|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Sept 23, 2022 12:23:22 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Sept 23, 2022 17:01:30 GMT -8
Have you ever posted an original thought, or analysis? How bout more self-own, like a video that shows immigrants easily breaching the trump wall? |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Sept 24, 2022 7:33:28 GMT -8
Have you ever posted an original thought, or analysis? How bout more self-own, like a video that shows immigrants easily breaching the trump wall? Hijacking a bit but, given the situation created, the idiocy for advocating for no wall or only a partial wall is self evident. With border patrol agents dealing with mass illegal migration where there is no wall....I'll let you finish the obvious. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Sept 24, 2022 17:38:40 GMT -8
Meanwhile, trump staffers have to tell recent trump rally attendees (audience) not to use one finger (QAnon) salute! Just how fugged up is that?? This is the Republican presidential leader for 2024..no shame ptsdthor?
|
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 2, 2022 15:59:00 GMT -8
www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-social-media-1589060So Hillary (and many others of her same ilk, I assume) want Foreign Governments to try to limit the free speech of posters on Twitter. Their fear, I gather, is that Elon Musk and his employees might otherwise allow posters to speak in a manner as is protected by our 1st Amendment! Oh the horrors! Regarding disinformation, half truths, woefully out of context information, lies, etc., how many times do you think political campaigns, for example, have used them as parts of their speech while stumping, making promises, taking credit, affixing blame, attacking their political opponents, airing ads, etc.? It was a video...Right Hillary? It is literally countless. Pols have been using those tactics since the start of Democracy itself. What she and others are really saying is that they want left-leaning speech moderators for Twitter or else. Of course, they absolutely must retain those 1st Amendment rights for themselves. The U.S. Constitution is just too dang tolerant of the comments and opinions from those who are not part of the "elect". Gotta get those Europeans to apply their "progressive" Constitutional Laws to Twitter! Wonder what Hamilton and Jefferson would think of Hillary and her ilk for wanting Europeans to dictate the limits of Free Speech to Americans? But, but the Russians! 
|
|
|
|
Post by 84aztec96 on Nov 2, 2022 16:48:00 GMT -8
Just watched Mr. Jones, was familiar with the story, but man it was a good reminder about gate keepers and what is labeled disinformation. But hey, what is a few million starving to death for the sake of progress?
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Nov 2, 2022 16:50:11 GMT -8
www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-social-media-1589060So Hillary (and many others of her same ilk, I assume) want Foreign Governments to try to limit the free speech of posters on Twitter. Their fear, I gather, is that Elon Musk and his employees might otherwise allow posters to speak in a manner as is protected by our 1st Amendment! Oh the horrors! Regarding disinformation, half truths, woefully out of context information, lies, etc., how many times do you think political campaigns, for example, have used them as parts of their speech while stumping, making promises, taking credit, affixing blame, attacking their political opponents, airing ads, etc.? It was a video...Right Hillary? It is literally countless. Pols have been using those tactics since the start of Democracy itself. What she and others are really saying is that they want left-leaning speech moderators for Twitter or else. Of course, they absolutely must retain those 1st Amendment rights for themselves. The U.S. Constitution is just too dang tolerant of the comments and opinions from those who are not part of the "elect". Gotta get those Europeans to apply their "progressive" Constitutional Laws to Twitter! Wonder what Hamilton and Jefferson would think of Hillary and her ilk for wanting Europeans to dictate the limits of Free Speech to Americans? But, but the Russians! Trolling again I see? Name one x-president historically who would insinuate that the guy who hammered Paul Pelosi was actually trying to break out of the place? Most likely cause he was tied up in some sexual bondage...or other. Of course the police report completely debunks that bull$#!+! We love the police....yea right...GFY. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 2, 2022 17:10:26 GMT -8
www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-social-media-1589060So Hillary (and many others of her same ilk, I assume) want Foreign Governments to try to limit the free speech of posters on Twitter. Their fear, I gather, is that Elon Musk and his employees might otherwise allow posters to speak in a manner as is protected by our 1st Amendment! Oh the horrors! Regarding disinformation, half truths, woefully out of context information, lies, etc., how many times do you think political campaigns, for example, have used them as parts of their speech while stumping, making promises, taking credit, affixing blame, attacking their political opponents, airing ads, etc.? It was a video...Right Hillary? It is literally countless. Pols have been using those tactics since the start of Democracy itself. What she and others are really saying is that they want left-leaning speech moderators for Twitter or else. Of course, they absolutely must retain those 1st Amendment rights for themselves. The U.S. Constitution is just too dang tolerant of the comments and opinions from those who are not part of the "elect". Gotta get those Europeans to apply their "progressive" Constitutional Laws to Twitter! Wonder what Hamilton and Jefferson would think of Hillary and her ilk for wanting Europeans to dictate the limits of Free Speech to Americans? But, but the Russians! Jesus Christ. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 3, 2022 18:33:37 GMT -8
www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-social-media-1589060So Hillary (and many others of her same ilk, I assume) want Foreign Governments to try to limit the free speech of posters on Twitter. Their fear, I gather, is that Elon Musk and his employees might otherwise allow posters to speak in a manner as is protected by our 1st Amendment! Oh the horrors! Regarding disinformation, half truths, woefully out of context information, lies, etc., how many times do you think political campaigns, for example, have used them as parts of their speech while stumping, making promises, taking credit, affixing blame, attacking their political opponents, airing ads, etc.? It was a video...Right Hillary? It is literally countless. Pols have been using those tactics since the start of Democracy itself. What she and others are really saying is that they want left-leaning speech moderators for Twitter or else. Of course, they absolutely must retain those 1st Amendment rights for themselves. The U.S. Constitution is just too dang tolerant of the comments and opinions from those who are not part of the "elect". Gotta get those Europeans to apply their "progressive" Constitutional Laws to Twitter! Wonder what Hamilton and Jefferson would think of Hillary and her ilk for wanting Europeans to dictate the limits of Free Speech to Americans? But, but the Russians! Jesus Christ. And speaking of book burners... www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2022/11/03/amy-coney-barrett-book-fight-progressives/8255951001 |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 3, 2022 18:46:25 GMT -8
I'm just going to assume you're lying, as always. |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Nov 4, 2022 6:47:00 GMT -8
I'm just going to assume you're lying, as always. Lying by proxy? Too funny! |
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Nov 4, 2022 8:03:17 GMT -8
I'm just going to assume you're lying, as always. Lying by proxy? Too funny! No, just lying. |
|
