|
|
Post by aardvark on Jul 5, 2024 8:25:57 GMT -8
Looks like the White House is having Joe use the Big Boy stairs when boarding Air Force One again.
At least he did today.
Yay?
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 5, 2024 8:30:22 GMT -8
Looks like the White House is having Joe use the Big Boy stairs when boarding Air Force One again. At least he did today. Yay? Are we taking part in some kind of athletic challenge? |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Jul 5, 2024 8:31:25 GMT -8
Looks like the White House is having Joe use the Big Boy stairs when boarding Air Force One again. At least he did today. Yay? Are we taking part in some kind of athletic challenge? Is Biden? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jul 5, 2024 8:34:03 GMT -8
The debate exposed more than Joe Biden’s mental issues. The complicit media who painstakingly ignored and covered up this story for the past two years has also been exposed. This was the largest single story in their lifetimes (I know it sounds cliché now, but this was way way bigger than Watergate) and they intentionally ignored/buried the story and lied about it to the American people to suit their own agendas.
Our media, can no longer be trusted.
“This version of Biden is the best Biden ever.” -Joe Scarborough
“He is totally focused, totally sharp.” -The liars on CNN
“President Biden had a photographic memory.” -Some other lying dweeb
Now these same journalists are calling for Biden’s resignation from office. A complete 180 reversal to throw their old dementia addled candidate under the bus.
Our media can no longer be trusted. Barring even a bigger coverup, Trump is going to win. The margin will be too big for their little vote harvesting shenanigans to work. They will probably attempt some kind of under the table switcheroo at the convention.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 5, 2024 8:34:43 GMT -8
Are we taking part in some kind of athletic challenge? Is Biden? You're the one who brought it like it was newsworthy. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 5, 2024 8:37:14 GMT -8
The debate exposed more than Joe Biden’s mental issues. The complicit media who painstakingly ignored and covered up this story for the past two years has also been exposed. This was the largest single story in their lifetimes (I know it sounds cliché now, but this was way way bigger than Watergate) and they intentionally ignored/buried the story and lied about it to the American people to suit their own agendas. Our media, can no longer be trusted. “This version of Biden is the best Biden ever.” -Joe Scarborough “He is totally focused, totally sharp.” -The liars on CNN “President Biden had a photographic memory.” -Some other lying dweeb Now these same journalists are calling for Biden’s resignation from office. A complete 180 reversal to throw their old dementia addled candidate under the bus. Our media can no longer be trusted. Barring even a bigger coverup, Trump is going to win. The margin will be too big for their little vote harvesting shenanigans to work. They will probably attempt some kind of under the table switcheroo at the convention. But, uh, you watch the news....so just your news can be trusted? Right. Idiocy. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 5, 2024 8:41:39 GMT -8
This is problematic...since his own Super PAC is running ads for Project 2025. The playbook is the same: "I don't know her. I didn't know him. I've never met this person before. I don't know anything about it." It's been floated for months. But this will get brushed aside, seemingly.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 5, 2024 8:43:38 GMT -8
The debate exposed more than Joe Biden’s mental issues. The complicit media who painstakingly ignored and covered up this story for the past two years has also been exposed. This was the largest single story in their lifetimes (I know it sounds cliché now, but this was way way bigger than Watergate) and they intentionally ignored/buried the story and lied about it to the American people to suit their own agendas. Our media, can no longer be trusted. “This version of Biden is the best Biden ever.” -Joe Scarborough “He is totally focused, totally sharp.” -The liars on CNN “President Biden had a photographic memory.” -Some other lying dweeb Now these same journalists are calling for Biden’s resignation from office. A complete 180 reversal to throw their old dementia addled candidate under the bus. Our media can no longer be trusted. Barring even a bigger coverup, Trump is going to win. The margin will be too big for their little vote harvesting shenanigans to work. They will probably attempt some kind of under the table switcheroo at the convention. Still an adjudicated sexual assaulter, by the way. Still a felon. Those things can't be covered up. A two-time popular vote loser is suddenly going to win by such a wide margin that it can't be disputed? Canned laughter inserted here. |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Jul 5, 2024 8:54:39 GMT -8
You're the one who brought it like it was newsworthy. It was an observation. Nothing more. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 5, 2024 9:00:42 GMT -8
Jobs report beats estimates again, adding 206,000 jobs to the economy. That's 15.7M jobs now created during the administration. The 206,000 was slightly down from May's 218,000 report.
|
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Jul 5, 2024 9:03:21 GMT -8
No, you like to spin, deflect and much more along those lines. Just own it. It's not shifting goalposts when it's been the same subject line for me all along. Politics. Cuban has an ulterior motive to say what he said, which is his dislike for Trump. That falls into the political realm. I've noticed that myself and others have to spell things out for you quite often. Not good. If you read the comments, most people are laughing at him. Using him is a horrible example. You can go ahead and keep saying that the Country shouldn't be worried about the health of the person who is the Face of the Nation, and also not be worried about who would be next in line should he step down, but nobody would take you seriously. It's painfully obvious why you're diminishing it, but it's not working. It's there for all to see. I'm over this subject. It's starting to feel incredibly ridiculous debating Biden's mental state, and to top it off discussing who would be dumb enough to hire him as their Face of the Company. It's incredibly laughable. Ryan, again, your agenda is painfully obvious and so is huge bias. You could never be fair and impartial if you were on a jury. I hope you never perform jury duty. Yikes!!! Just because you disagree with something doesn't mean it spin, man. Sorry that's lost on you. I don't know what to tell you, but framing something as "______ doesn't like Trump" is flimsy, at best. It's a weak rebuttal. I could find someone else and you'd come up with a new goalpost shifter. It's what ya do. But I understand. You have to spell things out for me? Hahahahahahahaha. Holy hell, that's funny. You have to do that because most of the time, your ideas, comments, statements, questions and opinions are illogical, nonsensical and unintelligent. You told me just a few posts ago that the discourse doesn't even matter, even though it's literally shaping this election. One of the dumbest things I've ever heard. You have failed, consistently, to articulate your position, repeating the same lazy, general narratives over and over again. Optics, optics, optics, optics, optics. We get it. It's not what's being asked. Figure it out. Pathetic. I have never said that the country shouldn't be worried about anyone's health. I've asked for the same standard of care to be placed on both candidates. Simple. Responsible. I said I'm not worried about the general public's construct, as casual voters just repeat what they hear from the sources they view. Lazy stuff. Now, to brass tacks. Did some digging. The New York Times, back in April, had one of their reporters go on the record, saying this. Imagine creating a sphere of influence of a massively important election because your editor is butthurt about not getting an interview with the president. Truly astounding. Yesterday, the executive editor says this: Galling levels of gaslighting the public. Investigating yourself to tell yourself that you did a great job, while simultaneously ignoring every single negative story that doesn't revolve around Biden. It's indefensible. You can be tired of something (that you even brought up yourself?) but it's because you're incapable of going deeper, consistently, to more complex ideas. Not my thing. What you think is "obvious" is irrelevant to me, it's literally not what I'm talking about. We are in two different libraries here, which is unfortunate. I'd be tired, too, if I was in your shoes. We owe it to ourselves and our fellow man to be better than this. Too much is at stake. Ha!!! First of all, regarding Cuban picking Biden, it was him picking Biden over Trump only, and not against a pool of candidates. Bad try on your part. Nobody would pick that guy out of a POOL of other candidates, but you tried your best to show that someone did, against only ONE individual whom that person despises. Again, incredibly laughable example. Yeah, "Cuban doesn't like Trump" IS the crux of it. Of course Cuban will pick Biden over Trump in ANY capacity. That was such a weak example, but it's expected from you since you're a known "reacher" and someone who will bring up REALLY weak examples to try and make a case for himself. It's exhausting. No, I/we have to spell things out for you because you spin the crap out of stuff and try to derail a debate in that fashion. It's always trying to get you back on topic. Again, exhausting. You're not known as Dr. Spin/Dr. Twist the issue for nothing. Sheesh. Another example of your twist/spin is saying I meant that discourse doesn't matter. In Hillary's case yes, it wasn't even CLOSE to the same situation, as others, not just myself have pointed out to you. That was another horrible example you tried to use in comparing Biden's health. That's your theme, right in front of your eyes, but you're in denial, with blinders on. That's too bad. Talking about "libraries", we all get it. You'll go to ANY lengths to try to make yourself right which includes big time spins and twists. That's your library. We're used to it, but tired of it. |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Jul 5, 2024 9:04:56 GMT -8
Jobs report beats estimates again, adding 206,000 jobs to the economy. That's 15.7M jobs now created during the administration. The 206,000 was slightly down from May's 218,000 report.  Unemployment now the highest since November 2021, and the May jobs report was revised downward from an originally announced 272,000. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 5, 2024 9:36:03 GMT -8
Jobs report beats estimates again, adding 206,000 jobs to the economy. That's 15.7M jobs now created during the administration. The 206,000 was slightly down from May's 218,000 report. Unemployment now the highest since November 2021, and the May jobs report was revised downward from an originally announced 272,000. Unemployment is 4.1%. |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Jul 5, 2024 9:52:21 GMT -8
Unemployment now the highest since November 2021, and the May jobs report was revised downward from an originally announced 272,000. Unemployment is 4.1%. Which...is the highest since November of 2021. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 5, 2024 10:03:47 GMT -8
Just because you disagree with something doesn't mean it spin, man. Sorry that's lost on you. I don't know what to tell you, but framing something as "______ doesn't like Trump" is flimsy, at best. It's a weak rebuttal. I could find someone else and you'd come up with a new goalpost shifter. It's what ya do. But I understand. You have to spell things out for me? Hahahahahahahaha. Holy hell, that's funny. You have to do that because most of the time, your ideas, comments, statements, questions and opinions are illogical, nonsensical and unintelligent. You told me just a few posts ago that the discourse doesn't even matter, even though it's literally shaping this election. One of the dumbest things I've ever heard. You have failed, consistently, to articulate your position, repeating the same lazy, general narratives over and over again. Optics, optics, optics, optics, optics. We get it. It's not what's being asked. Figure it out. Pathetic. I have never said that the country shouldn't be worried about anyone's health. I've asked for the same standard of care to be placed on both candidates. Simple. Responsible. I said I'm not worried about the general public's construct, as casual voters just repeat what they hear from the sources they view. Lazy stuff. Now, to brass tacks. Did some digging. The New York Times, back in April, had one of their reporters go on the record, saying this. Imagine creating a sphere of influence of a massively important election because your editor is butthurt about not getting an interview with the president. Truly astounding. Yesterday, the executive editor says this: Galling levels of gaslighting the public. Investigating yourself to tell yourself that you did a great job, while simultaneously ignoring every single negative story that doesn't revolve around Biden. It's indefensible. You can be tired of something (that you even brought up yourself?) but it's because you're incapable of going deeper, consistently, to more complex ideas. Not my thing. What you think is "obvious" is irrelevant to me, it's literally not what I'm talking about. We are in two different libraries here, which is unfortunate. I'd be tired, too, if I was in your shoes. We owe it to ourselves and our fellow man to be better than this. Too much is at stake. Ha!!! First of all, regarding Cuban picking Biden, it was him picking Biden over Trump only, and not against a pool of candidates. Bad try on your part. Nobody would pick that guy out of a POOL of other candidates, but you tried your best to show that someone did, against only ONE individual whom that person despises. Again, incredibly laughable example. Yeah, "Cuban doesn't like Trump" IS the crux of it. Of course Cuban will pick Biden over Trump in ANY capacity. That was such a weak example, but it's expected from you since you're a known "reacher" and someone who will bring up REALLY weak examples to try and make a case for himself. It's exhausting. No, I/we have to spell things out for you because you spin the crap out of stuff and try to derail a debate in that fashion. It's always trying to get you back on topic. Again, exhausting. You're not known as Dr. Spin/Dr. Twist the issue for nothing. Sheesh. Another example of your twist/spin is saying I meant that discourse doesn't matter. In Hillary's case yes, it wasn't even CLOSE to the same situation, as others, not just myself have pointed out to you. That was another horrible example you tried to use in comparing Biden's health. That's your theme, right in front of your eyes, but you're in denial, with blinders on. That's too bad. Talking about "libraries", we all get it. You'll go to ANY lengths to try to make yourself right which includes big time spins and twists. That's your library. We're used to it, but tired of it. S t u p i d. It took one sentence. It wasn't a "pool of candidates" because that wasn't the question posed to him by Piers Morgan. Maybe, I don't know...read? The original exchange critiques botb candidates, in detail, and answers the actual question that was asked. It was a binary one. Maybe instead of trying to achieve a "gotcha" moment, just follow the plot? Helps. He says flat out that Biden's performance was awful, he came across as feeble, etc. He even said he would be open to replacing Biden and Kamala Harris. Just because someone doesn't align with your idea of hatred doesn't make their opinion invalid. He, like an unknown sector of the population, preaches common sense values and comprehension. Biden? Ethical. Trump? Not. Biden? Compassionate. Trump? Not. Biden? Not a criminal. Trump? Not so much. Actual things that actually matter. Cuban is a registered Independent, by the way, so uh, nice effort. The rest of your post is some kind of wayward attempt to act like you have an army of fans here. It's alright to be on an island, that means you have principles, morals, ethics and a backbone. You shouldn't be concerned with popularity, but with integrity. You'll repeat vague generalities, with no substance behind them (Literally nobody, save for you and sdsuball commented on the Hilary situation but yourself after it was brought up, for example.) Discourse = Discussion and debate, by the way. You say the two situations aren't even CLOOOOOOOOOOOOSE to the same....but you couldn't even tell me anything else to elaborate on that. What an effective counter! (It's not, for the record.) Anyway, enough time wasted. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 5, 2024 10:06:05 GMT -8
Which...is the highest since November of 2021. By .1%. |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Jul 5, 2024 10:11:15 GMT -8
Which...is the highest since November of 2021. By .1%. And it's gone up .4% since the 1st of the year. 3 straight months of increases. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 5, 2024 10:12:10 GMT -8
Just because you disagree with something doesn't mean it spin, man. Sorry that's lost on you. I don't know what to tell you, but framing something as "______ doesn't like Trump" is flimsy, at best. It's a weak rebuttal. I could find someone else and you'd come up with a new goalpost shifter. It's what ya do. But I understand. You have to spell things out for me? Hahahahahahahaha. Holy hell, that's funny. You have to do that because most of the time, your ideas, comments, statements, questions and opinions are illogical, nonsensical and unintelligent. You told me just a few posts ago that the discourse doesn't even matter, even though it's literally shaping this election. One of the dumbest things I've ever heard. You have failed, consistently, to articulate your position, repeating the same lazy, general narratives over and over again. Optics, optics, optics, optics, optics. We get it. It's not what's being asked. Figure it out. Pathetic. I have never said that the country shouldn't be worried about anyone's health. I've asked for the same standard of care to be placed on both candidates. Simple. Responsible. I said I'm not worried about the general public's construct, as casual voters just repeat what they hear from the sources they view. Lazy stuff. Now, to brass tacks. Did some digging. The New York Times, back in April, had one of their reporters go on the record, saying this. Imagine creating a sphere of influence of a massively important election because your editor is butthurt about not getting an interview with the president. Truly astounding. Yesterday, the executive editor says this: Galling levels of gaslighting the public. Investigating yourself to tell yourself that you did a great job, while simultaneously ignoring every single negative story that doesn't revolve around Biden. It's indefensible. You can be tired of something (that you even brought up yourself?) but it's because you're incapable of going deeper, consistently, to more complex ideas. Not my thing. What you think is "obvious" is irrelevant to me, it's literally not what I'm talking about. We are in two different libraries here, which is unfortunate. I'd be tired, too, if I was in your shoes. We owe it to ourselves and our fellow man to be better than this. Too much is at stake. Ha!!! First of all, regarding Cuban picking Biden, it was him picking Biden over Trump only, and not against a pool of candidates. Bad try on your part. Nobody would pick that guy out of a POOL of other candidates, but you tried your best to show that someone did, against only ONE individual whom that person despises. Again, incredibly laughable example. Yeah, "Cuban doesn't like Trump" IS the crux of it. Of course Cuban will pick Biden over Trump in ANY capacity. That was such a weak example, but it's expected from you since you're a known "reacher" and someone who will bring up REALLY weak examples to try and make a case for himself. It's exhausting. No, I/we have to spell things out for you because you spin the crap out of stuff and try to derail a debate in that fashion. It's always trying to get you back on topic. Again, exhausting. You're not known as Dr. Spin/Dr. Twist the issue for nothing. Sheesh. Another example of your twist/spin is saying I meant that discourse doesn't matter. In Hillary's case yes, it wasn't even CLOSE to the same situation, as others, not just myself have pointed out to you. That was another horrible example you tried to use in comparing Biden's health. That's your theme, right in front of your eyes, but you're in denial, with blinders on. That's too bad. Talking about "libraries", we all get it. You'll go to ANY lengths to try to make yourself right which includes big time spins and twists. That's your library. We're used to it, but tired of it. I'll go to any lengths to advocate for common sense and the truth, yes. That's what happens when you're against fascism, authoritarian rule and preserving the integrity of the country. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Jul 5, 2024 10:16:15 GMT -8
The debate exposed more than Joe Biden’s mental issues. The complicit media who painstakingly ignored and covered up this story for the past two years has also been exposed. This was the largest single story in their lifetimes (I know it sounds cliché now, but this was way way bigger than Watergate) and they intentionally ignored/buried the story and lied about it to the American people to suit their own agendas. Our media, can no longer be trusted. “This version of Biden is the best Biden ever.” -Joe Scarborough “He is totally focused, totally sharp.” -The liars on CNN “President Biden had a photographic memory.” -Some other lying dweeb Now these same journalists are calling for Biden’s resignation from office. A complete 180 reversal to throw their old dementia addled candidate under the bus. Our media can no longer be trusted. Barring even a bigger coverup, Trump is going to win. The margin will be too big for their little vote harvesting shenanigans to work. They will probably attempt some kind of under the table switcheroo at the convention. Still an adjudicated sexual assaulter, by the way. Still a felon. Those things can't be covered up. A two-time popular vote loser is suddenly going to win by such a wide margin that it can't be disputed? Canned laughter inserted here. The canned laughter belongs to the brainwashed lemmings who bought into the lies about Joe Biden’s sharp mental facilities. You people are mesmerized suckers for believing that. How can we ever trust these political propagandists who pass themselves off as journalists? Meanwhile, we have the myriad of media lies about Trump being a Nazi, a rapist, someone who will ban all abortions. These are lies, falsehoods used by the lying media to attempt to reinstate someone who has basic Jell-O pudding between the ears. These attacks on Trump are basically all the left has right now. Biden’s record (and that of his handlers) is abysmal. We have a completely unenforced border, runaway inflation, incredibly high fuel costs and wars rampaging around the world; that is the true Biden record, not the fantasy which the mainstream media has tried to spin for the last three years. As for Trump being a felon, that is also a complete joke. Wasn’t Biden rated as sufficiently mentally incapable of standing trial? At least Trump showed up to Biden‘s Soviet style show trial, and has a result he is more popular than ever. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 5, 2024 10:17:06 GMT -8
And it's gone up .4% since the 1st of the year. 3 straight months of increases. Do you think that's statistically relevant? Labor force participation rate was up. While I think the market has cooled off, perhaps, in the short term, I think most of the other factors are still positive. |
|
