|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 28, 2023 20:23:17 GMT -8
I’m sorta confused. For years, liberals have gone with “oh you must be watching Fox News as your source” as if we didn’t know there was mega BS spewing outta there. I mean, does anyone with a modest or better IQ take Tucker Carlson seriously? Now the faux outrage over this? Interesting. Sadly, the old days of respectable TV news has mostly gone. You’ll find slanted garbage on many a station, Fox is just more despised by many and has a bigger audience. It's one thing to editorialize and opine like Tucker does nightly; no issue with the freedom to do that. Slant is slant. It's another thing entirely to flout things as truth when you personally have advanced knowledge that it isn't. Defamation and conspiracy can't be amplified, which is why Dominion is going to end up with a hefty, hefty settlement on their lawsuit. And that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to Fox. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Feb 28, 2023 21:18:51 GMT -8
The other poster didn't seem to have it. Perhaps you can tell us...how many months and years did the Democrat MSM push the obviously false Russia Collusion hoax? Can't do it either? Myth: Mueller found “no collusion.” Response: Mueller spent almost 200 pages describing “numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign.” He found that “a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.” He also found that “ a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations” against the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents. While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that “ statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In fact, Mueller also wrote that the “investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.” One of the underlying criminal offenses that Mueller reviewed for conspiracy was campaign-finance violations. Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,” according to an email message arranging the meeting. Sorry, there was a ton of evidence of collusion. Mueller came, 'This close,' to referring the case for charges. He said it needed to be investigated further because there was so much evidence, just not quite enough to warrant his recommendation of charges. But, again, he did say that others should investigate to see if they thought charges should be filed. So just stop with the, "There was no Russian collusion," crap. There was. There was evidence of the Russians working to help the Trump campaign in 2016. A significant amount of evidence. CNN reporting about that evidence wasn't, "Fake news," like Fox reporting that the 2020 election had been stolen and there was fraud when THEIR OWN PEOPLE KNEW NO FRAUD EXISTED AND THE ELECTION WASN'T STOLEN. They knew one thing to be fact, and reported the opposite to promote a political outcome that they preferred, even though it would be based in part on their own fraud. There's a world of difference there. And if you're to politically biased and brainwashed to see it, that's just sad. Fact is that Mueller was given a blank check to nail Trump Russia collusion and failed miserably. That is why that bogus narrative died so completely after his clownish presentation to Congress. Just a bunch of biased innuendo, nothing more. The FBI even offered up to a $1,000,000 to their sources to corroberate the claims in the Steele dossier and he/they wouldn't bite. And for good reason as it was all primarily lies. Just ask Carter Page about the Keystone Kops of ours. Danchenko's successful defense in the prosecution against him for lying to the FBI was his claim that the FBI knew all along that it was all lies when he gave and they received his info. And he prevailed in that defense. They were lies! That episode for the FBI & Mueller is a bad joke and anyone who believes the Trump Russia collusion hoax was real and not just a hit job by political enemies is absolutely clueless. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Feb 28, 2023 21:44:50 GMT -8
Myth: Mueller found “no collusion.” Response: Mueller spent almost 200 pages describing “numerous links between the Russian government and the Trump Campaign.” He found that “a Russian entity carried out a social media campaign that favored presidential candidate Donald J. Trump and disparaged presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.” He also found that “ a Russian intelligence service conducted computer-intrusion operations” against the Clinton campaign and then released stolen documents. While Mueller was unable to establish a conspiracy between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians involved in this activity, he made it clear that “ statement that the investigation did not establish particular facts does not mean there was no evidence of those facts.” In fact, Mueller also wrote that the “investigation established that the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.” One of the underlying criminal offenses that Mueller reviewed for conspiracy was campaign-finance violations. Mueller found that Trump campaign members Donald Trump Jr., Paul Manafort and Jared Kushner met with Russian nationals in Trump Tower in New York June 2016 for the purpose of receiving disparaging information about Clinton as part of “Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump,” according to an email message arranging the meeting. Sorry, there was a ton of evidence of collusion. Mueller came, 'This close,' to referring the case for charges. He said it needed to be investigated further because there was so much evidence, just not quite enough to warrant his recommendation of charges. But, again, he did say that others should investigate to see if they thought charges should be filed. So just stop with the, "There was no Russian collusion," crap. There was. There was evidence of the Russians working to help the Trump campaign in 2016. A significant amount of evidence. CNN reporting about that evidence wasn't, "Fake news," like Fox reporting that the 2020 election had been stolen and there was fraud when THEIR OWN PEOPLE KNEW NO FRAUD EXISTED AND THE ELECTION WASN'T STOLEN. They knew one thing to be fact, and reported the opposite to promote a political outcome that they preferred, even though it would be based in part on their own fraud. There's a world of difference there. And if you're to politically biased and brainwashed to see it, that's just sad. Fact is that Mueller was given a blank check to nail Trump Russia collusion and failed miserably. That is why that bogus narrative died so completely after his clownish presentation to Congress. Just a bunch of biased innuendo, nothing more. The FBI even offered up to a $1,000,000 to their sources to corroberate the claims in the Steele dossier and he/they wouldn't bite. And for good reason as it was all primarily lies. Just ask Carter Page about the Keystone Kops of ours. Danchenko's successful defense in the prosecution against him for lying to the FBI was his claim that the FBI knew all along that it was all lies when he gave and they received his info. And he prevailed in that defense. They were lies! That episode for the FBI & Mueller is a bad joke and anyone who believes the Trump Russia collusion hoax was real and not just a hit job by political enemies is absolutely clueless. You got as far as two words before you told a blatant lie. www.acslaw.org/projects/the-presidential-investigation-education-project/other-resources/stark-contrasts-between-the-mueller-report-and-attorney-general-barrs-summary/Barr misrepresented the findings and obstructed the investigation. A federal judge concludes that. So, no, Mueller didn't "fail miserably"....he wasn't allowed to investigate properly, thanks to Barr's interference. The only clueless person here is yourself. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Mar 1, 2023 7:40:29 GMT -8
Fact is that Mueller was given a blank check to nail Trump Russia collusion and failed miserably. That is why that bogus narrative died so completely after his clownish presentation to Congress. Just a bunch of biased innuendo, nothing more. The FBI even offered up to a $1,000,000 to their sources to corroberate the claims in the Steele dossier and he/they wouldn't bite. And for good reason as it was all primarily lies. Just ask Carter Page about the Keystone Kops of ours. Danchenko's successful defense in the prosecution against him for lying to the FBI was his claim that the FBI knew all along that it was all lies when he gave and they received his info. And he prevailed in that defense. They were lies! That episode for the FBI & Mueller is a bad joke and anyone who believes the Trump Russia collusion hoax was real and not just a hit job by political enemies is absolutely clueless. You got as far as two words before you told a blatant lie. www.acslaw.org/projects/the-presidential-investigation-education-project/other-resources/stark-contrasts-between-the-mueller-report-and-attorney-general-barrs-summary/Barr misrepresented the findings and obstructed the investigation. A federal judge concludes that. So, no, Mueller didn't "fail miserably"....he wasn't allowed to investigate properly, thanks to Barr's interference. The only clueless person here is yourself. The dog ate my homework  |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 1, 2023 8:05:13 GMT -8
The dog ate my homework Lazy. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Mar 4, 2023 18:29:07 GMT -8
The dog ate my homework trump at CPAC "I get along great with Putin" |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Mar 5, 2023 15:10:29 GMT -8
The dog ate my homework trump at CPAC "I get along great with Putin" Aha! Finally nailed him! :rolleye |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 5, 2023 17:26:18 GMT -8
trump at CPAC "I get along great with Putin" Aha! Finally nailed him! :rolleye Acting like this isn't a reality is insulting. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Mar 5, 2023 17:36:14 GMT -8
trump at CPAC "I get along great with Putin" Aha! Finally nailed him! :rolleye I hope not...hope he's your pick. |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Mar 5, 2023 21:29:12 GMT -8
The dog ate my homework trump at CPAC "I get along great with Putin" 2 peas in a pod! |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 6, 2023 17:43:07 GMT -8
I mean, I can.
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Mar 6, 2023 19:57:02 GMT -8
this guy is a POS...literally. Working the candy from a baby crowd and laughing all the way to the bank....despicable. |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Mar 6, 2023 22:54:22 GMT -8
F U, Tucker! I guess I'm a dishonest person and Democrat.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 7, 2023 8:52:00 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Mar 7, 2023 17:31:31 GMT -8
"I love the poorly educated"....I mean Foxnews loves the poorly educated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Mar 7, 2023 19:25:44 GMT -8
Phuker Carlson, once again spreading right wing manure on the TV tube. What happened to the truth and integrity??
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Mar 7, 2023 19:33:06 GMT -8
Phuker Carlson, once again spreading right wing manure on the TV tube. What happened to the truth and integrity?? I don't know, ask the resident PTSDtroll. |
|
|
|
Post by Fishn'Aztec on Mar 7, 2023 19:37:02 GMT -8
Phuker Carlson, once again spreading right wing manure on the TV tube. What happened to the truth and integrity?? I don't know, ask the resident PTSDtroll. I guess if you ask him no questions he will tell you no lies. Good luck with that! |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 8, 2023 10:01:04 GMT -8
Pretty sure we can shut this down now.
No real need to continue the hyperbole.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Mar 8, 2023 14:47:28 GMT -8
Here's what you won't see on Fox.
|
|
