|
|
Post by SDSU-Alum2003 on Mar 26, 2015 20:02:53 GMT -8
Senator Marty Block Continues to Advocate for SDSU www.thedailyaztec.com/65404/news/senator-says-sdsu-should-take-over-qualcomm-stadium/“We’re a long way from this being a completed project, but if we don’t start thinking about it, it won’t even be on the table when the time comes,” Block said. SDSU Chief of Communications Greg Block said that although acquiring the Qualcomm space is hypothetical at the moment, SDSU would consider the idea. “Whenever there is a possibility that San Diego State University could expand the campus and thereby our ability to serve our students and our community, it is worth exploring,” Greg Block said. |
|
|
|
Post by longtimebooster on Mar 26, 2015 20:37:17 GMT -8
Marty Block was one of the original psotters on Aztec Talk. He would psot early and often. But then he went into politics and had to get all serious.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecfan1 on Mar 26, 2015 20:39:48 GMT -8
Marty Block was one of the original psotters on Aztec Talk. He would psot early and often. But then he went into politics and had to get all serious. People in the DEMOCRAT party like to talk a lot about spending someone else's money. That's what they do, ad naseum. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecsig on Mar 26, 2015 20:54:43 GMT -8
Marty Block was one of the original psotters on Aztec Talk. He would psot early and often. But then he went into politics and had to get all serious. People in the DEMOCRAT party like to talk a lot about spending someone else's money. That's what they do, ad naseum. Can we get someone to veto this guy for wanting to start a Democrat vs Republican fight on this board? Tacky, tacky, tacky (and not entirely accurate). |
|
|
|
Post by HighNTight on Mar 26, 2015 21:11:06 GMT -8
Marty Block was one of the original psotters on Aztec Talk. He would psot early and often. But then he went into politics and had to get all serious. People in the DEMOCRAT party like to talk a lot about spending someone else's money. That's what they do, ad naseum. Shame on him for not knowing that tax money is only allowed to subsidize private companies .... Speaking of which, have you heard that a Dem and a Rep from the House oversight committee have sent a letter to the NFL questioning their tax-exempt 501C(6) non-profit status? A long-time sticking point for Washington, House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) sent a letter late Wednesday to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell saying that the committee is reviewing the tax-exempt status enjoyed by the NFL and 10 other sports leagues and associations.
Some of the other leagues that also received a letter include the NHL, various golf and tennis associations, and, yes, even the Professional Rodeo Cowboys Association.
In his letter, which was co-signed by Ranking Member Elijah Cummings (D-Md.), Chaffetz requested that the NFL send more information regarding its tax-exempt status no later than April 3. In addition to the documentation that granted the league such exemption, Chaffetz asked for other details including whether the NFL "has considered voluntarily abandoning its 501(c)(6) status". |
|
|
|
Post by AztecWilliam on Mar 26, 2015 21:12:57 GMT -8
I am not a fan of the Democrats' desire to spend more and more taxpayers' money on dubious projects, but spending that money on an S.D.S.U. West Campus in Mission Valley seems like a good deal to me.
AzWm
|
|
|
|
Post by missiontrails on Mar 26, 2015 21:14:40 GMT -8
Marty Block was one of the original psotters on Aztec Talk. He would psot early and often. But then he went into politics and had to get all serious. People in the DEMOCRAT party like to talk a lot about spending someone else's money. That's what they do, ad naseum. Yeah that's the narrative the right always sticks to, ad naseum. Proven over and over to be false. |
|
|
|
Post by zurac315 on Mar 26, 2015 21:44:27 GMT -8
Marty Block was one of the original psotters on Aztec Talk. He would psot early and often. But then he went into politics and had to get all serious. People in the DEMOCRAT party like to talk a lot about spending someone else's money. That's what they do, ad naseum. There is no such thing as the DEMOCRAT party. Educate yourself before you comment. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 26, 2015 22:03:57 GMT -8
DOES COACH FISHER EVEN PRACTICE FREE THROWS?!?!!
|
|
|
|
Post by missiontrails on Mar 26, 2015 22:50:00 GMT -8
DOES COACH FISHER EVEN PRACTICE FREE THROWS?!?!! Nothing in life is free son, you've gotta earn it. |
|
|
|
Post by McQuervo on Mar 27, 2015 7:00:41 GMT -8
[/quote]Nothing in life is free son, you've gotta earn it. [/quote]
That is of course, unless your related to Dean Spanos Sr.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Mar 27, 2015 7:18:08 GMT -8
Like the idea of SDSU taking over the Q site. One way to make sure nothing gets done is to drive a wedge between folks.
|
|
|
|
Post by obboy13 on Mar 27, 2015 7:41:45 GMT -8
Relax, this is just one guy named Block getting another guy named Block to help him get his name in print. Neither one of them can contribute anything to the process except an opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by AccessBowlTime on Mar 27, 2015 8:17:58 GMT -8
People in the DEMOCRAT party like to talk a lot about spending someone else's money. That's what they do, ad naseum. There is no such thing as the DEMOCRAT party. Educate yourself before you comment. It's a Faux News buzzword meant to demean the party they despise. I think it's funny as hell to hear. No better example of Faux's "fair and balanced" reporting. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2015 8:38:04 GMT -8
I partied with Marty Block when he got elected. Downtown Johnny browns was popping off that night.
|
|
|
|
Post by AztecSports95 on Mar 27, 2015 8:38:43 GMT -8
Relax, this is just one guy named Block getting another guy named Block to help him get his name in print. Neither one of them can contribute anything to the process except an opinion. LOL. What? |
|
|
|
Post by HighNTight on Mar 27, 2015 8:49:29 GMT -8
There is no such thing as the DEMOCRAT party. Educate yourself before you comment. It's a Faux News buzzword meant to demean the party they despise. I think it's funny as hell to hear. No better example of Faux's "fair and balanced" reporting. It does irk the conservatives to no end to hear the juxtaposition of the small "d" word "democratic" as a concept and used often in our democracy and to describe the United States ideal of a democratic form of government with the big "D" word "Democratic" as in a party affiliation with a more progressive or moderate stance. It's a form of angst on the part of the conservatives, especially when you consider the big "R" word "Republicans" took their name from the small "r" word "republic" a concept to describe a representative form of government, which was later co-opted by the big "C" word Communists to describe their countries (USSR). As if that wasn't bad enough -- the alternate name for the conservatives is G.O.P., which stands for Grand Old Party which seems to conjure images of aged curmudgeons out of step with the times. So yeah, there is a concerted effort to try and make their opposition seem awkward by making their name sound awkward. Branding you know ... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2015 9:55:28 GMT -8
Marty Block was one of the original psotters on Aztec Talk. He would psot early and often. But then he went into politics and had to get all serious. People in the DEMOCRAT party like to talk a lot about spending someone else's money. That's what they do, ad naseum. Whose money do the REPUBLIC party like to spend? |
|
|
|
Post by gigglyforshrigley on Mar 27, 2015 10:00:12 GMT -8
People in the DEMOCRAT party like to talk a lot about spending someone else's money. That's what they do, ad naseum. Whose money do the REPUBLIC party like to spend? Their own, not everyone else's. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2015 10:04:16 GMT -8
Whose money do the REPUBLIC party like to spend? Their own, not everyone else's. Seriously? hook, line, sinker... |
|
