|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 25, 2022 10:31:17 GMT -8
Yes, Kavanaugh is responding like he's coming off a bender. The character difference is huge. Unfortunately, trump has taken a big turd in the punch bowl. Any aberrant behavior is acceptable. Like recent endorsements who have groped multiple women...who happen to be mostly Republicans. Rush Limbaugh and Jerry Springer enabled trump. PS, the Musician doesn't give a f x x x about abortion. Abortion rates in America have been declining for years. Dude is all talking points and bull$#!+. Ok, it’s now a group effort. Let me say it in a different way, perhaps you will get it. The Congressional questions are part of the process, for both parties. I stated the level of attack was more intense on Justice Kavanaugh than on Justice Jackson. That’s my opinion, and I believe it is accurate. Here is some political logic for you: Right now the Republicans have a midterm to dominate, therefore they are not going to rock the boat with over the top questions. With Kavanaugh, the liberals were blinded with anti Trump rage and wanted protect the continuation of Roe v Wade, so they went all in with the demonization and lies. Surely you can follow that? My opinion, but it also makes sense. Not once in this thread (until this point) did I reference anyone’s ethnicity or skin color. That was all you libs, it seems you all think in those terms. You injected that into the discussion, and you toss around accusations very freely and casually. Wouldn’t that make you the __________? I really don’t care about the amount of pigment in a person’s skin, it’s ridiculous to me, but you jokers obviously do. You are the ones constantly bringing it up. Wouldn’t that make you the _____________? See? I don’t even have to type the word, and your brains just automatically go there. Proof positive, seek help. This argument is over, no more zingers…….just think about it. No, your line of logic makes no real credible sense. You're still backing up "demonization and lies" with zero proof. Where is the proof? We KNOW the FBI didn't properly investigate the allegations against Kavanaugh. There were thousands of tips. The FBI didn't even interview Kavanaugh. That's an actual fact, not an opinion. Why is that alright with you? Because it benefits "your side?" "Blinded with anti-Trump rage?" Isn't this the same literal exact thing that Lindsey Graham said just a few weeks ago? He said, verbatim, that the GOP would not ratify any vote for ANY nominee that Biden produced, regardless of qualification, since they were nominated by a Democrat. Yet where was the moral compass when they rammed through an unqualified Amy Coney Barrett to hijack the ideological control of the Supreme Court? That's a political hit job. I'm not asking you if you are a racist, although your party fully embraces the stripping away of civl rights on a fear-based strategy. I'm asking you if you're willing to admit that their platform enhances and utilizes that strategy and if you're okay with it? The line of questioning given to Justice Jackson was cloaked in it. The entire GOP platform is based on hypocrisy, fearmongering and the ridiculous notion of self-righteousness. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 25, 2022 10:50:07 GMT -8
Ok, it’s now a group effort. Let me say it in a different way, perhaps you will get it. The Congressional questions are part of the process, for both parties. I stated the level of attack was more intense on Justice Kavanaugh than on Justice Jackson. That’s my opinion, and I believe it is accurate. Here is some political logic for you: Right now the Republicans have a midterm to dominate, therefore they are not going to rock the boat with over the top questions. With Kavanaugh, the liberals were blinded with anti Trump rage and wanted protect the continuation of Roe v Wade, so they went all in with the demonization and lies. Surely you can follow that? My opinion, but it also makes sense. Not once in this thread (until this point) did I reference anyone’s ethnicity or skin color. That was all you libs, it seems you all think in those terms. You injected that into the discussion, and you toss around accusations very freely and casually. Wouldn’t that make you the __________? I really don’t care about the amount of pigment in a person’s skin, it’s ridiculous to me, but you jokers obviously do. You are the ones constantly bringing it up. Wouldn’t that make you the _____________? See? I don’t even have to type the word, and your brains just automatically go there. Proof positive, seek help. This argument is over, no more zingers…….just think about it. No, your line of logic makes no real credible sense. You're still backing up "demonization and lies" with zero proof. Where is the proof? We KNOW the FBI didn't properly investigate the allegations against Kavanaugh. There were thousands of tips. The FBI didn't even interview Kavanaugh. That's an actual fact, not an opinion. Why is that alright with you? Because it benefits "your side?" "Blinded with anti-Trump rage?" Isn't this the same literal exact thing that Lindsey Graham said just a few weeks ago? He said, verbatim, that the GOP would not ratify any vote for ANY nominee that Biden produced, regardless of qualification, since they were nominated by a Democrat. Yet where was the moral compass when they rammed through an unqualified Amy Coney Barrett to hijack the ideological control of the Supreme Court? That's a political hit job. I'm not asking you if you are a racist, although your party fully embraces the stripping away of civl rights on a fear-based strategy. I'm asking you if you're willing to admit that their platform enhances and utilizes that strategy and if you're okay with it? The line of questioning given to Justice Jackson was cloaked in it. The entire GOP platform is based on hypocrisy, fearmongering and the ridiculous notion of self-righteousness. What I said WAS MY OPINION. In the hearings, (which was hours of footage) the encapsulated version is the Republicans questioned Jackson’s legal rulings. The Democrats accused Kavanaugh of being a letcherous drunk rapist. See the difference? Probably not, this is a waste of my time. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 25, 2022 11:22:17 GMT -8
No, your line of logic makes no real credible sense. You're still backing up "demonization and lies" with zero proof. Where is the proof? We KNOW the FBI didn't properly investigate the allegations against Kavanaugh. There were thousands of tips. The FBI didn't even interview Kavanaugh. That's an actual fact, not an opinion. Why is that alright with you? Because it benefits "your side?" "Blinded with anti-Trump rage?" Isn't this the same literal exact thing that Lindsey Graham said just a few weeks ago? He said, verbatim, that the GOP would not ratify any vote for ANY nominee that Biden produced, regardless of qualification, since they were nominated by a Democrat. Yet where was the moral compass when they rammed through an unqualified Amy Coney Barrett to hijack the ideological control of the Supreme Court? That's a political hit job. I'm not asking you if you are a racist, although your party fully embraces the stripping away of civl rights on a fear-based strategy. I'm asking you if you're willing to admit that their platform enhances and utilizes that strategy and if you're okay with it? The line of questioning given to Justice Jackson was cloaked in it. The entire GOP platform is based on hypocrisy, fearmongering and the ridiculous notion of self-righteousness. What I said WAS MY OPINION. In the hearings, (which was hours of footage) the encapsulated version is the Republicans questioned Jackson’s legal rulings. The Democrats accused Kavanaugh of being a letcherous drunk rapist. See the difference? Probably not, this is a waste of my time. If you can't answer basic questions, that's on you, not me. See the difference? Yes, I do. One person was accused of sexual assault by multiple women and was not properly vetted or even interviewed by the FBI. That same person likely perjured themselves under oath. The other wasn't accused of any crime, is the most qualified nominee of any sitting Justice, yet she was attacked as being lenient on sentencing (Check out Barrett's overturn on appeal if you want to laugh) and then it's CRT and "what is a woman?" - Absurdly stupid and idiotic, but what do you expect from the party of Marjorie and Boebert? Oh, sorry, forgot Ted Cruz's "What if I wanted to be Asian?" line. It's utter nonsense. And you know it. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Apr 25, 2022 14:18:05 GMT -8
Yes, Kavanaugh is responding like he's coming off a bender. The character difference is huge. Unfortunately, trump has taken a big turd in the punch bowl. Any aberrant behavior is acceptable. Like recent endorsements who have groped multiple women...who happen to be mostly Republicans. Rush Limbaugh and Jerry Springer enabled trump. PS, the Musician doesn't give a f x x x about abortion. Abortion rates in America have been declining for years. Dude is all talking points and bull$#!+. Ok, it’s now a group effort. Let me say it in a different way, perhaps you will get it. The Congressional questions are part of the process, for both parties. I stated the level of attack was more intense on Justice Kavanaugh than on Justice Jackson. That’s my opinion, and I believe it is accurate. Here is some political logic for you: Right now the Republicans have a midterm to dominate, therefore they are not going to rock the boat with over the top questions. With Kavanaugh, the liberals were blinded with anti Trump rage and wanted protect the continuation of Roe v Wade, so they went all in with the demonization and lies. Surely you can follow that? My opinion, but it also makes sense. Not once in this thread (until this point) did I reference anyone’s ethnicity or skin color. That was all you libs, it seems you all think in those terms. You injected that into the discussion, and you toss around accusations very freely and casually. Wouldn’t that make you the __________? I really don’t care about the amount of pigment in a person’s skin, it’s ridiculous to me, but you jokers obviously do. You are the ones constantly bringing it up. Wouldn’t that make you the _____________? See? I don’t even have to type the word, and your brains just automatically go there. Proof positive, seek help. This argument is over, no more zingers…….just think about it. "Blinded by trump rage" hmm.. I guess you were ok with 5 private meetings with Putin, where there are no official notes in the record? I thought he worked for the American people? We are supposed to know what he discussed with the guy who is killing innocent women and children as we speak. Of course he's always "been a big fan" as he stated in a personal letter before he became president. He probably became a really big fan when he couldn't get loans from any US Bank or Deutsche bank in the early 2010's. His son is on a YouTube bragging about that "they get all the money they want from Russia" during that time. Of course we know now what they were discussing..at least what Putin wanted..and he's going after it now. "You Libs" easy response when you are incapable of critical thought... since you were including me...go back and find one reference I made to racism in this thread. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Apr 25, 2022 19:24:52 GMT -8
To see the crocodile tears coming from the ilk that created the verb "Bork" is just too funny! Setting up a 1-800-LIE-TOME phone line inviting leftist kooks to make baseless claims against a GOP SCOTUS Nominee and then feign outrage that these "tips" are not taken seriously is really amusing (if not pathetic). Her record of straying from the sentencing guidelines was self evident. Don't tell me the mean GOP Senators made her own her own documented judicial record? Oh Boo Hoo! Perhaps someone should have set up a toll free phone number soliciting lies about her and then we could have amplified those lies, especially the ones about her private life before college - that would have served the public better apparently  . Kavanaugh melted down under questioning like an 18 year old frat boy, while Judge Jackson remained cool as a cucumber. Your explanation is?? Righteous outrage vs non-violent sociopath. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 25, 2022 20:19:46 GMT -8
What I said WAS MY OPINION. In the hearings, (which was hours of footage) the encapsulated version is the Republicans questioned Jackson’s legal rulings. The Democrats accused Kavanaugh of being a letcherous drunk rapist. See the difference? Probably not, this is a waste of my time. If you can't answer basic questions, that's on you, not me. See the difference? Yes, I do. One person was accused of sexual assault by multiple women and was not properly vetted or even interviewed by the FBI. That same person likely perjured themselves under oath. The other wasn't accused of any crime, is the most qualified nominee of any sitting Justice, yet she was attacked as being lenient on sentencing (Check out Barrett's overturn on appeal if you want to laugh) and then it's CRT and "what is a woman?" - Absurdly stupid and idiotic, but what do you expect from the party of Marjorie and Boebert? Oh, sorry, forgot Ted Cruz's "What if I wanted to be Asian?" line. It's utter nonsense. And you know it. I basically state my opinions. I do not feel the need to answer your questions, you are not the self appointed Torquemada of AztecMesa. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 25, 2022 20:43:21 GMT -8
If you can't answer basic questions, that's on you, not me. See the difference? Yes, I do. One person was accused of sexual assault by multiple women and was not properly vetted or even interviewed by the FBI. That same person likely perjured themselves under oath. The other wasn't accused of any crime, is the most qualified nominee of any sitting Justice, yet she was attacked as being lenient on sentencing (Check out Barrett's overturn on appeal if you want to laugh) and then it's CRT and "what is a woman?" - Absurdly stupid and idiotic, but what do you expect from the party of Marjorie and Boebert? Oh, sorry, forgot Ted Cruz's "What if I wanted to be Asian?" line. It's utter nonsense. And you know it. I basically state my opinions. I do not feel the need to answer your questions, you are not the self appointed Torquemada of AztecMesa. Then you're not interested in useful dialogue and shouldn't be taken seriously. You don't feel the need to answer basic and straightforward questions? That's your call, but you're doing yourself a disservice and this board by spreading these outright falsehoods on the regular. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 26, 2022 0:50:49 GMT -8
I basically state my opinions. I do not feel the need to answer your questions, you are not the self appointed Torquemada of AztecMesa. Then you're not interested in useful dialogue and shouldn't be taken seriously. You don't feel the need to answer basic and straightforward questions? That's your call, but you're doing yourself a disservice and this board by spreading these outright falsehoods on the regular. Actually I find you disrespectful, so you do not get YOUR questions answered. Too many “racist” and “blatant liar” comments from your twisted liberal mind. Biden stinks and so do you. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 26, 2022 8:14:03 GMT -8
Then you're not interested in useful dialogue and shouldn't be taken seriously. You don't feel the need to answer basic and straightforward questions? That's your call, but you're doing yourself a disservice and this board by spreading these outright falsehoods on the regular. Actually I find you disrespectful, so you do not get YOUR questions answered. Too many “racist” and “blatant liar” comments from your twisted liberal mind. Biden stinks and so do you. Well, then stop blatantly lying and posting false information as fact - Ukraine, Trump, Kavanaugh, the riots, BLM...again, you have a history. That's your pattern of behavior. I've never called you racist, but the fact you can't answer that does raise some eyebrows... You're much better off not using edgy buzzwords: Libs, lefties, leftists..."twisted liberal mind?" I'm not even that far left of middle. I'm just interested in the truth, not here to glorify Donald Trump and conservative gasbags. And yes, Biden sucks. We agree. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 26, 2022 8:29:17 GMT -8
Actually I find you disrespectful, so you do not get YOUR questions answered. Too many “racist” and “blatant liar” comments from your twisted liberal mind. Biden stinks and so do you. Well, then stop blatantly lying and posting false information as fact - Ukraine, Trump, Kavanaugh, the riots, BLM...again, you have a history. That's your pattern of behavior. I've never called you racist, but the fact you can't answer that does raise some eyebrows... You're much better off not using edgy buzzwords: Libs, lefties, leftists..."twisted liberal mind?" I'm not even that far left of middle. I'm just interested in the truth, not here to glorify Donald Trump and conservative gasbags. And yes, Biden sucks. We agree. Stuff like this post in this very thread... "Recent memory? If you mean the last six months, I suppose this statement is accurate. The bottom line is if this marginally qualified nominee got rejected, the Democrat constituents would have burned down entire cities. They have done it before and will do it again. The Republicans obviously didn’t want that, so they went along with the process rather than risk domestic upheaval. They have an upcoming election to dominate, no need to rock the boat and give the Dem Voters an excuse to spread mayhem." This is not educated opinion, it's blurring the lines of trolling. It's decidedly false. Yet you accused me of being slanderous. Again, I don't care if you are/aren't anything, but this is just one example of your failure to tell the truth. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 28, 2022 2:06:25 GMT -8
Well, then stop blatantly lying and posting false information as fact - Ukraine, Trump, Kavanaugh, the riots, BLM...again, you have a history. That's your pattern of behavior. I've never called you racist, but the fact you can't answer that does raise some eyebrows... You're much better off not using edgy buzzwords: Libs, lefties, leftists..."twisted liberal mind?" I'm not even that far left of middle. I'm just interested in the truth, not here to glorify Donald Trump and conservative gasbags. And yes, Biden sucks. We agree. Stuff like this post in this very thread... "Recent memory? If you mean the last six months, I suppose this statement is accurate. The bottom line is if this marginally qualified nominee got rejected, the Democrat constituents would have burned down entire cities. They have done it before and will do it again. The Republicans obviously didn’t want that, so they went along with the process rather than risk domestic upheaval. They have an upcoming election to dominate, no need to rock the boat and give the Dem Voters an excuse to spread mayhem." This is not educated opinion, it's blurring the lines of trolling. It's decidedly false. Yet you accused me of being slanderous. Again, I don't care if you are/aren't anything, but this is just one example of your failure to tell the truth. Enjoy the midterms. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 28, 2022 8:03:07 GMT -8
Stuff like this post in this very thread... "Recent memory? If you mean the last six months, I suppose this statement is accurate. The bottom line is if this marginally qualified nominee got rejected, the Democrat constituents would have burned down entire cities. They have done it before and will do it again. The Republicans obviously didn’t want that, so they went along with the process rather than risk domestic upheaval. They have an upcoming election to dominate, no need to rock the boat and give the Dem Voters an excuse to spread mayhem." This is not educated opinion, it's blurring the lines of trolling. It's decidedly false. Yet you accused me of being slanderous. Again, I don't care if you are/aren't anything, but this is just one example of your failure to tell the truth. Enjoy the midterms. Okay? You should be rooting for your country, not a party of traitors, racists and fearmongerers. Again, it seems like you'd rather back that side than engage in meaningful discourse. You should be terrified about the involvement of the GOP on January 6th, the rise of QAnon, Herschel Walker in Georgia and essentially what the GOP stands for right now. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Apr 28, 2022 15:01:50 GMT -8
Okay? You should be rooting for your country, not a party of traitors, racists and fearmongerers. Again, it seems like you'd rather back that side than engage in meaningful discourse. You should be terrified about the involvement of the GOP on January 6th, the rise of QAnon, Herschel Walker in Georgia and essentially what the GOP stands for right now. More hateful rhetorical nonsense, conversations with you are not “meaningful discourse”, just you regurgitating liberal taking points. |
|
|
|
Post by sdsuball on Apr 28, 2022 19:27:52 GMT -8
Actually I find you disrespectful, so you do not get YOUR questions answered. Too many “racist” and “blatant liar” comments from your twisted liberal mind. Biden stinks and so do you. Well, then stop blatantly lying and posting false information as fact - Ukraine, Trump, Kavanaugh, the riots, BLM...again, you have a history. That's your pattern of behavior. I've never called you racist, but the fact you can't answer that does raise some eyebrows... You're much better off not using edgy buzzwords: Libs, lefties, leftists..."twisted liberal mind?" I'm not even that far left of middle. I'm just interested in the truth, not here to glorify Donald Trump and conservative gasbags. And yes, Biden sucks. We agree. I don't agree - I like Biden. I hate his federal vaccination mandates, but other then that I like him. I liked his Build Back Better plan, I like the way in which he's handled the war on Ukraine. More then anything I like that he is even-keeled and listens to his advisors, as well as other prominent people, before making a decision. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 28, 2022 19:32:32 GMT -8
Okay? You should be rooting for your country, not a party of traitors, racists and fearmongerers. Again, it seems like you'd rather back that side than engage in meaningful discourse. You should be terrified about the involvement of the GOP on January 6th, the rise of QAnon, Herschel Walker in Georgia and essentially what the GOP stands for right now. More hateful rhetorical nonsense, conversations with you are not “meaningful discourse”, just you regurgitating liberal taking points. Sidestepping the point by regurgitating radicalism? I can prove my point. Marjorie Taylor Greene's testimony is just one example. "It's just speculation." (No, it's not, she said it) Satan's controlling the church? Really? (Ignore the post's commentary, it doesn't change the video or her words) You're not going to win here because there's no truth to your thought process. You can post opinions to your heart's content, but when you start lambasting random Democrats without a functional purpose, with zero truth behind your claims....that's just not going to work. I'm not regurgitating talking points - The GOP has said themselves (and taken steps) to make it harder for particular groups of people to vote. They've stripped away LGBTQ rights. They've pushed conspiracy theories that have zero factual integrity to them. They were heavily and actively involved in January 6th. We KNOW that to be true. Those aren't talking points, that's reality. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 28, 2022 19:33:11 GMT -8
Well, then stop blatantly lying and posting false information as fact - Ukraine, Trump, Kavanaugh, the riots, BLM...again, you have a history. That's your pattern of behavior. I've never called you racist, but the fact you can't answer that does raise some eyebrows... You're much better off not using edgy buzzwords: Libs, lefties, leftists..."twisted liberal mind?" I'm not even that far left of middle. I'm just interested in the truth, not here to glorify Donald Trump and conservative gasbags. And yes, Biden sucks. We agree. I don't agree - I like Biden. I hate his federal vaccination mandates, but other then that I like him. I liked his Build Back Better plan, I like the way in which he's handled the war on Ukraine. More then anything I like that he is even-keeled and listens to his advisors, as well as other prominent people, before making a decision. He's a very mediocre president. |
|
|
|
Post by sdsuball on Apr 28, 2022 20:24:41 GMT -8
I don't agree - I like Biden. I hate his federal vaccination mandates, but other then that I like him. I liked his Build Back Better plan, I like the way in which he's handled the war on Ukraine. More then anything I like that he is even-keeled and listens to his advisors, as well as other prominent people, before making a decision. He's a very mediocre president. But mediocre how though? I've heard a lot of people say similar things, but I don't really get it. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 28, 2022 22:43:20 GMT -8
He's a very mediocre president. But mediocre how though? I've heard a lot of people say similar things, but I don't really get it. Old age, cognitive impairment, seen as weak by the world, reneged on forgiving student loan debt, foreign policy nightmare....there's a lot. |
|
|
|
Post by sdsuball on Apr 29, 2022 12:56:41 GMT -8
But mediocre how though? I've heard a lot of people say similar things, but I don't really get it. Old age, cognitive impairment, seen as weak by the world, reneged on forgiving student loan debt, foreign policy nightmare....there's a lot. Oh, well I guess we agree to disagree! In fact, I would argue that his foreign policy has been one of his stronger suits. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Apr 29, 2022 13:08:36 GMT -8
Old age, cognitive impairment, seen as weak by the world, reneged on forgiving student loan debt, foreign policy nightmare....there's a lot. Oh, well I guess we agree to disagree! In fact, I would argue that his foreign policy has been one of his stronger suits. With regards to Ukraine, maybe. But there are limits to that. He's unremarkable and the fact he was the nominee coming out of the Trump era is pretty disheartening. Democrats had a chance to really reshape the narrative and blew it. |
|
.