|
|
Post by wakelaunch on May 25, 2023 15:31:30 GMT -8
This guy can't be president. EVER
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 25, 2023 15:50:51 GMT -8
This guy can't be president. EVER He doesn't have a chance. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecmusician on May 25, 2023 16:32:03 GMT -8
This guy can't be president. EVER The View and MSNBC gave him four out of four Hitlers….so he must be bad. 🥸🥸🥸🥸 |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 25, 2023 22:49:46 GMT -8
Remember how the left all hoped that Trump would win the GOP nomination in 16? They thought that he was easily beaten.
Turned out Hillary's unfavorability numbers with independent voters and suburban women was their real problem and the rest is history.
So looking at unfavorability numbers to predict election outcomes, Trump benefitted from Hillary's and Joe, along with ballot harvesting, benefitted from Trump's.
Joe's unfavorable numbers are now in the tank and if he runs against anyone but Trump (who has similar unfavorability numbers), it means likely defeat.
Ergo the odd obsession that the True Believers and the MSM have now with the GOP's dark horse candidate DeSantis. The MSM and the True Believers will oddly ease off their TDS for a bit and will focus heavily on the GOP primary race and will go heavily against DeSantis. Watch.
It is their only hope for a Joe vs Trump rematch and any possibily for a win.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 25, 2023 23:01:22 GMT -8
Remember how the left all hoped that Trump would win the GOP nomination in 16? They thought that he was easily beaten. Turned out Hillary's unfavorability numbers with independent voters and suburban women was their real problem and the rest is history. So looking at unfavorability numbers to predict election outcomes, Trump benefitted from Hillary's and Joe, along with ballot harvesting, benefitted from Trump's. Joe's unfavorable numbers are now in the tank and if he runs against anyone but Trump (who has similar unfavorability numbers), it means likely defeat. Ergo the odd obsession that the True Believers and the MSM have now with the GOP's dark horse candidate DeSantis. The MSM and the True Believers will oddly ease off their TDS for a bit and will focus heavily on the GOP primary race and will go heavily against DeSantis. Watch. It is their only hope for a Joe vs Trump rematch and any possibily for a win. Without Russian interference, Trump loses in 2016. Minor details. DeSantis isn't a dark horse, either. His only chance is if Trump goes to prison. Another nonsensical post. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecnails on May 26, 2023 11:11:34 GMT -8
The Trump Russia collusion delusion was a lie on the Steele Dossier known as unproveable opposition research paid for by hilary clinton that she and the dnc got fined. A one million dollar reward from the fbi to prove the allegations in the Steele Dossier went unclaimed. adam schiff promised evidence and has yet to deliver and now faces expulsion and a fine for being a liar.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 26, 2023 11:30:40 GMT -8
The Trump Russia collusion delusion was a lie on the Steele Dossier known as unproveable opposition research paid for by hilary clinton that she and the dnc got fined. A one million dollar reward from the fbi to prove the allegations in the Steele Dossier went unclaimed. adam schiff promised evidence and has yet to deliver and now faces expulsion and a fine for being a liar. False. All you're doing is repeating narratives. Parts of the Steele Dossier were corroborated by multiple intelligence groups. Stop with the lies, please. We know (because the Senate held hearings) that Russia and Trump were connected. That's where all the indictments came from. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 26, 2023 17:32:05 GMT -8
The Trump Russia collusion delusion was a lie on the Steele Dossier known as unproveable opposition research paid for by hilary clinton that she and the dnc got fined. A one million dollar reward from the fbi to prove the allegations in the Steele Dossier went unclaimed. adam schiff promised evidence and has yet to deliver and now faces expulsion and a fine for being a liar. False. All you're doing is repeating narratives. Parts of the Steele Dossier were corroborated by multiple intelligence groups. Stop with the lies, please. We know (because the Senate held hearings) that Russia and Trump were connected. That's where all the indictments came from. False. All the indictments were associated with process infractions involved with interactions with FBI agents, or DoJ procecutions, or tax law, etc and had nothing, nada, zip zero to do with anyone in the Trump sphere colluding with the Russians. The Durham report showed us that the FBI had to resort to effectively bribing Steele to prove (or claim in court) his crap was true and he couldn't prove it and wouldn't take the bait to perjur himself in a court of law. The Durham prosecutions also exposed the fact that the Hillary campaign paid a Russian agent to interfere in our elections. And Danchenko's successful defense in the Durham case against him for lying to FBI agents was that the FBI KNEW he was lying to them all along. A clown show. Durham Report also shows us that the Obama led Junta all knew there was no there there and that the Clinton campaign was going to generate the false narrative about Trump Russia collusion to counter her E-MAIL debacle. The Durham report also shows that everyone who signed off on the false or unverified allegations in the Carter Page FISA warrants were criminals themselves for effectively defrauding the court. But True Belivers will continue to think the joke about Hillary's email in Trump's speech at the convention was actual "tradecraft"  |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 26, 2023 17:56:56 GMT -8
False. All you're doing is repeating narratives. Parts of the Steele Dossier were corroborated by multiple intelligence groups. Stop with the lies, please. We know (because the Senate held hearings) that Russia and Trump were connected. That's where all the indictments came from. False. All the indictments were associated with process infractions involved with interactions with FBI agents, or DoJ procecutions, or tax law, etc and had nothing, nada, zip zero to do with anyone in the Trump sphere colluding with the Russians. The Durham report showed us that the FBI had to resort to effectively bribing Steele to prove (or claim in court) his crap was true and he couldn't prove it and wouldn't take the bait to perjur himself in a court of law. The Durham prosecutions also exposed the fact that the Hillary campaign paid a Russian agent to interfere in our elections. And Danchenko's successful defense in the Durham case against him for lying to FBI agents was that the FBI KNEW he was lying to them all along. A clown show. Durham Report also shows us that the Obama led Junta all knew there was no there there and that the Clinton campaign was going to generate the false narrative about Trump Russia collusion to counter her E-MAIL debacle. The Durham report also shows that everyone who signed off on the false or unverified allegations in the Carter Page FISA warrants were criminals themselves for effectively defrauding the court. But True Belivers will continue to think the joke about Hillary's email in Trump's speech at the convention was actual "tradecraft" Completely false, troll. abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/breakdown-indictments-cases-muellers-probe/story?id=61219489Internal polling data was given to Russian intelligence services. The sole purpose was to tamper and damage Clinton's chances at winning. Just stop. You're on the wrong side. Not interested in alternative facts here. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecnails on May 27, 2023 10:27:42 GMT -8
clinton destroyed her chances of winning with the financial foreign donations crimes mentioned in the book Clinton Cash by Peter Schweizer. That book debuted at no.2 on the New York Times best seller's list in 2015. Then she Bleach Bit her phone containing emails under a Congress subpoena. It was the clinton comment about Republicans being in a basket of deplorables that sunk her campaign in Sept. 2016. No Republicans needed for that. As for CNN polls, 66% says biden winning in 2024 would be a disaster or setback for this country. Add one to that poll as I am in the 66%.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 27, 2023 10:44:03 GMT -8
clinton destroyed her chances of winning with the financial foreign donations crimes mentioned in the book Clinton Cash by Peter Schweizer. That book debuted at no.2 on the New York Times best seller's list in 2015. Then she Bleach Bit her phone containing emails under a Congress subpoena. It was the clinton comment about Republicans being in a basket of deplorables that sunk her campaign in Sept. 2016. No Republicans needed for that. As for CNN polls, 66% says biden winning in 2024 would be a disaster or setback for this country. Add one to that poll as I am in the 66%. She won the popular vote by the largest margin in history at the time. Russia interfered in the election, Trump carried vital swing states by very, very small margins which changed the outcome. Sorry, but it's the truth. And then we suffered for four years as a result with bigotry, hatred, racism and corruption. That same poll, you conveniently omitted, declared Trump would be a disaster at a 56% clip. And nobody cares what bracket you fall into, honestly. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 27, 2023 12:27:02 GMT -8
False. All the indictments were associated with process infractions involved with interactions with FBI agents, or DoJ procecutions, or tax law, etc and had nothing, nada, zip zero to do with anyone in the Trump sphere colluding with the Russians. The Durham report showed us that the FBI had to resort to effectively bribing Steele to prove (or claim in court) his crap was true and he couldn't prove it and wouldn't take the bait to perjur himself in a court of law. The Durham prosecutions also exposed the fact that the Hillary campaign paid a Russian agent to interfere in our elections. And Danchenko's successful defense in the Durham case against him for lying to FBI agents was that the FBI KNEW he was lying to them all along. A clown show. Durham Report also shows us that the Obama led Junta all knew there was no there there and that the Clinton campaign was going to generate the false narrative about Trump Russia collusion to counter her E-MAIL debacle. The Durham report also shows that everyone who signed off on the false or unverified allegations in the Carter Page FISA warrants were criminals themselves for effectively defrauding the court. But True Belivers will continue to think the joke about Hillary's email in Trump's speech at the convention was actual "tradecraft" Completely false, troll. abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/breakdown-indictments-cases-muellers-probe/story?id=61219489Internal polling data was given to Russian intelligence services. The sole purpose was to tamper and damage Clinton's chances at winning. Just stop. You're on the wrong side. Not interested in alternative facts here. False yet again. James Clapper, Obama's DNI, admitted under oath that there was NO EVIDENCE that Trump colluded with Russia in election interference. If you think James Clapper is a liar and lied under oath, please present your proof? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 27, 2023 12:41:06 GMT -8
False yet again. James Clapper, Obama's DNI, admitted under oath that there was NO EVIDENCE that Trump colluded with Russia in election interference. If you think James Clapper is a liar and lied under oath, please present your proof? No need. A GOP-led Senate panel concluded over a thousand pages the exact opposite. "The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump's behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin's aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers." |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on May 27, 2023 13:30:25 GMT -8
False yet again. James Clapper, Obama's DNI, admitted under oath that there was NO EVIDENCE that Trump colluded with Russia in election interference. If you think James Clapper is a liar and lied under oath, please present your proof? No need. A GOP-led Senate panel concluded over a thousand pages the exact opposite. "The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump's behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin's aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers." Your chance to put up and you failed. Mind reading of Russians is now "Evidence" for you? Really? www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/may/24/it-was-clinton-camp-colluding-with-russia-all-alon/The only Russian collaborators in the 2016 election were Clintonistas. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on May 27, 2023 14:11:03 GMT -8
No need. A GOP-led Senate panel concluded over a thousand pages the exact opposite. "The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump's behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin's aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers." Your chance to put up and you failed. Mind reading of Russians is now "Evidence" for you? Really? www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/may/24/it-was-clinton-camp-colluding-with-russia-all-alon/The only Russian collaborators in the 2016 election were Clintonistas. I don't need to "put up" anything to satisfy a simpleton who lies repeatedly and does nothing but troll. You can figure out how to read in your own time. This is the logical fallacy of dealing with Trump backers. They will shift the goalposts and pluck whatever they want to satisfy a narrative that doesn't exist. Direct proof means nothing to them. They'll just mind pretzel their way to some justification either way, even if it's laughably stupid and patently false. Your position is Clinton colluded with Russia? To damage her own campaign? Uh, sure. Makes sense. We have VIDEO of the Kremlin celebrating Trump's win. Please stop treating people like they are stupid, because we aren't. Let me go slower, one more time, to fix your brain. A GOP-led Senate panel investigated this matter for three years. Their conclusions, combined with basic evidence, were that the Trump campaign coordinated with Russian intelligence services to denigrate the Clinton campaign. We know this is *TRUE* because Paul Manafort went to jail for illegally contacting Russian sources to share internal polling data for the purpose of harming the Clinton campaign. This isn't hard to grasp, unless you're just intent on never getting to a truthful conclusion. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on May 27, 2023 14:16:08 GMT -8
No need. A GOP-led Senate panel concluded over a thousand pages the exact opposite. "The nearly 1,000-page report, the fifth and final one from the Republican-led Senate intelligence committee on the Russia investigation, details how Russia launched an aggressive effort to interfere in the election on Trump's behalf. It says the Trump campaign chairman had regular contact with a Russian intelligence officer and says other Trump associates were eager to exploit the Kremlin's aid, particularly by maximizing the impact of the disclosure of Democratic emails hacked by Russian intelligence officers." Your chance to put up and you failed. Mind reading of Russians is now "Evidence" for you? Really? www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/may/24/it-was-clinton-camp-colluding-with-russia-all-alon/The only Russian collaborators in the 2016 election were Clintonistas. Once again, just for you. Eric Trump 2014. "We don't rely on US banks, we have all the funding we need from Russia". |
|
