|
Post by San Diego Football Fan on Mar 27, 2015 14:50:36 GMT -8
So are we taking over Qualcomm or not? lol like the way SDFF takes over a box of doughnuts. Had to take them from you so you wouldn't have another heart attack.
|
|
|
Post by Montezumas Revenge 88 on Mar 27, 2015 15:03:49 GMT -8
SDSU should take-over Thomas Jefferson law while we're at it haha
|
|
|
Post by rebar619 on Mar 27, 2015 15:08:40 GMT -8
As long as "best interests" is defined by you right? Please explain how the campus west concept is not in the best interest of the University. I'm curious on that one. Cmon man, dont put words in my mouth. When did I say anything about the west campus? Some argue that sharing a facility with the Chargers is the best for SDSU. Others say that an OCS is the best for SDSU. My point is that simply saying that you want someone that has the FB team's best interest is a subjective statement. Hell, there are some on here that would be ok with FB going away if it means there is a west campus on the Q site. More to the point is that MD loves to denigrate and label those that disagree with him. So you want to be careful what you define as the best interest of SDSU, because there is a pretty diverse set of opinions on that around here.
|
|
|
Post by rebar619 on Mar 27, 2015 15:11:02 GMT -8
SDSU should take-over Thomas Jefferson law while we're at it haha I'm down. Lets storm the F&*ker and make it our own. Its about time SDSU had a law school. I'd go back to school just to get my JD from SDSU.
|
|
|
Post by HighNTight on Mar 27, 2015 15:13:45 GMT -8
SDSU should take-over Thomas Jefferson law while we're at it haha I would be interested to know the legal hurdles for SDSU to "purchase" a law school and "move it" onto campus, while still maintaining enough of a separation to offer joint JDs to satisfy CSU charter restrictions ... sounds like an ideal use of a West Campus
|
|
|
Post by HighNTight on Mar 27, 2015 15:27:20 GMT -8
It does irk the conservatives to no end to hear the juxtaposition of the small "d" word "democratic" as a concept and used often in our democracy and to describe the United States ideal of a democratic form of government with the big "D" word "Democratic" as in a party affiliation with a more progressive or moderate stance. It's a form of angst on the part of the conservatives, especially when you consider the big "R" word "Republicans" took their name from the small "r" word "republic" a concept to describe a representative form of government, which was later co-opted by the big "C" word Communists to describe their countries (USSR). As if that wasn't bad enough -- the alternate name for the conservatives is G.O.P., which stands for Grand Old Party which seems to conjure images of aged curmudgeons out of step with the times. So yeah, there is a concerted effort to try and make their opposition seem awkward by making their name sound awkward. Branding you know ... You do know that the United States is NOT a true democracy...but in reality it is a republic... A democracy is where everyone votes on every law... A republic is where we vote to elect representatives to create laws and vote on our behalf... Just saying... We need to get back to sports...You kind of just illustrated my point about what irks conservatives about the use of the term "democratic" and yeah I'd rather talk about sports too
|
|
|
Post by Spud on Mar 27, 2015 15:41:17 GMT -8
like the way SDFF takes over a box of doughnuts. Had to take them from you so you wouldn't have another heart attack. Apparently everyone thinks AztecAndre is a fat dude living in a basement...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2015 15:42:08 GMT -8
Please explain how the campus west concept is not in the best interest of the University. I'm curious on that one. Cmon man, dont put words in my mouth. When did I say anything about the west campus? Some argue that sharing a facility with the Chargers is the best for SDSU. Others say that an OCS is the best for SDSU. My point is that simply saying that you want someone that has the FB team's best interest is a subjective statement. Hell, there are some on here that would be ok with FB going away if it means there is a west campus on the Q site. More to the point is that MD loves to denigrate and label those that disagree with him. So you want to be careful what you define as the best interest of SDSU, because there is a pretty diverse set of opinions on that around here. Best interest of the FB team? How about best interest of the UNIVERSITY. There is no logical argument that I've seen that states not expanding to the west location at the Q site is better for the UNINVERSITY overall. But lets talk about just the FB team. Look at the top 40 programs in the last 25 years. How many of them share a stadium? How many have an OCS? How many have their own facility but at an off campus site? Other than wishing or hoping, there is no real world example of a college football program benefiting from a partnership with an NFL franchise on a stadium.
|
|
|
Post by missiontrails on Mar 27, 2015 15:43:31 GMT -8
I'm almost willing to pay for entertainment like this. Where's my popcorn?
|
|
|
Post by AzTex on Mar 27, 2015 16:06:35 GMT -8
DOES COACH FISHER EVEN PRACTICE FREE THROWS?!?!! Why should he? Dutcher won't give him any playing time. He'll never get a chance to shoot one in a game.
|
|
|
Post by AzTex on Mar 27, 2015 16:10:58 GMT -8
Never thought a failed attempt at a podcast would make someone behave in such a pathetic manner. The podcast was awesome. People are still talking about it three years later. People are still talking about Rosanne Barr and the Padres 25 years later. Not necessarily evidence of awesomeness.
|
|
|
Post by SDSU-Alum2003 on Mar 27, 2015 16:17:54 GMT -8
Cmon man, dont put words in my mouth. When did I say anything about the west campus? Some argue that sharing a facility with the Chargers is the best for SDSU. Others say that an OCS is the best for SDSU. My point is that simply saying that you want someone that has the FB team's best interest is a subjective statement. Hell, there are some on here that would be ok with FB going away if it means there is a west campus on the Q site. More to the point is that MD loves to denigrate and label those that disagree with him. So you want to be careful what you define as the best interest of SDSU, because there is a pretty diverse set of opinions on that around here. Best interest of the FB team? How about best interest of the UNIVERSITY. There is no logical argument that I've seen that states not expanding to the west location at the Q site is better for the UNINVERSITY overall. But lets talk about just the FB team. Look at the top 40 programs in the last 25 years. How many of them share a stadium? How many have an OCS? How many have their own facility but at an off campus site? Other than wishing or hoping, there is no real world example of a college football program benefiting from a partnership with an NFL franchise on a stadium. This. 100% Spot on. Some people just don't get this or don't want to admit it.
|
|
|
Post by San Diego Football Fan on Mar 27, 2015 16:18:05 GMT -8
The podcast was awesome. People are still talking about it three years later. People are still talking about Rosanne Barr and the Padres 25 years later. Not necessarily evidence of awesomeness. I was being sarcastic. Wasn't expecting much from blogtalkradio and living room production but it was fun.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2015 17:48:20 GMT -8
People are still talking about Rosanne Barr and the Padres 25 years later. Not necessarily evidence of awesomeness. I was being sarcastic. Wasn't expecting much from blogtalkradio and "mom's"living room production but it was fun. EFT
|
|
|
Post by aztecfan1 on Mar 27, 2015 19:21:36 GMT -8
People in the DEMOCRAT party like to talk a lot about spending someone else's money. That's what they do, ad naseum. There is no such thing as the DEMOCRAT party. Educate yourself before you comment. Actually, I'm highly educated about the cesspool that is politics. Here's a primer for you. There is nothing DEMOCRATIC about the Democrat party. They want no dissent from the premise that government control is everything and individuals (have you ever read The U.S. Constitution?) are nothing. Got it? Now, how interesting that there are so many post here about something that has no real bearing on the Aztecs. I wish a fraction of this audience would educate themselves about Aztec football, as in having opinions based on observations of spring practice for example. Precious few made that a priority but far too many make uninformed and subjective comments (Rocky sucks......DUH!). I am hoping this board comes around this summer with more intelligent discourse as we approach perhaps the most important season in Aztec football ever. Which way will it go? The vision of Top 25? Or a disappointing alternative ? I think we are headed upwards. Let's discuss why or why not. Shall we have that informed discussion going forward?
|
|
|
Post by SDSU-Alum2003 on Mar 27, 2015 19:23:05 GMT -8
There is no such thing as the DEMOCRAT party. Educate yourself before you comment. Actually, I'm highly educated about the cesspool that is politics. Here's a primer for you. There is nothing DEMOCRATIC about the Democrat party. They want no dissent from the premise that government control is everything and individuals (have you ever read The U.S. Constitution?) are nothing. Got it? Now, how interesting that there are so many post here about something that has no real bearing on the Aztecs. I wish a fraction of this audience would educate themselves about Aztec football, as in having opinions based on observations of spring practice for example. Precious few made that a priority but far too many make uninformed and subjective comments (Rocky sucks......DUH!). I am hoping this board comes around this summer with more intelligent discourse as we approach perhaps the most important season in Aztec football ever. Which way will it go? The vision of Top 25? Or a disappointing alternative ? I think we are headed upwards. Let's discuss why or why not. Shall we have that informed discussion going forward? I hope so. This politics talk is BS!
|
|
|
Post by rebar619 on Mar 27, 2015 21:25:12 GMT -8
Cmon man, dont put words in my mouth. When did I say anything about the west campus? Some argue that sharing a facility with the Chargers is the best for SDSU. Others say that an OCS is the best for SDSU. My point is that simply saying that you want someone that has the FB team's best interest is a subjective statement. Hell, there are some on here that would be ok with FB going away if it means there is a west campus on the Q site. More to the point is that MD loves to denigrate and label those that disagree with him. So you want to be careful what you define as the best interest of SDSU, because there is a pretty diverse set of opinions on that around here. Best interest of the FB team? How about best interest of the UNIVERSITY. There is no logical argument that I've seen that states not expanding to the west location at the Q site is better for the UNINVERSITY overall. But lets talk about just the FB team. Look at the top 40 programs in the last 25 years. How many of them share a stadium? How many have an OCS? How many have their own facility but at an off campus site? Other than wishing or hoping, there is no real world example of a college football program benefiting from a partnership with an NFL franchise on a stadium. Congrats on having a conversation with yourself. Well done. I'm not arguing with you on this. My point was... F it, never mind, you won't pay attention anyway.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2015 22:06:27 GMT -8
Cut it out. Abolishing the Democrat,Republican and Tea parties and restoring the Declaration of Independence would solve ALOT of problems. And whoever started this thread is responsible for this thread being political not me.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Mar 28, 2015 7:39:56 GMT -8
There is no such thing as the DEMOCRAT party. Educate yourself before you comment. Actually, I'm highly educated about the cesspool that is politics. Here's a primer for you. There is nothing DEMOCRATIC about the Democrat party. They want no dissent from the premise that government control is everything and individuals (have you ever read The U.S. Constitution?) are nothing. Got it? Now, how interesting that there are so many post here about something that has no real bearing on the Aztecs. I wish a fraction of this audience would educate themselves about Aztec football, as in having opinions based on observations of spring practice for example. Precious few made that a priority but far too many make uninformed and subjective comments (Rocky sucks......DUH!). I am hoping this board comes around this summer with more intelligent discourse as we approach perhaps the most important season in Aztec football ever. Which way will it go? The vision of Top 25? Or a disappointing alternative ? I think we are headed upwards. Let's discuss why or why not. Shall we have that informed discussion going forward? Let's keep politics over there where it is fun and keep The Aztecs here where it is even more fun.
|
|
|
Post by Montezumas Revenge 88 on Mar 28, 2015 9:20:01 GMT -8
This thread went full retard-Never go full retard!
|
|