|
|
Post by AztecWilliam on Apr 2, 2015 10:15:51 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by thepapacy on Apr 2, 2015 11:37:26 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Apr 2, 2015 12:15:23 GMT -8
There sits Kerry and the American delegation like a bunch of dimwits after France, Russia and England have seen that this mission is foolish. The Obama Administration is hopeless and helpless.
|
|
|
|
Post by thepapacy on Apr 2, 2015 12:34:17 GMT -8
The Obama Administration is hopeless and helpless. What does that make our Senate Majority Leader? |
|
|
|
Post by Luchador El Guerrero Azteca on Apr 2, 2015 14:26:17 GMT -8
The Obama Administration is hopeless and helpless. What does that make our Senate Majority Leader? New to the job? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Apr 2, 2015 15:43:29 GMT -8
What does that make our Senate Majority Leader? New to the job? and not an unrepentant liar like the last one, Harry Reid. |
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Apr 18, 2015 19:40:46 GMT -8
There is no middle road with these jerks. The only reason they want the nuclear is to control it's arab neighbors and wipe out Israel. My terms would be: No nuclear components, cancel funding terrorist, organizations, recognize tiny Israel as a nation, and allow Christian and Jewish places of worship to be constructed, and protect their right to worship in these places. THEN we will eliminate the sanctions.
|
|
|
|
Post by cmonaztecs on Apr 19, 2015 6:52:54 GMT -8
What grounds do we have telling someone else they can't have nukes?
How hypocritical can you be?
|
|
|
|
Post by Luchador El Guerrero Azteca on Apr 19, 2015 7:02:55 GMT -8
Lol. So it's ok for Iran and North Korea to have them in your world? That isn't hypocritical, it's common sense leadership.
|
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Apr 19, 2015 8:50:40 GMT -8
What grounds do we have telling someone else they can't have nukes? For the exact reasons I stated above. |
|
|
|
Post by cmonaztecs on Apr 19, 2015 14:51:25 GMT -8
Lol. So it's ok for Iran and North Korea to have them in your world? That isn't hypocritical, it's common sense leadership. LOL, your not a leader, you're a hypocrite ! The world is not as stupid as you think. And I hate to burst your bubble but N. Korea already has nukes. You should go back and concentrate on another 50 attempts to kill Obamacare. |
|
|
|
Post by Luchador El Guerrero Azteca on Apr 19, 2015 15:31:35 GMT -8
Lol. So it's ok for Iran and North Korea to have them in your world? That isn't hypocritical, it's common sense leadership. LOL, your not a leader, you're a hypocrite ! The world is not as stupid as you think. And I hate to burst your bubble but N. Korea already has nukes. You should go back and concentrate on another 50 attempts to kill Obamacare. Show me once that I have. Just once. I have spoken about some of the problems with it. You may notice that I am a moderate democrat that is a defense realist. See my other posts here. Lastly, I never said they didn't have them. Work on your reading comprehension! |
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Apr 20, 2015 8:21:17 GMT -8
There is no middle road with these jerks. The only reason they want the nuclear is to control it's arab neighbors and wipe out Israel. My terms would be: No nuclear components, cancel funding terrorist, organizations, recognize tiny Israel as a nation, and allow Christian and Jewish places of worship to be constructed, and protect their right to worship in these places. THEN we will eliminate the sanctions. Let's also impose these conditions on our Arab 'allies'; Saudi, UAE, etc. |
|
|
|
Post by thepapacy on Apr 20, 2015 9:19:08 GMT -8
There is no middle road with these jerks. The only reason they want the nuclear is to control it's arab neighbors and wipe out Israel. My terms would be: No nuclear components, cancel funding terrorist, organizations, recognize tiny Israel as a nation, and allow Christian and Jewish places of worship to be constructed, and protect their right to worship in these places. THEN we will eliminate the sanctions. Let's also impose these conditions on our Arab 'allies'; Saudi, UAE, etc. Want to get isolationist liberals to support a war? Burn Saudi Arabia to the ground. |
|
|
|
Post by Luchador El Guerrero Azteca on Apr 20, 2015 12:50:23 GMT -8
Let's also impose these conditions on our Arab 'allies'; Saudi, UAE, etc. Want to get isolationist liberals to support a war? Burn Saudi Arabia to the ground. Not feeling that. Isolationists in any form would care less or be against that type of action. |
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Apr 20, 2015 12:50:39 GMT -8
There is no middle road with these jerks. The only reason they want the nuclear is to control it's arab neighbors and wipe out Israel. My terms would be: No nuclear components, cancel funding terrorist, organizations, recognize tiny Israel as a nation, and allow Christian and Jewish places of worship to be constructed, and protect their right to worship in these places. THEN we will eliminate the sanctions. Let's also impose these conditions on our Arab 'allies'; Saudi, UAE, etc. Absolutely agree. Even though Iran is the subject here, it really should apply to all those non-tolerant countries. |
|
|
|
Post by thepapacy on Apr 20, 2015 12:58:03 GMT -8
Want to get isolationist liberals to support a war? Burn Saudi Arabia to the ground. Not feeling that. Isolationists in any form would care less or be against that type of action. I am an isolationist liberal, and your claim is not true. Isolationism does not imply disdain for any military action, it is used to express the belief that we should not be meddling in regions, conflicts, or country's political affairs when they do not concern us. Saudi Arabia has consistently been our adversary in almost every way and a direct supporter of terrorism in the US and in our allies' lands, while somehow getting a pass from almost every politician and the media. They're one of, if not the, most evil countries on Earth and somehow no one wants to talk about it. It would be a war worth fighting. |
|
|
|
Post by Luchador El Guerrero Azteca on Apr 20, 2015 13:19:13 GMT -8
Not feeling that. Isolationists in any form would care less or be against that type of action. I am an isolationist liberal, and your claim is not true. Isolationism does not imply disdain for any military action, it is used to express the belief that we should not be meddling in regions, conflicts, or country's political affairs when they do not concern us. Saudi Arabia has consistently been our adversary in almost every way and a direct supporter of terrorism in the US and in our allies' lands, while somehow getting a pass from almost every politician and the media. They're one of, if not the, most evil countries on Earth and somehow no one wants to talk about it. It would be a war worth fighting. That doesn't sound very isolationist to me. That sounds like an interventionist, like Kennedy, Johnson, and Bush. |
|
|
|
Post by thepapacy on Apr 20, 2015 14:17:23 GMT -8
I am an isolationist liberal, and your claim is not true. Isolationism does not imply disdain for any military action, it is used to express the belief that we should not be meddling in regions, conflicts, or country's political affairs when they do not concern us. Saudi Arabia has consistently been our adversary in almost every way and a direct supporter of terrorism in the US and in our allies' lands, while somehow getting a pass from almost every politician and the media. They're one of, if not the, most evil countries on Earth and somehow no one wants to talk about it. It would be a war worth fighting. That doesn't sound very isolationist to me. That sounds like an interventionist, like Kennedy, Johnson, and Bush. You misunderstand the term. |
|
|
|
Post by Luchador El Guerrero Azteca on Apr 27, 2015 17:57:31 GMT -8
lol. Nice diversion.
|
|
