|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 16, 2024 7:54:59 GMT -8
One of the big stories with this that we haven't really talked about is how did the assassin get so close at an elevated position, AND the bystanders actually saw him and alerted police before he shot the president and three rally goers. Still not sure about the time frame. And I heard reports that a police officer tried to engage right before the shooting? Anyway, that definitely needs to be investigated. I tend to not think it is a conspiracy on either side, but rather incompetence. I had read that they're currently interviewing the officer who spotted the assassin and actually didn't engage him. We'll see.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 16, 2024 8:01:59 GMT -8
The DNC has been using CIA style destabilization tactics on the Trump campaign. See if any of this rings a bell for any of you liberal Dems. 1). Bombard the leader with controversy. 2). De platform….take away the leader’s ability to communicate with citizens/voters. 3). Drum up bogus investigations and phony legal proceedings. 4). Demonize the leader and stoke the fires of hostility against him/her. 5). Convince the public they are in imminent danger if leader is allowed to continue on. These are tactics used by the CIA to bring down dictators of foreign countries. They should never….ever….be used by politicians inside the borders of our country. Yet they have, by this White House. By the Joe Biden White House. If you are one of the people who has been affected by these tactics, I’m sorry, but you have been conditioned with a destabilizing campaign…….and infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome. Of course the weaker willed will not realize this has happened and completely deny they are affected. If that is the case, please stay peaceful. The only weak-willed person here is likely you. A complete and utter lack of self-awareness...but damn, the gaslighting is insane.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 16, 2024 8:03:08 GMT -8
One of the big stories with this that we haven't really talked about is how did the assassin get so close at an elevated position, AND the bystanders actually saw him and alerted police before he shot the president and three rally goers. Still not sure about the time frame. And I heard reports that a police officer tried to engage right before the shooting? Anyway, that definitely needs to be investigated. I tend to not think it is a conspiracy on either side, but rather incompetence. Inexperienced local police. Poor planning..and likely some cowardice mixed in.
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jul 16, 2024 10:14:08 GMT -8
The DNC has been using CIA style destabilization tactics on the Trump campaign. See if any of this rings a bell for any of you liberal Dems. 1). Bombard the leader with controversy. 2). De platform….take away the leader’s ability to communicate with citizens/voters. 3). Drum up bogus investigations and phony legal proceedings. 4). Demonize the leader and stoke the fires of hostility against him/her. 5). Convince the public they are in imminent danger if leader is allowed to continue on. These are tactics used by the CIA to bring down dictators of foreign countries. They should never….ever….be used by politicians inside the borders of our country. Yet they have, by this White House. By the Joe Biden White House. If you are one of the people who has been affected by these tactics, I’m sorry, but you have been conditioned with a destabilizing campaign…….and infected with Trump Derangement Syndrome. Of course the weaker willed will not realize this has happened and completely deny they are affected. If that is the case, please stay peaceful. The only weak-willed person here is likely you. A complete and utter lack of self-awareness...but damn, the gaslighting is insane. Oh please lemming. You have been consistently wrong about everything on this thread. -You advocated this was a staged event. WRONG! -You downplayed the level of danger President Trump was in. WRONG! -You dismissed the possibility that the heated political rhetoric was responsible for this situation. WRONG!! Both sides are agreeing to tone down the discord at least for now. And this is just in the first few pages! Your initial gut reaction, influenced by your severe TDS, has been completely off. Perhaps you need to adapt the Seinfeld/ George Costanza approach, where you advocate the opposite of what your initial instinctive response is. Maybe you will have a correct take for once. Please review my list again, you can easily check off everything this lawless Biden campaign and it’s constituents has done for the sake of political power.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 16, 2024 10:26:39 GMT -8
The only weak-willed person here is likely you. A complete and utter lack of self-awareness...but damn, the gaslighting is insane. Oh please lemming. You have been consistently wrong about everything on this thread. -You advocated this was a staged event. WRONG! -You downplayed the level of danger President Trump was in. WRONG! -You dismissed the possibility that the heated political rhetoric was responsible for this situation. WRONG!! Both sides are agreeing to tone down the discord at least for now. And this is just in the first few pages! Your initial gut reaction, influenced by your severe TDS, has been completely off. Perhaps you need to adapt the Seinfeld/ George Costanza approach, where you advocate the opposite of what your initial instinctive response is. Maybe you will have a correct take for once. Please review my list again, you can easily check off everything this lawless Biden campaign and it’s constituents has done for the sake of political power. - We have no proof of really anything yet. - He was never in any danger after the first three seconds. People in danger don't pose for photo ops or ask to get their shoes because they are afraid of their ego being damaged. - If the rhetoric was responsible, the shooter would be a Democrat. That's not the case. There's nothing to indicate or validate that assessment beyond your own paranoia. Perhaps you need to get a clue and learn how to consume information without a tilt towards propaganda. Sounds like a you problem. But you've been unserious from the jump, so, yeah. You still can't articulate why you have such a fervent and undying support for a con artist. He's not going to sleep with you. You are the epitome of individual selfishness over country and a three foot world. Evolve.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 16, 2024 11:01:00 GMT -8
Oh please lemming. You have been consistently wrong about everything on this thread. -You advocated this was a staged event. WRONG! -You downplayed the level of danger President Trump was in. WRONG! -You dismissed the possibility that the heated political rhetoric was responsible for this situation. WRONG!! Both sides are agreeing to tone down the discord at least for now. And this is just in the first few pages! Your initial gut reaction, influenced by your severe TDS, has been completely off. Perhaps you need to adapt the Seinfeld/ George Costanza approach, where you advocate the opposite of what your initial instinctive response is. Maybe you will have a correct take for once. Please review my list again, you can easily check off everything this lawless Biden campaign and it’s constituents has done for the sake of political power. - We have no proof of really anything yet. - He was never in any danger after the first three seconds. People in danger don't pose for photo ops or ask to get their shoes because they are afraid of their ego being damaged. - If the rhetoric was responsible, the shooter would be a Democrat. That's not the case. There's nothing to indicate or validate that assessment beyond your own paranoia. Perhaps you need to get a clue and learn how to consume information without a tilt towards propaganda. Sounds like a you problem. But you've been unserious from the jump, so, yeah. You still can't articulate why you have such a fervent and undying support for a con artist. He's not going to sleep with you. You are the epitome of individual selfishness over country and a three foot world. Evolve. You must admit that you said it was not a bullet. I don't understand how you can say, we really don't know anything yet. You apparently knew it wasn't a bullet. You didn't say it was possibly not a bullet. You said it wasn't even a bullet.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 16, 2024 11:12:41 GMT -8
- We have no proof of really anything yet. - He was never in any danger after the first three seconds. People in danger don't pose for photo ops or ask to get their shoes because they are afraid of their ego being damaged. - If the rhetoric was responsible, the shooter would be a Democrat. That's not the case. There's nothing to indicate or validate that assessment beyond your own paranoia. Perhaps you need to get a clue and learn how to consume information without a tilt towards propaganda. Sounds like a you problem. But you've been unserious from the jump, so, yeah. You still can't articulate why you have such a fervent and undying support for a con artist. He's not going to sleep with you. You are the epitome of individual selfishness over country and a three foot world. Evolve. You must admit that you said it was not a bullet. I don't understand how you can say, we really don't know anything yet. You apparently knew it wasn't a bullet. You didn't say it was possibly not a bullet. You said it wasn't even a bullet. I don't need you to tell me what you think I said. Secret Service sources said it was likely glass, we have no confirmation otherwise, to this point. I never said "We know it wasn't a bullet." We don't know what it was at this point. I'm skeptical, still, given the track record of Trump.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 16, 2024 11:24:06 GMT -8
- We have no proof of really anything yet. - He was never in any danger after the first three seconds. People in danger don't pose for photo ops or ask to get their shoes because they are afraid of their ego being damaged. - If the rhetoric was responsible, the shooter would be a Democrat. That's not the case. There's nothing to indicate or validate that assessment beyond your own paranoia. Perhaps you need to get a clue and learn how to consume information without a tilt towards propaganda. Sounds like a you problem. But you've been unserious from the jump, so, yeah. You still can't articulate why you have such a fervent and undying support for a con artist. He's not going to sleep with you. You are the epitome of individual selfishness over country and a three foot world. Evolve. You must admit that you said it was not a bullet. I don't understand how you can say, we really don't know anything yet. You apparently knew it wasn't a bullet. You didn't say it was possibly not a bullet. You said it wasn't even a bullet. Some actual thought-provoking questions: - Why is the medical team (whomever it was) deferring to the Trump campaign for any specifics on the treatment to Trump's injury? - Why is the Trump campaign sending out memos threatening staffers with termination if they go on the record to the media? - Why did Trump show up with a ridiculously oversized bandage last night at the RNC that wasn't even appropriate for the wound he claims to have? - As much as Trump likes to openly brag about virtually everything under the sun, we have heard nothing outside of the initial posting on Truth Social. Why?
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 16, 2024 11:39:25 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jul 16, 2024 11:52:02 GMT -8
You must admit that you said it was not a bullet. I don't understand how you can say, we really don't know anything yet. You apparently knew it wasn't a bullet. You didn't say it was possibly not a bullet. You said it wasn't even a bullet. I don't need you to tell me what you think I said. Secret Service sources said it was likely glass, we have no confirmation otherwise, to this point. I never said "We know it wasn't a bullet." We don't know what it was at this point. I'm skeptical, still, given the track record of Trump. Your takes are completely biased, and that is leading you to fallacious conclusions. That has been proven. Your continued plodding through inspite your numerous inaccuracies is both admirable and pathetic at the same time. You doggedly hang on to fallacies or pivot to something else which is usually weirdly off point and barely relevant. It usually involves Trump’s past involvements with pagents or other unfocused attacks from the DNC playbook. Please, no violence when the Trump landslide washes over your WOKE Barbie Dreamhouse.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 16, 2024 11:52:49 GMT -8
To speculate that Trump somehow staged this is pure insanity. With zero evidence you accuse the Secret Service?? The fact someone got close is inexcusable, however if you feel the need to point a speculative finger I suggest you look at who has the most to gain and the clearest motive. Either that or an outlier kook brainwashed by the “Trump is EVIL” narrative constantly droned on by the mainstream democrat controlled media. I hope “moanin Joe”, Joy Behare and all the other anti Trump media personalities report themselves to their nearest toilet….and flush themselves away for good. Seriously, they all stink to high heaven. That being said, this was a very close brush with death for President Trump, one inch to the left and the bullet goes in his eye socket and through his brain. Truly this man had some kind of divine grace looking after him. The bullet which almost killed Reagan was a ricochet off the presidential limousine. Right into his left lung, almost killed him on the spot. JSYK. The shooter turns out to be a registered Republican and a pro 2A individual...and Trump wasn't even hit by a bullet. The melodrama is unnecessary. What I THINK you said? "Trump wasn't even hit by a bullet." There ya go.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 16, 2024 11:56:20 GMT -8
I don't need you to tell me what you think I said. Secret Service sources said it was likely glass, we have no confirmation otherwise, to this point. I never said "We know it wasn't a bullet." We don't know what it was at this point. I'm skeptical, still, given the track record of Trump. You takes are completely biased, and that is leading you to fallacious conclusions. That has been proven. Your continued plodding through inspite your numerous inaccuracies is both admirable and pathetic at the same time. You doggedly hang on to fallacies or pivot to something else which is usually weirdly off point and barely relevant. It usually involves Trump’s past involvements with pagents or other unfocused attacks from the DNC playbook. Please, no violence when the Trump landslide washes over your WOKE Barbie Dreamhouse. You're a grown adult simping for a con artist who is a likely pedophile. If you're proud of that, which you obviously are, I mean...go for it. Outlandish fantasies aside, any time you want to compare track record of facts, I'm right here.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 16, 2024 11:56:49 GMT -8
The shooter turns out to be a registered Republican and a pro 2A individual...and Trump wasn't even hit by a bullet. The melodrama is unnecessary. What I THINK you said? "Trump wasn't even hit by a bullet." There ya go. We have no proof he was or wasn't.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 16, 2024 11:57:42 GMT -8
I don't need you to tell me what you think I said. Secret Service sources said it was likely glass, we have no confirmation otherwise, to this point. I never said "We know it wasn't a bullet." We don't know what it was at this point. I'm skeptical, still, given the track record of Trump. You takes are completely biased, and that is leading you to fallacious conclusions. That has been proven. Your continued plodding through inspite your numerous inaccuracies is both admirable and pathetic at the same time. You doggedly hang on to fallacies or pivot to something else which is usually weirdly off point and barely relevant. It usually involves Trump’s past involvements with pagents or other unfocused attacks from the DNC playbook. Please, no violence when the Trump landslide washes over your WOKE Barbie Dreamhouse. If my takes are biased, what are yours? Like...read the room. Have some kind of self-awareness. Just an absolute embarrassment. People who use the word "woke" are children.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 16, 2024 12:08:13 GMT -8
What I THINK you said? "Trump wasn't even hit by a bullet." There ya go. We have no proof he was or wasn't. You've changed your mind. Now you're not sure. Ok.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 16, 2024 12:09:18 GMT -8
We have no proof he was or wasn't. You've changed your mind. Now you're not sure. Ok. Not changed anything. We don't have enough information. Which should likely drive you to some critical thought as to why.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 16, 2024 12:11:03 GMT -8
Fellow student nicknamed "School Shooter." That says A LOT. They also said he was bullied, and a loner. These can be typical traits for a person of this nature.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 16, 2024 12:12:36 GMT -8
You've changed your mind. Now you're not sure. Ok. Not changed anything. We don't have enough information. Which should likely drive you to some critical thought as to why. No, you said it WASN'T a bullet. That's stating a fact. You've changed your tune. Why is it so difficult to admit you're wrong? That's a very bad trait to have.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 16, 2024 12:12:56 GMT -8
Fellow student nicknamed "School Shooter." That says A LOT. They also said he was bullied, and a loner. These can be typical traits for a person of this nature. Whoa.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 16, 2024 12:15:05 GMT -8
Fellow student nicknamed "School Shooter." That says A LOT. They also said he was bullied, and a loner. These can be typical traits for a person of this nature. Whoa. I know. For someone to be labeled "School Shooter" as in he would be the number one person they would think of if their school got shot up, is VERY telling. Put all the other adjectives they used together, and it can point somewhere.
|
|