Post by PowayAztec on Jan 23, 2011 11:14:23 GMT -8
Jan 21, 2011 12:50:43 GMT -8 @sleepinggiantsfan said:
No. You must be wrong. Since SDSU paid somebody $35,000 to create that thing, it must be good.
Personally, I like that original look. Probably patterned after a legitimately historical pattern. (As opposed to a Steve Martin skit on Saturday Night Live.)
I still can't believe they picked that stupid "DS" logo.What the X X X X were they thinking? I remember some of the options that were presented at the time,and some were really cool,but then to my surprise, they actually went ahead and decided on the worst one -- the WORST one. They could have paid some SDSU graphic student to produce a better one for 35 bucks,let alone $35,000.What a moronic move. Who makes these decisions to go outside for dumb ass ideas?
+1
Why can't we ever get the logo that just hits the mark. I always thought we could save a ton of $$ by having students from the Art department design a logo. How about presenting several logos and have a vote on it. Don't adopt a logo until you find one that gets a 2/3 majority and most of the arguing will end. Then we can concentrate on hating the "airbrush" helmet and our other marketing disasters.
