|
|
Post by uwphoto on Nov 1, 2024 5:28:09 GMT -8
So, if you are having trouble with the women's vote you could always do a commercial that talks about Kamala Harris and the "C Word". If that doesn't work, talk about "protecting women, if they like it ..or not" (must remind a few of sexual assault). Or, to really seal the deal, talk about shooting Liz Cheney in the face? I hope the women's vote sinks this .....!
|
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Nov 1, 2024 8:24:39 GMT -8
So, if you are having trouble with the women's vote you could always do a commercial that talks about Kamala Harris and the "C Word". If that doesn't work, talk about "protecting women, if they like it ..or not" (must remind a few of sexual assault). Or, to really seal the deal, talk about shooting Liz Cheney in the face? I hope the women's vote sinks this .....! I’m presently in Canada where allegations are the same as a conviction, but when did America switch to guilty until to proven innocent? When did a word spoken become as egregious as Slick Willy’s actions? Yes, a sentence taken out of contest is so important. Reminds me of Condoleezza Rice saying (out of context,) “Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction.” In context, “Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction. And if you believe that, you’re not paying attention.” I paraphrase. There certainly is a gender gap, but it is not as massive as reported by the radical left Vox and Salon. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 1, 2024 8:28:08 GMT -8
So, if you are having trouble with the women's vote you could always do a commercial that talks about Kamala Harris and the "C Word". If that doesn't work, talk about "protecting women, if they like it ..or not" (must remind a few of sexual assault). Or, to really seal the deal, talk about shooting Liz Cheney in the face? I hope the women's vote sinks this .....! I’m presently in Canada where allegations are the same as a conviction, but when did America switch to guilty until to proven innocent? When did a word spoken become as egregious as Slick Willy’s actions? Yes, a sentence taken out of contest is so important. Reminds me of Condoleezza Rice saying (out of context,) “Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction.” In context, “Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction. And if you believe that, you’re not paying attention.” I paraphrase. There certainly is a gender gap, but it is not as massive as reported by the radical left Vox and Salon. "Taken out of context." "Misunderstood." "He didn't really mean it." "He's just kidding around." The lengths people will go to.... |
|
|
|
Post by azson on Nov 1, 2024 8:30:29 GMT -8
So, if you are having trouble with the women's vote you could always do a commercial that talks about Kamala Harris and the "C Word". If that doesn't work, talk about "protecting women, if they like it ..or not" (must remind a few of sexual assault). Or, to really seal the deal, talk about shooting Liz Cheney in the face? I hope the women's vote sinks this .....! Sadly the woman's vote is one of the reason HRC lost in 2016. Unfortunately the "big daddy's gonna take care of me" syndrome is a thing - let's just hope it's not as much of a thing this cycle. It's quite mindboggling to me that misogyny is just as prevalent in women as it is in men. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 1, 2024 8:53:40 GMT -8
So, if you are having trouble with the women's vote you could always do a commercial that talks about Kamala Harris and the "C Word". If that doesn't work, talk about "protecting women, if they like it ..or not" (must remind a few of sexual assault). Or, to really seal the deal, talk about shooting Liz Cheney in the face? I hope the women's vote sinks this .....! Sadly the woman's vote is one of the reason HRC lost in 2016. Unfortunately the "big daddy's gonna take care of me" syndrome is a thing - let's just hope it's not as much of a thing this cycle. It's quite mindboggling to me that misogyny is just as prevalent in women as it is in men. The early women's vote is pretty stunning. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Nov 1, 2024 9:14:28 GMT -8
Sadly the woman's vote is one of the reason HRC lost in 2016. Unfortunately the "big daddy's gonna take care of me" syndrome is a thing - let's just hope it's not as much of a thing this cycle. It's quite mindboggling to me that misogyny is just as prevalent in women as it is in men. The early women's vote is pretty stunning. Certainly young women voters seeing "Grab em by the *****" on TikTok for the first time may be an inspiration. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 1, 2024 9:24:46 GMT -8
The early women's vote is pretty stunning. Certainly young women voters seeing "Grab em by the *****" on TikTok for the first time may be an inspiration. More to do with women's rights and abortion. |
|
|
|
Post by bnastyaztecs on Nov 1, 2024 9:41:10 GMT -8
So, if you are having trouble with the women's vote you could always do a commercial that talks about Kamala Harris and the "C Word". If that doesn't work, talk about "protecting women, if they like it ..or not" (must remind a few of sexual assault). Or, to really seal the deal, talk about shooting Liz Cheney in the face? I hope the women's vote sinks this .....! I’m presently in Canada where allegations are the same as a conviction, but when did America switch to guilty until to proven innocent? When did a word spoken become as egregious as Slick Willy’s actions? Yes, a sentence taken out of contest is so important. Reminds me of Condoleezza Rice saying (out of context,) “Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction.” In context, “Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction. And if you believe that, you’re not paying attention.” I paraphrase. There certainly is a gender gap, but it is not as massive as reported by the radical left Vox and Salon. "... when did America switch to guilty until to proven innocent?" When it saw a Black man walking down its all-white neighborhood streets. Listen...who has been shot at...allegedly...who has had a gun-related near-death experience...says someone should have "guns trained at her face?"...that's no slip...that's no misspeak...that's just plain viciousness/evil...it's darn sure unpresidential to speak in such a way...as far as women...it's not all of them...just a specific group...as I said a long time ago...this is a white folk's election...this is an election on whether white women have any self-respect...: " Forty-seven per cent of white women voted for Trump, while 45% backed Clinton, according to an analysis of validated voter files by the Pew Research Center. Trump’s success with white women highlighted a longstanding truth: this group votes for Republicans." "In contrast, 95% of Black women voted for Joe Biden in 2020, along with 61% of Hispanic women, Pew found." www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/08/white-women-voters-harris-trumpIf the nation falls into disrepair after next Tuesday...it'll be on white women...and nobody else...... |
|
|
|
Post by aztecbrothers on Nov 1, 2024 10:13:52 GMT -8
It is tricky since Kamala/Walz want to take a Mother's rights to be a parent and take her right to choose what is good for her children.
Kamala is being funded by Big Pharma and they will profit from the policies she is supporting.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 1, 2024 10:22:19 GMT -8
It is tricky since Kamala/Walz want to take a Mother's rights to be a parent and take her right to choose what is good for her children. Kamala is being funded by Big Pharma and they will profit from the policies she is supporting. Delusional. |
|
|
|
Post by azson on Nov 1, 2024 10:25:52 GMT -8
It is tricky since Kamala/Walz want to take a Mother's rights to be a parent and take her right to choose what is good for her children. Kamala is being funded by Big Pharma and they will profit from the policies she is supporting. |
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Nov 2, 2024 8:19:36 GMT -8
I’m presently in Canada where allegations are the same as a conviction, but when did America switch to guilty until to proven innocent? When did a word spoken become as egregious as Slick Willy’s actions? Yes, a sentence taken out of contest is so important. Reminds me of Condoleezza Rice saying (out of context,) “Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction.” In context, “Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction. And if you believe that, you’re not paying attention.” I paraphrase. There certainly is a gender gap, but it is not as massive as reported by the radical left Vox and Salon. "Taken out of context." "Misunderstood." "He didn't really mean it." "He's just kidding around." The lengths people will go to.... Delusional. The shoe fits
Traditional synonymous with paranoia, is a mental illness in which a person has delusions, but with no accompanying prominent hallucinations, thought disorder, mood disorder, or significant flattening of affect. Delusions are a specific symptom of psychosis. Delusions can be bizarre or non-bizarre in content; non-bizarre delusions are fixed false beliefs that involve situations that could occur in real life, such as being harmed or poisoned. Apart from their delusion or delusions, people with delusional disorder may continue to socialize and function in a normal manner and their behavior does not necessarily seem odd. However, the preoccupation with delusional ideas can be disruptive to their overall lives. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 2, 2024 8:24:52 GMT -8
"Taken out of context." "Misunderstood." "He didn't really mean it." "He's just kidding around." The lengths people will go to.... Delusional. The shoe fits Traditional synonymous with paranoia, is a mental illness in which a person has delusions, but with no accompanying prominent hallucinations, thought disorder, mood disorder, or significant flattening of affect. Delusions are a specific symptom of psychosis. Delusions can be bizarre or non-bizarre in content; non-bizarre delusions are fixed false beliefs that involve situations that could occur in real life, such as being harmed or poisoned. Apart from their delusion or delusions, people with delusional disorder may continue to socialize and function in a normal manner and their behavior does not necessarily seem odd. However, the preoccupation with delusional ideas can be disruptive to their overall lives. I'm not defending Donald Trump, so I think my eyes are wide open. It speaks volumes that you can't argue the merits....likely because you know you're on the wrong side. |
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Nov 2, 2024 16:41:03 GMT -8
With Election Day just around the corner, conservative influencers are openly fretting about women voting, especially as NBC News reports that Harris has a 33-point advantage among women. Some of those influencers are upset at the idea of a woman having the freedom to pick whoever she votes for, while others are throwing tantrums about women being allowed to vote at all. But the outrage is a predictable development from a movement that has prided itself on its performative machismo and outright misogyny. Just this week, John McEntee, a former Trump campaign official and Project 2025 adviser, shared a video in which he openly suggests a repeal of women’s voting rights in order to have “male-only” voting. When Kamala Harris’ campaign called out his video, McEntee responded, “Relax, relax it’s only jokes…unless. 👀” Elsewhere, Turning Point USA founder and far-right activist Charlie Kirk, a prime peddler of the whole “only real men vote for Trump” propaganda, has been having conniptions about women exhibiting any political independence. Kirk seemed appalled by a Democratic ad that reminds women their vote is private and needn’t align with their husband’s. During a recent podcast appearance, he shuddered to think some Republican women might “undermine their husbands” by voting for Harris, even though, as he says, their husband “works his tail off to make sure that she can have a nice life.”
Kirk seems quite worried about all of this, as indicated by his hair-on-fire reaction to the reported numbers of women voting. “Early vote has been disproportionately female,” he posted Wednesday on X, adding that “if men stay at home, Kamala is president. It’s that simple.” He ended his post by saying, “Men need to GO VOTE NOW.” This is in keeping with the hysteria elsewhere in the MAGA social media ecosystem, as far-right influencers like Mike Cernovich, Jack Posobiec, McEntee and others trying to rally MAGA men to the polls. You can almost hear the alarm as you read this post from the managing editor of the ultraconservative satirical news site the Babylon Bee:
I guess MAGA women aren’t moving their “fat pig” husbands, as Trump called them, to the polls fast enough.
On Fox News, host Jesse Watters used a violent (if extremely vague) World War II metaphor to scold wives who vote differently from their husbands, saying that if his wife voted for Kamala Harris, it would be “D-Day” and “the same thing as having an affair.”
In the evangelical community, where the backlash to feminism has been particularly oppressive, MAGA men have been more explicit in denouncing women for exercising even the least political independence.
MAGA pastor Dale Partridge said on social media Tuesday that “in a Christian marriage, a wife should vote according to her husband’s direction” because “he is the head and they are one” — unless he says to vote for a Democrat, in which case that doesn’t apply. “This is not controversial,” Partridge declared.
Seems pretty controversial to me, though.
During an episode of his podcast last week, Joel Webbon, another popular far-right pastor, doubled down on his earlier statement that the 19th Amendment should be repealed. Webbon said women’s political choices should be given to the men in their lives, whether that’s their husbands, fathers, brothers or uncles.
Days out from Election Day, the MAGA movement’s misogyny is on full display. They simply can’t contain their outrage over the fact that women — for now, at least — have the freedom to make their own choices at the ballot box. And it seems they’re finally starting to realize their juvenile bravado and unabashed chauvinism might come back to bite them. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Nov 2, 2024 17:18:09 GMT -8
With Election Day just around the corner, conservative influencers are openly fretting about women voting, especially as NBC News reports that Harris has a 33-point advantage among women. Some of those influencers are upset at the idea of a woman having the freedom to pick whoever she votes for, while others are throwing tantrums about women being allowed to vote at all. But the outrage is a predictable development from a movement that has prided itself on its performative machismo and outright misogyny. Just this week, John McEntee, a former Trump campaign official and Project 2025 adviser, shared a video in which he openly suggests a repeal of women’s voting rights in order to have “male-only” voting. When Kamala Harris’ campaign called out his video, McEntee responded, “Relax, relax it’s only jokes…unless. 👀” Elsewhere, Turning Point USA founder and far-right activist Charlie Kirk, a prime peddler of the whole “only real men vote for Trump” propaganda, has been having conniptions about women exhibiting any political independence. Kirk seemed appalled by a Democratic ad that reminds women their vote is private and needn’t align with their husband’s. During a recent podcast appearance, he shuddered to think some Republican women might “undermine their husbands” by voting for Harris, even though, as he says, their husband “works his tail off to make sure that she can have a nice life.”
Kirk seems quite worried about all of this, as indicated by his hair-on-fire reaction to the reported numbers of women voting. “Early vote has been disproportionately female,” he posted Wednesday on X, adding that “if men stay at home, Kamala is president. It’s that simple.” He ended his post by saying, “Men need to GO VOTE NOW.” This is in keeping with the hysteria elsewhere in the MAGA social media ecosystem, as far-right influencers like Mike Cernovich, Jack Posobiec, McEntee and others trying to rally MAGA men to the polls. You can almost hear the alarm as you read this post from the managing editor of the ultraconservative satirical news site the Babylon Bee:
I guess MAGA women aren’t moving their “fat pig” husbands, as Trump called them, to the polls fast enough.
On Fox News, host Jesse Watters used a violent (if extremely vague) World War II metaphor to scold wives who vote differently from their husbands, saying that if his wife voted for Kamala Harris, it would be “D-Day” and “the same thing as having an affair.”
In the evangelical community, where the backlash to feminism has been particularly oppressive, MAGA men have been more explicit in denouncing women for exercising even the least political independence.
MAGA pastor Dale Partridge said on social media Tuesday that “in a Christian marriage, a wife should vote according to her husband’s direction” because “he is the head and they are one” — unless he says to vote for a Democrat, in which case that doesn’t apply. “This is not controversial,” Partridge declared.
Seems pretty controversial to me, though.
During an episode of his podcast last week, Joel Webbon, another popular far-right pastor, doubled down on his earlier statement that the 19th Amendment should be repealed. Webbon said women’s political choices should be given to the men in their lives, whether that’s their husbands, fathers, brothers or uncles.
Days out from Election Day, the MAGA movement’s misogyny is on full display. They simply can’t contain their outrage over the fact that women — for now, at least — have the freedom to make their own choices at the ballot box. And it seems they’re finally starting to realize their juvenile bravado and unabashed chauvinism might come back to bite them. These guys are hilarious! More "C-word"commercials, "weather they like it or not", grab em by, and on and on. Women will save America! |
|
|
|
Post by North County Aztec on Nov 2, 2024 17:35:21 GMT -8
Delusional. The shoe fits Traditional synonymous with paranoia, is a mental illness in which a person has delusions, but with no accompanying prominent hallucinations, thought disorder, mood disorder, or significant flattening of affect. Delusions are a specific symptom of psychosis. Delusions can be bizarre or non-bizarre in content; non-bizarre delusions are fixed false beliefs that involve situations that could occur in real life, such as being harmed or poisoned. Apart from their delusion or delusions, people with delusional disorder may continue to socialize and function in a normal manner and their behavior does not necessarily seem odd. However, the preoccupation with delusional ideas can be disruptive to their overall lives. I'm not defending Donald Trump, so I think my eyes are wide open. It speaks volumes that you can't argue the merits....likely because you know you're on the wrong side. Congratulations, your long pending application to the Rodman Edward Serling Fan Club, after months of careful scrutiny has been approved. Welcome to the Twilight Zone where you have proven you belong. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 2, 2024 18:18:27 GMT -8
I'm not defending Donald Trump, so I think my eyes are wide open. It speaks volumes that you can't argue the merits....likely because you know you're on the wrong side. Congratulations, your long pending application to the Rodman Edward Serling Fan Club, after months of careful scrutiny has been approved. Welcome to the Twilight Zone where you have proven you belong. Predictable. Can you tell me why I'm wrong? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecbrothers on Nov 2, 2024 21:27:40 GMT -8
Congratulations, your long pending application to the Rodman Edward Serling Fan Club, after months of careful scrutiny has been approved. Welcome to the Twilight Zone where you have proven you belong. Predictable. Can you tell me why I'm wrong? You are not wrong. We all know you have Trump envy syndrome. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 3, 2024 15:01:21 GMT -8
Predictable. Can you tell me why I'm wrong? You are not wrong. We all know you have Trump envy syndrome. Well, that's the funniest thing I'll ever read, next to you claiming to be an Independent, of course. Envy....On my deathbed, I wouldn't be envious of a person who floated through life abusing people, taking advantage of the vulnerable, not having the courage to serve our country and making a general mockery of the justice system. |
|
