...lost his mental acuity...so they're hiding his dementia from the public/campaign view...trying to cross the goal line with the least attention to his physical/mental deterioration...meanwhile Harris is vigorously traversing the nation...spreading the good word: democracy. After Harris told Oprah that if anyone comes into her house, they will get blowen away with her Glock!. Ha! Ha! Ha! as she laughs. The gun control issue got flushed down the toilet after that interview. No need for Trump to speak at NRA event because they are all voting for Trump anyway. Doubt he is losing any steam with his performance at the New York Catholic Dioses fund raiser the other night. That guy never fumbles a name...kind of crazy for his age. |
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Oct 19, 2024 4:29:59 GMT -8
The UK invasion. The Labour Party is sending 100 current and former staff members to campaign for Kammie in North Carolina, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Virginia. This must be illegal as foreign election interference. Imagine the tantrum the left would throw if members of the Russian Duma did this on Trump’s behalf.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 19, 2024 7:28:10 GMT -8
The UK invasion. The Labour Party is sending 100 current and former staff members to campaign for Kammie in North Carolina, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Virginia. This must be illegal as foreign election interference. Imagine the tantrum the left would throw if members of the Russian Duma did this on Trump’s behalf. Not illegal. Netanyahu showing up to Mar-A-Lago, on the other hand... |
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Oct 19, 2024 9:30:32 GMT -8
The UK invasion. The Labour Party is sending 100 current and former staff members to campaign for Kammie in North Carolina, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Virginia. This must be illegal as foreign election interference. Imagine the tantrum the left would throw if members of the Russian Duma did this on Trump’s behalf. Not illegal. Netanyahu showing up to Mar-A-Lago, on the other hand...What's the difference? Come on, you got to admit if the Russians came to support Trump the left would go bananas. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Oct 19, 2024 9:43:46 GMT -8
Not illegal. Netanyahu showing up to Mar-A-Lago, on the other hand...What's the difference? Come on, you got to admit if the Russians came to support Trump the left would go bananas. ....they already are... |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Oct 19, 2024 10:09:33 GMT -8
What's the difference? Come on, you got to admit if the Russians came to support Trump the left would go bananas. ....they already are... Ha!!! |
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Oct 19, 2024 10:15:49 GMT -8
What's the difference? Come on, you got to admit if the Russians came to support Trump the left would go bananas. ....they already are... And exactly where are they within the USA? How many Russians are actively campaigning for Trump in the USA? Name them!!! Or perhaps you've missed the point. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 19, 2024 11:33:53 GMT -8
Not illegal. Netanyahu showing up to Mar-A-Lago, on the other hand...What's the difference? Come on, you got to admit if the Russians came to support Trump the left would go bananas. It's a major difference. It undermines foreign policy in the Middle East and it's a violation of the Logan Act. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecbrothers on Oct 19, 2024 11:42:11 GMT -8
The UK invasion. The Labour Party is sending 100 current and former staff members to campaign for Kammie in North Carolina, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Virginia. This must be illegal as foreign election interference. Imagine the tantrum the left would throw if members of the Russian Duma did this on Trump’s behalf. Not illegal. Netanyahu showing up to Mar-A-Lago, on the other hand... Why do you see Netanyahu visiting Mar-A-Lago as bad? |
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Oct 19, 2024 11:47:55 GMT -8
What's the difference? Come on, you got to admit if the Russians came to support Trump the left would go bananas. It's a major difference. It undermines foreign policy in the Middle East and it's a violation of the Logan Act. Come on, you even got to laugh at yourself on that one. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 19, 2024 11:56:31 GMT -8
It's a major difference. It undermines foreign policy in the Middle East and it's a violation of the Logan Act. Come on, you even got to laugh at yourself on that one. Definitely not laughing. Seems pretty easy to decipher that Trump wants Netanyahu to continue his path and Trump is a private citizen. You think Russian influences have to be in country to weaponize and propagandize their efforts? We live in an age of connectivity. |
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Oct 19, 2024 12:24:33 GMT -8
Come on, you even got to laugh at yourself on that one. Definitely not laughing. Seems pretty easy to decipher that Trump wants Netanyahu to continue his path and Trump is a private citizen. You think Russian influences have to be in country to weaponize and propagandize their efforts? We live in an age of connectivity. You need a mighty big shoehorn to make the the Logan Act fit here. You are not following the point. What you are endorsing, is that it is ok for UK elected officials (current and former) on US soil to campaign for your candidate. Then you are diverting the focus to an other elected official and not addressing the Russian officials. This is always your tactic, to divert and never address the issue outside of some lame attempt to focus on something immaterial. What you haven't addressed is it ok for Kammie to have her UK buddies (my latitude) campaign on US soil and not Russians to do the same for Trump. And I'll repeat, your side would go bonkers, major bonkers if that happened. US soil!!! For once, major on the majors and not major on the minors. I have faith you can do it. I'm in a far away time zone and it is getting late so the floor is yours. Goodnight. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecbrothers on Oct 19, 2024 12:37:06 GMT -8
Come on, you even got to laugh at yourself on that one. Definitely not laughing. Seems pretty easy to decipher that Trump wants Netanyahu to continue his path and Trump is a private citizen. You think Russian influences have to be in country to weaponize and propagandize their efforts? We live in an age of connectivity. Jimmy Carter went to North Korea in 1994 after his Presidency to address nuclear tensions. Was that a violation of Ryan's Law as well? In your age of connectivity, what is your main point to hate the Russians? It seems economists think that hating other countries is more like isolationism, and would lead to and create inflation for US Citizens/consumers. |
|
|
|
Post by bnastyaztecs on Oct 19, 2024 12:54:26 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecbrothers on Oct 19, 2024 13:30:58 GMT -8
Can you list the Clinton, Obama, Biden/Harris ties to China and Ukraine as well. It will be good to have equal representation between parties. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 19, 2024 16:20:44 GMT -8
Definitely not laughing. Seems pretty easy to decipher that Trump wants Netanyahu to continue his path and Trump is a private citizen. You think Russian influences have to be in country to weaponize and propagandize their efforts? We live in an age of connectivity. You need a mighty big shoehorn to make the the Logan Act fit here. You are not following the point. What you are endorsing, is that it is ok for UK elected officials (current and former) on US soil to campaign for your candidate. Then you are diverting the focus to an other elected official and not addressing the Russian officials. This is always your tactic, to divert and never address the issue outside of some lame attempt to focus on something immaterial. What you haven't addressed is it ok for Kammie to have her UK buddies (my latitude) campaign on US soil and not Russians to do the same for Trump. And I'll repeat, your side would go bonkers, major bonkers if that happened. US soil!!! For once, major on the majors and not major on the minors. I have faith you can do it. I'm in a far away time zone and it is getting late so the floor is yours. Goodnight. No, you don't. Private citizen meeting with foreign leader to undermine policy. Simplicity. It'll never be enforced, yes. It'll never be adjudicated, yes. I'm not diverting anything. Her name is Kamala, though. |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Oct 19, 2024 17:40:32 GMT -8
And exactly where are they within the USA? How many Russians are actively campaigning for Trump in the USA? Name them!!! Or perhaps you've missed the point. Money, money, money. Russians probably pouring unknown amounts of long green into the GOP PACs. |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Oct 19, 2024 17:44:47 GMT -8
What's the difference? Come on, you got to admit if the Russians came to support Trump the left would go bananas. It's a major difference. It undermines foreign policy in the Middle East and it's a violation of the Logan Act. Unfortunately, Trump didn't give a rats arse about the Hatch Act and Garland hasn't kicked 1 ass violating the Logan Act. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 19, 2024 17:47:48 GMT -8
It's a major difference. It undermines foreign policy in the Middle East and it's a violation of the Logan Act. Unfortunately, Trump didn't give a rats arse about the Hatch Act and Garland hasn't kicked 1 ass violating the Logan Act. It'll never be prosecuted. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Oct 19, 2024 17:58:12 GMT -8
I understand what you meant now. I thought you were referring to Liberals. My bad. |
|
