|
|
Post by azson on Nov 5, 2020 10:11:37 GMT -8
This may be the first time in history I've ever rooted for Vegas and Reno.
|
|
|
|
Post by azson on Nov 5, 2020 10:44:06 GMT -8
Much like AZ last night, NV Clark County Registrar Joe Gloria concerned for his safety this morning. But yes, tell me more about how BLM is the real threat in this country.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 5, 2020 10:51:01 GMT -8
Much like AZ last night, NV Clark County Registrar Joe Gloria concerned for his safety this morning. But yes, tell me more about how BLM is the real threat in this country. Nevada said they won't be done for a week. Fortunately, Pennsylvania will be done today, according to the Secretary of State. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 5, 2020 11:23:54 GMT -8
Speak it into existence.
|
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Nov 5, 2020 13:57:39 GMT -8
Is it true that around 108,000 ballots in Michigan came in for Biden without one of them going for Trump? It's just something I heard. If that's true, then that's very suspicious. No...it isn't. The areas that reported today and last night were heavily Democrat territories. Ann Arbor? 93-7, Biden. Wayne County (Detroit) is Democratic. The early vote was counted after the day of votes were, which is why the margins are where they are. Ok, but I've been hearing that it was something like 108,000 votes for Biden that came in at one time with zero of them for Trump. And, now there's word that in another state there was around 38,000 votes that came in at one time with not one of them going for Trump as well. That just seems odd. |
|
|
|
Post by Al-O-Meter on Nov 5, 2020 14:11:16 GMT -8
Ok, but I've been hearing that it was something like 108,000 votes for Biden that came in at one time with zero of them for Trump. It was 138,339 votes.  The vote counts for both Michigan and Wisconsin look extremely suspicious. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 5, 2020 14:28:26 GMT -8
No...it isn't. The areas that reported today and last night were heavily Democrat territories. Ann Arbor? 93-7, Biden. Wayne County (Detroit) is Democratic. The early vote was counted after the day of votes were, which is why the margins are where they are. Ok, but I've been hearing that it was something like 108,000 votes for Biden that came in at one time with zero of them for Trump. And, now there's word that in another state there was around 38,000 votes that came in at one time with not one of them going for Trump as well. That just seems odd. It's not odd, it's fictional. The mail-in votes are predominantly Democratic. Most states counted the "day of" votes first and the mail-in ballots afterwards. There's no grand conspiracy - Unlike in 2016 when Russia sided with Trump. Biden will win Pennsylvania (as every poll suggested) and that's all that really matters from here on out. But if you're referring to Wisconsin where the lead was 108,000 for Trump, Kenosha and Milwaukee (City) were more than 3:1 Biden, and there were a LOT of absentee ballots in that area. It was enough to flip the lead. |
|
|
|
Post by Al-O-Meter on Nov 5, 2020 14:34:01 GMT -8
Ok, but I've been hearing that it was something like 108,000 votes for Biden that came in at one time with zero of them for Trump. And, now there's word that in another state there was around 38,000 votes that came in at one time with not one of them going for Trump as well. That just seems odd. It's not odd, it's fictional. The mail-in votes are predominantly Democratic. Most states counted the "day of" votes first and the mail-in ballots afterwards. There's no grand conspiracy There is a difference between "predominantly Democratic" and 100% Democratic with not a single Trump vote. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Nov 5, 2020 14:35:28 GMT -8
It's not odd, it's fictional. The mail-in votes are predominantly Democratic. Most states counted the "day of" votes first and the mail-in ballots afterwards. There's no grand conspiracy There is a difference between "predominantly Democratic" and 100% Democratic with not a single Trump vote. That's exactly what I'm saying. That's unheard of. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 5, 2020 14:35:58 GMT -8
It's not odd, it's fictional. The mail-in votes are predominantly Democratic. Most states counted the "day of" votes first and the mail-in ballots afterwards. There's no grand conspiracy There is a difference between "predominantly Democratic" and 100% Democratic with not a single Trump vote. It didn't happen. Sorry, Breitbart. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 5, 2020 14:36:36 GMT -8
There is a difference between "predominantly Democratic" and 100% Democratic with not a single Trump vote. That's exactly what I'm saying. That's unheard of. Because it didn't happen. Stop believing everything you hear from unsourced graphics and pictures. The picture was clearly manipulated. It came from Matt Mackowiak - Who has been spreading false propaganda and has been flagged on social media for disinformation. |
|
|
|
Post by Al-O-Meter on Nov 5, 2020 14:43:11 GMT -8
That's exactly what I'm saying. That's unheard of. Because it didn't happen. Yes. Don't believe your eyes or the voting record. Evidence?? What is that??? It happened. Maybe there is an explanation for it, but it looks terrible. If there was ever an election that we needed to appear transparent and on the level, this is that election. No one being honest can look at that counting timeline curve and not immediately wonder what happened. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 5, 2020 14:50:28 GMT -8
Because it didn't happen. Yes. Don't believe your eyes or the voting record. Evidence?? What is that??? It happened. Maybe there is an explanation for it, but it looks terrible. If there was ever an election that we needed to appear transparent and on the level, this is that election. No one being honest can look at that counting timeline curve and not immediately wonder what happened. There's no timestamp on the screenshot. I can literally go to my computer, use developer tools and edit any picture I want to make it look like this. It looks like it was taken between data entry points. I'm sure there will be a recount in Wisconsin - But Trump hasn't filed for it. Michigan wasn't close. This is just like people saying Wisconsin has 101% voter turnout. Total myth. |
|
|
|
Post by azson on Nov 5, 2020 14:58:53 GMT -8
I love the smell of right wing desperation in the afternoon...smells like...victory.
|
|
|
|
Post by Al-O-Meter on Nov 5, 2020 15:01:18 GMT -8
There's no timestamp on the screenshot. I can literally go to my computer, use developer tools and edit any picture I want to make it look like this. It looks like it was taken between data entry points. True. You could do that, but if you did that Politifact wouldn't immediately throw up pages saying your forgeries were real while trying to explain them away. It happened. It looks terrible. |
|
|
|
Post by Al-O-Meter on Nov 5, 2020 15:17:34 GMT -8
I love the smell of right wing desperation in the afternoon...smells like...victory. Not at all. I don't think Trump is going to win this and I'm stoked with how things came out. The GOP held on to the Senate when they weren't projected to do so. They added to their already majority of Governors and controlled State Houses in the year when census happens so they get to control redistricting. The cherry on top is they're taking a bunch of House seats too. The election map next year is more advantageous for Republican AND in off-year election the party not in the White House usually adds both Senate and House seats meaning the GOP majority in the Senate will get even stronger. Court Packing is off the table. The Democrats are out of their minds with rage. Just check the usual left-leaning media sites and see if there are more celebratory opinion pieces or angry teeth gnashing ones. The Democrat Caucus call earlier today was pure hilarity. By all means keep talking up how amazing Democratic Socialism is. Keep defending the Antifa/BLM rioters as they burn, loot, and murder people. Tell me all about how you want to defund the police and replace them with social workers. I am all for your shouting at the top of your lungs how great the Green New Deal is. Even if Trump did not win this election, Conservatives did great and we added many new black and brown faces who have grown tired of racist but virtue-signaling fat white women telling them what is good for them. I'm in a great mood! You should be too. You got your man Biden to hold your banner for the immediate future. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 5, 2020 16:03:26 GMT -8
Georgia's margin is down to just over 3,500 votes.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 5, 2020 16:05:41 GMT -8
There's no timestamp on the screenshot. I can literally go to my computer, use developer tools and edit any picture I want to make it look like this. It looks like it was taken between data entry points. True. You could do that, but if you did that Politifact wouldn't immediately throw up pages saying your forgeries were real while trying to explain them away. It happened. It looks terrible. It only looks bad if you're trying to insinuate there's fraud. The optics without explanation are bad. The simplicity is that the person who put it out has dubious intentions and it's not an authentic representation of what really happened. Nothing out of the ordinary that didn't happen in 2016. |
|
|
|
Post by Al-O-Meter on Nov 5, 2020 16:10:30 GMT -8
True. You could do that, but if you did that Politifact wouldn't immediately throw up pages saying your forgeries were real while trying to explain them away. It happened. It looks terrible. It only looks bad if you're trying to insinuate there's fraud. The optics without explanation are bad. The simplicity is that the person who put it out has dubious intentions. The optics look bad. Maybe you can put up an explanation but even paired with the best explanation in the world it isn't better than if they hadn't added 138,339 Biden votes alongside 0 Trump votes in a single shot to create a bizarre vertical line that immediately jump off the page. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 5, 2020 16:13:49 GMT -8
It only looks bad if you're trying to insinuate there's fraud. The optics without explanation are bad. The simplicity is that the person who put it out has dubious intentions. The optics look bad. Maybe you can put up an explanation but even paired with the best explanation in the world it isn't better than if they hadn't added 138,339 Biden votes alongside 0 Trump votes in a single shot to create a bizarre vertical line that immediately jump off the page. It's literally as simple as this : It's either photoshopped (which it looks like) or between data entry points. Without a relevant timestamp, it isn't indicative of anything. And again, the source is questionable at best. I get what you're trying to say, but there's no way something like that in a process as open as this is going to take place. |
|
