|
|
Post by JOCAZTEC on Jan 27, 2011 22:46:05 GMT -8
First half: no calls on either team.
Second half: no calls on the Cheaters.
enuff said.
CBS was in ca-hoots, ta-boot.
hai.
|
|
|
|
Post by dmilesai on Jan 27, 2011 22:59:53 GMT -8
What does this even mean?
We got the positive end of the worst call in the game when they didn't call a goaltend on an obvious goaltend.
|
|
|
|
Post by seggy on Jan 27, 2011 23:13:26 GMT -8
What does this even mean? We got the positive end of the worst call in the game when they didn't call a goaltend on an obvious goaltend. exactly, the calls wern't bad at all. no excuses here they outplayed us... all we can do is forget about it and look forward |
|
|
|
Post by dreadhawk909 on Jan 27, 2011 23:15:31 GMT -8
First half: no calls on either team. Second half: no calls on the Cheaters. enuff said. CBS was in ca-hoots, ta-boot. hai. I hope you're drunk. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2011 8:30:13 GMT -8
You are an absolute idiot.
|
|
|
|
Post by longtimebooster on Jan 28, 2011 9:29:32 GMT -8
Hey, quit bagging on Aztec Joe.
He makes perfect sense in an anti-Phil Jackson, anti-Zen sort of way.
A bird flu on you all!
|
|
|
|
Post by Rider Of Rahon on Jan 28, 2011 10:00:07 GMT -8
The curse of Gidget!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by guyledouche on Jan 28, 2011 10:24:53 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jan 28, 2011 13:51:20 GMT -8
What does this even mean? We got the positive end of the worst call in the game when they didn't call a goaltend on an obvious goaltend. That was not goal tending. The ball was still going up. Stop believing the Announcers. The ball would have hit the backboard above where he swatted it. |
|
|
|
Post by dreadhawk909 on Jan 28, 2011 13:55:38 GMT -8
What does this even mean? We got the positive end of the worst call in the game when they didn't call a goaltend on an obvious goaltend. That was not goal tending. The ball was still going up. Stop believing the Announcers. The ball would have hit the backboard above where he swatted it. The announcers were so bad I had in on mute. And it was a goal tend. |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jan 28, 2011 14:00:33 GMT -8
That was not goal tending. The ball was still going up. Stop believing the Announcers. The ball would have hit the backboard above where he swatted it. The announcers were so bad I had in on mute. And it was a goal tend. What do you think the ball would have done if it hadn't been touched from the time he touched it on? The way I saw it, the ball would have then hit the backboard above where he touched it. |
|
|
|
Post by longtimebooster on Jan 28, 2011 14:29:46 GMT -8
Sorry, Bill, I almost always agree with you, as you usually have the facts, and the numbers to back them up, on your side.
However, I replayed that block three or four times on my DVR. The ball was swatted a full foot below its apogee. It was a very obvious goal tend.
|
|
|
|
Post by azson on Jan 28, 2011 14:35:28 GMT -8
Sorry, Bill, I almost always agree with you, as you usually have the facts, and the numbers to back them up, on your side. However, I replayed that block three or four times on my DVR. The ball was swatted a full foot below its apogee. It was a very obvious goal tend. +2 +1 for being correct and +1 for using apogee in your post. |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jan 28, 2011 14:38:35 GMT -8
Sorry, Bill, I almost always agree with you, as you usually have the facts, and the numbers to back them up, on your side. However, I replayed that block three or four times on my DVR. The ball was swatted a full foot below its apogee. It was a very obvious goal tend. I will have to re-watch it. I too thought it was below its Apogee - but yet to hit the apogee. Which I think would have been on the backboard after the point at which he touched it. |
|
|
|
Post by lou on Jan 28, 2011 17:13:34 GMT -8
Help me out please. English is my second language and my basketball knowledge is minimal, and I have difficulty understanding "The ball was swatted a full foot below its apogee. It was a very obvious goal tend." I understand apogee to be a further point in distance, whilst a pogee is a closer point in distance, both in relation to some object. So if the apogee had not yet been reached by the basketball, how could a player blocking the ball from reaching its apogee be goal tending? Thanking you in advance for the instruction.  |
|
|
|
Post by aztectlg on Jan 28, 2011 17:38:46 GMT -8
Why can't some people just put this damned game behind them and move on? Pure and simple, we got our ass summarily kicked by a team that was better on that one particular night. Bitching about all the WTFs makes us sound like our mascot should be Tiny Tears. Grow up, babies.
|
|
|
|
Post by JOCAZTEC on Jan 29, 2011 21:36:32 GMT -8
Uh oh.
Sorry.
I retract my Gidget remarks.
And, insert, "Loser!"
Take notes, it will make this year go smoothly.
HAM
|
|
|
|
Post by dmilesai on Jan 29, 2011 23:49:43 GMT -8
What does this even mean? We got the positive end of the worst call in the game when they didn't call a goaltend on an obvious goaltend. That was not goal tending. The ball was still going up. Stop believing the Announcers. The ball would have hit the backboard above where he swatted it. Huh? I hope this is a joke. |
|
