|
Post by Den60 on May 14, 2024 11:29:49 GMT -8
It is now nearly $97M for 2023 (expenditures are $104M). We have grown by 76% since 2018. We are on par with both PAC2 schools and better than 4 in the B12 and 2 in the ACC: knightnewhousedata.org/fbs/mwc#!quicktabs-tab-where_the_money-0
|
|
|
Post by zurac315 on May 14, 2024 11:41:27 GMT -8
I'm amazed by this. I had no idea.
|
|
|
Post by Den60 on May 14, 2024 11:48:06 GMT -8
I'm amazed by this. I had no idea. We were something like $76M last year. A bit concerned about a budget deficit but starting in 2025 we will see more revenue with the MLS team.
|
|
|
Post by standiego on May 14, 2024 12:27:10 GMT -8
is that going through the roof at Viejas or a partial roof/ overhang at Snapdragon ?
|
|
|
Post by RB Aztec on May 14, 2024 14:23:13 GMT -8
What caused this nice growth? Was it Snapdragon Stadium?
|
|
|
Post by docmm on May 14, 2024 14:46:41 GMT -8
is that going through the roof at Viejas or a partial roof/ overhang at Snapdragon ? It's going through the canopies.
|
|
|
Post by missiontrails on May 14, 2024 15:05:17 GMT -8
More than UConn, Kansas State, and Syracuse. I'd love to see the actual revenue sources breakdown. I'm sure souvenir sales are up after our Final Four appearance, but that's probably only a drop in the bucket towards the total. The fact we keep most of our stadium revenue now vs when we were tenants at the Q' has to help as well.
|
|
|
Post by 94sdsu on May 14, 2024 16:47:47 GMT -8
This isn't Athletic revenue, but instead the budget. Pretty nice that our budget is so large and I would have to imagine its due to Snapdragon. Is the loan payoff for Snapdragon in that budget? Maybe that's why the budget is so high?
|
|
|
Post by docmm on May 14, 2024 16:55:01 GMT -8
It is now nearly $97M for 2023 (expenditures are $104M). We have grown by 76% since 2018. We are on par with both PAC2 schools and better than 4 in the B12 and 2 in the ACC: knightnewhousedata.org/fbs/mwc#!quicktabs-tab-where_the_money-0 If you go to the link at the bottom, it says the Revenue is actually almost $104,000,000 and the expenses are $97,000,000.
|
|
|
Post by Den60 on May 14, 2024 16:55:24 GMT -8
What caused this nice growth? Was it Snapdragon Stadium? I expect that Snapdragon is a big part of it. I have to wonder if the B12 isn't taking notice. We already earn more than 4 members and their new competition is the AAC, which has Calford on an island. The B12 isn't on the West Coast but could be with us an one other (UNLV, OSU?)The PAC 4 corner schools would love to add SDSU so you have to wonder if we could see an invite. When you look at these numbers, we are not matched well in our conference.
|
|
|
Post by docmm on May 14, 2024 17:04:39 GMT -8
What caused this nice growth? Was it Snapdragon Stadium? I expect that Snapdragon is a big part of it. I have to wonder if the B12 isn't taking notice. We already earn more than 4 members and their new competition is the AAC, which has Calford on an island. The B12 isn't on the West Coast but could be with us an one other (UNLV, OSU?)The PAC 4 corner schools would love to add SDSU so you have to wonder if we could see an invite. When you look at these numbers, we are not matched well in our conference. I agree that revenue is important but net is probably more important.
|
|
|
Post by robthevol on May 14, 2024 19:27:23 GMT -8
Would love to see an income & expense statement.
|
|
|
Post by aztecfred on May 14, 2024 20:12:19 GMT -8
What caused this nice growth? Was it Snapdragon Stadium? I expect that Snapdragon is a big part of it. I have to wonder if the B12 isn't taking notice. We already earn more than 4 members and their new competition is the AAC, which has Calford on an island. The B12 isn't on the West Coast but could be with us an one other (UNLV, OSU?)The PAC 4 corner schools would love to add SDSU so you have to wonder if we could see an invite. When you look at these numbers, we are not matched well in our conference. should have been begging B12 to take us, but we pushed them aside and got left at the alter.
|
|