|
Post by laaztec on Nov 18, 2024 21:25:58 GMT -8
I’ve seen enough.
|
|
|
Post by sdsuballer on Nov 18, 2024 21:28:22 GMT -8
Well at least Dutcher has an Alpha in Boyd. Those hard hedges on high pick n roll let our roller wide open. Unfortunately the rollers didn't want the ball.
|
|
|
Post by sdsudevil on Nov 18, 2024 22:16:18 GMT -8
Dutch gets another year, let's not be crazy...
|
|
|
Post by sdsuballer on Nov 18, 2024 22:42:17 GMT -8
Yeah, let's not get crazy. If Lewis was Coaching todays basketball game Heide would have started at PG and played all 40 minutes. #Aztecfast #BetheAlpha #Onlydaddyballisallowedinfootball
|
|
|
Post by sdsualumn2011 on Nov 19, 2024 7:24:30 GMT -8
Well at least Dutcher has an Alpha in Boyd. Those hard hedges on high pick n roll let our roller wide open. Unfortunately the rollers didn't want the ball. Be The Alpha!
|
|
|
Post by RiffelBooks on Nov 19, 2024 8:22:04 GMT -8
Come on, at least let Dutcher finish out the season. He's earned that right!
|
|
|
Post by LostAztec on Nov 19, 2024 8:32:16 GMT -8
Personally, Dutch should be given two more years to see how his recruits develop. Hopefully, he will grow as a Coach.
|
|
|
Post by rmksdsu30 on Nov 19, 2024 9:40:00 GMT -8
That’s so dumb, first on Lewis he needs time to get his players at least 2 years! Dutcher is great we probably go 17-12 ish this year but hopeful on next season geeze he is carrying us into the pac 10 and since 2019 has the 3rd most wins of all programs you don’t fire that. You lock him down if there’s any fault it’s NIL
|
|
|
Post by azson on Nov 19, 2024 10:23:38 GMT -8
That’s so dumb, first on Lewis he needs time to get his players at least 2 years! Dutcher is great we probably go 17-12 ish this year but hopeful on next season geeze he is carrying us into the pac 10 and since 2019 has the 3rd most wins of all programs you don’t fire that. You lock him down if there’s any fault it’s NIL FYI OP was being facetious about Dutch, making the point that those calling for Lew's head already are dum dums.
|
|
|
Post by standiego on Nov 19, 2024 11:24:13 GMT -8
very harsh reality about the NIL and Transfer Portal
Also injuries have hit both squads - but do wonder about Lewis - style of dealing with players- coaches - play selection - interesting article in the UT today
|
|
|
Post by laaztec on Nov 19, 2024 12:56:04 GMT -8
That’s so dumb, first on Lewis he needs time to get his players at least 2 years! Dutcher is great we probably go 17-12 ish this year but hopeful on next season geeze he is carrying us into the pac 10 and since 2019 has the 3rd most wins of all programs you don’t fire that. You lock him down if there’s any fault it’s NIL FYI OP was being facetious about Dutch, making the point that those calling for Lew's head already are dum dums. Correct.
|
|
|
Post by perch on Nov 19, 2024 13:21:07 GMT -8
I don't think the old rule of giving a coach2-3 years to develop the squad holds amymore, at least for the non power schools. this is because if the coach gets in some good players and develop them for a year or ywo, a major team will swoop in and grab them. College football is in a real bad way. The only solution I see is for the NCAA to reinstate the rule that a player must sit out a year if he transfers. Most big schools will not want to pay out big money for someine to sit on the bench for a year.
|
|
|
Post by jp92grad on Nov 19, 2024 14:08:44 GMT -8
I don't think the old rule of giving a coach2-3 years to develop the squad holds amymore, at least for the non power schools. this is because if the coach gets in some good players and develop them for a year or ywo, a major team will swoop in and grab them. College football is in a real bad way. The only solution I see is for the NCAA to reinstate the rule that a player must sit out a year if he transfers. Most big schools will not want to pay out big money for someine to sit on the bench for a year. Things are so screwed up right now, there really is just about nothing that can be done with how this system is right now. -The way the system is now setup (starting next year) you can not ask for scholarships to be limited based on transfers (next year 105 max) only the bigger programs can afford those kinds of numbers. -Salary caps would still be a joke, rumor (not roomer) is that they are talking about (10-15) million NIL cap, that's on top of operating budget for P4 programs and maybe 1-2 million for G5. How in the HELL are any of the lower programs going to be able to build AND maintain their programs if they are continually raided year after year? This system is soo screwed up right now and football as we know it right now is never going to be the same!
|
|
|
Post by Aztec Since 88 on Nov 19, 2024 14:12:02 GMT -8
I don't think the old rule of giving a coach2-3 years to develop the squad holds amymore, at least for the non power schools. this is because if the coach gets in some good players and develop them for a year or ywo, a major team will swoop in and grab them. College football is in a real bad way. The only solution I see is for the NCAA to reinstate the rule that a player must sit out a year if he transfers. Most big schools will not want to pay out big money for someine to sit on the bench for a year. I agree about the sit out rule on transfers, but I do not think that Genie can go back in the bottle. If I were in charge of the NCAA and eligibility. I would stream line rules to the following to make it easier for roster management. 1. Players should get 5 years to play 4 years for all sports. Once a player has played 4 years their eligibility expires. No more red shirting for any reason. In football if you play in 2 or more games, it counts as a season played. In all other sports it is 5 games played counts as a season played. 2. Players get one free transfer during their eligibility timeline, but a second transfer requires a player to sit out a year before playing. 3. The transfer portal opens the day after the national championship is determined, and goes for 30 days that is only window to transfer. 4. The signing period for high school athletes has 3 windows to sign after your junior year. (1)the first week in August, (2) the second week in December (3) lastly from May 1 to June 30 to fill out rosters. 5. Collective monies would have a cap of 25 million per school per year for all sports, it obviously adjusts with inflation over the years. How the school chooses to disperse the money is up to them. Players can still earn extra money from their own NIL. (Making commercials, autographs etc.) this was real intent of NIL not the collective monies. 6. Scholarship limits would be determined by sport. Personally I think it should be 90 for football, 12 for hoops, 25 for baseball/softball. Other sports TBD.
|
|
|
Post by missiontrails on Nov 19, 2024 16:04:43 GMT -8
Dutch has been so successful over the years as an assistant and a head coach that he has personally driven inflation (of season and individual game tickets). I'm going to see what it feels like to be a single-issue voter and call for Dutch to be fired! His whole staff too!
|
|
|
Post by aztecdan8 on Nov 19, 2024 16:13:54 GMT -8
All these sensible suggestions and recommendations to "fix" NIL are unfortunately pointless. The biggest and richest "schools" will decide what goes down, what the "rules" are, and they won't care one iota what is fair for the majority of the current D1/FBS programs.
It really might be time to have a plan in place for the G5 schools, including a separate G5 playoff. The best 1 or 2 G5 schools every season can go play in the big boys playoffs.
I feel like a lot of the schools like SDSU are the moderately attractive girl hoping to get an invite to the prom. But when the BMOCs look at the reasonably atttactive girl, they don't find her attractive at all and wouldn't be caught dead hanging out with that girl, let alone inviting her to the prom or their inner circle.
Sorry if I took an odd left turn analogy at Albuquerque, but I hope you get my point.
The additional irony is the current SEC & B1G "bottom dwellers" might be teams without a home in the not too distant future. They might want to be invited to the homely kids prom.
|
|
|
Post by standiego on Nov 19, 2024 16:58:50 GMT -8
unless you are a magician the rules are what they are and coaches have to be able to work with them - similar to what BSU - UNLV have been doing
coaches have to be able to Recruit their current players every year and have true conversations with them as they approach the end of a season
Coaches have to be able to attract players from the Portal - Dutcher is able to do it some what but the NIL money is a problem but he has won and players to get some offers from the NBA - but it will only get more difficult as NIL becomes more important for players especially guys heading towards the end of their college career
Lewis - not sure what he can do other then say Aztec Fast - the results just have not been there - especially with the losses to teams that were beatable- Lobos - C . Michigan .... he did do a great sell job on JD - as Colorado has survived him leaving and the UNLV OC has been able to rebound from losing QB's
Not sure what the feelings of the players are towards the HC - will he lose more players - do they believe in him or see right through him -
toss in terrible field conditions and high prices of tickets( poor attendance ) so players are not seeing much of a home field advantage or bright future at SDSU
It seems he is over whelmed at least on the field and if you read the article in the UT - the NIL and Portal have him wishing for the good old days he coached and played in
|
|
|
Post by La Mesa Aztec on Nov 19, 2024 17:33:30 GMT -8
Why can't we sign players to multi year, enforceable contracts? They don't get to leave after a good season and they aren't kicked out if they aren't any good.
|
|
|
Post by AzTex on Nov 19, 2024 18:11:36 GMT -8
I don't think the old rule of giving a coach2-3 years to develop the squad holds amymore, at least for the non power schools. this is because if the coach gets in some good players and develop them for a year or ywo, a major team will swoop in and grab them. College football is in a real bad way. The only solution I see is for the NCAA to reinstate the rule that a player must sit out a year if he transfers. Most big schools will not want to pay out big money for someine to sit on the bench for a year. I agree about the sit out rule on transfers, but I do not think that Genie can go back in the bottle. If I were in charge of the NCAA and eligibility. I would stream line rules to the following to make it easier for roster management. 1. Players should get 5 years to play 4 years for all sports. Once a player has played 4 years their eligibility expires. No more red shirting for any reason. In football if you play in 2 or more games, it counts as a season played. In all other sports it is 5 games played counts as a season played. 2. Players get one free transfer during their eligibility timeline, but a second transfer requires a player to sit out a year before playing. 3. The transfer portal opens the day after the national championship is determined, and goes for 30 days that is only window to transfer. 4. The signing period for high school athletes has 3 windows to sign after your junior year. (1)the first week in August, (2) the second week in December (3) lastly from May 1 to June 30 to fill out rosters. 5. Collective monies would have a cap of 25 million per school per year for all sports, it obviously adjusts with inflation over the years. How the school chooses to disperse the money is up to them. Players can still earn extra money from their own NIL. (Making commercials, autographs etc.) this was real intent of NIL not the collective monies. 6. Scholarship limits would be determined by sport. Personally I think it should be 90 for football, 12 for hoops, 25 for baseball/softball. Other sports TBD. If I were in charge I'd make college sports amateur only again. If a college student wants to play for pay let them find a pro, or simi-pro league to play for.
|
|
|
Post by jp92grad on Nov 19, 2024 20:04:39 GMT -8
I agree about the sit out rule on transfers, but I do not think that Genie can go back in the bottle. If I were in charge of the NCAA and eligibility. I would stream line rules to the following to make it easier for roster management. 1. Players should get 5 years to play 4 years for all sports. Once a player has played 4 years their eligibility expires. No more red shirting for any reason. In football if you play in 2 or more games, it counts as a season played. In all other sports it is 5 games played counts as a season played. 2. Players get one free transfer during their eligibility timeline, but a second transfer requires a player to sit out a year before playing. 3. The transfer portal opens the day after the national championship is determined, and goes for 30 days that is only window to transfer. 4. The signing period for high school athletes has 3 windows to sign after your junior year. (1)the first week in August, (2) the second week in December (3) lastly from May 1 to June 30 to fill out rosters. 5. Collective monies would have a cap of 25 million per school per year for all sports, it obviously adjusts with inflation over the years. How the school chooses to disperse the money is up to them. Players can still earn extra money from their own NIL. (Making commercials, autographs etc.) this was real intent of NIL not the collective monies. 6. Scholarship limits would be determined by sport. Personally I think it should be 90 for football, 12 for hoops, 25 for baseball/softball. Other sports TBD. If I were in charge I'd make college sports amateur only again. If a college student wants to play for pay let them find a pro, or simi-pro league to play for. Maybe we should put you in charge!
I like this type of thinking, I would rather watch a group of SDSU AMATEUR student athletes play against other AMATEUR student athletes much more then a group professional (paid) athletes that hang out and train at a college facility that call themselves "student athletes". I will say these days I am much more of an Aztec fan then a Football or Basketball fan and it is not even close! Go Aztec!
|
|