|
|
Post by aztecryan on Sept 13, 2024 6:51:30 GMT -8
Came across a good thread that I can't find anymore thanks to the X algorithm, but I'll sum up some thoughts...
Why is it dangerous to be a one issue voter? Well, this election, in particular, you can't really choose what that issue is. Republicans are actively trying to undermine the right to vote in multiple swing states. So, do you care about voting rights?
The overturning of Roe v. Wade has made it extraordinarily difficult for women and young girls to receive access to abortion, putting countless lives at risk. Do you care about women's rights?
The much-ballyhooed immigration issues: Mass deportations and crashing the US economy is on the table. Do you care about economic value and affordability? Housing costs? Infrastructure?
This election is just far too important to be a one-issue voter. You have to take a comprehensive look at *all* the issues and determine what fits best, not just for yourself, but the good of the country as we go forward.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Aztec Panther on Sept 13, 2024 7:10:29 GMT -8
Yeah, the people who support Trump's insane idea of mass deportations of people who have been living, working, and paying taxes here have no idea how deporting those people in mass numbers would destroy the economy. It would create economic chaos. Trump keeps talking about Kamala destroying the American economy and turning us into, "Venezuela on steoroids," but that's exactly what would happen if his mass deportations went through!
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Sept 13, 2024 8:25:31 GMT -8
Yeah, the people who support Trump's insane idea of mass deportations of people who have been living, working, and paying taxes here have no idea how deporting those people in mass numbers would destroy the economy. It would create economic chaos. Trump keeps talking about Kamala destroying the American economy and turning us into, "Venezuela on steoroids," but that's exactly what would happen if his mass deportations went through! He might deport a handful of gang bangers for show if he can find them. It's a bigly bluff to throw red meat for the Cult. It is not feasible/ doable = "mass deport". This is Mexico is paying for it all over again. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Sept 13, 2024 8:34:40 GMT -8
Yeah, the people who support Trump's insane idea of mass deportations of people who have been living, working, and paying taxes here have no idea how deporting those people in mass numbers would destroy the economy. It would create economic chaos. Trump keeps talking about Kamala destroying the American economy and turning us into, "Venezuela on steoroids," but that's exactly what would happen if his mass deportations went through! He might deport a handful of gang bangers for show if he can find them. It's a bigly bluff to throw red meat for the Cult. It is not feasible/ doable = "mass deport". This is Mexico is paying for it all over again. This. That's not going to happen. He can't do "mass" deportations. It won't work. Yes, fluff, fluff, fluff. Typical posturing from candidates. I'm going to do this, and I'm going to do that, then crickets. People need to sift through the B.S. and not let these outlandish claims influence their vote. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Sept 13, 2024 9:39:00 GMT -8
Yeah, the people who support Trump's insane idea of mass deportations of people who have been living, working, and paying taxes here have no idea how deporting those people in mass numbers would destroy the economy. It would create economic chaos. Trump keeps talking about Kamala destroying the American economy and turning us into, "Venezuela on steoroids," but that's exactly what would happen if his mass deportations went through! He might deport a handful of gang bangers for show if he can find them. It's a bigly bluff to throw red meat for the Cult. It is not feasible/ doable = "mass deport". This is Mexico is paying for it all over again. There's a massive middle ground there that still equals disaster. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Sept 13, 2024 9:39:24 GMT -8
He might deport a handful of gang bangers for show if he can find them. It's a bigly bluff to throw red meat for the Cult. It is not feasible/ doable = "mass deport". This is Mexico is paying for it all over again. This. That's not going to happen. He can't do "mass" deportations. It won't work. Yes, fluff, fluff, fluff. Typical posturing from candidates. I'm going to do this, and I'm going to do that, then crickets. People need to sift through the B.S. and not let these outlandish claims influence their vote. Read Project 2025, then come back to the table. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Sept 13, 2024 9:57:06 GMT -8
He might deport a handful of gang bangers for show if he can find them. It's a bigly bluff to throw red meat for the Cult. It is not feasible/ doable = "mass deport". This is Mexico is paying for it all over again. There's a massive middle ground there that still equals disaster. Most of these people are working for Corps. that feed cash to the power structure..once they make noise...its tail between the legs time. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Sept 13, 2024 10:02:38 GMT -8
There's a massive middle ground there that still equals disaster. Most of these people are working for Corps. that feed cash to the power structure..once they make noise...its tail between the legs time. To be clear, any attempt at mass deportation would result in legal challenges and chaos, which still causes instability. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Sept 13, 2024 10:47:37 GMT -8
This. That's not going to happen. He can't do "mass" deportations. It won't work. Yes, fluff, fluff, fluff. Typical posturing from candidates. I'm going to do this, and I'm going to do that, then crickets. People need to sift through the B.S. and not let these outlandish claims influence their vote. Read Project 2025, then come back to the table. Ok. I'm back. It ain't happening. Not mass. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Sept 13, 2024 10:58:33 GMT -8
Read Project 2025, then come back to the table. Ok. I'm back. It ain't happening. Not mass. What is "mass?" My point is that you really don't understand that it's not just a bluff, much of Project 2025 has been in the works for years. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecnails on Sept 15, 2024 11:44:37 GMT -8
Trump is not with project 2025. He denounced it. That is the work of the Heritage Foundation. Trump's plan is Agenda 47 on his campaign page. When voters consider the failed economy under biden and harris, border security, reducing crime, courts not being used for political lawfare and more, Trump will win in November. The left can own abortion and walz signing legislation about putting tampons in boy's bathrooms.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Sept 15, 2024 12:19:24 GMT -8
Trump is not with project 2025. He denounced it. That is the work of the Heritage Foundation. Trump's plan is Agenda 47 on his campaign page. When voters consider the failed economy under biden and harris, border security, reducing crime, courts not being used for political lawfare and more, Trump will win in November. The left can own abortion and walz signing legislation about putting tampons in boy's bathrooms. Trump endorsed the Heritage Foundation in 2022 and gave the keynote address. Spare me the silliness. Failed economy? Lol. Kook. |
|
