|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 18, 2024 9:27:18 GMT -8
Said the often wrong doofus. If I cared about pointing out what's wrong, you probably wouldn't even post anymore. I'm going to force you to reconcile with racism, misogyny pedophilia and the predatory actions of your preferred candidate. - Do you support rape? - Do you support the objectification of women? - Do you support mass deportations? - Are you a White nationalist? We can start there.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 18, 2024 9:39:15 GMT -8
Said the often wrong doofus. Here's how your brain works. Anything that helps Trump? Good. It can be lawless, pointless, reckless, dangerous, completely void of reality...but if it helps Trump in any capacity, you fawn over it and justify it. You *worship* and I mean WORSHIP a 78 year old, obese geriatric who spent more time golfing and stealing money from YOUR tax dollars than he did running this country. A corrupt, immoral, racist gasbag who wanted to shoot protesters in the streets of Washington. In case you're wondering, that's not normal behavior for a rational human being to take part in. It signals that you are emotionally invested, mentally compromised and lack the ability to be objective.
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jul 18, 2024 9:41:43 GMT -8
Said the often wrong doofus. If I cared about pointing out what's wrong, you probably wouldn't even post anymore. I'm going to force you to reconcile with racism, misogyny pedophilia and the predatory actions of your preferred candidate. - Do you support rape? - Do you support the objectification of women? - Do you support mass deportations? - Are you a White nationalist? We can start there. Quit deflecting off topic.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 18, 2024 9:46:25 GMT -8
If I cared about pointing out what's wrong, you probably wouldn't even post anymore. I'm going to force you to reconcile with racism, misogyny pedophilia and the predatory actions of your preferred candidate. - Do you support rape? - Do you support the objectification of women? - Do you support mass deportations? - Are you a White nationalist? We can start there. Quit deflecting off topic. It has to deal with the former president of the United States, someone you've praised. So, it's on topic. It goes to psychology and glorification. So that's a yes then. Good to know.
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jul 18, 2024 10:12:19 GMT -8
Quit deflecting off topic. It has to deal with the former president of the United States, someone you've praised. So, it's on topic. It goes to psychology and glorification. So that's a yes then. Good to know. You are deflecting away from the potential incompetence of the Biden administration’s management of Secret Service assets. RFK, an actual presidential candidate hasn’t (at least until very recently) has Secret Service protection. Apparently Trump has had insufficient protection.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 18, 2024 10:22:20 GMT -8
It has to deal with the former president of the United States, someone you've praised. So, it's on topic. It goes to psychology and glorification. So that's a yes then. Good to know. You are deflecting away from the potential incompetence of the Biden administration’s management of Secret Service assets. RFK, an actual presidential candidate hasn’t (at least until very recently) has Secret Service protection. Apparently Trump has had insufficient protection. Not deflecting away from anything. Your opinions are nonsensical and not grounded in reality and I'm under no obligation to acquiesce to your fantasies.
|
|
|
Post by bnastyaztecs on Jul 18, 2024 10:25:56 GMT -8
Thomas Matthew Crooks' Father Profiled by Donald Trump Campaign"Matthew Crooks was included in a database that Trump's 2016 campaign built profiling millions of voters in key battleground states as part of a secret effort to identify gun owners who could be targeted with messages about gun rights ahead of the 2016 election, according to Channel 4 News." " Crooks' father was identified in the database as a strong Republican, likely gun owner and a "hunter," according to the outlet. His mother, Mary Crooks, was also identified as a likely gun owner." www.newsweek.com/thomas-crooks-father-profiled-trump-campaign-1926175Like I say...Crooks is a patsy...a fall guy...who was manipulated by Trump and/or et al...to stage the shooting...they had all the information on the kid...knew his and his family's mental state...probably started sending him subvert propaganda that radicalized him...oh the plot thickens.....
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Jul 18, 2024 10:38:04 GMT -8
Thomas Matthew Crooks' Father Profiled by Donald Trump Campaign"Matthew Crooks was included in a database that Trump's 2016 campaign built profiling millions of voters in key battleground states as part of a secret effort to identify gun owners who could be targeted with messages about gun rights ahead of the 2016 election, according to Channel 4 News." " Crooks' father was identified in the database as a strong Republican, likely gun owner and a "hunter," according to the outlet. His mother, Mary Crooks, was also identified as a likely gun owner." www.newsweek.com/thomas-crooks-father-profiled-trump-campaign-1926175Like I say...Crooks is a patsy...a fall guy...who was manipulated by Trump and/or et al...to stage the shooting...they had all the information on the kid...knew his and his family's mental state...probably started sending him subvert propaganda that radicalized him...oh the plot thickens.....
|
|
|
Post by azson on Jul 18, 2024 10:38:46 GMT -8
Thomas Matthew Crooks' Father Profiled by Donald Trump Campaign"Matthew Crooks was included in a database that Trump's 2016 campaign built profiling millions of voters in key battleground states as part of a secret effort to identify gun owners who could be targeted with messages about gun rights ahead of the 2016 election, according to Channel 4 News." " Crooks' father was identified in the database as a strong Republican, likely gun owner and a "hunter," according to the outlet. His mother, Mary Crooks, was also identified as a likely gun owner." www.newsweek.com/thomas-crooks-father-profiled-trump-campaign-1926175Like I say...Crooks is a patsy...a fall guy...who was manipulated by Trump and/or et al...to stage the shooting...they had all the information on the kid...knew his and his family's mental state...probably started sending him subvert propaganda that radicalized him...oh the plot thickens..... Possible, but sounds like conspiracy theory to me. At the very least though this is a chicken coming home to roost moment for Trump, but of course he's parlaying it to feed his victim mentality.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 18, 2024 10:44:24 GMT -8
Thomas Matthew Crooks' Father Profiled by Donald Trump Campaign"Matthew Crooks was included in a database that Trump's 2016 campaign built profiling millions of voters in key battleground states as part of a secret effort to identify gun owners who could be targeted with messages about gun rights ahead of the 2016 election, according to Channel 4 News." " Crooks' father was identified in the database as a strong Republican, likely gun owner and a "hunter," according to the outlet. His mother, Mary Crooks, was also identified as a likely gun owner." www.newsweek.com/thomas-crooks-father-profiled-trump-campaign-1926175Like I say...Crooks is a patsy...a fall guy...who was manipulated by Trump and/or et al...to stage the shooting...they had all the information on the kid...knew his and his family's mental state...probably started sending him subvert propaganda that radicalized him...oh the plot thickens..... Possible, but sounds like conspiracy theory to me. At the very least though this is a chicken coming home to roost moment for Trump, but of course he's parlaying it to feed his victim mentality. Something is definitely off.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 18, 2024 10:46:12 GMT -8
Thomas Matthew Crooks' Father Profiled by Donald Trump Campaign"Matthew Crooks was included in a database that Trump's 2016 campaign built profiling millions of voters in key battleground states as part of a secret effort to identify gun owners who could be targeted with messages about gun rights ahead of the 2016 election, according to Channel 4 News." " Crooks' father was identified in the database as a strong Republican, likely gun owner and a "hunter," according to the outlet. His mother, Mary Crooks, was also identified as a likely gun owner." www.newsweek.com/thomas-crooks-father-profiled-trump-campaign-1926175Like I say...Crooks is a patsy...a fall guy...who was manipulated by Trump and/or et al...to stage the shooting...they had all the information on the kid...knew his and his family's mental state...probably started sending him subvert propaganda that radicalized him...oh the plot thickens..... You just may be the patsy, throwing out conspiracy theories like the assassination attempt was fake, this recent post of yours, etc... I get it, you'll jump on anything that will shed bad light on Trump. You're very, very predictable. Your plot is there for all to see.
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jul 18, 2024 11:03:24 GMT -8
You are deflecting away from the potential incompetence of the Biden administration’s management of Secret Service assets. RFK, an actual presidential candidate hasn’t (at least until very recently) has Secret Service protection. Apparently Trump has had insufficient protection. Not deflecting away from anything. Your opinions are nonsensical and not grounded in reality and I'm under no obligation to acquiesce to your fantasies. Ok, brainwashed lemming…..what is incorrect? Trump’s inadequate protection? RFK’s nonexistent protection? These are now established facts. Do you still think this was a staged skit?
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 18, 2024 11:23:09 GMT -8
Not deflecting away from anything. Your opinions are nonsensical and not grounded in reality and I'm under no obligation to acquiesce to your fantasies. Ok, brainwashed lemming…..what is incorrect? Trump’s inadequate protection? RFK’s nonexistent protection? These are now established facts. Do you still think this was a staged skit? "Inadequate protection?" They propped him up for a photo op and got his lifts out of shoes. These are *not* established facts, they are talking points. RFK got protection...which is the opposite of your "facts." We don't know, still, anything more than we did on Saturday.
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Jul 18, 2024 11:49:03 GMT -8
Let's put it this way, if this was a movie, I would be calling BS on a shooter getting that close to the former president, because it would be so improbable. It's always possible that I'm missing something and some facts are going to come in that will cause the situation to make some sense, but right now, I just don't see it.
"Unprecedented level of incompetence" seems correct right now.
There needs to be clarification and if necessary accountability for how a seemingly inept assassin got that close, with that good of a shot and killed an innocent bystander, wounded two others and grazed the former president's head. I mean, come on! It's seems unbelievably incompetent.
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Jul 18, 2024 12:02:10 GMT -8
The funny thing is, Left conspiracy, right conspiracy, and incompetence. All of us would be in agreement that how that shooter was able to get that close at an elevated position should be thoroughly investigated. I'm assuming the press (right and left) is going hard after this story?
Anyway, if I would go the conspiracy route, I think the right side conspiracy has more probability. And it would look something like having the head of security consistently leave 'holes' in the security detail. Then all you are doing is waiting for the whole to be filled by a shooter. There are plenty of people out there that want to kill Trump (and Biden too), so you just need to give them opportunity.
But I don't think that is what ACTUALLY happened.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 18, 2024 12:03:03 GMT -8
Thanks for the snopes link John. People will believe what they want to believe, sometimes it's best just to let it go. That close up to his ear shows just how close Trump came to death. Anyway, how the assassin got on the roof needs to be thoroughly addressed. Heard an agent on T.V. say something about putting officers on the roof posed a danger to the officers because it was slanted??? What is that??? We might have bigger problems if "safety" determines that we can't station officers on a slanted roof (even though the ones that shot the assassin where on a slanted roof with a greater pitch). No problem. Yes, and it also shows the two chunks taken out of his ear that line up straight across from each other.
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 18, 2024 12:05:25 GMT -8
The funny thing is, Left conspiracy, right conspiracy, and incompetence. All of us would be in agreement that how that shooter was able to get that close at an elevated position should be thoroughly investigated. I'm assuming the press (right and left) is going hard after this story? Anyway, if I would go the conspiracy route, I think the right side conspiracy has more probability. And it would look something like having the head of security consistently leave 'holes' in the security detail. Then all you are doing is waiting for the whole to be filled by a shooter. There are plenty of people out there that want to kill Trump (and Biden too), so you just need to give them opportunity. But I don't think that is what ACTUALLY happened. Yes, to me that makes more sense IF you're going to go down the conspiracy route. They spotted him with a range finder. Incredible. There's so much incompetence to go around, it makes your head spin.
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Jul 18, 2024 12:08:27 GMT -8
Ok, brainwashed lemming…..what is incorrect? Trump’s inadequate protection? RFK’s nonexistent protection? These are now established facts. Do you still think this was a staged skit? "Inadequate protection?" They propped him up for a photo op and got his lifts out of shoes. These are *not* established facts, they are talking points. RFK got protection...which is the opposite of your "facts." We don't know, still, anything more than we did on Saturday. My god, this is what I'm talking about Ryan (ideology over truth). Do you think Trump got adequate protection??? A dude with a rifle got an elevated position about 150 yards away from him. Doesn't get much worse then that. Do you work for the Democratic party?
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 18, 2024 12:16:26 GMT -8
"Inadequate protection?" They propped him up for a photo op and got his lifts out of shoes. These are *not* established facts, they are talking points. RFK got protection...which is the opposite of your "facts." We don't know, still, anything more than we did on Saturday. My god, this is what I'm talking about Ryan (ideology over truth). Do you think Trump got adequate protection??? A dude with a rifle got an elevated position about 150 yards away from him. Doesn't get much worse then that. Do you work for the Democratic party? I think there's an obvious distinction between "adequate" protection and logistical failures that took place between poorly coordinated agencies. I don't think the *protection* is the issue, I think the interagency coordination, or lack thereof, is largely behind this. I also don't think this idea is the biggest issue in play, either.
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Jul 18, 2024 12:20:53 GMT -8
The funny thing is, Left conspiracy, right conspiracy, and incompetence. All of us would be in agreement that how that shooter was able to get that close at an elevated position should be thoroughly investigated. I'm assuming the press (right and left) is going hard after this story? Anyway, if I would go the conspiracy route, I think the right side conspiracy has more probability. And it would look something like having the head of security consistently leave 'holes' in the security detail. Then all you are doing is waiting for the whole to be filled by a shooter. There are plenty of people out there that want to kill Trump (and Biden too), so you just need to give them opportunity. But I don't think that is what ACTUALLY happened. Yes, to me that makes more sense IF you're going to go down the conspiracy route. They spotted him with a range finder. Incredible. There's so much incompetence to go around, it makes your head spin. Wait, they spotted him with a "range finder". So he would know the distance between the roof and the stage??? And then what did they do? If that's true... Anyway, that's what I'm saying...thorough investigation. All the facts. What actually happened.
|
|