|
|
Post by Den60 on May 25, 2024 18:16:44 GMT -8
OK, it appears that the post I made a couple of weeks ago was incorrect. That one showed SDSU with about $97M in revenue for athletics an $104M in costs. However, that site has been updated and the numbers have been reversed: SDSU AD Revenue: $103,930,691 SDSU AD Expenses: $96,611,742 Those are solid numbers. knightnewhousedata.org/fbs/mwc#!quicktabs-tab-where_the_money-0 |
|
|
|
Post by AZTEC4LIFE1992 on May 25, 2024 18:53:59 GMT -8
Can you imagine if we had 40m in conference funds like ACC
|
|
|
|
Post by Den60 on May 26, 2024 10:11:32 GMT -8
Can you imagine if we had 40m in conference funds like ACC I've got to think both the ACC and the B12 are taking notice. |
|
|
|
Post by aztech on May 26, 2024 16:42:51 GMT -8
OK, it appears that the post I made a couple of weeks ago was incorrect. That one showed SDSU with about $97M in revenue for athletics an $104M in costs. However, that site has been updated and the numbers have been reversed: SDSU AD Revenue: $103,930,691 SDSU AD Expenses: $96,611,742 Those are solid numbers. knightnewhousedata.org/fbs/mwc#!quicktabs-tab-where_the_money-0 On a related subject I wonder how much equity we accumualate every year while paying off our stadium debt. Seeing how it was financed when the interest rates were dirt cheap, the principal to interest payments should really be in our favor from the start. I don't know how bonds are financed. Is interest front loaded like our 30 year home mortgages? If so, then that should reduce the $96 million AD expenses over time. |
|
