|
Post by AZTEC4LIFE1992 on May 21, 2024 16:16:53 GMT -8
Looks the the B12 has signed off on the House settlement and the raping of the G5 is about to proceed. The money is going to pay prior P5 athletes and will be funding with a major funding from the G 5's. All while the the P4 is set to make an enormous amount of money off the new CFB playoff system. Gloria has been awful silent about the MWC stance on the settlement. has anyone actually seen what the potential damages to the MWC would look like without the settlement? I would think they would be seeking to block this. Also interesting to note that the Pac is voting with all current members on whether to accept this or not. Not sure how this settlement and settlements of the other current cases could effect the P2 rebuilding effort, but it can't help. Also not sure if the P2 would be included in the profit sharing that the P4 will be doing. $20m to share, plus NIL money. The SEC will have the Dodgers payroll numbers. There will be a lot of future litigation on this. Does each sport only get profit sharing if that sport makes a profit? Will Title IX allow that? Or Will Profit sharing be spread out evenly between football and olympic sports? If profit sharing is going to mostly football, men's and women's bball, then the G5 will be dead. We can't compete with the NIL now, what until athletes get more NIL money plus profit sharing to jump from SDSU to Ohio State. On a minor scale, how does the Big 12 and ACC keep up with the P2? They are bound by the 20m profit sharing, but with a lot less budget than the P2. www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/40192345/big-12-first-agree-settle-house-v-ncaa-case-sources-say
|
|
|
Post by FULL_MONTY on May 21, 2024 17:41:43 GMT -8
Looks the the B12 has signed off on the House settlement and the raping of the G5 is about to proceed. The money is going to pay prior P5 athletes and will be funding with a major funding from the G 5's. All while the the P4 is set to make an enormous amount of money off the new CFB playoff system. Gloria has been awful silent about the MWC stance on the settlement. has anyone actually seen what the potential damages to the MWC would look like without the settlement? I would think they would be seeking to block this. Also interesting to note that the Pac is voting with all current members on whether to accept this or not. Not sure how this settlement and settlements of the other current cases could effect the P2 rebuilding effort, but it can't help. Also not sure if the P2 would be included in the profit sharing that the P4 will be doing. $20m to share, plus NIL money. The SEC will have the Dodgers payroll numbers. There will be a lot of future litigation on this. Does each sport only get profit sharing if that sport makes a profit? Will Title IX allow that? Or Will Profit sharing be spread out evenly between football and olympic sports? If profit sharing is going to mostly football, men's and women's bball, then the G5 will be dead. We can't compete with the NIL now, what until athletes get more NIL money plus profit sharing to jump from SDSU to Ohio State. On a minor scale, how does the Big 12 and ACC keep up with the P2? They are bound by the 20m profit sharing, but with a lot less budget than the P2. www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/40192345/big-12-first-agree-settle-house-v-ncaa-case-sources-sayOne thing is constant, change. We shall see where this all leads. The biggest challenge facing the MW/P2 is TV money and exposure. With the death of the P12 network, an inventory problem has arisen for the MW. Games that were buried on that network will now be made available to be broadcast and those games will fill the late night slots that the PAC 12 vacated and push out the MW. I don't see an easy solution forward. We need the ratings on the CW for the P2 Games to be compelling.
|
|
|
Post by standiego on May 22, 2024 7:46:22 GMT -8
wouldn't this allow Schools to use the Money they get from the TV deals to be used as NIL money for players they are trying to sign ? be it HS or Transfers ?
A further division between schools with a major amount of money and those not getting that much from their TV deals
|
|
|
Post by mactec on May 22, 2024 9:55:32 GMT -8
I don't quite understand the article. Can you explain how G5 schools will be giving major funding for former P5 athletes?
|
|
|
Post by AZTEC4LIFE1992 on May 22, 2024 10:40:22 GMT -8
I don't quite understand the article. Can you explain how G5 schools will be giving major funding for former P5 athletes? They are withholding money paid out to the conference from NCAAT to pay the retroactive amount to past players who couldn’t get NIL. The prospective is being paid by P4 in profit sharing of 20m/yr per school to student athletes. Which athletes this at the school is not determined. Most of the prior athletes suing for damages are from p4 schools, but G5 will be paying most of the bills. G5 aren’t even named defendants and aren’t represented in this law suit or settlement. P4 gets what they want, G5 helping pay their past bills while they get to pay players from their enormous profits from new cfb playoffs contract.
|
|
|
Post by LostAztec on May 22, 2024 11:50:34 GMT -8
Screw the NCAA.
I just listened to the Big Sky Commish on a local radio station. All Big Sky Schools have to pay $300k per for ten years.
These Schools don't pay their FB Coaches that much. They are being forced to pay the expenses of the P4 while financially strangling their own programs.
Bottom Line: why should any supporter of a smaller School want to spend money on tix, gear, donations when that money will be funneled to the P4 ?
This will kill College Sports at the lower levels
|
|
|
Post by AzTex on May 22, 2024 12:38:01 GMT -8
I saw the following posted on the mwcconnection.com website. It's an estimate of what each conference will be charged for their part of the settlement. NOTE: The dollar amounts are shown in $thousands. So where the Mountain West distribution reduction is shown as $5,040 to $6,160 per year that is actually $5 million to $6 million per year.
Click on the embedded chart for larger version.
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on May 22, 2024 13:13:12 GMT -8
I don't quite understand the article. Can you explain how G5 schools will be giving major funding for former P5 athletes? They are withholding money paid out to the conference from NCAAT to pay the retroactive amount to past players who couldn’t get NIL. The prospective is being paid by P4 in profit sharing of 20m/yr per school to student athletes. Which athletes this at the school is not determined. Most of the prior athletes suing for damages are from p4 schools, but G5 will be paying most of the bills. G5 aren’t even named defendants and aren’t represented in this law suit or settlement. P4 gets what they want, G5 helping pay their past bills while they get to pay players from their enormous profits from new cfb playoffs contract. Adding to this, the reason former P5 FB & BB players will be receiving the majority of the money is due to a formula they're using to identify the amounts each player will receive. The frustration, obviously, is that while the G5's will be paying a greater % of the overall settlement, their former players will be receiving a minority of the payouts. Why they can't make the expected payouts to P5 vs. G5 players be proportionate to the amount P5/G5 pay in is beyond me. Seems like the logical thing to do. But the P4's control the vote, apparently.
|
|
|
Post by aztech on May 22, 2024 13:46:57 GMT -8
They are withholding money paid out to the conference from NCAAT to pay the retroactive amount to past players who couldn’t get NIL. The prospective is being paid by P4 in profit sharing of 20m/yr per school to student athletes. Which athletes this at the school is not determined. Most of the prior athletes suing for damages are from p4 schools, but G5 will be paying most of the bills. G5 aren’t even named defendants and aren’t represented in this law suit or settlement. P4 gets what they want, G5 helping pay their past bills while they get to pay players from their enormous profits from new cfb playoffs contract. Adding to this, the reason former P5 FB & BB players will be receiving the majority of the money is due to a formula they're using to identify the amounts each player will receive. The frustration, obviously, is that while the G5's will be paying a greater % of the overall settlement, their former players will be receiving a minority of the payouts. Why they can't make the expected payouts to P5 vs. G5 players be proportionate to the amount P5/G5 pay in is beyond me. Seems like the logical thing to do. But the P4's control the vote, apparently. The G5 needs to hire lawyers to appeal it. We need to push back.
|
|
|
Post by AZTEC4LIFE1992 on May 22, 2024 13:55:25 GMT -8
They are withholding money paid out to the conference from NCAAT to pay the retroactive amount to past players who couldn’t get NIL. The prospective is being paid by P4 in profit sharing of 20m/yr per school to student athletes. Which athletes this at the school is not determined. Most of the prior athletes suing for damages are from p4 schools, but G5 will be paying most of the bills. G5 aren’t even named defendants and aren’t represented in this law suit or settlement. P4 gets what they want, G5 helping pay their past bills while they get to pay players from their enormous profits from new cfb playoffs contract. Adding to this, the reason former P5 FB & BB players will be receiving the majority of the money is due to a formula they're using to identify the amounts each player will receive. The frustration, obviously, is that while the G5's will be paying a greater % of the overall settlement, their former players will be receiving a minority of the payouts. Why they can't make the expected payouts to P5 vs. G5 players be proportionate to the amount P5/G5 pay in is beyond me. Seems like the logical thing to do. But the P4's control the vote, apparently. G5 isn’t even part of the law suit. This is the ncaa forcing it on the G5 in desperate attempt to satisfy the sec and B1G. I’m not sure how this resolves liability against SDSU, it resolved it for p5 and ncaa.
|
|