|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 28, 2020 19:44:00 GMT -8
logiclogiclogic.wordpress.com/2019/09/09/dr-robert-epstein-and-seme-search-engine-manipulation-effect/If you dare check out Dr. Robert Epstein and the bias of Google. See the above link and elsewhere (use www.google.com  ). Spoiler alert, you can't refute what he claims. To think that similar ideologies and schemes are not in play at FB & Twitter is delusional. I've seen it. You've seen it too. But True Believers and their any means possible could care less. Sure, once you checked the box when you download the app, a cynic should know they are screwed. Their sin, if you will, is that they obscure their bias to the unassuming user and they lie to congress when confronted with the facts, etc. And they do this because they have a leftist political agenda. You can't watch the tapes from their crying sessions after the 2016 election to know that this is true. Believe what you will thinking there is no bias in San Fran and Seattle tech but facts show otherwise and arguments claiming there is no overt bias will be lost on anyone with any intellectual honesty. All I wanted was for you to answer one question honestly and you can't. Are you serious? Do you really equate the surreptitious leftist bias in the ubiquitous social media platforms of Google, FB and Twitter, skewing the perception of the news of the day to millions and millions to the errors of a bunch of USPS Union member's and their failure to process their sort on election night properly? I guess DeJoy was supposed to pull the mishandled ballots out of his a$$ and I guess he didn't to the satisfaction of the "unbiased" Judge Sullivan. That is only one of thousands of irregularities seen in this election. Does that give the biased social media monopolies some sort of pass? Who cares if they are privately owned platforms? What else would they be? They portray themselves as if they are unbiased to the millions and millions and they are not. Their bias is in the countless lies of omission, the "oh I made a mistake" when they block a post/link or erroneously demonetized a site or fact check using a biased fact checker or hide your site from search results, etc, etc. etc. See the info from Dr. Epstein. I see you didn't comment on his observations other than, I guess, its a private platform (?). Google alone is biased and able to sway millions by a wide variety of means. I had a google news feed active at times during the run up to the election and it never posted a favorable article for Trump. I had to block NYT, WaPo, NPR, etc etc and google continued to find anti-Trump articles from obscure sources for me. I know true believers just think it is normal but it isn't. Their algorithms were trying very hard. In fact, per Dr. Epstein, the more conservative your profile, the more aggressively leftist were google's search results. By hey, its a private platform and just an algorithm . |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 28, 2020 20:14:16 GMT -8
All I wanted was for you to answer one question honestly and you can't. Are you serious? Do you really equate the surreptitious leftist bias in the ubiquitous social media platforms of Google, FB and Twitter, skewing the perception of the news of the day to millions and millions to the errors of a bunch of USPS Union member's and their failure to process their sort on election night properly? I guess DeJoy was supposed to pull the mishandled ballots out of his a$$ and I guess he didn't to the satisfaction of the "unbiased" Judge Sullivan. That is only one of thousands of irregularities seen in this election. Does that give the biased social media monopolies some sort of pass? Who cares if they are privately owned platforms? What else would they be? They portray themselves as if they are unbiased to the millions and millions and they are not. Their bias is in the countless lies of omission, the "oh I made a mistake" when they block a post/link or erroneously demonetized a site or fact check using a biased fact checker or hide your site from search results, etc, etc. etc. See the info from Dr. Epstein. I see you didn't comment on his observations other than, I guess, its a private platform (?). Google alone is biased and able to sway millions by a wide variety of means. I had a google news feed active at times during the run up to the election and it never posted a favorable article for Trump. I had to block NYT, WaPo, NPR, etc etc and google continued to find anti-Trump articles from obscure sources for me. I know true believers just think it is normal but it isn't. Their algorithms were trying very hard. In fact, per Dr. Epstein, the more conservative your profile, the more aggressively leftist were google's search results. By hey, its a private platform and just an algorithm . I don't care what some random, equally biased guy on a right-wing site claims. Sorry. You can have the victory here, if it makes you feel better. Are you really trying to explain DeJoy's tampering as an irregularity? |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 28, 2020 22:17:00 GMT -8
Are you serious? Do you really equate the surreptitious leftist bias in the ubiquitous social media platforms of Google, FB and Twitter, skewing the perception of the news of the day to millions and millions to the errors of a bunch of USPS Union member's and their failure to process their sort on election night properly? I guess DeJoy was supposed to pull the mishandled ballots out of his a$$ and I guess he didn't to the satisfaction of the "unbiased" Judge Sullivan. That is only one of thousands of irregularities seen in this election. Does that give the biased social media monopolies some sort of pass? Who cares if they are privately owned platforms? What else would they be? They portray themselves as if they are unbiased to the millions and millions and they are not. Their bias is in the countless lies of omission, the "oh I made a mistake" when they block a post/link or erroneously demonetized a site or fact check using a biased fact checker or hide your site from search results, etc, etc. etc. See the info from Dr. Epstein. I see you didn't comment on his observations other than, I guess, its a private platform (?). Google alone is biased and able to sway millions by a wide variety of means. I had a google news feed active at times during the run up to the election and it never posted a favorable article for Trump. I had to block NYT, WaPo, NPR, etc etc and google continued to find anti-Trump articles from obscure sources for me. I know true believers just think it is normal but it isn't. Their algorithms were trying very hard. In fact, per Dr. Epstein, the more conservative your profile, the more aggressively leftist were google's search results. By hey, its a private platform and just an algorithm . I don't care what some random, equally biased guy on a right-wing site claims. Sorry. You can have the victory here, if it makes you feel better. Are you really trying to explain DeJoy's tampering as an irregularity? Dr Epstein has it right. You dont. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 28, 2020 23:11:22 GMT -8
I don't care what some random, equally biased guy on a right-wing site claims. Sorry. You can have the victory here, if it makes you feel better. Are you really trying to explain DeJoy's tampering as an irregularity? Dr Epstein has it right. You dont. That's your opinion, sure. The article you link uses the word "claims" quite a bit....largely because it's not verified. Thanks for ducking the question (again)...Better utilization of my time to just ignore this. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 29, 2020 7:00:21 GMT -8
Dr Epstein has it right. You dont. That's your opinion, sure. The article you link uses the word "claims" quite a bit....largely because it's not verified. Thanks for ducking the question (again)...Better utilization of my time to just ignore this. I get it...Run away if you can't deal with it. You know as well as I do that the vast majority of the 300k were tallied. Simple artifact that the ballots were processed differently on the receiving end and there are any number of valid or inocuous reasons for that (if you read anymore than headlines, that is). And if you actually cared about disenfranchisement, you would care about the dead voters, the wave of over 90 year old voters (harvesting victims), the votes given for money, the poorly maintained voter rolls (that generate excess mailing ballots), the over voting (#votes to #registered count), the votes corrected by partisan poll workers, the denied oversight of voting by partisan poll workers (what are they hiding?), etc. etc. These acts of disenfranchisement dwarf your red herring about DeJoya. But then again, the larger threats to our vote don't play into the TDS wheelhouse. I get it. I dare you to look farther into Dr. Epstein's reporting and offer a valid reason why he is not entirely correct in his assessment on the influence of the biased social media complex has on voters. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 29, 2020 13:30:05 GMT -8
That's your opinion, sure. The article you link uses the word "claims" quite a bit....largely because it's not verified. Thanks for ducking the question (again)...Better utilization of my time to just ignore this. I get it...Run away if you can't deal with it. You know as well as I do that the vast majority of the 300k were tallied. Simple artifact that the ballots were processed differently on the receiving end and there are any number of valid or inocuous reasons for that (if you read anymore than headlines, that is). And if you actually cared about disenfranchisement, you would care about the dead voters, the wave of over 90 year old voters (harvesting victims), the votes given for money, the poorly maintained voter rolls (that generate excess mailing ballots), the over voting (#votes to #registered count), the votes corrected by partisan poll workers, the denied oversight of voting by partisan poll workers (what are they hiding?), etc. etc. These acts of disenfranchisement dwarf your red herring about DeJoya. But then again, the larger threats to our vote don't play into the TDS wheelhouse. I get it. I dare you to look farther into Dr. Epstein's reporting and offer a valid reason why he is not entirely correct in his assessment on the influence of the biased social media complex has on voters I don't need to run from delusional, unverified conspiracy. The language in your initial article is an immediate giveaway that the source is extremely biased and not credible. Curious how votes can be tallied when ballots got never delivered? That doesn't compute. You want to run with your narrative, go for it. I'll stick to actuality. DeJoy ignored a court order. That's a fact. I don't have TDS. My opinions are backed with actual, verifiable evidence. There was no denial of voting oversight, Republicans were in every room. There's no overcounting. You can't prove ANY of it. That matters. |
|
|
|
Post by Al-O-Meter on Dec 11, 2020 8:33:02 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Jan 27, 2021 8:52:08 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Jan 28, 2021 15:55:29 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Feb 11, 2021 10:09:02 GMT -8
twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2021/02/11/woke-wars-canceldisneyplus-trends-after-lucasfilm-boots-gina-carano-over-abhorrent-social-media-posts/“Jews were beaten in the streets, not by Nazi soldiers but by their neighbors…even by children,” Carano wrote Instagram. “Because history is edited, most people today don’t realize that to get to the point where Nazi soldiers could easily round up thousands of Jews, the government first made their own neighbors hate them simply for being Jews. How is that any different from hating someone for their political views.” So, was the 1933 Jewish Boycott in Germany only done by German Government employees? Was Kristallnacht perpetrated only by German Government Employees? "Truth" is now "hate speech" in some cases, I gather. Some people should actually read a book vs get all they know from our media and wokesters on social media. Her sin was to compare the plight of the then Jews to anything other than the holocaust itself, I'm assuming. Look at the propaganda that preluded the Rwandan Civil war and how it was adopted by the Hutu masses. No surprise to see this: www.lacortenews.com/n/cnns-anderson-cooper-compares-capitol-hill-riot-to-rwandan-genocide. The open discrimination against people for their political beliefs should be chilling to all.
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Feb 12, 2021 8:57:51 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Feb 12, 2021 11:20:56 GMT -8
That's your opinion, sure. The article you link uses the word "claims" quite a bit....largely because it's not verified. Thanks for ducking the question (again)...Better utilization of my time to just ignore this. I get it...Run away if you can't deal with it. You know as well as I do that the vast majority of the 300k were tallied. Simple artifact that the ballots were processed differently on the receiving end and there are any number of valid or inocuous reasons for that (if you read anymore than headlines, that is). And if you actually cared about disenfranchisement, you would care about the dead voters, the wave of over 90 year old voters (harvesting victims), the votes given for money, the poorly maintained voter rolls (that generate excess mailing ballots), the over voting (#votes to #registered count), the votes corrected by partisan poll workers, the denied oversight of voting by partisan poll workers (what are they hiding?), etc. etc. These acts of disenfranchisement dwarf your red herring about DeJoya. But then again, the larger threats to our vote don't play into the TDS wheelhouse. I get it. I dare you to look farther into Dr. Epstein's reporting and offer a valid reason why he is not entirely correct in his assessment on the influence of the biased social media complex has on voters. does Mike Pence have TDS? |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Apr 9, 2021 16:55:35 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Jul 2, 2021 18:28:57 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Aug 31, 2021 19:53:43 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by sdsustoner on Sept 4, 2021 7:25:04 GMT -8
😆 When you don't realize liberals enable the fascism you adore 😆
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Sept 4, 2021 14:55:29 GMT -8
😆 When you don't realize liberals enable the fascism you adore 😆 Socialism can only be put into practice only by methods which most socialists disapprove. Fascism is the stage reached after communism has proved an illusion. Hayak See China, Venezuela, etc. Academia has no idea what they are seeking and destined to "enjoy" |
|
|
|
Post by sdsustoner on Sept 7, 2021 6:52:29 GMT -8
😆 When you don't realize liberals enable the fascism you adore 😆 Socialism can only be put into practice only by methods which most socialists disapprove. Fascism is the stage reached after communism has proved an illusion. Hayak See China, Venezuela, etc. Academia has no idea what they are seeking and destined to "enjoy" 😆 😆 😆 Describe a titmouse |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Oct 29, 2021 16:55:36 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 12, 2021 8:17:27 GMT -8
|
|
). Spoiler alert, you can't refute what he claims. To think that similar ideologies and schemes are not in play at FB & Twitter is delusional. I've seen it. You've seen it too. But True Believers and their any means possible could care less.
