|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 30, 2020 12:24:25 GMT -8
Bombshell.
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Dec 1, 2020 8:59:54 GMT -8
It is not the # of votes that is in question (as Democrat operatives could have easily harvested (assisted with, etc) the mailout ballot requests to make the total number of votes appear possible), it is the nearly impossible margin percentages that is the primary issue. If it looks to good to be true, well guess what?? www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-new-analysis-shows-biden-winning-nearly-impossible-margins-on-mail-in-ballots-in-pennsylvaniaThe crank back on the signature matching is also key to the Democrat's success in PA with mail-in ballots. It is ironic to see Obama in his 2008 run against the cheater Hillary and have him cite the need for signature matching on absentee ballots as an important check to potential voter fraud. For True Believers, it seems, the countless affidavits citing voter fraud are miraculously "not true" if a GOP lawyer can't convince a Judge(s) to change the vote totals using them. It is an apples to oranges comparison. Rampant voting fraud did occur in this election, much more than in previous elections (so spare me the "there is always SOME voter fraud"). It is yet to be seen if the powers that be can negate its effect, however. So...was it Democrat boots on the ground that provided us with the impossible numbers? Or was it the voting machines? More evidence of voting fraud below but this was primarily overt bribery: www.theepochtimes.com/illegal-money-for-votes-raffles-conducted-in-several-states-in-2020-election_3598915.html?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-01-2 |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 1, 2020 10:33:42 GMT -8
It is not the # of votes that is in question (as Democrat operatives could have easily harvested (assisted with, etc) the mailout ballot requests to make the total number of votes appear possible), it is the nearly impossible margin percentages that is the primary issue. If it looks to good to be true, well guess what?? www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-new-analysis-shows-biden-winning-nearly-impossible-margins-on-mail-in-ballots-in-pennsylvaniaThe crank back on the signature matching is also key to the Democrat's success in PA with mail-in ballots. It is ironic to see Obama in his 2008 run against the cheater Hillary and have him cite the need for signature matching on absentee ballots as an important check to potential voter fraud. For True Believers, it seems, the countless affidavits citing voter fraud are miraculously "not true" if a GOP lawyer can't convince a Judge(s) to change the vote totals using them. It is an apples to oranges comparison. Rampant voting fraud did occur in this election, much more than in previous elections (so spare me the "there is always SOME voter fraud"). It is yet to be seen if the powers that be can negate its effect, however. So...was it Democrat boots on the ground that provided us with the impossible numbers? Or was it the voting machines? More evidence of voting fraud below but this was primarily overt bribery: www.theepochtimes.com/illegal-money-for-votes-raffles-conducted-in-several-states-in-2020-election_3598915.html?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-01-2Way to take the bait. These numbers are from the June primary, not the general election. The post was eventually deleted after he was outed. Yes, I'd like to believe someone named Gummi Bear as credible, but I'll choose the Fairy Godmother instead. No rampant fraud occurred in this election. The affidavits (why are people still talking about them?) are mostly made up drivel. Like the person who claimed to see fraud in Edison County, Michigan. Too bad there is no Edison County in Michigan. Whoops. Your side lost a democratic election. The other side lost an election in 2016. Just own it and move on. This is nothing more than a cash grab by the president to secure a defense fund off the backs of mindless cultists who can't think independently. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Dec 1, 2020 10:46:33 GMT -8
Oh, the Biden Magic! votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020From the article: "The four vote updates in question are: An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump" later: "In general, the larger the sample size, the smaller we expect the deviation from the population average to be. While anomalous vote ratios may occur, the statistical chance of anomalous margins goes down as the size of the sample (or vote update) goes up. The basic intuition is: big margins are one thing, and so are super-skewed results, but it’s weird to have them both at the same time, as they generally become inversely related as either value increases." So, we know that small vote samples can yield skewed results (~lopsided ratios or margins). It is strange to have huge drops (large vote sample sizes) with large one-sided ratios or margins. I recall the confidence that Biden had at about midnight eastern time regarding the results for WI, MI and PA specifically all while, at the time, he was behind in all three of those states. Who was whispering in his ear? Democrat boots on the ground that were working on the drops for later that evening? Remember, follow the science.... |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Dec 1, 2020 10:49:48 GMT -8
It is not the # of votes that is in question (as Democrat operatives could have easily harvested (assisted with, etc) the mailout ballot requests to make the total number of votes appear possible), it is the nearly impossible margin percentages that is the primary issue. If it looks to good to be true, well guess what?? www.theblaze.com/op-ed/horowitz-new-analysis-shows-biden-winning-nearly-impossible-margins-on-mail-in-ballots-in-pennsylvaniaThe crank back on the signature matching is also key to the Democrat's success in PA with mail-in ballots. It is ironic to see Obama in his 2008 run against the cheater Hillary and have him cite the need for signature matching on absentee ballots as an important check to potential voter fraud. For True Believers, it seems, the countless affidavits citing voter fraud are miraculously "not true" if a GOP lawyer can't convince a Judge(s) to change the vote totals using them. It is an apples to oranges comparison. Rampant voting fraud did occur in this election, much more than in previous elections (so spare me the "there is always SOME voter fraud"). It is yet to be seen if the powers that be can negate its effect, however. So...was it Democrat boots on the ground that provided us with the impossible numbers? Or was it the voting machines? More evidence of voting fraud below but this was primarily overt bribery: www.theepochtimes.com/illegal-money-for-votes-raffles-conducted-in-several-states-in-2020-election_3598915.html?utm_source=news&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=breaking-2020-12-01-2Way to take the bait. These numbers are from the June primary, not the general election. The post was eventually deleted after he was outed. Yes, I'd like to believe someone named Gummi Bear as credible, but I'll choose the Fairy Godmother instead. No rampant fraud occurred in this election. The affidavits (why are people still talking about them?) are mostly made up drivel. Like the person who claimed to see fraud in Edison County, Michigan. Too bad there is no Edison County in Michigan. Whoops. Your side lost a democratic election. The other side lost an election in 2016. Just own it and move on. This is nothing more than a cash grab by the president to secure a defense fund off the backs of mindless cultists who can't think independently. No bait taken. The analysis does not say there was an overvote as did the tweeter. It says the margins are miraculous. See the subsequent post. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 1, 2020 11:02:32 GMT -8
Oh, the Biden Magic! votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020From the article: "The four vote updates in question are: An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump" later: "In general, the larger the sample size, the smaller we expect the deviation from the population average to be. While anomalous vote ratios may occur, the statistical chance of anomalous margins goes down as the size of the sample (or vote update) goes up. The basic intuition is: big margins are one thing, and so are super-skewed results, but it’s weird to have them both at the same time, as they generally become inversely related as either value increases." So, we know that small vote samples can yield skewed results (~lopsided ratios or margins). It is strange to have huge drops (large vote sample sizes) with large one-sided ratios or margins. I recall the confidence that Biden had at about midnight eastern time regarding the results for WI, MI and PA specifically all while, at the time, he was behind in all three of those states. Who was whispering in his ear? Democrat boots on the ground that were working on the drops for later that evening? Remember, follow the science.... LOL - Really? It's called counties dumping their votes. Every single one of those states had DEEP blue counties outstanding (Milwaukee County, as an example) is very blue. Clinton carried nearly 67% of the vote in 2016. Clayton County, in Georgia. Clinton won 85.1% of the vote - It's the deepest blue county in the entire state. Stay with me here - It's very possible (even likely) that Biden felt confident because their internal polling was accurate and the fact they knew that majority Democratic counties hadn't yet reported all their numbers. This is another lame, failed attempt at a "gotcha" moment that's explained easily by basic voting protocol. Your angst should be guided toward the GOP in Pennsylvania, who made it illegal to count mail-in votes prior to the close of the polls on the 3rd. There's nothing here to overturn results, we have Trump-appointed officials saying there was no hacking of software and the election was secure. It's done. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 1, 2020 11:03:55 GMT -8
Way to take the bait. These numbers are from the June primary, not the general election. The post was eventually deleted after he was outed. Yes, I'd like to believe someone named Gummi Bear as credible, but I'll choose the Fairy Godmother instead. No rampant fraud occurred in this election. The affidavits (why are people still talking about them?) are mostly made up drivel. Like the person who claimed to see fraud in Edison County, Michigan. Too bad there is no Edison County in Michigan. Whoops. Your side lost a democratic election. The other side lost an election in 2016. Just own it and move on. This is nothing more than a cash grab by the president to secure a defense fund off the backs of mindless cultists who can't think independently. No bait taken. The analysis does not say there was an overvote as did the tweeter. It says the margins are miraculous. See the subsequent post. Sorry, but Gummi Bear is wrong. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Dec 1, 2020 11:13:26 GMT -8
Oh, the Biden Magic! votepatternanalysis.substack.com/p/voting-anomalies-2020From the article: "The four vote updates in question are: An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump" later: "In general, the larger the sample size, the smaller we expect the deviation from the population average to be. While anomalous vote ratios may occur, the statistical chance of anomalous margins goes down as the size of the sample (or vote update) goes up. The basic intuition is: big margins are one thing, and so are super-skewed results, but it’s weird to have them both at the same time, as they generally become inversely related as either value increases." So, we know that small vote samples can yield skewed results (~lopsided ratios or margins). It is strange to have huge drops (large vote sample sizes) with large one-sided ratios or margins. I recall the confidence that Biden had at about midnight eastern time regarding the results for WI, MI and PA specifically all while, at the time, he was behind in all three of those states. Who was whispering in his ear? Democrat boots on the ground that were working on the drops for later that evening? Remember, follow the science.... LOL - Really? It's called counties dumping their votes. Every single one of those states had DEEP blue counties outstanding (Milwaukee County, as an example) is very blue. Clinton carried nearly 67% of the vote in 2016. Clayton County, in Georgia. Clinton won 85.1% of the vote - It's the deepest blue county in the entire state. Stay with me here - It's very possible (even likely) that Biden felt confident because their internal polling was accurate and the fact they knew that majority Democratic counties hadn't yet reported all their numbers. This is another lame, failed attempt at a "gotcha" moment that's explained easily by basic voting protocol. Your angst should be guided toward the GOP in Pennsylvania, who made it illegal to count mail-in votes prior to the close of the polls on the 3rd. There's nothing here to overturn results, we have Trump-appointed officials saying there was no hacking of software and the election was secure. It's done. I agree that voting fraud did come out of DEEP blue counties in the key battle ground states. The two large drops in MI = ~93.5 Biden and all while Trump had reportedly improved his margins with Latinx and African American Males? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 1, 2020 11:31:47 GMT -8
LOL - Really? It's called counties dumping their votes. Every single one of those states had DEEP blue counties outstanding (Milwaukee County, as an example) is very blue. Clinton carried nearly 67% of the vote in 2016. Clayton County, in Georgia. Clinton won 85.1% of the vote - It's the deepest blue county in the entire state. Stay with me here - It's very possible (even likely) that Biden felt confident because their internal polling was accurate and the fact they knew that majority Democratic counties hadn't yet reported all their numbers. This is another lame, failed attempt at a "gotcha" moment that's explained easily by basic voting protocol. Your angst should be guided toward the GOP in Pennsylvania, who made it illegal to count mail-in votes prior to the close of the polls on the 3rd. There's nothing here to overturn results, we have Trump-appointed officials saying there was no hacking of software and the election was secure. It's done. I agree that voting fraud did come out of DEEP blue counties in the key battle ground states. The two large drops in MI = ~93.5 Biden and all while Trump had reportedly improved his margins with Latinx and African American Males? This is the president's chief ally dismissing your narrative outright. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Dec 1, 2020 13:10:31 GMT -8
Don't know if this has been talked about, but there's a truck driver saying that he brought in THOUSANDS of votes from New York and was told to take it to Pennsylvania. That's odd.
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Dec 1, 2020 13:28:22 GMT -8
Well, 200K plus votes with two drops in Michigan, even in a deep blue area of Detroit, would inevitably include a mixture of black males, black females, latinxs, asians, whites, Republicans, Independents, etc. yet, given the margins/ratios, suggests the entire demographic in those two drops was made up of black females only (~92% Biden). Fairy Godmother indeed! |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Dec 1, 2020 15:15:19 GMT -8
While I don't like the Presidential election results, Barr's statement pretty much says it's time to move on. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 1, 2020 16:05:37 GMT -8
Don't know if this has been talked about, but there's a truck driver saying that he brought in THOUSANDS of votes from New York and was told to take it to Pennsylvania. That's odd. My aunt could be my uncle, too. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 1, 2020 16:06:20 GMT -8
Well, 200K plus votes with two drops in Michigan, even in a deep blue area of Detroit, would inevitably include a mixture of black males, black females, latinxs, asians, whites, Republicans, Independents, etc. yet, given the margins/ratios, suggests the entire demographic in those two drops was made up of black females only (~92% Biden). Fairy Godmother indeed! False. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Dec 1, 2020 16:28:33 GMT -8
While I don't like the Presidential election results, Barr's statement pretty much says it's time to move on. It may well be too late to do anything now for Trump. Judges not wanting to become a nationwide headline have the plaintiffs coming and going -i.e. shoulda complained before the vote, shoulda had more evidence (as opposed to just eye witnesses) of suspicious or unlawful activities, shoulda caught them in the act rather than just detect the anomalies using traditional voting fraud statistical analysis afterwards, shoulda evidenced "systemic" voting fraud rather than just detail a hoard of individual violations etc., etc. But I want Trump and the GOP to work these voting frauds and violations to ground for the sake of the next election. Expose the crap to the state legislatures. If a group of motivated Democrat volunteers can pull off these miraculous numbers in battleground states (read that - one party machine cities), that successful game plan will be copied everywhere a close race exists. We will see a general refusal to (or an ultra slow roll on) scrubbing the voter rolls, permanent mandates for Barf-out ballots, more harvesting of ballots allowed by party operatives, ridiculously early voting, bribes/lotteries for turning in ballots OKed, eased absentee ballot signature detections, ballots allowed to be received/tallied days after the election, elimination/weakening of voter ID requirements, leftist oligarchs paying for polling station operatives everywhere, etc. With no changes (and adding a dash of unconstitutional amnesty), we will soon have one party rule just when Independents now outnumber the GOP or the Democrats separately. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Dec 1, 2020 16:40:00 GMT -8
Well, 200K plus votes with two drops in Michigan, even in a deep blue area of Detroit, would inevitably include a mixture of black males, black females, latinxs, asians, whites, Republicans, Independents, etc. yet, given the margins/ratios, suggests the entire demographic in those two drops was made up of black females only (~92% Biden). Fairy Godmother indeed! False. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump The numbers are false? The math is wrong? Please regale us.... |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Dec 1, 2020 17:16:10 GMT -8
Don't know if this has been talked about, but there's a truck driver saying that he brought in THOUSANDS of votes from New York and was told to take it to Pennsylvania. That's odd. My aunt could be my uncle, too. That can be said about a lot of things posted on here. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 1, 2020 17:43:26 GMT -8
An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump The numbers are false? The math is wrong? Please regale us.... Wayne County results in 2016 : Clinton/Kaine : 234,871 Trump/Pence : 7,682 From the Wayne County official site. Nothing out of the ordinary that didn't happen in the previous election. Wayne County is heavily Democratic, consistently. Your problem is with the optics, which at first glance, would probably be worrisome. But not here - It's simple ballot dumps from heavily Democratic counties that were expected. Conflating the idea that Trump did better with Asians and Latino voters with this doesn't compute. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Dec 1, 2020 17:44:15 GMT -8
My aunt could be my uncle, too. That can be said about a lot of things posted on here. Probably. I'm just not into baseless conspiracy theory myself. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Dec 1, 2020 18:31:59 GMT -8
An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump The numbers are false? The math is wrong? Please regale us.... Wayne County results in 2016 : Clinton/Kaine : 234,871 Trump/Pence : 7,682 From the Wayne County official site. Nothing out of the ordinary that didn't happen in the previous election. Wayne County is heavily Democratic, consistently. Your problem is with the optics, which at first glance, would probably be worrisome. But not here - It's simple ballot dumps from heavily Democratic counties that were expected. Conflating the idea that Trump did better with Asians and Latino voters with this doesn't compute. Results: 1,170 of 1,171 precincts reporting Presidential race (Wayne County results only) Trump/Pence (Rep.) - 228,313; 29.29 percent Clinton/Kaine (Dem.) - 517,022; 66.33 percent What are you talking about? The info I have on Wayne County in 2016 is much different. Your link? |
|
