|
Post by sdsuaztecs on May 28, 2012 17:29:26 GMT -8
ESPN offered $3.0M per year per team from what I heard...
|
|
|
Post by FULL_MONTY on May 28, 2012 18:13:39 GMT -8
ESPN offered $3.0M per year per team from what I heard... When?
|
|
|
Post by k5james on May 28, 2012 18:15:07 GMT -8
ESPN offered $3.0M per year per team from what I heard... When? Don't even bother, the guy makes a habit out of spouting, pure, unadulterated BS on here.
|
|
|
Post by sdsuaztecs on May 28, 2012 19:54:11 GMT -8
My mistake...it was $2.0M
|
|
|
Post by fatmanaztec on May 29, 2012 8:43:50 GMT -8
^ He is talking about what ESPN is going to CHARGE each team in the MWC to televise their games when their next contract comes up as the remaining schools have litterally NO television market value under an economic principle so therefore the converse of paying schools is that you charge them...
|
|
|
Post by k5james on Aug 9, 2012 12:36:05 GMT -8
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 9, 2012 14:48:42 GMT -8
which comes out to about $3MM/year for football only schools like ourselves. Yuck. Almost nobody out there is more savvy about this stuff than the blogger who calls himself Frank the Tank. According to Frank, that number just doesn't pass the smell test. He continues to think all-sports members will get around $10M each, which means SDSU would get around $6M as predicted by the consultant Sterk hired.
|
|
|
Post by hbaztec on Aug 10, 2012 4:07:21 GMT -8
which comes out to about $3MM/year for football only schools like ourselves. Yuck. Almost nobody out there is more savvy about this stuff than the blogger who calls himself Frank the Tank. According to Frank, that number just doesn't pass the smell test. He continues to think all-sports members will get around $10M each, which means SDSU would get around $6M as predicted by the consultant Sterk hired. I am hearing $10 M for football. That will keep the athletic department alive.
|
|
|
Post by TheSanDiegan on Aug 10, 2012 8:03:04 GMT -8
It is true they lose West Virginia, Pittsburgh, Syracuse and add SDSU, BSU, Houston, SMU, and CF. You can't just make assumptions about the value of what was lost and the value of what is added to determine the new value of the TV contract. If that was how it worked the Big XII adding TCU and losing Nebraska and Texas A&M would have got less money. But we know they got a ton more money. The Market has changed and articles like that don't understand it. I really think it's as simple as the numbers, i.e., increased TV market exposure vs. any perceived decrease in product quality. And IMO, the increased (and easily quantifiable) market exposure - which will be huge compared to the OBE - more than offsets any perception of loss of product quality, and I can virtually guarantee it will in the eyes of the bean counters who's job it is to crunch the numbers for the guys upstairs. If I was a betting man, I'd put my money on a sizable contract in line with SDSU's original analysis and expectations.
|
|