|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 21, 2023 22:32:40 GMT -8
Go for it. (You won't) and I guarantee you that I can defend the opinion and expand on it. Still waiting for your proof. I'm getting bored. You're too easy. For just ONE example, you talked about how Trump raped some women. You claimed that if enough women say it, it must be true. Where there's smoke, there's before. It is possible that he committed crimes, but they only have their words to go on. No direct evidence, yet you're good with it since it's Trump. Now that there's an obvious situation where Biden obviously knows what Hunter's financials are and his payments, you play conveniently dumb, because it's not Trump. I believe that Trump has committed sexual abuse against women, but I doubt rape, just as I believe Biden DOES know most everything concerning Hunters financials, and payments. Some things are just no brainers. He was found civilly liable, in a court of law, by a jury, of sexual assault. Not my opinion. It happened. Might want to come to terms with that. He's being sued, for defamation of that victim, for the second time. You may want to excuse sexual assault, I do not. "It is possible that he committed some crimes." You think? He admitted to doing so on a nationally televised debate. Again, not my opinion. It happened. He admitted to retaining classified intelligence, he admitted to pressuring Georgia's SoS to find votes to overturn the election, he admitted ON VIDEO to sharing classified information to people without security clearances...and that's just two of the indictments he's facing. There's a MOUNTAIN of direct evidence against him There's a 40 page indictment floating around that goes into extremely specific detail. Again....LOL. I'm not playing dumb. I've said countless times if you can actually connect Joe Biden to a CRIME, prosecute him. That hasn't happened. The FD-1023, the only evidence displayed thus far, isn't credible. It's been investigated previously and nothing was found. Any theoretical prosecution would take place after he leaves office, due to the same policy that saved Trump. Your use of the word "obvious" makes it obvious you're just parroting talking points. Where's the proof? I want proof. And the judge overseeing the civil rape case disagrees with your assessment. Interesting to note that you delineate between sexual assault and rape, like one is seemingly no big deal and the other is not. Is this really the best you got? Because it's weak, predictable and fruitless. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 21, 2023 23:02:36 GMT -8
You're too easy. For just ONE example, you talked about how Trump raped some women. You claimed that if enough women say it, it must be true. Where there's smoke, there's before. It is possible that he committed crimes, but they only have their words to go on. No direct evidence, yet you're good with it since it's Trump. Now that there's an obvious situation where Biden obviously knows what Hunter's financials are and his payments, you play conveniently dumb, because it's not Trump. I believe that Trump has committed sexual abuse against women, but I doubt rape, just as I believe Biden DOES know most everything concerning Hunters financials, and payments. Some things are just no brainers. He was found civilly liable, in a court of law, by a jury, of sexual assault. Not my opinion. It happened. Might want to come to terms with that. He's being sued, for defamation of that victim, for the second time. You may want to excuse sexual assault, I do not. "It it possible that he committed some crimes." You think? He admitted to doing so on a nationally televised debate. Again, not my opinion. It happened. He admitted to retaining classified intelligence, he admitted to pressuring Georgia's SoS to find votes to overturn the election, he admitted ON VIDEO to sharing classified information to people without security clearances...and that's just two of the indictments he's facing. I'm not playing dumb. I've said countless times if you can actually connect Joe Biden to a CRIME, prosecute him. That hasn't happened. The FD-1023, the only evidence displayed thus far, isn't credible. It's been investigated previously and nothing was found. Any theoretical prosecution would take place after he leaves office, due to the same policy that saved Trump. Your use of the word "obvious" makes it obvious you're just parroting talking points. Where's the proof? I want proof. And the judge overseeing the civil rape case disagrees with your assessment. Interesting to note that you delineate between sexual assault and rape, like one is seemingly no big deal and the other is not. Is this really the best you got? Because it's weak, predictable and fruitless. Yes, he was found CIVILLY liable, but that's not all that difficult to prove there. Come to terms with it? Did you miss the part at the end of my post where I said I believe he committed sexual assault? Cherry picking again, I see. Like I said, I believe he sexually assaulted someone, which can also mean touching someone, which is a far cry from raping someone, although it's obviously still not good. Again, the burden of proof in a civil trial is MUCH more forgiving than in a criminal trial. You know that. Also, don't put words in my mouth to defame me by saying that I may be ok with sexual assault. You know where you can go with that comment, bud. Again, sexual assault can mean many things, from touching, to trying to rape you, but not being successful, all not good obviously, but actual rape is worse. It's the offender taking it to the next level, and succeeding. Of course you'll bring up all the other Trumpisms in your post, which I haven't even debated, even though we're talking about something else. You don't need to pour it on Ryan. We're all crystal clear on your stance. Sheesh. Hunter Biden's evidence is words, maybe more though, just like in Trump's sexual assault case, but you don't believe that because it's not Trump, but you'll believe the words of women who accuse Trump. Not shocking. They are both not the best of individuals. I happen to believe both are guilty of what they're accused of, and that Joe Biden obviously knows of his son's dealings, and payments. No bias with me. With you, of course. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 22, 2023 7:53:11 GMT -8
He was found civilly liable, in a court of law, by a jury, of sexual assault. Not my opinion. It happened. Might want to come to terms with that. He's being sued, for defamation of that victim, for the second time. You may want to excuse sexual assault, I do not. "It it possible that he committed some crimes." You think? He admitted to doing so on a nationally televised debate. Again, not my opinion. It happened. He admitted to retaining classified intelligence, he admitted to pressuring Georgia's SoS to find votes to overturn the election, he admitted ON VIDEO to sharing classified information to people without security clearances...and that's just two of the indictments he's facing. I'm not playing dumb. I've said countless times if you can actually connect Joe Biden to a CRIME, prosecute him. That hasn't happened. The FD-1023, the only evidence displayed thus far, isn't credible. It's been investigated previously and nothing was found. Any theoretical prosecution would take place after he leaves office, due to the same policy that saved Trump. Your use of the word "obvious" makes it obvious you're just parroting talking points. Where's the proof? I want proof. And the judge overseeing the civil rape case disagrees with your assessment. Interesting to note that you delineate between sexual assault and rape, like one is seemingly no big deal and the other is not. Is this really the best you got? Because it's weak, predictable and fruitless. Yes, he was found CIVILLY liable, but that's not all that difficult to prove there. Come to terms with it? Did you miss the part at the end of my post where I said I believe he committed sexual assault? Cherry picking again, I see. Like I said, I believe he sexually assaulted someone, which can also mean touching someone, which is a far cry from raping someone, although it's obviously still not good. Again, the burden of proof in a civil trial is MUCH more forgiving than in a criminal trial. You know that. Also, don't put words in my mouth to defame me by saying that I may be ok with sexual assault. You know where you can go with that comment, bud. Again, sexual assault can mean many things, from touching, to trying to rape you, but not being successful, all not good obviously, but actual rape is worse. It's the offender taking it to the next level, and succeeding. Of course you'll bring up all the other Trumpisms in your post, which I haven't even debated, even though we're talking about something else. You don't need to pour it on Ryan. We're all crystal clear on your stance. Sheesh. Hunter Biden's evidence is words, maybe more though, just like in Trump's sexual assault case, but you don't believe that because it's not Trump, but you'll believe the words of women who accuse Trump. Not shocking. They are both not the best of individuals. I happen to believe both are guilty of what they're accused of, and that Joe Biden obviously knows of his son's dealings, and payments. No bias with me. With you, of course. Nobody is putting your words in your mouth. You're just mind-pretzeling the hell out of this for no reason to be intentionallly argumentative. Sexual assault? Bad. Rape? Bad. Simple. And the JUDGE who oversaw the case disagrees with your assessment. You can't have it both ways, you screaming victim. You said "He may have committed crimes, but it's their words against his." Kinda hard to figure out what crimes you're referring to? Of course I'm going to bring up the 70+ felonies he's charged with. It illustrates a pattern of behavior. Perhaps you should address specific examples and make your explanations more succinct, but if you only want to talk about rape, have at it. Sorry, not sorry. What you are doing is textbook manipulation and victim shaming. You're attempting to draw a moral line between sexual assault, attempted rape and actual rape. All three acts are vile, disgusting and reprehensible. While they are charged differently in the legal system, there is very little difference in the trauma inflicted on the victim. (It's sick that I have to explain this to an adult who claims to be virtuous...) I believe the evidence, for what it's worth. So did the jury. Your pathetic attempts to explain away logic and jury findings as "You hate Trump" are unoriginal and dull. I despise people of all walks of life who are garbage human beings and broadcast that through their criminal activity. No bias with you....LOL. Newsflash: If you try to flimsily dance around different sexual misconduct, excusing the behavior indirectly and in the same breath say "I believe he is guilty of sexual assault" it comes across as disingenuous, hollow and cognizant that you know you sound like a miscreant. Not the way it works. You still have not shown anything resembling proof that your allegations are anything more than copying and pasting fiction. Where's the evidence? All you've done is show yourself to be void of character, dignity and empathy. Fantastic job. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 22, 2023 8:23:16 GMT -8
Yes, he was found CIVILLY liable, but that's not all that difficult to prove there. Come to terms with it? Did you miss the part at the end of my post where I said I believe he committed sexual assault? Cherry picking again, I see. Like I said, I believe he sexually assaulted someone, which can also mean touching someone, which is a far cry from raping someone, although it's obviously still not good. Again, the burden of proof in a civil trial is MUCH more forgiving than in a criminal trial. You know that. Also, don't put words in my mouth to defame me by saying that I may be ok with sexual assault. You know where you can go with that comment, bud. Again, sexual assault can mean many things, from touching, to trying to rape you, but not being successful, all not good obviously, but actual rape is worse. It's the offender taking it to the next level, and succeeding. Of course you'll bring up all the other Trumpisms in your post, which I haven't even debated, even though we're talking about something else. You don't need to pour it on Ryan. We're all crystal clear on your stance. Sheesh. Hunter Biden's evidence is words, maybe more though, just like in Trump's sexual assault case, but you don't believe that because it's not Trump, but you'll believe the words of women who accuse Trump. Not shocking. They are both not the best of individuals. I happen to believe both are guilty of what they're accused of, and that Joe Biden obviously knows of his son's dealings, and payments. No bias with me. With you, of course. Nobody is putting your words in your mouth. You're just mind-pretzeling the hell out of this for no reason to be intentionallly argumentative. Sexual assault? Bad. Rape? Bad. Simple. And the JUDGE who oversaw the case disagrees with your assessment. You can't have it both ways, you screaming victim. You said "He may have committed crimes, but it's their words against his." Kinda hard to figure out what crimes you're referring to? Perhaps you should address specific examples and make your explanations more succinct. Sorry, not sorry. What you are doing is textbook manipulation and victim shaming. You're attempting to draw a moral line between sexual assault, attempted rape and actual rape. All three acts are vile, disgusting and reprehensible. While they are charged differently in the legal system, there is very little difference in the trauma inflicted on the victim. (It's sick that I have to explain this to an adult who claims to be virtuous...) I believe the evidence, for what it's worth. Your pathetic attempts to explain away logic and jury findings as "You hate Trump" are unoriginal and dull. I despise people of all walks of life who are garbage human beings and broadcast that through their criminal activity. No bias with you....LOL. You still have not shown anything resembling proof that your allegations are anything more than copying and pasting fiction. All you've done is show yourself to be void of character, dignity and empathy. Fantastic job. I clarified TWICE that I believe he committed sexual crimes. Your personal definition of who I am is absolutely meaningless to me. You will take anything I say, and twist it to TRY and make me look bad. You'll be your dramatic self. I said none of it is good, obviously. Rape is next level evil. What you have shown, continually, is your bias towards ANYONE who has a different opinion than you, or challenges you in any way. You'll take the word of any person, not hard evidence against Trump, but you highly question the words of people and when it comes to any Biden. They're both horrible, Trump and Biden. If they used the same justice system as they do in a Civil Trial towards Hunter Biden, or Joe Biden, they would easily be found "likely" guilty. The lack of character you show concerning this is horrible. You can't have it both ways, but that's how you continually rationalize situations, concerning Trump and ANYBODY else. Your bias is full blown. Do you think that Hunter Biden received large payments, and Joe Biden knew about it? Do you think Joe Biden is guilty of bribery? Do you think Hunter Biden made a lot of money through his name only from many other countries, such as China, etc? I'll wait for your obvious answer. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 22, 2023 8:38:20 GMT -8
Nobody is putting your words in your mouth. You're just mind-pretzeling the hell out of this for no reason to be intentionallly argumentative. Sexual assault? Bad. Rape? Bad. Simple. And the JUDGE who oversaw the case disagrees with your assessment. You can't have it both ways, you screaming victim. You said "He may have committed crimes, but it's their words against his." Kinda hard to figure out what crimes you're referring to? Perhaps you should address specific examples and make your explanations more succinct. Sorry, not sorry. What you are doing is textbook manipulation and victim shaming. You're attempting to draw a moral line between sexual assault, attempted rape and actual rape. All three acts are vile, disgusting and reprehensible. While they are charged differently in the legal system, there is very little difference in the trauma inflicted on the victim. (It's sick that I have to explain this to an adult who claims to be virtuous...) I believe the evidence, for what it's worth. Your pathetic attempts to explain away logic and jury findings as "You hate Trump" are unoriginal and dull. I despise people of all walks of life who are garbage human beings and broadcast that through their criminal activity. No bias with you....LOL. You still have not shown anything resembling proof that your allegations are anything more than copying and pasting fiction. All you've done is show yourself to be void of character, dignity and empathy. Fantastic job. I clarified TWICE that I believe he committed sexual crimes. Your personal definition of who I am is absolutely meaningless to me. You will take anything I say, and twist it to TRY and make me look bad. You'll be your dramatic self. I said none of it is good, obviously. Rape is next level evil. What you have shown, continually, is your bias towards ANYONE who has a different opinion than you, or challenges you in any way. You'll take the word of any person, not hard evidence against Trump, but you highly question the words of people and when it comes to any Biden. They're both horrible, Trump and Biden. If they used the same justice system as they do in a Civil Trial towards Hunter Biden, or Joe Biden, they would easily be found "likely" guilty. The lack of character you show concerning this is horrible. You can't have it both ways, but that's how you continually rationalize situations, concerning Trump and ANYBODY else. Your bias is full blown. Do you think that Hunter Biden received large payments, and Joe Biden knew about it? Do you think Joe Biden is guilty of bribery? Do you think Hunter Biden made a lot of money through his name only from many other countries, such as China, etc? I'll wait for your obvious answer. John, if Biden and trump are "equally horrible"..danger to America. why can we easily find 100 former employees and insiders of trump that say that...find me one for Biden. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 22, 2023 8:47:11 GMT -8
I clarified TWICE that I believe he committed sexual crimes. Your personal definition of who I am is absolutely meaningless to me. You will take anything I say, and twist it to TRY and make me look bad. You'll be your dramatic self. I said none of it is good, obviously. Rape is next level evil. What you have shown, continually, is your bias towards ANYONE who has a different opinion than you, or challenges you in any way. You'll take the word of any person, not hard evidence against Trump, but you highly question the words of people and when it comes to any Biden. They're both horrible, Trump and Biden. If they used the same justice system as they do in a Civil Trial towards Hunter Biden, or Joe Biden, they would easily be found "likely" guilty. The lack of character you show concerning this is horrible. You can't have it both ways, but that's how you continually rationalize situations, concerning Trump and ANYBODY else. Your bias is full blown. Do you think that Hunter Biden received large payments, and Joe Biden knew about it? Do you think Joe Biden is guilty of bribery? Do you think Hunter Biden made a lot of money through his name only from many other countries, such as China, etc? I'll wait for your obvious answer. John, if Biden and trump are "equally horrible"..danger to America. why can we easily find 100 former employees and insiders of trump that say that...find me one for Biden. Yes, I've said many times before that I think Trump is more horrible than Biden, but forget to add that at times. My posts above ate to show how Ryan will want concrete proof with Hunter and Joe Biden, but is ok with just the words when it comes to any other politician who may side with Trump, and especially Trump himself. I'm pretty much done talking about these two politicians, and comparing their faults. They're both horrible. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 22, 2023 8:50:24 GMT -8
Nobody is putting your words in your mouth. You're just mind-pretzeling the hell out of this for no reason to be intentionallly argumentative. Sexual assault? Bad. Rape? Bad. Simple. And the JUDGE who oversaw the case disagrees with your assessment. You can't have it both ways, you screaming victim. You said "He may have committed crimes, but it's their words against his." Kinda hard to figure out what crimes you're referring to? Perhaps you should address specific examples and make your explanations more succinct. Sorry, not sorry. What you are doing is textbook manipulation and victim shaming. You're attempting to draw a moral line between sexual assault, attempted rape and actual rape. All three acts are vile, disgusting and reprehensible. While they are charged differently in the legal system, there is very little difference in the trauma inflicted on the victim. (It's sick that I have to explain this to an adult who claims to be virtuous...) I believe the evidence, for what it's worth. Your pathetic attempts to explain away logic and jury findings as "You hate Trump" are unoriginal and dull. I despise people of all walks of life who are garbage human beings and broadcast that through their criminal activity. No bias with you....LOL. You still have not shown anything resembling proof that your allegations are anything more than copying and pasting fiction. All you've done is show yourself to be void of character, dignity and empathy. Fantastic job. I clarified TWICE that I believe he committed sexual crimes. Your personal definition of who I am is absolutely meaningless to me. You will take anything I say, and twist it to TRY and make me look bad. You'll be your dramatic self. I said none of it is good, obviously. Rape is next level evil. What you have shown, continually, is your bias towards ANYONE who has a different opinion than you, or challenges you in any way. You'll take the word of any person, not hard evidence against Trump, but you highly question the words of people and when it comes to any Biden. They're both horrible, Trump and Biden. If they used the same justice system as they do in a Civil Trial towards Hunter Biden, or Joe Biden, they would easily be found "likely" guilty. The lack of character you show concerning this is horrible. You can't have it both ways, but that's how you continually rationalize situations, concerning Trump and ANYBODY else. Your bias is full blown. Do you think that Hunter Biden received large payments, and Joe Biden knew about it? Do you think Joe Biden is guilty of bribery? Do you think Hunter Biden made a lot of money through his name only from many other countries, such as China, etc? I'll wait for your obvious answer. You think this is a challenge? Read your posts. You wildly contradict and flip flop....then double down on your original stance for cover. You just did it again with this post, defending Trump and then claiming he's guilty. Again, it's textbook manipulation. I don't have to, because it's very simple. All sex crimes are evil and there's no amount of twisting that is required to change that. If Hunter Biden was charged with rape, I'd have the same stance. Scum behavior is scum behavior. I highly question the words of people who have shown zero integrity or fact-finding neutrality. When someone in charge of an investigation says "We don't care if the charges are accurate"....that raises red warning flags. When a whistleblower is testifying and it comes out, under oath, that they were paid to testify against Biden by a Trump advisor, that raises red warning flags, as it's an easy conflict of interest. When James Comer says, on record, that they can't produce the evidence....again, red warning flags. What you are missing is the actual evidence. You parroting back statements to me shows me nothing. Sorry. But to actually answer your question: Receiving payments is not a crime. It's irrelevant if Joe Biden knew that Hunter was receiving money from a foreign entity unless there's a crime attached to it. Unless Joe Biden himself can be tied to money laundering, bribery, extortion, blackmail, et al... it's nothing. Again, this FD-1023, what the entire case is built on has already been investigated. The claims couldn't be verified and even former Trump associates are casting doubt on its legitimacy. Both Hunter and his father were cleared of wrongdoing. Hunter was investigated by Trump's DOJ and they found...nothing. Evidence. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 22, 2023 8:51:05 GMT -8
John, if Biden and trump are "equally horrible"..danger to America. why can we easily find 100 former employees and insiders of trump that say that...find me one for Biden. Yes, I've said many times before that I think Trump is more horrible than Biden, but forget to add that at times. well if Biden is even "horrible" as a human being..not saying he may be incompetent in some areas... why can't you find one? The person who accused Biden of "groping" was not credible and defected to Russia of all places!! |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 22, 2023 8:57:24 GMT -8
I clarified TWICE that I believe he committed sexual crimes. Your personal definition of who I am is absolutely meaningless to me. You will take anything I say, and twist it to TRY and make me look bad. You'll be your dramatic self. I said none of it is good, obviously. Rape is next level evil. What you have shown, continually, is your bias towards ANYONE who has a different opinion than you, or challenges you in any way. You'll take the word of any person, not hard evidence against Trump, but you highly question the words of people and when it comes to any Biden. They're both horrible, Trump and Biden. If they used the same justice system as they do in a Civil Trial towards Hunter Biden, or Joe Biden, they would easily be found "likely" guilty. The lack of character you show concerning this is horrible. You can't have it both ways, but that's how you continually rationalize situations, concerning Trump and ANYBODY else. Your bias is full blown. Do you think that Hunter Biden received large payments, and Joe Biden knew about it? Do you think Joe Biden is guilty of bribery? Do you think Hunter Biden made a lot of money through his name only from many other countries, such as China, etc? I'll wait for your obvious answer. You think this is a challenge? Read your posts. You wildly contradict and flip flop....then double down on your original stance for cover. You just did it again with this post, defending Trump and then claiming he's guilty. Again, it's textbook manipulation. I don't have to, because it's very simple. All sex crimes are evil and there's no amount of twisting that is required to change that. If Hunter Biden was charged with rape, I'd have the same stance. Scum behavior is scum behavior. I highly question the words of people who have shown zero integrity or fact-finding neutrality. When someone in charge of an investigation says "We don't care if the charges are accurate"....that raises red warning flags. When a whistleblower is testifying and it comes out, under oath, that they were paid to testify against Biden by a Trump advisor, that raises red warning flags, as it's an easy conflict of interest. When James Comer says, on record, that they can't produce the evidence....again, red warning flags. What you are missing is the actual evidence. You parroting back statements to me shows me nothing. Sorry. But to actually answer your question: Receiving payments is not a crime. It's irrelevant if Joe Biden knew that Hunter was receiving money from a foreign entity unless there's a crime attached to it. Unless Joe Biden himself can be tied to money laundering, bribery, extortion, blackmail, et al... it's nothing. Again, this FD-1023, what the entire case is built on has already been investigated. Both Hunter and his father were cleared of wrongdoing. Hunter was investigated by Trump's DOJ and they found...nothing. Evidence. Doubling down? It's just a simple example. You'll take the words of someone, and the obvious, when it comes to Trump, but when it comes to the Biden's, you say you want concrete proof. I said that I think they're BOTH guilty, but you have a bias when it comes to Trump and will give everybody else the benefit of the doubt. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 22, 2023 9:07:21 GMT -8
You think this is a challenge? Read your posts. You wildly contradict and flip flop....then double down on your original stance for cover. You just did it again with this post, defending Trump and then claiming he's guilty. Again, it's textbook manipulation. I don't have to, because it's very simple. All sex crimes are evil and there's no amount of twisting that is required to change that. If Hunter Biden was charged with rape, I'd have the same stance. Scum behavior is scum behavior. I highly question the words of people who have shown zero integrity or fact-finding neutrality. When someone in charge of an investigation says "We don't care if the charges are accurate"....that raises red warning flags. When a whistleblower is testifying and it comes out, under oath, that they were paid to testify against Biden by a Trump advisor, that raises red warning flags, as it's an easy conflict of interest. When James Comer says, on record, that they can't produce the evidence....again, red warning flags. What you are missing is the actual evidence. You parroting back statements to me shows me nothing. Sorry. But to actually answer your question: Receiving payments is not a crime. It's irrelevant if Joe Biden knew that Hunter was receiving money from a foreign entity unless there's a crime attached to it. Unless Joe Biden himself can be tied to money laundering, bribery, extortion, blackmail, et al... it's nothing. Again, this FD-1023, what the entire case is built on has already been investigated. Both Hunter and his father were cleared of wrongdoing. Hunter was investigated by Trump's DOJ and they found...nothing. Evidence. Doubling down? It's just a simple example. You'll take the words of someone, and the obvious, when it comes to Trump, but when it comes to the Biden's, you say you want concrete proof. I said that I think they're BOTH guilty, but you have a bias when it comes to Trump and will give everybody else the benefit of the doubt. Whose word am I taking against Trump? His own? You really want to go that route? Okay. Isolating to the civil rape case and ignoring everything else. - Trump called Carroll "not his type"....and then confused her for his former wife in a picture. - Trump claimed he didn't know Carroll, despite photographic evidence to the contrary. - Trump claimed the civil suit was a ploy for Carroll to "boost her book sales." - Trump called Carroll a "nut job" and "mentally sick." When someone in a deposition doesn't do anything but insult the victim and her attorney with repeated misogynistic statements, yeah, that's not a screaming endorsement for innocence. The jury found him liable, not me. Now, back to the full scope. Not faithfully ignoring a decades long history of criminal activity, lawsuits, repeated actions of racial bias and inflammatory statements gives me a whole lot of credence to believe that things are more likely than not, true. Read the indictment in the documents case, then get back to me with actual doubt. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 22, 2023 10:18:29 GMT -8
Doubling down? It's just a simple example. You'll take the words of someone, and the obvious, when it comes to Trump, but when it comes to the Biden's, you say you want concrete proof. I said that I think they're BOTH guilty, but you have a bias when it comes to Trump and will give everybody else the benefit of the doubt. Whose word am I taking against Trump? His own? You really want to go that route? Okay. Isolating to the civil rape case and ignoring everything else. - Trump called Carroll "not his type"....and then confused her for his former wife in a picture. - Trump claimed he didn't know Carroll, despite photographic evidence to the contrary. - Trump claimed the civil suit was a ploy for Carroll to "boost her book sales." - Trump called Carroll a "nut job" and "mentally sick." When someone in a deposition doesn't do anything but insult the victim and her attorney with repeated misogynistic statements, yeah, that's not a screaming endorsement for innocence. The jury found him liable, not me. Now, back to the full scope. Not faithfully ignoring a decades long history of criminal activity, lawsuits, repeated actions of racial bias and inflammatory statements gives me a whole lot of credence to believe that things are more likely than not, true. Read the indictment in the documents case, then get back to me with actual doubt. All he does is insult her? Cherry picking at its finest, AGAIN. He also said he didn't do it, etc..... See how you pile on with your accusations, but only the accusations you want to bring up? Again, it was a Civil Case, much easier to convict there. I think he did commit unwanted sexual advances on women, but I'd like it to have gone to a criminal trial to see the hard evidence, and if there were any, I would have liked to have seen him go to jail, for a very long time. Answer the question. Do you think it's likely that Hunter Biden received large sums of money from China and other countries? Do you think Joe Biden is guilty of bribery? |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 22, 2023 10:37:57 GMT -8
Whose word am I taking against Trump? His own? You really want to go that route? Okay. Isolating to the civil rape case and ignoring everything else. - Trump called Carroll "not his type"....and then confused her for his former wife in a picture. - Trump claimed he didn't know Carroll, despite photographic evidence to the contrary. - Trump claimed the civil suit was a ploy for Carroll to "boost her book sales." - Trump called Carroll a "nut job" and "mentally sick." When someone in a deposition doesn't do anything but insult the victim and her attorney with repeated misogynistic statements, yeah, that's not a screaming endorsement for innocence. The jury found him liable, not me. Now, back to the full scope. Not faithfully ignoring a decades long history of criminal activity, lawsuits, repeated actions of racial bias and inflammatory statements gives me a whole lot of credence to believe that things are more likely than not, true. Read the indictment in the documents case, then get back to me with actual doubt. All he does is insult her? Cherry picking at its finest, AGAIN. He also said he didn't do it, etc..... See how you pile on with your accusations, but only the accusations you want to bring up? Again, it was a Civil Case, much easier to convict there. I think he did commit unwanted sexual advances on women, but I'd like it to have gone to a criminal trial to see the hard evidence, and if there were any, I would have liked to have seen him go to jail, for a very long time. Answer the question. Do you think it's likely that Hunter Biden received large sums of money from China and other countries? Do you think Joe Biden is guilty of bribery? "He said he didn't do it". John, maybe you have noticed..trump has never admitted wrong doing in his life!! Deny deny deny is in his playbook. Remember when he said he believed Putin over our intelligence agencies...because Putin denied it! Peas in a pod. In other words..the fact that Trump denies something has absolutely nothing to do with what is true. As far as him and women...there is the famous tape of trump saying he likes to hang around Epstein..cause he's a fun guy. trump says "he likes em on the younger side"(regarding Epstein).how would he know? Not to mention comments on Howard Stern sexualizing his own daughter. This guy is the lowest form of life.. but unfortunately is an expert at manipulation. You might check out a re ent town hall where he is asked how his "faith" has strengthened since 2016. The word salad answer is obviously the biggest stream of bull$#!+ you will ever hear. Shyster #1 of all time...2nd place ..maybe PT Barnam. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 22, 2023 12:05:05 GMT -8
All he does is insult her? Cherry picking at its finest, AGAIN. He also said he didn't do it, etc..... See how you pile on with your accusations, but only the accusations you want to bring up? Again, it was a Civil Case, much easier to convict there. I think he did commit unwanted sexual advances on women, but I'd like it to have gone to a criminal trial to see the hard evidence, and if there were any, I would have liked to have seen him go to jail, for a very long time. Answer the question. Do you think it's likely that Hunter Biden received large sums of money from China and other countries? Do you think Joe Biden is guilty of bribery? "He said he didn't do it". John, maybe you have noticed..trump has never admitted wrong doing in his life!! Deny deny deny is in his playbook. Remember when he said he believed Putin over our intelligence agencies...because Putin denied it! Peas in a pod. In other words..the fact that Trump denies something has absolutely nothing to do with what is true. As far as him and women...there is the famous tape of trump saying he likes to hang around Epstein..cause he's a fun guy. trump says "he likes em on the younger side"(regarding Epstein).how would he know? Not to mention comments on Howard Stern sexualizing his own daughter. This guy is the lowest form of life.. but unfortunately is an expert at manipulation. You might check out a re ent town hall where he is asked how his "faith" has strengthened since 2016. The word salad answer is obviously the biggest stream of bull$#!+ you will ever hear. Shyster #1 of all time...2nd place ..maybe PT Barnam. I only brought up that Trump also denied it, because Ryan had said that all he did was insult her and that made him look guilty. I think he's guilty of some type sexual assault. I also think the Biden's are as corrupt, in other ways, as all get go, just like a lot of politicians. Trump takes the cake when it comes to sleazy, though, etc... |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 22, 2023 12:18:30 GMT -8
Whose word am I taking against Trump? His own? You really want to go that route? Okay. Isolating to the civil rape case and ignoring everything else. - Trump called Carroll "not his type"....and then confused her for his former wife in a picture. - Trump claimed he didn't know Carroll, despite photographic evidence to the contrary. - Trump claimed the civil suit was a ploy for Carroll to "boost her book sales." - Trump called Carroll a "nut job" and "mentally sick." When someone in a deposition doesn't do anything but insult the victim and her attorney with repeated misogynistic statements, yeah, that's not a screaming endorsement for innocence. The jury found him liable, not me. Now, back to the full scope. Not faithfully ignoring a decades long history of criminal activity, lawsuits, repeated actions of racial bias and inflammatory statements gives me a whole lot of credence to believe that things are more likely than not, true. Read the indictment in the documents case, then get back to me with actual doubt. All he does is insult her? Cherry picking at its finest, AGAIN. He also said he didn't do it, etc..... See how you pile on with your accusations, but only the accusations you want to bring up? Again, it was a Civil Case, much easier to convict there. I think he did commit unwanted sexual advances on women, but I'd like it to have gone to a criminal trial to see the hard evidence, and if there were any, I would have liked to have seen him go to jail, for a very long time. Answer the question. Do you think it's likely that Hunter Biden received large sums of money from China and other countries? Do you think Joe Biden is guilty of bribery? I already answered this. Not wasting my time repeating it so you can deflect with nonsensical retorts like what you just posted. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 22, 2023 13:32:47 GMT -8
"He said he didn't do it". John, maybe you have noticed..trump has never admitted wrong doing in his life!! Deny deny deny is in his playbook. Remember when he said he believed Putin over our intelligence agencies...because Putin denied it! Peas in a pod. In other words..the fact that Trump denies something has absolutely nothing to do with what is true. As far as him and women...there is the famous tape of trump saying he likes to hang around Epstein..cause he's a fun guy. trump says "he likes em on the younger side"(regarding Epstein).how would he know? Not to mention comments on Howard Stern sexualizing his own daughter. This guy is the lowest form of life.. but unfortunately is an expert at manipulation. You might check out a re ent town hall where he is asked how his "faith" has strengthened since 2016. The word salad answer is obviously the biggest stream of bull$#!+ you will ever hear. Shyster #1 of all time...2nd place ..maybe PT Barnam. I only brought up that Trump also denied it, because Ryan had said that all he did was insult her and that made him look guilty. I think he's guilty of some type sexual assault. I also think the Biden's are as corrupt, in other ways, as all get go, just like a lot of politicians. Trump takes the cake when it comes to sleazy, though, etc... This doesn't make you brave, just so you know. I brought up direct quotes from the deposition where he verbally attacked both Carroll and her attorney, which is highly unethical and not common. If you want to get caught up in the stupidity of "Well he also said he didn't do it while claiming he wasn't her type"....go for it. It shows a lack of comprehension and it doesn't change my point. Statute of limitations had long expired before the lawsuit, making a criminal case impossible. The trauma is the reason women don't come forward. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 22, 2023 13:54:06 GMT -8
I only brought up that Trump also denied it, because Ryan had said that all he did was insult her and that made him look guilty. I think he's guilty of some type sexual assault. I also think the Biden's are as corrupt, in other ways, as all get go, just like a lot of politicians. Trump takes the cake when it comes to sleazy, though, etc... This doesn't make you brave, just so you know. I brought up direct quotes from the deposition where he verbally attacked both Carroll and her attorney, which is highly unethical and not common. If you want to get caught up in the stupidity of "Well he also said he didn't do it while claiming he wasn't her type"....go for it. It shows a lack of comprehension and it doesn't change my point. Statute of limitations had long expired before the lawsuit, making a criminal case impossible. The trauma is the reason women don't come forward. Make me brave??? Geeze, your mind sure does wander off to ridiculous avenues. Mr Dramatic arrived once again!!! Ryan, the reacher, is what you should be called. Sheesh. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 22, 2023 14:55:06 GMT -8
This doesn't make you brave, just so you know. I brought up direct quotes from the deposition where he verbally attacked both Carroll and her attorney, which is highly unethical and not common. If you want to get caught up in the stupidity of "Well he also said he didn't do it while claiming he wasn't her type"....go for it. It shows a lack of comprehension and it doesn't change my point. Statute of limitations had long expired before the lawsuit, making a criminal case impossible. The trauma is the reason women don't come forward. Make me brave??? Geeze, your mind sure does wander off to ridiculous avenues. Mr Dramatic arrived once again!!! Ryan, the reacher, is what you should be called. Sheesh. Nope, just call it like I see it. When you defend scum of the Earth people and then try to explain it away with "Well I think he's guilty of ________" it renders your sincerity pretty obsolete. It's perfectly fine to take a hardened stance and not talk out of both sides of your mouth. Still waiting for the proof you said you would provide of Biden's improprieties. "It's obvious" doesn't count, FYI. Produce some real evidence, please? |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 22, 2023 15:04:36 GMT -8
Make me brave??? Geeze, your mind sure does wander off to ridiculous avenues. Mr Dramatic arrived once again!!! Ryan, the reacher, is what you should be called. Sheesh. Nope, just call it like I see it. When you defend scum of the Earth people and then try to explain it away with "Well I think he's guilty of ________" it renders your sincerity pretty obsolete. It's perfectly fine to take a hardened stance and not talk out of both sides of your mouth. Still waiting for the proof you said you would provide of Biden's improprieties. "It's obvious" doesn't count, FYI. Produce some real evidence, please? Where's your REAL evidence that Trump raped that woman as you say he did? It's ok for you when you say, read between the lines, but not for other people. That's how you roll, unfortunately. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 22, 2023 15:27:17 GMT -8
Nope, just call it like I see it. When you defend scum of the Earth people and then try to explain it away with "Well I think he's guilty of ________" it renders your sincerity pretty obsolete. It's perfectly fine to take a hardened stance and not talk out of both sides of your mouth. Still waiting for the proof you said you would provide of Biden's improprieties. "It's obvious" doesn't count, FYI. Produce some real evidence, please? Where's your REAL evidence that Trump raped that woman as you say he did? It's ok for you when you say, read between the lines, but not for other people. That's how you roll, unfortunately. His repeated misogynistic statements on the record about assaulting women and getting away with it, including one during the deposition referenced earlier. The 25+ women that have accused him of improper sexual conduct over the last five decades. His *intentional* behavior of *deliberately* going into female dressing rooms during the Miss America and Miss Teen USA pageants when teenage and adult women were in various states of undress on four different occasions, believing it was acceptable because "he owned it." The $5,000,000 judgment in damages a New York jury made up of six men and three women unanimously awarded E. Jean Carroll for sexual assault and defamation, asserting that they did not find Trump's denials to be credible defenses. Your turn. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 22, 2023 16:20:42 GMT -8
Nope, just call it like I see it. When you defend scum of the Earth people and then try to explain it away with "Well I think he's guilty of ________" it renders your sincerity pretty obsolete. It's perfectly fine to take a hardened stance and not talk out of both sides of your mouth. Still waiting for the proof you said you would provide of Biden's improprieties. "It's obvious" doesn't count, FYI. Produce some real evidence, please? Where's your REAL evidence that Trump raped that woman as you say he did? It's ok for you when you say, read between the lines, but not for other people. That's how you roll, unfortunately. He told General Kelley he'd f x x x Ivanka if she wasn't his daughter. |
|
