|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 10, 2024 11:35:53 GMT -8
It's not exactly endorsing. She certainly didn't refute, or lessen any of the claims going around about him. Is it a factual headline or not? No, it's not completely accurate, but her answer is still not what Biden would want to hear. Less than stellar. If the headline fit what she actually said, it would still not be a good headline.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 11:38:01 GMT -8
That does not equal this. Imagine if is she just would've said "YES!!"...instead of a political word salad...the headlines would've said "Democrat Congress Coalesce Behind Biden"...if Nancy would've said "yes" it would've been over with...especially after the Black Caucus, Hispanic Caucus, Jefferies, Schumer et el said they are "Ride'n with Biden!"...now he has another 24hr news cycle of negativity...that's Dem self-inflicted injuries...Trump needs to go into an inner-city golf course and help fix it up...trot out some falsely-convicted criminal...because he is threat to democracy because Dems are allowing him to be by acting/talking ignorantly about their nominee...who a lot of Dems don't like/will not vote for because of Gaza...this is real...how else can a man convicted of 34 felonies...had two impeachments...under (maybe) three more indictments...convicted of sexual assault...fraud...etc. be thought of as the best candidate to lead this nation? Lol, not even close. The Times and other outlets would just ignore the story or bury it. It doesn't sell, so they don't care. The pattern of coverage in recent weeks is obvious. And you're still harping about Gaza...
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 11:38:41 GMT -8
Is it a factual headline or not? No, it's not completely accurate, but her answer is still not what Biden would want to hear. Less than stellar. If the headline fit what she actually said, it would still not be a good headline. So, no, it's not factual, nor does it represent anything close to what she said. Good.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 10, 2024 12:04:45 GMT -8
No, it's not completely accurate, but her answer is still not what Biden would want to hear. Less than stellar. If the headline fit what she actually said, it would still not be a good headline. So, no, it's not factual, nor does it represent anything close to what she said. Good. They could have just as easily had an accurate headline of: "Pelosi doesn't exactly endorse Biden" or "Pelosi suggests Biden do what whatever he wants to do." Not good, at all, no matter how you slice it.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 12:24:24 GMT -8
So, no, it's not factual, nor does it represent anything close to what she said. Good. They could have just as easily had an accurate headline of: "Pelosi doesn't exactly endorse Biden" or "Pelosi suggests Biden do what whatever he wants to do." Not good, at all, no matter how you slice it. The truth...is what matters.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 10, 2024 14:32:22 GMT -8
It certainly doesn't help the cause when you have George Stephanopoulos say his true feelings, when he didn't know the cameras were on, saying that he didn't think Biden could serve another 4 years.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 14:41:08 GMT -8
It certainly doesn't help the cause when you have George Stephanopoulos say his true feelings, when he didn't know the cameras were on, saying that he didn't think Biden could serve another 4 years. Which he immediately reversed course on, once he realized the cameras were rolling. And it doesn't matter. The question everyone should be asking is WHY is legacy media trying this hard to shape this race? What's the endgame? Why the sudden upheaval over the last handful of weeks? Critical thinking....
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 10, 2024 14:47:00 GMT -8
It certainly doesn't help the cause when you have George Stephanopoulos say his true feelings, when he didn't know the cameras were on, saying that he didn't think Biden could serve another 4 years. Which he immediately reversed course on, once he realized the cameras were rolling. And it doesn't matter. The question everyone should be asking is WHY is legacy media trying this hard to shape this race? What's the endgame? Why the sudden upheaval over the last handful of weeks? Critical thinking.... Well yeah, he reversed his his coursed since the Company he works for is holding the next debate, and they distanced themselves from his comment which is a no brainer to do with the debate coming up. There's an all out assault on Biden because they realize America sees what they've been trying to monitor/hide for years now. It probably doesn't matter now if they keep Biden on the ticket, or not. It's probably a losing cause either way, but stranger things have happened.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 14:49:25 GMT -8
Which he immediately reversed course on, once he realized the cameras were rolling. And it doesn't matter. The question everyone should be asking is WHY is legacy media trying this hard to shape this race? What's the endgame? Why the sudden upheaval over the last handful of weeks? Critical thinking.... Well yeah, he reversed his his coursed since the Company he works for is holding the next debate, and they distanced themselves from his comment which is a no brainer to do with the debate coming up. There's an all out assault on Biden because they realize America sees what they've been trying to monitor/hide for years now. It probably doesn't matter now if they keep Biden on the ticket, or not. It's probably a losing cause either way, but stranger things have happened. And nope, this isn't it.
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 10, 2024 15:11:18 GMT -8
It certainly doesn't help the cause when you have George Stephanopoulos say his true feelings, when he didn't know the cameras were on, saying that he didn't think Biden could serve another 4 years. Which he immediately reversed course on, once he realized the cameras were rolling. And it doesn't matter. The question everyone should be asking is WHY is legacy media trying this hard to shape this race? What's the endgame? Why the sudden upheaval over the last handful of weeks? Critical thinking.... Clooney Juice tequila and mezcal is out.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 10, 2024 15:16:02 GMT -8
Well yeah, he reversed his his coursed since the Company he works for is holding the next debate, and they distanced themselves from his comment which is a no brainer to do with the debate coming up. There's an all out assault on Biden because they realize America sees what they've been trying to monitor/hide for years now. It probably doesn't matter now if they keep Biden on the ticket, or not. It's probably a losing cause either way, but stranger things have happened. And nope, this isn't it. Yes it is. You just happen to have your own all out assault on deflecting anything negative Biden.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 15:16:29 GMT -8
Which he immediately reversed course on, once he realized the cameras were rolling. And it doesn't matter. The question everyone should be asking is WHY is legacy media trying this hard to shape this race? What's the endgame? Why the sudden upheaval over the last handful of weeks? Critical thinking.... Clooney Juice tequila and mezcal is out. Yeah. He's got motives, too.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 10, 2024 15:17:56 GMT -8
Clooney Juice tequila and mezcal is out. Yeah. He's got motives, too. According to you EVERYBODY does if they don't align with your theories. Sheesh.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 15:22:40 GMT -8
No, it's not. You're just repeating what you think is obvious to the world, this isn't about what's obvious or it wouldn't be asked. You think the media is just figuring out Biden is old? I mean ..LOL. No, that's not it. You are repeating a Fox chyron, for all intents and purposes, complete with the same language. The media has a vested interest in limiting turnout and wanting a Trump victory. Most every major legacy outlet is owned by a Republican in some form or fashion. Trump equals ratings, which equals dollars, which gives blood to a dying organism (broadcast journalism.) They want chaos, they want division, they want a lack of unity. It brings clicks and revenue. And it's literally every...single...outlet. The disingenuous framing of headlines, the repetitive bias, the pandering, the pandemonium.... it's not even unique to Biden. We saw this in 2016, we saw it in 2012. The names change, the narrative doesn't.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 10, 2024 15:38:43 GMT -8
No, it's not. You're just repeating what you think is obvious to the world, this isn't about what's obvious or it wouldn't be asked. You think the media is just figuring out Biden is old? I mean ..LOL. No, that's not it. You are repeating a Fox chyron, for all intents and purposes, complete with the same language. The media has a vested interest in limiting turnout and wanting a Trump victory. Most every major legacy outlet is owned by a Republican in some form or fashion. Trump equals ratings, which equals dollars, which gives blood to a dying organism (broadcast journalism.) They want chaos, they want division, they want a lack of unity. It brings clicks and revenue. And it's literally every...single...outlet. The disingenuous framing of headlines, the repetitive bias, the pandering, the pandemonium.... it's not even unique to Biden. We saw this in 2016, we saw it in 2012. The names change, the narrative doesn't. You have your own all out assault on deflecting anything negative about Biden, and not acknowledging diddly squat. Disingenuous. You must not read my whole posts. I've said that the Media has no other option but to talk about Biden's health now, due to the disastrous debate performance. It's for all to see. Now that America has seen it, they're worried he can't beat Biden so they're panicking and doing they're best to see that there's a change. If they're all Republican, why has the Media been anti Trump for years and years? I don't speak the way I do due to watching Fox. If Fox is stating it with the same language as I, then that's because it's obvious stuff.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 15:45:24 GMT -8
Yeah. He's got motives, too. According to you EVERYBODY does if they don't align with your theories. Sheesh. Naive statement.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 10, 2024 15:48:01 GMT -8
According to you EVERYBODY does if they don't align with your theories. Sheesh. Naive statement. I don't think so. The proofs in the pudding. Everybody has a motive according to you.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 15:49:33 GMT -8
No, it's not. You're just repeating what you think is obvious to the world, this isn't about what's obvious or it wouldn't be asked. You think the media is just figuring out Biden is old? I mean ..LOL. No, that's not it. You are repeating a Fox chyron, for all intents and purposes, complete with the same language. The media has a vested interest in limiting turnout and wanting a Trump victory. Most every major legacy outlet is owned by a Republican in some form or fashion. Trump equals ratings, which equals dollars, which gives blood to a dying organism (broadcast journalism.) They want chaos, they want division, they want a lack of unity. It brings clicks and revenue. And it's literally every...single...outlet. The disingenuous framing of headlines, the repetitive bias, the pandering, the pandemonium.... it's not even unique to Biden. We saw this in 2016, we saw it in 2012. The names change, the narrative doesn't. You have your own all out assault on deflecting anything negative about Biden, and not acknowledging diddly squat. Disingenuous. You must not read my whole posts. I've said that the Media has no other option but to talk about Biden's health now, due to the disastrous debate performance. It's for all to see. Now that America has seen it, they're worried he can't beat Biden so they're panicking and doing they're best to see that there's a change. If they're all Republican, why has the Media been anti Trump for years and years? I don't speak the way I do due to watching Fox. If Fox is stating it with the same language as I, then that's because it's obvious stuff. I have read everything you post, painstakingly. It's still wrong. What have I not acknowledged? Biden is old. Asked and answered, covered to death. Boring, repetitive, uninteresting. So you think they have no choice? Uh, yeah, there's other news stories to cover in the universe than Biden mixing up his sentences, stumbling over an anecdote or whatever else. The media hasn't been anti-Trump. They serve their masters, depending on time of day, time of year, time of election. And no, it's because where you get your news is where you get your news.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 10, 2024 15:50:02 GMT -8
I don't think so. The proofs in the pudding. Everybody has a motive according to you. Because in the world of politics, they do.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 10, 2024 16:00:24 GMT -8
You have your own all out assault on deflecting anything negative about Biden, and not acknowledging diddly squat. Disingenuous. You must not read my whole posts. I've said that the Media has no other option but to talk about Biden's health now, due to the disastrous debate performance. It's for all to see. Now that America has seen it, they're worried he can't beat Biden so they're panicking and doing they're best to see that there's a change. If they're all Republican, why has the Media been anti Trump for years and years? I don't speak the way I do due to watching Fox. If Fox is stating it with the same language as I, then that's because it's obvious stuff. I have read everything you post, painstakingly. It's still wrong. What have I not acknowledged? Biden is old. Asked and answered, covered to death. Boring, repetitive, uninteresting. So you think they have no choice? Uh, yeah, there's other news stories to cover in the universe than Biden mixing up his sentences, stumbling over an anecdote or whatever else. The media hasn't been anti-Trump. They serve their masters, depending on time of day, time of year, time of election. And no, it's because where you get your news is where you get your news. No, you don't read my whole posts, or it's the reading comprehension thing, again. I never insinuated, or said that the Media is just now figuring out that Biden is old. I've repeatedly said that they've known, obviously, but they weren't talking about it in length like they are now, and were always diminishing it until they simply can't now. There's no hiding it anymore. Also, it's not his age more so than his diminishing mental faculties. The Media hadn't been Anti Trump? That's about as bad of a quote as when you said that Biden has been the best President in Modern History. Ugh. I will say that a lot of it was deservedly so.
|
|