|
|
Post by aztecwin on Dec 3, 2010 7:02:02 GMT -8
www.redstate.com/erick/2010/11/23/michele-bachmann-is-on-the-money/I did not know if I should put this here or in Health Care. I decided here since the harm that Obama is trying to do to the country is much more far reaching than just the ObamaCare issue. Bachmann is one of the members of Congress that the loony left likes to demonize, but she is so right on most issues and more and more thinking Americans are seeing that fact.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Great Aztec Joe on Dec 3, 2010 8:00:16 GMT -8
Ahhhh! Just so much posturing from the "I'VE GOT MINE SO FUG YOU!" crowd.
We need to remove the Republicans from Congress because they are callously UnAmerican in all their presentation. They are trying their best to destroy the Constitution and create a country with Oligarchy Rule.
Democracy is a government by the People, not a government of and for the rich.
The Deep South was an Oligarchy for years because they were able to exclude the poor and the minorities (Mostly Black but some Browns) from the voting process with poll taxes and literacy tests, and prior to that, land ownership requirements. That corruption did not stand the test of time and the Constitution.
The Republican money grubbing and money worshiping scum need to be put in their place. They have the money to spend in their massive wave of corruption that they have brought to this country. They proudly pat themselves on the back each time they managed to rob the poor of even their last shreds of dignity.
All of the Robber Banks in this country are Republican Controlled by the Fat Cats who have no conscience. If the Republicans are allowed to keep their massive greed going, we are going to see a bloody civil war in this country.
There is going to come a day when the common people are just so fed up that they will not take it any more. On that day, the shooting will start. The people will be resolved to overthrow the massive wave of corruption in our society.
I am going to name that day, "Resolution Day."
It is coming soon. I expect within three years.
Even so, come Resolution Day, come!
|
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Dec 3, 2010 8:16:28 GMT -8
Another hit piece from the right. Next aztecwin will be telling us that Obama is having Nancy Reagan in to help him contact Karl Marx in the spirit world. The conservatives claim that the left demonizes the right. As if Obama is not the most demonized politician in the country.  |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Dec 3, 2010 8:23:57 GMT -8
Another hit piece from the right. Next aztecwin will be telling us that Obama is having Nancy Reagan in to help him contact Karl Marx in the spirit world. The conservatives claim that the left demonizes the right. As if Obama is not the most demonized politician in the country. Can accurate reporting of actions be deemed "demonizing"? I think not! Bachmann merely points our Obama's actions in clear terms. |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Dec 3, 2010 8:24:54 GMT -8
Another hit piece from the right. Next aztecwin will be telling us that Obama is having Nancy Reagan in to help him contact Karl Marx in the spirit world. The conservatives claim that the left demonizes the right. As if Obama is not the most demonized politician in the country. Can accurate reporting of actions be deemed "demonizing"? I think not! Bachmann merely points our Obama's actions in clear terms. Accurate reporting? You mean something you agree with. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Dec 3, 2010 8:30:07 GMT -8
Can accurate reporting of actions be deemed "demonizing"? I think not! Bachmann merely points our Obama's actions in clear terms. Accurate reporting? You mean something you agree with. If I agree with it, it must be accurate! You are catching on!  |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Dec 3, 2010 16:05:48 GMT -8
Pooh, I mean really - using that poor, mentally ill woman just to offer a troll? It's really rather sad . =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Dec 3, 2010 17:38:30 GMT -8
Pooh, I mean really - using that poor, mentally ill woman just to offer a troll? It's really rather sad . =Bob Mentally ill? How can one addicted to tobacco and too crazy to quit call a Conservative member of Congress anything? She could be as nutty as an outhouse mouse and still look like Enstein next to you or any substance addled liberal. Stop calling this nice normal lady anything! I mean really, you throwing stones at anyone is funny. |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Dec 3, 2010 19:10:26 GMT -8
Pooh, I mean really - using that poor, mentally ill woman just to offer a troll? It's really rather sad . =Bob Mentally ill? How can one addicted to tobacco and too crazy to quit call a Conservative member of Congress anything? She could be as nutty as an outhouse mouse and still look like Enstein next to you or any substance addled liberal. Stop calling this nice normal lady anything! I mean really, you throwing stones at anyone is funny. Yet another in a long line of pathetic trolls. Only reason you defend her is because, in your dotage, you think she's "hot". =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by waztec on Dec 3, 2010 20:04:44 GMT -8
The World Health Organization ranks our health system 37th. Our system is also the most expensive. We could do almost anything to our health system and improve what we have. Yes, Obama is really gonna mess us up. After all what we have now is great. Ask any bankruptcy filer and odds are they are bankrupt because of our 37th raked health care. When I was a dependent, the Navy care I got beat the crap out of any care I got from private insurance. Michelle Bachmann is not a very serious person, even for a conservative. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Dec 4, 2010 8:24:39 GMT -8
Mentally ill? How can one addicted to tobacco and too crazy to quit call a Conservative member of Congress anything? She could be as nutty as an outhouse mouse and still look like Enstein next to you or any substance addled liberal. Stop calling this nice normal lady anything! I mean really, you throwing stones at anyone is funny. Yet another in a long line of pathetic trolls. Only reason you defend her is because, in your dotage, you think she's "hot". =Bob It is not just a thought, and she is Conservative as well. Who needs the playboy channel? |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Dec 4, 2010 8:36:58 GMT -8
The World Health Organization ranks our health system 37th. Our system is also the most expensive. We could do almost anything to our health system and improve what we have. Yes, Obama is really gonna mess us up. After all what we have now is great. Ask any bankruptcy filer and odds are they are bankrupt because of our 37th raked health care. When I was a dependent, the Navy care I got beat the crap out of any care I got from private insurance. Michelle Bachmann is not a very serious person, even for a conservative. Obama Care will make us even worse. We need reform, but we are now going backward. When you were a dependent, you and your family deserved the very best care that your nation can provide. It is also very expensive. Our goal should be that kind of care at an affordable price. That rules our government as that provider. It should tell us that we need to get government out of the way other than safety. If insurance companies are not efficient, shop around. Competition can fix most anything. Serious or not, I would prefer Bachmann to represent me over Barney Frank or any number of other so called liberals. Even =Bob thinks she is "hot". He tries to put in on me, but he is a closet Bachmann fan just because of her smokin' hot looks. |
|
|
|
Post by OCEOTL on Dec 4, 2010 10:19:31 GMT -8
I hope she revamps (pun unintended) the Republican party in her image.
|
|
|
|
Post by JOCAZTEC on Dec 4, 2010 15:59:45 GMT -8
I like it, "President Bachmann"!!
Then get someone good, named, "Turner" for VP,
and, bring in a new House speaker, named, "Over-drive".
HAM
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Dec 4, 2010 16:27:31 GMT -8
It should tell us that we need to get government out of the way other than safety. If every government program is such a failure (which I tend to believe is true), then why should it be in charge of national defense? Kinda playing devil's advocate, but now that I think about it, kinda not. Well, for what it is worth, Defense is one of the few legit functions of the government. I think we all know it could be more focused and better run. I recognize this as a troll, but could not help myself. |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Dec 4, 2010 16:34:15 GMT -8
>>>Serious or not, I would prefer Bachmann to represent me over Barney Frank or any number of other so called liberals. Even =Bob thinks she is "hot". He tries to put in on me, but he is a closet Bachmann fan just because of her smokin' hot looks.<<<
Nail, head.
I don't know what this Bachmann babe looks like, but she must be a "looker". The =Perfesser alway projects himself on to others when it "comes" to conservative babes.
He has a long history of projection. He says the same $#!+ about Palin and Coulter.
I bet he watches Fox News just to watch the babes while he gets all frustrated trying to beat his flaccid meat.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Dec 4, 2010 16:58:26 GMT -8
If every government program is such a failure (which I tend to believe is true), then why should it be in charge of national defense? Kinda playing devil's advocate, but now that I think about it, kinda not. Well, for what it is worth, Defense is one of the few legit functions of the government. I think we all know it could be more focused and better run. I recognize this as a troll, but could not help myself. What does "provide for the general welfare" mean to you? |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Dec 4, 2010 17:32:25 GMT -8
I like it, "President Bachmann"!! Then get someone good, named, "Turner" for VP, and, bring in a new House speaker, named, "Over-drive". HAM Cute, but I don't think you'd like a President Bachmann since Randy Bachmann is LDS and most likely a MIP supporter . =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by Bob Forsythe on Dec 4, 2010 17:34:21 GMT -8
>>>Serious or not, I would prefer Bachmann to represent me over Barney Frank or any number of other so called liberals. Even =Bob thinks she is "hot". He tries to put in on me, but he is a closet Bachmann fan just because of her smokin' hot looks.<<< Nail, head. I don't know what this Bachmann babe looks like, but she must be a "looker". The =Perfesser alway projects himself on to others when it "comes" to conservative babes. He has a long history of projection. He says the same $#!+ about Palin and Coulter. I bet he watches Fox News just to watch the babes while he gets all frustrated trying to beat his flaccid meat. Um, sure thing, Dave. Sorry, but two years ago, it wasn't me but some of the right-wingers on here, who were claiming Palin was hot. Personally, with all three of them, I follow the old adage - beauty is skin deep but ugly is to the bone and all three of them fit the latter. =Bob |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Dec 4, 2010 17:35:57 GMT -8
Well, for what it is worth, Defense is one of the few legit functions of the government. I think we all know it could be more focused and better run. I recognize this as a troll, but could not help myself. What does "provide for the general welfare" mean to you? Dunno what "Win" thinks, but Madison said in Federalist 41: "It has been urged and echoed that the power 'to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, to pay the debts, and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States,' amounts to an unlimited commission to execise every power which may be necessary for the common defense or general welfare. No stronger proof could be given of the distress under which these writers labor for objections, than their stooping to such misconstruction. "Had no other enumeration or definition of the powers of the Congress been found in the Constitution than the general expressions just cited, the authors of the objection might have had some color for it; though it would have been difficult to find a reason for so awkward a form for describing an authority to legislate in all possible cases." IOW, both the general welfare and common defense clauses have to be supported by the specific grants of power in Article I, section 8. I can find clauses about providing for a navy, providing for an army, providing for a postal service, among other powers. Nothing about food stamps, mortgage buyouts, bank bailouts, corporation takeovers, or countless other blatant usurpations too many to number. |
|
