|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Oct 29, 2022 2:20:51 GMT -8
Paul Pelosi, husband of Nancy, was attacked with a hammer this morning inside their home. The intruder was screaming "Where's Nancy?" repeatedly. This is the violence that you're rewarded with when you deny elections and promote victimization. Well, this is certainly horrible. Thank goodness the SFPD responded and stopped the attack. Yet another example of why “defund the police” which most democrats embraced, was absolute lame brained folly. Without police intervention Paul Pelosi may not have survived this incident. This perp is a certified nutcase, nudist and hemp smoker, he probably should have been placed in a padded room long ago. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 29, 2022 7:47:13 GMT -8
Paul Pelosi, husband of Nancy, was attacked with a hammer this morning inside their home. The intruder was screaming "Where's Nancy?" repeatedly. This is the violence that you're rewarded with when you deny elections and promote victimization. Well, this is certainly horrible. Thank goodness the SFPD responded and stopped the attack. Yet another example of why “defund the police” which most democrats embraced, was absolute lame brained folly. Without police intervention Paul Pelosi may not have survived this incident. This perp is a certified nutcase, nudist and hemp smoker, he probably should have been placed in a padded room long ago. And of course you take the deranged side and exploit it to fit your gross, pathetic agenda. Just once I'd like a post that's honest, fact-based and comes from a place of integrity. "Defund the police" doesn't mean a lack of police intervention. It means more things like we don't have officers shooting kids in a McDonald's parking lot without provocation. What you should be taking away from this is that election conspiracies (unfounded) have dangerous consequences. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Oct 29, 2022 8:38:59 GMT -8
Paul Pelosi, husband of Nancy, was attacked with a hammer this morning inside their home. The intruder was screaming "Where's Nancy?" repeatedly. This is the violence that you're rewarded with when you deny elections and promote victimization. Well, this is certainly horrible. Thank goodness the SFPD responded and stopped the attack. Yet another example of why “defund the police” which most democrats embraced, was absolute lame brained folly. Without police intervention Paul Pelosi may not have survived this incident. This perp is a certified nutcase, nudist and hemp smoker, he probably should have been placed in a padded room long ago. Glad you care about this attack. An 82 year old man getting attacked by a hammer is terrible, no matter who it is. I don't know about your statement "most Democrats embraced". I'd have to see data on that. Of course the police response was critical in this case. Here's the scary part. Although FOX News is trying to make this into a random crime / "defund the police" issue. This was a targeted attack. Most of us, including Paul Pelosi, don't have 24/7 security detail. Anybody who knows my name and just bits and pieces about me, can find me. When somebody wants to target someone, it isn't that difficult to find them and cause mayhem. After all, somebody with not all that much talent and intellect got President Kennedy. This is why the heated rhetoric of today is incredibly dangerous. People say all kinds of volatile, harmful, $#!+ on media and pay no consequence. Think about how many nutballs and people on edge there are in America. If the $#!+ hits the fan, I even worry about a couple of my 3%er neighbors. This is how easy it is to find somebody on the internet. I played basketball with a retired cop from Oakland for a few years. All of a sudden I didn't hear from him for a couple months and wondered what happened to him. All I knew was his first name (one of the most common first names you can have), the community of San Diego where he lived and his age. By the next day, I was knocking on his front door. I got a hit when I entered Oakland police department and the years he most likely worked. As far as "padded rooms" are concerned... those disappeared in the early 80's. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Oct 29, 2022 12:36:44 GMT -8
Well, this is certainly horrible. Thank goodness the SFPD responded and stopped the attack. Yet another example of why “defund the police” which most democrats embraced, was absolute lame brained folly. Without police intervention Paul Pelosi may not have survived this incident. This perp is a certified nutcase, nudist and hemp smoker, he probably should have been placed in a padded room long ago. And of course you take the deranged side and exploit it to fit your gross, pathetic agenda. Just once I'd like a post that's honest, fact-based and comes from a place of integrity. "Defund the police" doesn't mean a lack of police intervention. It means more things like we don't have officers shooting kids in a McDonald's parking lot without provocation. What you should be taking away from this is that election conspiracies (unfounded) have dangerous consequences. Do you want to defund the police? And no, I didn’t take the side of the perp you bonehead. What part of “certified nutcase……should have been placed in a padded room long ago” did you not comprehend? |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Oct 29, 2022 15:37:28 GMT -8
And of course you take the deranged side and exploit it to fit your gross, pathetic agenda. Just once I'd like a post that's honest, fact-based and comes from a place of integrity. "Defund the police" doesn't mean a lack of police intervention. It means more things like we don't have officers shooting kids in a McDonald's parking lot without provocation. What you should be taking away from this is that election conspiracies (unfounded) have dangerous consequences. Do you want to defund the police? And no, I didn’t take the side of the perp you bonehead. What part of “certified nutcase……should have been placed in a padded room long ago” did you not comprehend? No name calling! |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 29, 2022 22:27:29 GMT -8
And of course you take the deranged side and exploit it to fit your gross, pathetic agenda. Just once I'd like a post that's honest, fact-based and comes from a place of integrity. "Defund the police" doesn't mean a lack of police intervention. It means more things like we don't have officers shooting kids in a McDonald's parking lot without provocation. What you should be taking away from this is that election conspiracies (unfounded) have dangerous consequences. Do you want to defund the police? And no, I didn’t take the side of the perp you bonehead. What part of “certified nutcase……should have been placed in a padded room long ago” did you not comprehend? An attempt at deflection. Yes, I'd like to see police departments defunded and restructured to provide better service and protection for communities across America. The narrative you are trying to seize (wrongly) insinuates that all Democrats want is anarchy and lawlessness. That's false. They want accountability, service, proper vetting procedures and protocol with a greater emphasis on mental health response and de-escalation to avoid lives being lost. The San Antonio police officer who shot an unarmed teenager eating McDonald's without provocation, for example. It's not a short list. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 29, 2022 22:58:18 GMT -8
And of course you take the deranged side and exploit it to fit your gross, pathetic agenda. Just once I'd like a post that's honest, fact-based and comes from a place of integrity. "Defund the police" doesn't mean a lack of police intervention. It means more things like we don't have officers shooting kids in a McDonald's parking lot without provocation. What you should be taking away from this is that election conspiracies (unfounded) have dangerous consequences. Do you want to defund the police? And no, I didn’t take the side of the perp you bonehead. What part of “certified nutcase……should have been placed in a padded room long ago” did you not comprehend? Do you even know what the, "Defund the police," crowd wants to defund? Not cops on the beat. Not detectives investigating crimes. They want to defund the part of the police's job that deals with things that social workers are better suited to deal with. Leave the nonviolent, non dangerous stuff to experts in those fields and leave the police to police work. Now, I'd want to ease into it, to make sure that the changes could work, but that would certainly allow people to specialize in what they do so they can do it better and more effectively. Don't get caught up in the catchphrases. "Defund the police," was a stupid term to use - because it wasn't (and isn't) accurate. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Oct 30, 2022 5:44:32 GMT -8
So a Republican Magat attempts to kill Nancy Pelosi, and I'm sure that's perfectly fine with the rank and file. It's frightening how they don't see how completely UN-AMERICAN their party has become. This post isn't going to age well. How fast the TDS crowd believes exactly what they are told by partisan media. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Oct 30, 2022 7:31:32 GMT -8
So a Republican Magat attempts to kill Nancy Pelosi, and I'm sure that's perfectly fine with the rank and file. It's frightening how they don't see how completely UN-AMERICAN their party has become. This post isn't going to age well. How fast the TDS crowd believes exactly what they are told by partisan media. Well, as deranged as this guy is...there is a reason he's targeting Nancy Pelosi. Lotta influences out there painting her as the devil. Wanna guess how many guys just like this are out there? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Oct 30, 2022 7:49:46 GMT -8
So a Republican Magat attempts to kill Nancy Pelosi, and I'm sure that's perfectly fine with the rank and file. It's frightening how they don't see how completely UN-AMERICAN their party has become. This post isn't going to age well. How fast the TDS crowd believes exactly what they are told by partisan media. As compared to...what? The media you consume from Epoch Times? Gateway Pundit? Newsmax? Here's Reuters: "In recent posts on several websites, an internet user named "daviddepape" expressed support for former President Donald Trump and embraced the cult-like conspiracy theory QAnon. The posts included references to "satanic pedophilia," anti-Semitic tropes and criticism of women, transgender people and censorship by tech companies." |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 30, 2022 8:22:40 GMT -8
So a Republican Magat attempts to kill Nancy Pelosi, and I'm sure that's perfectly fine with the rank and file. It's frightening how they don't see how completely UN-AMERICAN their party has become. This post isn't going to age well. How fast the TDS crowd believes exactly what they are told by partisan media. That post is going to age just fine, thank you. The guy is a right wing, Q'Anon, MAGA supporter. He's been told by the right that Pelosi is a traitor and should be executed. (MTG used exactly those words, and others have suggested the same thing.) Yeah, I wonder what his motive was?  Please... |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Oct 30, 2022 10:46:38 GMT -8
Do you want to defund the police? And no, I didn’t take the side of the perp you bonehead. What part of “certified nutcase……should have been placed in a padded room long ago” did you not comprehend? An attempt at deflection. Yes, I'd like to see police departments defunded and restructured to provide better service and protection for communities across America. The narrative you are trying to seize (wrongly) insinuates that all Democrats want is anarchy and lawlessness. That's false. They want accountability, service, proper vetting procedures and protocol with a greater emphasis on mental health response and de-escalation to avoid lives being lost. The San Antonio police officer who shot an unarmed teenager eating McDonald's without provocation, for example. It's not a short list. It sounds to me that you want the police reformed to suit your needs and political agenda. No thank you. Now THAT reminds me of Germany 1936. I just read about the San Antonio shooting. Horrible. Please allow me to point out that for every individual police blunder, there are tens of thousands of well handled law enforcement incidents. It’s a tough job. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Oct 30, 2022 11:02:19 GMT -8
Do you want to defund the police? And no, I didn’t take the side of the perp you bonehead. What part of “certified nutcase……should have been placed in a padded room long ago” did you not comprehend? Do you even know what the, "Defund the police," crowd wants to defund? Not cops on the beat. Not detectives investigating crimes. They want to defund the part of the police's job that deals with things that social workers are better suited to deal with. Leave the nonviolent, non dangerous stuff to experts in those fields and leave the police to police work. Now, I'd want to ease into it, to make sure that the changes could work, but that would certainly allow people to specialize in what they do so they can do it better and more effectively. Don't get caught up in the catchphrases. "Defund the police," was a stupid term to use - because it wasn't (and isn't) accurate. Defund the police. They are words right out the founders mouths. Now, two years later after their monumental stupidity has been comprehensively demonstrated I’m sure these knuckleheads are whistling a different tune. I have been to countries where there is no independent police force, meaning the police are basically there to make sure the criminals can conduct their business. We couldn’t even safely leave the hotel. It also sounds like you are professing to be some kind of law enforcement expert who can define what where and where police presence is warranted. That honestly sounds dangerous. Liberals have been running things for two years and Americans have seen the results. Skyrocketing crime, one of the key issues in this coming election. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 30, 2022 11:07:59 GMT -8
Do you even know what the, "Defund the police," crowd wants to defund? Not cops on the beat. Not detectives investigating crimes. They want to defund the part of the police's job that deals with things that social workers are better suited to deal with. Leave the nonviolent, non dangerous stuff to experts in those fields and leave the police to police work. Now, I'd want to ease into it, to make sure that the changes could work, but that would certainly allow people to specialize in what they do so they can do it better and more effectively. Don't get caught up in the catchphrases. "Defund the police," was a stupid term to use - because it wasn't (and isn't) accurate. Defund the police. They are words right out the founders mouths. Now, two years later after their monumental stupidity has been comprehensively demonstrated I’m sure these knuckleheads are whistling a different tune. I have been to countries where there is no independent police force, meaning the police are basically there to make sure the criminals can conduct their business. We couldn’t even safely leave the hotel. It also sounds like you are professing to be some kind of law enforcement expert who can define what where and where police presence is warranted. That honestly sounds dangerous. Liberals have been running things for two years and Americans have seen the results. Skyrocketing crime, one of the key issues in this coming election. OK, you know better than that. As soon as this concept was introduced the people behind it had to clarify - and they did. Years ago. It's not about cutting police officers. It's about taking the social work aspect of their jobs away and giving it to actual social workers. Imagine that. You are clearly engaging in trolling. You are not posting in good faith, you are posting to get a negative, angry reaction. That is against forum rules. So consider this a warning before the $#!+ hits the fan for you. Post in good faith, or there will be consequences. Rules must be followed. You've been given a lot of slack, but the rope just ran out of slack. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Oct 30, 2022 11:44:39 GMT -8
Defund the police. They are words right out the founders mouths. Now, two years later after their monumental stupidity has been comprehensively demonstrated I’m sure these knuckleheads are whistling a different tune. I have been to countries where there is no independent police force, meaning the police are basically there to make sure the criminals can conduct their business. We couldn’t even safely leave the hotel. It also sounds like you are professing to be some kind of law enforcement expert who can define what where and where police presence is warranted. That honestly sounds dangerous. Liberals have been running things for two years and Americans have seen the results. Skyrocketing crime, one of the key issues in this coming election. OK, you know better than that. As soon as this concept was introduced the people behind it had to clarify - and they did. Years ago. It's not about cutting police officers. It's about taking the social work aspect of their jobs away and giving it to actual social workers. Imagine that. You are clearly engaging in trolling. You are not posting in good faith, you are posting to get a negative, angry reaction. That is against forum rules. So consider this a warning before the $#!+ hits the fan for you. Post in good faith, or there will be consequences. Rules must be followed. You've been given a lot of slack, but the rope just ran out of slack. Hate to get in the middle of this...but Musician is not a troll. I think he believes everything he says. Inability to see nuance and gray areas..and think outside the box he has put himself into?...perhaps....troll no. He did express empathy for Mr. Pelosi...you should roll over to FOXnews.com sometime and read the comments over there! Just as despicable, racist, and evil as you could imagine. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Oct 30, 2022 12:17:49 GMT -8
I must admit it is rather unpleasant expressing (at least in my opinion) rational viewpoints only to get immediately dogpiled upon by 6 or so liberal posters. Any thought which doesn’t perfectly align with their views gets immediately attacked. I can see why other conservative independent posters steer clear of this board.
If I am being threatened with a cancel culture mentality, fine.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 30, 2022 12:25:33 GMT -8
I must admit it is rather unpleasant expressing (at least in my opinion) rational viewpoints only to get immediately dogpiled upon by 6 or so liberal posters. Any thought which doesn’t perfectly align with their views gets immediately attacked. I can see why other conservative independent posters steer clear of this board. If I am being threatened with a cancel culture mentality, fine. You are intentionally being obtuse. We show you evidence, which you then ignore, and you then present a non-sequitur as an argument in favor of your opinion. You are not discussing this in good faith when you do so. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecnails on Oct 30, 2022 21:30:40 GMT -8
Without any evidence. hillary clinton blamed republicans for this Paul Pelosi incident.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Oct 31, 2022 7:54:22 GMT -8
Without any evidence. hillary clinton blamed republicans for this Paul Pelosi incident. Ummmm... The attacker was screaming, "Where's Nancy? Where's Nancy?" He has a blog with absurd Q'Anon/MAGA/Republican conspiracy theories expressed. Gee. I wonder who got him riled up enough to believe that Nancy Pelosi was an evil traitor to the country who should be executed? I mean, it's not like there's video of Majorie Taylor Greene actually SAYING in front of hundreds of people that Nancy Pelosi was a traitor who should be executed, inspiring thousands of others to share, and echo, those beliefs. Wait... |
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Oct 31, 2022 8:43:00 GMT -8
According to David DePage’s former partner, Gypsy Taub (who is far from a saint) he’s been a nut case for a long time and a leftist extremists. I’m not suggesting leftist extremists are nut cases. Another account indicates he was right wing extremist with wild conspiracy theories, more likely, nevertheless a nut case. Perhaps DePage has a toggle switch in his brain. Links below.
Surely there must be surveillance video of the break end. Some accounts suggest there was more broken glass on the exterior of the backdoor than the interior of the home which seems suspicious. Also, I would have thought there would have been a security alarm system of greater sophistication than an average household that would have prompted a call. Additionally, if the security system was not activated that would have prompted a call, which my cheap system provides. Regardless DePage shouldn’t see daylight for a long, long time. abc7news.com/who-attacked-paul-pelosi-david-depape-nancy-husband-conspiracy-theory/12392008/ |
|
