|
|
Post by johneaztec on May 19, 2020 12:47:03 GMT -8
Not a naive statement. It's a fact. No one can get it unless it's prescribed thru a doctor. What I'm saying is that it's not going to hurt anyone else just because the President uses it. If his doctor wrongly says it because he's a quack, then that's on him. I'm not condoning what he's doing. He simply feels it's right for him. If you think he's lying about it, then that's just your opinion. So you're not condoning it by condoning it. Perfect. Doctors don't have agendas? Doctors are infallible? Incredibly dense levels of thinking here. Every doctor ever has only issued prescriptions out of good faith, with correct dosages, every single time. Hey, case closed. Get with the program. I'm not saying that what he's doing is correct or not. I'm saying it's his choice. Get it now? Nice grasping at straws by you, AGAIN. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on May 19, 2020 12:51:01 GMT -8
Exactly, and very well said. They'll take any information that may be even a tiny bit controversial and blow it out of proportion sky high. Ridiculous. You can't think for yourself, we've already discovered that. You don't need to hide behind conspiracy theory and matryr complexes. Lol. I take that with a grain of salt bud, coming from you. It's all Trump's fault!!! Lol |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 19, 2020 12:58:21 GMT -8
You can't think for yourself, we've already discovered that. You don't need to hide behind conspiracy theory and matryr complexes. Lol. I take that with a grain of salt bud, coming from you. It's all Trump's fault!!! Lol I'd blame Nancy Pelosi, Bill Clinton, Adam Schiff or anyone else if they did the same thing. The presidential standard is higher for a reason. Deal with the facts, please. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 19, 2020 13:05:02 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on May 19, 2020 13:07:53 GMT -8
Exactly, and very well said. They'll take any information that may be even a tiny bit controversial and blow it out of proportion sky high. Ridiculous. You can't think for yourself, we've already discovered that. You don't need to hide behind conspiracy theory and matryr complexes. You mad bro? You've been resorting to attacks. It's not a good look. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on May 19, 2020 13:09:57 GMT -8
I respect UWphoto for taking a break in the past after he admittedly didn't like what he was posting. He took a step back. That's what you should do Ryan, if you can't control yourself and your anger.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 19, 2020 13:12:11 GMT -8
You can't think for yourself, we've already discovered that. You don't need to hide behind conspiracy theory and matryr complexes. You mad bro? You've been resorting to attacks. It's not a good look. Not an attack, just tired of arguing with someone who doesn't believe in being genuine. The only time you ever substantiate anything is when you piggyback on other people's illogical diatribes. I present facts, like the IG being fired. Crickets. I present facts like the president lying on a continual basis. Crickets. Hydroxychloroquine? Some random, unproduced claim about credible people and testimonials, straight off the Trump video presser. Until you can illustrate otherwise, I call a spade a spade. You start from a premise of belief, I start from a premise of skepticism based off a track record of patterns and repeated instances of malfeasance. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 19, 2020 13:14:03 GMT -8
I respect UWphoto for taking a break in the past after he admittedly didn't like what he was posting. He took a step back. That's what you should do Ryan, if you can't control yourself and your anger. Not angry at all. Lol. I deal with people like this regularly. It happens. Part of the division in this country. Not mad at ya, not even in the slightest. I don't have TDS, I don't have ill will towards anyone. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 19, 2020 13:20:26 GMT -8
As you know, the fish tank cleaner story is likely a murder case and using Trump's comments as an alibi. And the poisoning is strictly the effect in popular culture of an anti-Trump MSM that contorted what he said and it seems some Democrat voters were curious to see if what the MSM was saying about Trump was possible. I read and saw the text of what Trump said in the press conference and it was a glancing comment about using UV light as a disinfectant. No one is hurt with UV light. But people are hurt listing to clueless leftist clowns. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 19, 2020 13:27:00 GMT -8
As you know, the fish tank cleaner story is likely a murder case and using Trump's comments as an alibi. And the poisoning is strictly the effect in popular culture of an anti-Trump MSM that contorted what he said and it seems some Democrat voters were curious to see if what the MSM was saying about Trump was possible. I read and saw the text of what Trump said in the press conference and it was a glancing comment about using UV light as a disinfectant. No one is hurt with UV light. But people are hurt listing to clueless leftist clowns. Colorful. Not accurate, but colorful. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on May 19, 2020 13:45:29 GMT -8
You mad bro? You've been resorting to attacks. It's not a good look. Not an attack, just tired of arguing with someone who doesn't believe in being genuine. The only time you ever substantiate anything is when you piggyback on other people's illogical diatribes. I present facts, like the IG being fired. Crickets. I present facts like the president lying on a continual basis. Crickets. Hydroxychloroquine? Some random, unproduced claim about credible people and testimonials, straight off the Trump video presser. Until you can illustrate otherwise, I call a spade a spade. You start from a premise of belief, I start from a premise of skepticism based off a track record of patterns and repeated instances of malfeasance. I'm absolutely being genuine. You have no right to say that I'm not being genuine. You don't know me. Just because I don't share the same opinion of you or disagree with you, doesn't mean that I'm not genuine. Give it a rest. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 19, 2020 13:50:57 GMT -8
Not an attack, just tired of arguing with someone who doesn't believe in being genuine. The only time you ever substantiate anything is when you piggyback on other people's illogical diatribes. I present facts, like the IG being fired. Crickets. I present facts like the president lying on a continual basis. Crickets. Hydroxychloroquine? Some random, unproduced claim about credible people and testimonials, straight off the Trump video presser. Until you can illustrate otherwise, I call a spade a spade. You start from a premise of belief, I start from a premise of skepticism based off a track record of patterns and repeated instances of malfeasance. I'm absolutely being genuine. You have no right to say that I'm not being genuine. You don't know me. Just because I don't share the same opinion of you or disagree with you, doesn't mean that I'm not genuine. Give it a rest. With how flimsy your arguments are, the repeated deflections and the inability to answer basic questions, that is not "genuine" to me. Not you personally, just the construction of the narrative you're representing. But yes, I think it's time to move on as you're pretty grounded in your fandom. Nothing personal, no ill will. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on May 19, 2020 14:03:42 GMT -8
I'm absolutely being genuine. You have no right to say that I'm not being genuine. You don't know me. Just because I don't share the same opinion of you or disagree with you, doesn't mean that I'm not genuine. Give it a rest. With how flimsy your arguments are, the repeated deflections and the inability to answer basic questions, that is not "genuine" to me. Not you personally, just the construction of the narrative you're representing. But yes, I think it's time to move on as you're pretty grounded in your fandom. Nothing personal, no ill will. You say fandom, I say it's not. I say you come from hate, you say you don't. Definitely time to move on. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 19, 2020 14:26:37 GMT -8
With how flimsy your arguments are, the repeated deflections and the inability to answer basic questions, that is not "genuine" to me. Not you personally, just the construction of the narrative you're representing. But yes, I think it's time to move on as you're pretty grounded in your fandom. Nothing personal, no ill will. You say fandom, I say it's not. I say you come from hate, you say you don't. Definitely time to move on. Hate doesn't care about facts. If you want to see TDS, join social media. I care about the truth and the rudderless direction while deaths skyrocket. Hate doesn't post relevant information vital to the national well-being. Debate is always welcome, but I don't see your mind changing. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 19, 2020 14:30:36 GMT -8
As you know, the fish tank cleaner story is likely a murder case and using Trump's comments as an alibi. And the poisoning is strictly the effect in popular culture of an anti-Trump MSM that contorted what he said and it seems some Democrat voters were curious to see if what the MSM was saying about Trump was possible. I read and saw the text of what Trump said in the press conference and it was a glancing comment about using UV light as a disinfectant. No one is hurt with UV light. But people are hurt listening to clueless leftist clowns. Colorful. Not accurate, but colorful. Here is how the MSM contorts facts and TDS starts: www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-coronavirus-press-conference-transcript-april-23CNN Jimmy Acosta: (34:05) The president mentioned the idea of a cleaner, bleach and isopropyl alcohol emerging. There’s no scenario where that could be injected into a person, is there? Bill Bryan - Senior Official for Undersecretary Department of Homeland Security->Science and Technology: (34:16) No, I’m here to talk about the finds that we had in the study. We don’t do that within that lab at our labs. Donald Trump: (34:22) [crosstalk 00:34:22] It wouldn’t be through injections, [inaudible 00:34:25] almost a cleaning and sterilization of an area. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t work, but it certainly has a big affect if it’s on a stationary object. In fact, Jimmy mischaracterizes what Trump said as Trump was talking about UV Light primarily and it was confirmed twice in follow up answers to Jimmy that neither Trump nor Bill Bryan wanted to suggest that anyone be injected with liquid disinfectant. But the contrary is what the MSM reported and the TDS crowd clings to. It gives their life meaning, it seems. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on May 19, 2020 14:57:41 GMT -8
You say fandom, I say it's not. I say you come from hate, you say you don't. Definitely time to move on. Hate doesn't care about facts. If you want to see TDS, join social media. I care about the truth and the rudderless direction while deaths skyrocket. Hate doesn't post relevant information vital to the national well-being. Debate is always welcome, but I don't see your mind changing. So be it. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 19, 2020 14:59:15 GMT -8
Colorful. Not accurate, but colorful. Here is how the MSM contorts facts and TDS starts: www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-coronavirus-press-conference-transcript-april-23CNN Jimmy Acosta: (34:05) The president mentioned the idea of a cleaner, bleach and isopropyl alcohol emerging. There’s no scenario where that could be injected into a person, is there? Bill Bryan - Senior Official for Undersecretary Department of Homeland Security->Science and Technology: (34:16) No, I’m here to talk about the finds that we had in the study. We don’t do that within that lab at our labs. Donald Trump: (34:22) [crosstalk 00:34:22] It wouldn’t be through injections, [inaudible 00:34:25] almost a cleaning and sterilization of an area. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t work, but it certainly has a big affect if it’s on a stationary object. In fact, Jimmy mischaracterizes what Trump said as Trump was talking about UV Light primarily and it was confirmed twice in follow up answers to Jimmy that neither Trump nor Bill Bryan wanted to suggest that anyone be injected with liquid disinfectant. But the contrary is what the MSM reported and the TDS crowd clings to. It gives their life meaning, it seems. I have the transcript. Trump definitely insinuated the disinfectant comment, plain as day. How that gets interpreted by his base of followers is up to them. But the events are correlated. It's one incident in a much larger pattern. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on May 19, 2020 14:59:21 GMT -8
Colorful. Not accurate, but colorful. Here is how the MSM contorts facts and TDS starts: www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-coronavirus-press-conference-transcript-april-23CNN Jimmy Acosta: (34:05) The president mentioned the idea of a cleaner, bleach and isopropyl alcohol emerging. There’s no scenario where that could be injected into a person, is there? Bill Bryan - Senior Official for Undersecretary Department of Homeland Security->Science and Technology: (34:16) No, I’m here to talk about the finds that we had in the study. We don’t do that within that lab at our labs. Donald Trump: (34:22) [crosstalk 00:34:22] It wouldn’t be through injections, [inaudible 00:34:25] almost a cleaning and sterilization of an area. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t work, but it certainly has a big affect if it’s on a stationary object. In fact, Jimmy mischaracterizes what Trump said as Trump was talking about UV Light primarily and it was confirmed twice in follow up answers to Jimmy that neither Trump nor Bill Bryan wanted to suggest that anyone be injected with liquid disinfectant. But the contrary is what the MSM reported and the TDS crowd clings to. It gives their life meaning, it seems. There's many examples just like this one. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 19, 2020 15:01:23 GMT -8
Here is how the MSM contorts facts and TDS starts: www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-coronavirus-press-conference-transcript-april-23CNN Jimmy Acosta: (34:05) The president mentioned the idea of a cleaner, bleach and isopropyl alcohol emerging. There’s no scenario where that could be injected into a person, is there? Bill Bryan - Senior Official for Undersecretary Department of Homeland Security->Science and Technology: (34:16) No, I’m here to talk about the finds that we had in the study. We don’t do that within that lab at our labs. Donald Trump: (34:22) [crosstalk 00:34:22] It wouldn’t be through injections, [inaudible 00:34:25] almost a cleaning and sterilization of an area. Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t work, but it certainly has a big affect if it’s on a stationary object. In fact, Jimmy mischaracterizes what Trump said as Trump was talking about UV Light primarily and it was confirmed twice in follow up answers to Jimmy that neither Trump nor Bill Bryan wanted to suggest that anyone be injected with liquid disinfectant. But the contrary is what the MSM reported and the TDS crowd clings to. It gives their life meaning, it seems. There's many examples just like this one. Piggybacking again. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 19, 2020 15:02:34 GMT -8
|
|
