|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 10, 2024 7:28:36 GMT -8
Biden, team waiting for trump's VP choice..then he steps aside. Are they that smart?
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 7:50:30 GMT -8
Biden, team waiting for trump's VP choice..then he steps aside. Are they that smart? Biden isn't dropping out. If Biden drops out, Trump wins.
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 10, 2024 7:51:47 GMT -8
Biden, team waiting for trump's VP choice..then he steps aside. Are they that smart? Biden isn't dropping out. If Biden drops out, Trump wins. Someone else runs against trump in November.
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 10, 2024 7:53:04 GMT -8
Harris / Whitmer
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 7:56:42 GMT -8
Whitmer is a governor. She's not running. Harris is your only alternative and the media will destroy her, too. It's Biden or bust. Stop feeding into the frenzy.
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Jul 10, 2024 8:59:17 GMT -8
Harris beats Trump.
The question is, does Joe admit that he's too old to be effective in the last two years of his next term? I have no doubt that he can be effective as President for the next two years, but his decline has started, and it's the last two years in 2027 and 2028 that I'd have concerns about. Harris could end up being President either way.
There are a lot of people who don't want to vote for Trump because they know what kind of a scumbag, anti-Democracy, arrogant, narcissistic, stupid POS he is, but they don't trust Biden because of his age. They'll vote for Harris.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 9:02:51 GMT -8
Harris beats Trump. The question is, does Joe admit that he's too old to be effective in the last two years of his next term? I have no doubt that he can be effective as President for the next two years, but his decline has started, and it's the last two years in 2027 and 2028 that I'd have concerns about. Harris could end up being President either way. There are a lot of people who don't want to vote for Trump because they know what kind of a scumbag, anti-Democracy, arrogant, narcissistic, stupid POS he is, but they don't trust Biden because of his age. They'll vote for Harris. Highly doubtful. The media will (and already has) smeared her, too. She's not popular, the right sees her as a DEI candidate and that'll be her downfall. If the media were to shut up about Biden, most of the outrage would blow over. She's the only nominee you could have, though, outside of Biden. Nobody else is realistic or has any shot in hell of winning. People who are voting for Biden are voting for the ticket.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 9:09:39 GMT -8
There's a stunning disconnect between the elites/media and the common voter. The former want to disenfranchise an untold number of people who voted overwhelmingly for Biden in the primary. Starting over, without a pile of cash, less than four months before ED with a new candidate is political suicide. And yet we're being forcefed this reality with fake headlines, non-storied, flat out lies from legacy media and pompous arrogance from reporters who are claiming "neutrality." Meanwhile, Trump goes off the rails last night with another nonsensical rally and it's not even acknowledged. The media is doing Trump's campaign for him.
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Jul 10, 2024 9:32:22 GMT -8
Harris beats Trump. The question is, does Joe admit that he's too old to be effective in the last two years of his next term? I have no doubt that he can be effective as President for the next two years, but his decline has started, and it's the last two years in 2027 and 2028 that I'd have concerns about. Harris could end up being President either way. There are a lot of people who don't want to vote for Trump because they know what kind of a scumbag, anti-Democracy, arrogant, narcissistic, stupid POS he is, but they don't trust Biden because of his age. They'll vote for Harris. Highly doubtful. The media will (and already has) smeared her, too. She's not popular, the right sees her as a DEI candidate and that'll be her downfall. If the media were to shut up about Biden, most of the outrage would blow over. She's the only nominee you could have, though, outside of Biden. Nobody else is realistic or has any shot in hell of winning. People who are voting for Biden are voting for the ticket. She already leads Trump in at least one poll (the only one I know of that has pitted them against each other). Once she started campaigning and running ads her lead would increase, not decrease. Trump's got his base, and people who don't believe Biden is capable of doing the job. Take away the people (independents and undecideds) who would have their fears about Biden's health/competence removed and all you're left with is about 37% of registered voters. Trump can't win without the undecideds in the middle, and he won't get them if it's someone other than Biden. The people in the middle hate Trump.
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 10, 2024 9:38:16 GMT -8
There's a stunning disconnect between the elites/media and the common voter. The former want to disenfranchise an untold number of people who voted overwhelmingly for Biden in the primary. Starting over, without a pile of cash, less than four months before ED with a new candidate is political suicide. And yet we're being forcefed this reality with fake headlines, non-storied, flat out lies from legacy media and pompous arrogance from reporters who are claiming "neutrality." Meanwhile, Trump goes off the rails last night with another nonsensical rally and it's not even acknowledged. The media is doing Trump's campaign for him. Nancy not sold, Stephanopolous, people that see him up close.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 9:42:26 GMT -8
Highly doubtful. The media will (and already has) smeared her, too. She's not popular, the right sees her as a DEI candidate and that'll be her downfall. If the media were to shut up about Biden, most of the outrage would blow over. She's the only nominee you could have, though, outside of Biden. Nobody else is realistic or has any shot in hell of winning. People who are voting for Biden are voting for the ticket. She already leads Trump in at least one poll (the only one I know of that has pitted them against each other). Once she started campaigning and running ads her lead would increase, not decrease. Trump's got his base, and people who don't believe Biden is capable of doing the job. Take away the people (independents and undecideds) who would have their fears about Biden's health/competence removed and all you're left with is about 37% of registered voters. Trump can't win without the undecideds in the middle, and he won't get them if it's someone other than Biden. The people in the middle hate Trump. www.forbes.com/sites/saradorn/2024/07/09/heres-how-kamala-harris-performs-in-polls-against-trump-as-she-emerges-as-most-likely-biden-replacement/Worse. And objectively false.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 9:42:46 GMT -8
There's a stunning disconnect between the elites/media and the common voter. The former want to disenfranchise an untold number of people who voted overwhelmingly for Biden in the primary. Starting over, without a pile of cash, less than four months before ED with a new candidate is political suicide. And yet we're being forcefed this reality with fake headlines, non-storied, flat out lies from legacy media and pompous arrogance from reporters who are claiming "neutrality." Meanwhile, Trump goes off the rails last night with another nonsensical rally and it's not even acknowledged. The media is doing Trump's campaign for him. Nancy not sold, Stephanopolous, people that see him up close. Read what Pelosi actually said, not the headline.
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Jul 10, 2024 10:43:31 GMT -8
Harris beats Trump. The question is, does Joe admit that he's too old to be effective in the last two years of his next term? I have no doubt that he can be effective as President for the next two years, but his decline has started, and it's the last two years in 2027 and 2028 that I'd have concerns about. Harris could end up being President either way. There are a lot of people who don't want to vote for Trump because they know what kind of a scumbag, anti-Democracy, arrogant, narcissistic, stupid POS he is, but they don't trust Biden because of his age. They'll vote for Harris. ![:rotfl](//storage.proboards.com/2927646/images/X_85tWleU_jbe4rBRRQN.gif)
|
|
|
Post by bnastyaztecs on Jul 10, 2024 11:01:57 GMT -8
Nancy not sold, Stephanopolous, people that see him up close. Read what Pelosi actually said, not the headline. Nancy was asked what she thought of Biden running...she did not answer that question...when asked does Biden have her support to run...she did not answer the question...when asked does she want Biden to run...she did not answer the question...Nancy knows how to answer questions directly...all she said was political speak...her non-answer answer spoke volumes.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 11:12:00 GMT -8
Read what Pelosi actually said, not the headline. Nancy was asked what she thought of Biden running...she did not answer that question...when asked does Biden have her support to run...she did not answer the question...when asked does she want Biden to run...she did not answer the question...Nancy knows how to answer questions directly...all she said was political speak...her non-answer answer spoke volumes. That does not equal this.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 10, 2024 11:16:22 GMT -8
Nancy was asked what she thought of Biden running...she did not answer that question...when asked does Biden have her support to run...she did not answer the question...when asked does she want Biden to run...she did not answer the question...Nancy knows how to answer questions directly...all she said was political speak...her non-answer answer spoke volumes. That does not equal this. It's not exactly endorsing. She certainly didn't refute, or lessen any of the claims going around about him.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 11:19:25 GMT -8
That does not equal this. It's not exactly endorsing. She certainly didn't refute, or lessen any of the claims going around about him. Is it a factual headline or not?
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 11:23:19 GMT -8
Something to note here: The Times updated the story, reflecting Pelosi's comments...but didn't change the headline.
Gee, I wonder why.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 11:28:09 GMT -8
MSNBC, quoting Senator Blumenthal: "I am deeply concerned" about Biden.
Let's go to the actual video of the interview:
|
|
|
Post by bnastyaztecs on Jul 10, 2024 11:33:58 GMT -8
Nancy was asked what she thought of Biden running...she did not answer that question...when asked does Biden have her support to run...she did not answer the question...when asked does she want Biden to run...she did not answer the question...Nancy knows how to answer questions directly...all she said was political speak...her non-answer answer spoke volumes. That does not equal this. Imagine if is she just would've said "YES!!"...instead of a political word salad...the headlines would've said "Democrat Congress Coalesce Behind Biden"...if Nancy would've said "yes" it would've been over with...especially after the Black Caucus, Hispanic Caucus, Jefferies, Schumer et el said they are "Ride'n with Biden!"...now he has another 24hr news cycle of negativity...that's Dem self-inflicted injuries...Trump needs to go into an inner-city golf course and help fix it up...trot out some falsely-convicted criminal...because he is threat to democracy because Dems are allowing him to be by acting/talking ignorantly about their nominee...who a lot of Dems don't like/will not vote for because of Gaza...this is real...how else can a man convicted of 34 felonies...had two impeachments...under (maybe) three more indictments...convicted of sexual assault...fraud...etc. be thought of as the best candidate to lead this nation?....
|
|