|
|
Post by johneaztec on Feb 8, 2024 15:13:27 GMT -8
It's really sad. Sounds a bit like the the "Weekend at Bernie's" movie. It just confirms what everybody (except those in denial about how bad it really is) already knew. Equating yourself with the biggest waste of space on this site. Smart. Ha!!! Ryan strikes again. No, Mr Dramatic, I can simply separate myself from issues that I agree with, and disagree with. I couldn't care less if you want to see it another way. Meaningless to me. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 8, 2024 15:17:55 GMT -8
Equating yourself with the biggest waste of space on this site. Smart. Ha!!! Ryan strikes again. No, Mr Dramatic, I can simply separate myself from issues that I agree with, and disagree with. I couldn't care less if you want to see it another way. Meaningless to me. You also simply separate from reality, as the OP falsely quoted Hur. Zero pushback. Good for you, charlatan. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Feb 8, 2024 15:29:59 GMT -8
Ha!!! Ryan strikes again. No, Mr Dramatic, I can simply separate myself from issues that I agree with, and disagree with. I couldn't care less if you want to see it another way. Meaningless to me. You also simply separate from reality, as the OP falsely quoted Hur. Zero pushback. Good for you, charlatan. The point remains the same, Mr. Dramatic. The points are, Biden has zero mental competency and your a triggered, dramatic individual. Get rid of all your anger somewhere else. They do have classes for that ya know. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 8, 2024 15:39:21 GMT -8
You also simply separate from reality, as the OP falsely quoted Hur. Zero pushback. Good for you, charlatan. The point remains the same, Mr. Dramatic. The points are, Biden has zero mental competency and your a triggered, dramatic individual. Get rid of all your anger somewhere else. They do have classes for that ya know. It absolutely does not remain the same. Yet again, you preach values, seemingly having none. Weird how you didn't say a *word* about Trump's memory issues. Not a word about the speech gaffes. (And no, I'm not talking about any lazy sadness about *both* candidates.....that's not the same thing.) Hur, a lifelong Republican (Trump-appointee in 2017) is not a psychiatrist, not a medical doctor and is likewise not qualified to publicly address Biden's competency. And this is what's really important: Instead of Biden's exoneration in the midst of this, we are now going to be dosed with sound bytes of Biden's mental state (which is where your equal got his fake quote from, undoubtedly.) This is James Comey 2.0 all over again. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 8, 2024 15:45:46 GMT -8
Another wildly important thing: The handling of classified material needs to be completely overhauled. The care and manner in which documents are handled should be paramount, simply for national security reasons. That's true for Obama, true for Trump, true for Bush, true for Biden and true for everyone who holds office.
|
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Feb 8, 2024 15:47:29 GMT -8
The point remains the same, Mr. Dramatic. The points are, Biden has zero mental competency and your a triggered, dramatic individual. Get rid of all your anger somewhere else. They do have classes for that ya know. It absolutely does not remain the same. Yet again, you preach values, seemingly having none. Weird how you didn't say a *word* about Trump's memory issues. Not a word about the speech gaffes. (And no, I'm not talking about any lazy sadness about *both* candidates.....that's not the same thing.) Hur, a lifelong Republican (Trump-appointee in 2017) is not a psychiatrist, not a medical doctor and is likewise not qualified to publicly address Biden's competency. And this is what's really important: Instead of Biden's exoneration in the midst of this, we are now going to be dosed with sound bytes of Biden's mental state (which is where your equal got his fake quote from, undoubtedly.) This is James Comey 2.0 all over again. I'm not angry, you're just a fraud. You'll go with where the wind blows you. It shows a lack of integrity, a lack of foresight and a willingness to be easily manipulated. Of course I didn't say anything about Trump's memory issues, since he's not the President. Kind of an important thing. Going where the wind blows? Mr. Dramatic strikes again. I'm really going out on the limb saying that Biden has incompetency issues, which something you reluctantly admit. "Uh, uh, uh, what about Trump's memory issues?" You can't help yourself. Sheesh. I don't care for either candidate. Biden just so happens to be out president and if a special counsel comes out and says these things about him, that's very concerning, not that it wasn't already obvious. Anything that will lessen the hurt on Trump, you'll soften such as Biden s competency issues, etc... You're so wound up with Trump in your head, you can't see it. The most minor details you'll post on here. You have an unhealthy obsession. Get. Help. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 8, 2024 15:56:08 GMT -8
It absolutely does not remain the same. Yet again, you preach values, seemingly having none. Weird how you didn't say a *word* about Trump's memory issues. Not a word about the speech gaffes. (And no, I'm not talking about any lazy sadness about *both* candidates.....that's not the same thing.) Hur, a lifelong Republican (Trump-appointee in 2017) is not a psychiatrist, not a medical doctor and is likewise not qualified to publicly address Biden's competency. And this is what's really important: Instead of Biden's exoneration in the midst of this, we are now going to be dosed with sound bytes of Biden's mental state (which is where your equal got his fake quote from, undoubtedly.) This is James Comey 2.0 all over again. I'm not angry, you're just a fraud. You'll go with where the wind blows you. It shows a lack of integrity, a lack of foresight and a willingness to be easily manipulated. Of course I didn't say anything about Trump's memory issues, since he's not the President. Kind of an important thing. Going where the wind blows? Mr. Dramatic strikes again. I'm really going out on the limb saying that Biden has incompetency issues, which something you reluctantly admit. Sheesh. I don't care for either candidate. Biden just so happens to be out president and if a special counsel comes out and says these things about him, that's very concerning, not that it wasn't already obvious. Anything that will lessen the hurt on Trump, you'll soften such as Biden s competency issues, etc... You're so wound up with Trump in your head, you can't see it. The most minor details you'll post on here. You have an unhealthy obsession. Get. Help. Are you serious? He's running for president. He's already BEEN the president. He's under active indictment for the same action in this THREAD. Are you in kindergarten? Of all the things you could have said to combat that statement, that was pretty low on the list. Swing and a miss. I've not reluctantly admitted anything. Biden is 80 years old. That's hard to evade as a point of conversation. He's old. Of the list of things we should care about, his age isn't in the top three. I take it you've read all 388 pages, right? Or just enough to agree with a trolling, imaginary quote? You repeat the same concepts ad nauseum. This is why political discussion is dead. Unwilling to think for yourself (or unable?) you just latch on to talking points. No depth. You think Biden's age is what we should be worried about...and you're the exact type of mark they want to target. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Feb 8, 2024 16:29:27 GMT -8
Of course I didn't say anything about Trump's memory issues, since he's not the President. Kind of an important thing. Going where the wind blows? Mr. Dramatic strikes again. I'm really going out on the limb saying that Biden has incompetency issues, which something you reluctantly admit. Sheesh. I don't care for either candidate. Biden just so happens to be out president and if a special counsel comes out and says these things about him, that's very concerning, not that it wasn't already obvious. Anything that will lessen the hurt on Trump, you'll soften such as Biden's competency issues, etc... You're so wound up with Trump in your head, you can't see it. The most minor details you'll post on here. You have an unhealthy obsession. Get. Help. Are you serious? He's running for president. He's already BEEN the president. He's under active indictment for the same action in this THREAD. Are you in kindergarten? Of all the things you could have said to combat that statement, that was pretty low on the list. Swing and a miss. I've not reluctantly admitted anything. Biden is 80 years old. That's hard to evade as a point of conversation. He's old. Of the list of things we should care about, his age isn't in the top three. I take it you've read all 388 pages, right? Or just enough to agree with a trolling, imaginary quote? You repeat the same concepts ad nauseum. This is why political discussion is dead. Unwilling to think for yourself (or unable?) you just latch on to talking points. No depth. You think Biden's age is what we should be worried about...and you're the exact type of mark they want to target. Get real, and bad try. Talk about a fraud. Hey, I thought no way Trump will win the election, and he's going to be in pinstripes, right? He's a non entity, right? You sure are making Trump out to be a contender. Which is it? Why do worried? Lol. If you think there's no way he can win the election, then you're doing out of hate. Ok, but don't try to make it out to be because he's running for president. Sheesh. It's a nationwide story about Biden failing a special counsel interview, miserably. Biden's the topic in that category. Newsflash, Biden's our current president Trump may have memory issues as well, but I'm not going to pretend that they're any where near as bad as Biden's. If somebody singles out Biden for ANY negative issue, you go nuts on them for not including Trump's faults. For not comparing the two. It gets really old. You really need help. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 8, 2024 16:48:47 GMT -8
Are you serious? He's running for president. He's already BEEN the president. He's under active indictment for the same action in this THREAD. Are you in kindergarten? Of all the things you could have said to combat that statement, that was pretty low on the list. Swing and a miss. I've not reluctantly admitted anything. Biden is 80 years old. That's hard to evade as a point of conversation. He's old. Of the list of things we should care about, his age isn't in the top three. I take it you've read all 388 pages, right? Or just enough to agree with a trolling, imaginary quote? You repeat the same concepts ad nauseum. This is why political discussion is dead. Unwilling to think for yourself (or unable?) you just latch on to talking points. No depth. You think Biden's age is what we should be worried about...and you're the exact type of mark they want to target. Get real, and bad try. Talk about a fraud. Hey, I thought no way Trump will win the election, and he's going to be in pinstripes, right? He's a non entity, right? You sure are making Trump out to be a contender. Which is it? Why do worried? Lol. If you think there's no way he can win the election, then you're doing out of hate. Ok, but don't try to make it out to be because he's running for president. Sheesh. It's a nationwide story about Biden failing a special counsel interview, miserably. Biden's the topic in that category. Newsflash, Biden's our current president Trump may have memory issues as well, but I'm not going to pretend that they're any where near as bad as Biden's. If somebody singles out Biden for ANY negative issue, you go nuts on them for not including Trump's faults. For not comparing the two. It gets really old. You really need help. John. You preach values. You tout yourself. And then when it comes time for the chips to fall, you shrink up and become nothing more than a house of cards, toppled by whatever nonsense you capture in the blink of an eye. It's as astonishingly hypocritical as it is tone-deaf, irresponsible and alarming. Let me explain how concepts work, so there's no more confusion here. Nowhere did anyone say Trump was a "non-entity." He's the GOP frontrunner for the presidency. In a two-party system, votes will be within a predictable margin, dictated by a variety of factors like geography, demographics, political upbringing, cultural choices and so on. Still with me? I still don't believe he will *win* the election, based on what we know TODAY. Emphasis there on TODAY....as things change rapidly in this sphere. That said, doing it out of hate? No. I'm doing it out of an ability to seek clarity, to embrace the truth and to correct fraudulently promoted drivel. Unlike yourself, I intentionally want to see the bigger picture. When the Hur report came out, I didn't immediately go to the section that details Biden's memory and competency. "Biden exonerated" is the real headline. Big. Picture. Thinking. Biden didn't "fail" anything. There was no test. It was an interview conducted by Hur in which Biden couldn't recall specific dates and times. (Again, this is the point you realize you're the mark.) The fact you think something like that is a "nationwide" story is alarming. It shows me you are a partisan, straw grasping, groupthink participant. Fox will, of course capture this, blow it up, distract from the real important core issues of the report itself and continue to be not news. You can pretend or not pretend. Unfortunately, that's up to you. But you forfeit the right to be the ethics police when you throw your morals in the trash, like you did here. When you fail to see nuance, or aren't able to, you're going to miss a lot. That's a real shame. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 8, 2024 17:05:28 GMT -8
Get real, and bad try. Talk about a fraud. Hey, I thought no way Trump will win the election, and he's going to be in pinstripes, right? He's a non entity, right? You sure are making Trump out to be a contender. Which is it? Why do worried? Lol. If you think there's no way he can win the election, then you're doing out of hate. Ok, but don't try to make it out to be because he's running for president. Sheesh. It's a nationwide story about Biden failing a special counsel interview, miserably. Biden's the topic in that category. Newsflash, Biden's our current president Trump may have memory issues as well, but I'm not going to pretend that they're any where near as bad as Biden's. If somebody singles out Biden for ANY negative issue, you go nuts on them for not including Trump's faults. For not comparing the two. It gets really old. You really need help. John. You preach values. You tout yourself. And then when it comes time for the chips to fall, you shrink up and become nothing more than a house of cards, toppled by whatever nonsense you capture in the blink of an eye. It's as astonishingly hypocritical as it is tone-deaf, irresponsible and alarming. Let me explain how concepts work, so there's no more confusion here. Nowhere did anyone say Trump was a "non-entity." He's the GOP frontrunner for the presidency. In a two-party system, votes will be within a predictable margin, dictated by a variety of factors like geography, demographics, political upbringing, cultural choices and so on. Still with me? I still don't believe he will *win* the election, based on what we know TODAY. Emphasis there on TODAY....as things change rapidly in this sphere. That said, doing it out of hate? No. I'm doing it out of an ability to seek clarity, to embrace the truth and to correct fraudulently promoted drivel. Unlike yourself, I intentionally want to see the bigger picture. When the Hur report came out, I didn't immediately go to the section that details Biden's memory and competency. "Biden exonerated" is the real headline. Big. Picture. Thinking. Biden didn't "fail" anything. There was no test. It was an interview conducted by Hur in which Biden couldn't recall specific dates and times. (Again, this is the point you realize you're the mark.) The fact you think something like that is a "nationwide" story is alarming. It shows me you are a partisan, straw grasping, groupthink participant. Fox will, of course capture this, blow it up, distract from the real important core issues of the report itself and continue to be not news. You can pretend or not pretend. Unfortunately, that's up to you. But you forfeit the right to be the ethics police when you throw your morals in the trash, like you did here. When you fail to see nuance, or aren't able to, you're going to miss a lot. That's a real shame. An example of what I mean by nuance: You'll pick up on the talking point of Hur being critical of Biden's memory. Fine. Good. It's going to be aired on conservative TV and radio. But consider some things: The report had to be reviewed by Garland before it could even be published. Biden got an advanced look at it. Now, consider Hur. What does he have to gain? He's a former Trump appointee in Maryland. Is Biden's memory and cognitive functionality relevant to the conclusive findings? How is the death of his son remotely related to the handling of classified documents? Keep in mind: The DOJ is *supposed* to be impartial, staying away from politically-charged decisions. As I said before, this is Comey 2.0 all over again. |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Feb 8, 2024 17:20:15 GMT -8
Interesting, that during Biden's hastily-called presser tonight, a question was asked about the Israeli-Gaza war, and Biden, for some unknown reason, mentions the President of Mexico.
What in the actual f***?
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 8, 2024 17:26:33 GMT -8
Interesting, that during Biden's hastily-called presser tonight, a question was asked about the Israeli-Gaza war, and Biden, for some unknown reason, mentions the President of Mexico. What in the actual f***? Yes, another sound byte. We'll have 15 more by next month. |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Feb 8, 2024 17:31:02 GMT -8
Interesting, that during Biden's hastily-called presser tonight, a question was asked about the Israeli-Gaza war, and Biden, for some unknown reason, mentions the President of Mexico. What in the actual f***? Yes, another sound byte. We'll have 15 more by next month. That's a good one to start with. |
|
|
|
Post by johneaztec on Feb 8, 2024 17:33:31 GMT -8
Interesting, that during Biden's hastily-called presser tonight, a question was asked about the Israeli-Gaza war, and Biden, for some unknown reason, mentions the President of Mexico. What in the actual f***? Yeah, I just heard that. With a chance to redeem himself, he failed again. He also mistakenly mentioned someone from another country, but was from Egypt. Not good. I guess same case. He mentioned the Mexican president when it was the Egyptian. This is a guy who couldn't remember when he was VP. Wow. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 8, 2024 17:34:01 GMT -8
Yes, another sound byte. We'll have 15 more by next month. That's a good one to start with. I guess? Johnson's too old!  |
|
|
|
Post by aardvark on Feb 8, 2024 17:54:15 GMT -8
That's a good one to start with. I guess? Johnson's too old! Term limits for all. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on Feb 8, 2024 20:52:51 GMT -8
Today, special counsel investigating Biden’s mishandling of classified documents: “President Biden is too old and incompetent to be held responsible for mishandling classified information and state secrets.” It’s time for the 25th Amendment to be implemented. If you're going to quote someone, be accurate. Scum of the Earth type stuff to push your agenda. This is a tough day for the White House. I’m sorry these stories upset you Ryan, but questions about the Commander In Chief of the most powerful military in history need to be asked and addressed. www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/-nightmare-special-counsels-assessment-bidens-mental-fitness-triggers-rcna137975Biden probably have stepped down awhile ago. We have choice between a president who barely knows who and where he is, versus another candidate who has been accused of sexual misconduct from 25 years ago. A complete mess. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 8, 2024 21:02:27 GMT -8
If you're going to quote someone, be accurate. Scum of the Earth type stuff to push your agenda. This is a tough day for the White House. I’m sorry these stories upset you Ryan, but questions about the Commander In Chief of the most powerful military in history need to be asked and addressed. www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/-nightmare-special-counsels-assessment-bidens-mental-fitness-triggers-rcna137975Biden probably have stepped down awhile ago. We have choice between a president who barely knows who and where he is, versus another candidate who has been accused of sexual misconduct from 25 years ago. A complete mess. Your relationship with objective truth is what's upsetting. Yes, I'm sure questions by some rando on the Internet are really going to be heavy and concerning. We have a president who has presided over a rebuilt economy, passed the largest infrastructure bill in modern history and lowered unemployment to record levels....and then there's Donald Trump. Four indictments. 91 felonies. Sexual assault. Defamation. Failure as president. But hey, enjoy that legacy. |
|
|
|
Post by sdsu2000 on Feb 8, 2024 21:02:43 GMT -8
I’ve said this before and I say it again. Newsom will be the next President. Biden will step down after he earns the party’s nomination and they will just put Newsom in to replace him.
|
|
|
|
Post by azson on Feb 9, 2024 9:48:17 GMT -8
I guess? Johnson's too old! Term limits for all. Something we ALL can agree on! Well, except for maybe musician, I'm sure he'd love nothing more than a Trumpian reign until he dies. |
|
