|
Post by AztecWilliam on Jul 27, 2021 17:20:24 GMT -8
One more thing. How many were killed on Jan.6th? I do not mean died of natural causes, which is bad enough. How many were killed? Who was killed? Who killed that person? Did the victim have a gun? Why did it take so long for the name of the killer to be made public?
AzWm
|
|
|
Post by AztecWilliam on Jul 27, 2021 17:26:42 GMT -8
This entire circus is a joke. Let's punish the idiots who got misled by politicians rather than do anything to the political elite who led them. This is so stereotypically Murican. Weimar only imprisoned Hitler for 5 years. How'd that work out for them? We're doing far less to fight fascism. Every politician responsible should've been shoved into a wood chippper. I'll speak for a moment for my William Lowell Rupp persona. Suggesting that anyone should be shoved into a wood chippper (sic) clearly qualifies as hate speech. Please find other ways to express you opinions. By the way, Hitler only served about 9 months for the 1923 Putsch. AzWm/WLR
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 27, 2021 18:04:09 GMT -8
I woke up this morning in a very masochistic mood. After thinking it over, I decided that the best way to receive some serious hate was to comment on January 6th, 2021. Here goes. (Start sharpening your keyboards.) Regarding the riots (my preferred term) of the 6th of January, nothing positive can be said. Many people committed crimes at the Capitol that day, some serious and others not so serious. I think we will see some of the indicted ultimately receive some pretty harsh sentences. Others are being charged, I believe, on much less serious crimes such as trespassing. How should we view the events of Jan. 6th in DC? A bunch of rag-tag partisans, mostly supporters of Donald Trump, who came looking for trouble and found the Capitol security unprepared to defend the center of republican government? Or perhaps a well-organized attempt by right-wing, well-armed stormtroopers to seize the government of the United States? It certainly was at least the former of those two possibilities. As for the latter, one must ask some questions. How many of those who stormed the capitol brought firearms? (Let me emphasize the word "firearms", not "weapons". One does not knock over a government armed with slingshots and baseball bats.) I looked that up and found that only " Christopher Michael Alberts was arrested by Metropolitan Police on Jan. 6 for carrying a pistol without a license, possession of a firearm on Capital grounds". The the item did not say whether the man had actually entered the building. In any case, if what he is charged with is true, it's a crime and he should be prosecuted. But if it was a serious attempt to seize control of the U.S. government, it was a pretty pathetic one. Take a look at the videos of some of boobs walking around the House chamber looking like drunken college sophomores after a football game. Do you think that they constituted a threat to our government? That does NOT mean it was not a serious breach of the law and a gross affront to our concept of civilized government. I condemn it without reservation. But, as serious as the riot was in a number of ways, it never had a chance of overthrowing he U.S. government. Even if they had succeeded in killing many Representatives and Senators, they would not have achieved their goal. The military would have killed most of them when it, inevitably, retook the premises by force. And, no, it's very unlikely that the evil monster Donald Trump would have ordered the army to install him as President by force. Anyway, we have heard how Gen. Milley, eager not to allow the POTUS to do anything untoward, would have stepped in to stop him. As bad as the riot was, there is one thing that worries me more. That is the obvious attempt by the Democrats to portray ALL their political opponents as, in essence, being as guilty as those who stormed the Capitol. That of course is rubbish. I can't imagine that, out of the 74 million Trump voters, more than a handful actually approve of what happened on Jan. 6th. If the Democrats can convince even a relatively small percentage of the 74 million who voted for Trump that the GOP is synonymous with National Socialism and White Supremacy, I don't see how they can ever again fail to win the presidency. Okay, I'm ready for the hate. Bring it on. AzWm ....Oof. It was an insurrection, not a riot or a protest. The textbook definition of insurrection was met, to a tee. They were there to overthrow a lawful, democratic vote to certify an election. That's not debatable, it's a fact. Using your preferred term is unequivocal spin, set to diminish the events of what took place. And they deserve to be spotlighted, not hidden in the shadows. Regarding the execution of said plan, it was planned weeks in advance by parties involved. Meetings at Trump Tower, social media coordination, Turning Point buses, etc. It was not a spur of the moment Bastille Day. Don't confuse a lack of intelligence with a lack of execution, as this was not that. It was absolutely coordinated, albeit not by a bunch of genius level savants. I'm not sure how thorough your research was, because at least four people have been charged with actual firearms offenses. Here's one, which is a pretty serious and rare charge to deliver... "The rare weapons charge was handed up Wednesday in a five-count superseding indictment against Guy Wesley Reffitt, 48, who prosecutors say brought a rifle and semiautomatic handgun to Washington and recruited members to a right-wing Texas Three Percenters group claiming he had created a new security business to circumvent gun laws." As for your determination to try and explain it away as a non-threat, that's utterly false and a mischaracterizatiom. There were multiple, multiple, multiple current/former law enforcement and members of the military involved in the insurrection. Uniquely dangerous individuals with specialized training. If you think that's a coincidence or something else, I'm inclined to disagree. See the photos of former military members that got a hold of zip ties. Or the people that attacked the officer whose Taser was used against him repeatedly, by his own testimony. Killing members of Congress would have changed the course of our history. It would have allowed for a coup to take place with presidential backing - Lest we forget, the president was seen watching and laughing from on site, along with Donald Trump Jr and others. He refused to call in the Guard, it was a purposeful, calculated decision not to do so, that directly put the life of the VP in danger. I'm not sure how is this even remotely considered a positive point, because it definitely isn't. And lastly, I'm sorry, but your point about it being "obvious" that Democrats are trying to paint everyone as evil? How? Where? Show me something that would indicate that. What we have in reality is pearlclutching, false equivalence by a delusional horde of GOP members that want to elevate BLM protests and the like with THIS, which is a complete nonstarter. It's literally false and there's no comparison whatsoever between the two. Adam Kinzinger, one of the few GOP members with a spine, also a member of the Air Force said it best yesterday - He never saw the very essence of our government threatened by any BLM protests, as he was called to serve during them.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 27, 2021 18:07:47 GMT -8
One more thing. How many were killed on Jan.6th? I do not mean died of natural causes, which is bad enough. How many were killed? Who was killed? Who killed that person? Did the victim have a gun? Why did it take so long for the name of the killer to be made public? AzWm What does any of this matter? Ashli Babbitt was named that day. She was shot while attempting to climb through a broken window. Officer Brian Sicknick died as well. Are you trying to point to some larger conspiracy?
|
|
|
Post by azson on Jul 28, 2021 8:32:37 GMT -8
I woke up this morning in a very masochistic mood. After thinking it over, I decided that the best way to receive some serious hate was to comment on January 6th, 2021. Here goes. (Start sharpening your keyboards.) Regarding the riots (my preferred term) of the 6th of January, nothing positive can be said. Many people committed crimes at the Capitol that day, some serious and others not so serious. I think we will see some of the indicted ultimately receive some pretty harsh sentences. Others are being charged, I believe, on much less serious crimes such as trespassing. How should we view the events of Jan. 6th in DC? A bunch of rag-tag partisans, mostly supporters of Donald Trump, who came looking for trouble and found the Capitol security unprepared to defend the center of republican government? Or perhaps a well-organized attempt by right-wing, well-armed stormtroopers to seize the government of the United States? It certainly was at least the former of those two possibilities. As for the latter, one must ask some questions. How many of those who stormed the capitol brought firearms? (Let me emphasize the word "firearms", not "weapons". One does not knock over a government armed with slingshots and baseball bats.) I looked that up and found that only " Christopher Michael Alberts was arrested by Metropolitan Police on Jan. 6 for carrying a pistol without a license, possession of a firearm on Capital grounds". The the item did not say whether the man had actually entered the building. In any case, if what he is charged with is true, it's a crime and he should be prosecuted. But if it was a serious attempt to seize control of the U.S. government, it was a pretty pathetic one. Take a look at the videos of some of boobs walking around the House chamber looking like drunken college sophomores after a football game. Do you think that they constituted a threat to our government? That does NOT mean it was not a serious breach of the law and a gross affront to our concept of civilized government. I condemn it without reservation. But, as serious as the riot was in a number of ways, it never had a chance of overthrowing he U.S. government. Even if they had succeeded in killing many Representatives and Senators, they would not have achieved their goal. The military would have killed most of them when it, inevitably, retook the premises by force. And, no, it's very unlikely that the evil monster Donald Trump would have ordered the army to install him as President by force. Anyway, we have heard how Gen. Milley, eager not to allow the POTUS to do anything untoward, would have stepped in to stop him. As bad as the riot was, there is one thing that worries me more. That is the obvious attempt by the Democrats to portray ALL their political opponents as, in essence, being as guilty as those who stormed the Capitol. That of course is rubbish. I can't imagine that, out of the 74 million Trump voters, more than a handful actually approve of what happened on Jan. 6th. If the Democrats can convince even a relatively small percentage of the 74 million who voted for Trump that the GOP is synonymous with National Socialism and White Supremacy, I don't see how they can ever again fail to win the presidency. Okay, I'm ready for the hate. Bring it on. AzWm ....Oof. It was an insurrection, not a riot or a protest. The textbook definition of insurrection was met, to a tee. They were there to overthrow a lawful, democratic vote to certify an election. That's not debatable, it's a fact. Using your preferred term is unequivocal spin, set to diminish the events of what took place. And they deserve to be spotlighted, not hidden in the shadows. Regarding the execution of said plan, it was planned weeks in advance by parties involved. Meetings at Trump Tower, social media coordination, Turning Point buses, etc. It was not a spur of the moment Bastille Day. Don't confuse a lack of intelligence with a lack of execution, as this was not that. It was absolutely coordinated, albeit not by a bunch of genius level savants. I'm not sure how thorough your research was, because at least four people have been charged with actual firearms offenses. Here's one, which is a pretty serious and rare charge to deliver... "The rare weapons charge was handed up Wednesday in a five-count superseding indictment against Guy Wesley Reffitt, 48, who prosecutors say brought a rifle and semiautomatic handgun to Washington and recruited members to a right-wing Texas Three Percenters group claiming he had created a new security business to circumvent gun laws." As for your determination to try and explain it away as a non-threat, that's utterly false and a mischaracterizatiom. There were multiple, multiple, multiple current/former law enforcement and members of the military involved in the insurrection. Uniquely dangerous individuals with specialized training. If you think that's a coincidence or something else, I'm inclined to disagree. See the photos of former military members that got a hold of zip ties. Or the people that attacked the officer whose Taser was used against him repeatedly, by his own testimony. Killing members of Congress would have changed the course of our history. It would have allowed for a coup to take place with presidential backing - Lest we forget, the president was seen watching and laughing from on site, along with Donald Trump Jr and others. He refused to call in the Guard, it was a purposeful, calculated decision not to do so, that directly put the life of the VP in danger. I'm not sure how is this even remotely considered a positive point, because it definitely isn't. And lastly, I'm sorry, but your point about it being "obvious" that Democrats are trying to paint everyone as evil? How? Where? Show me something that would indicate that. What we have in reality is pearlclutching, false equivalence by a delusional horde of GOP members that want to elevate BLM protests and the like with THIS, which is a complete nonstarter. It's literally false and there's no comparison whatsoever between the two. Adam Kinzinger, one of the few GOP members with a spine, also a member of the Air Force said it best yesterday - He never saw the very essence of our government threatened by any BLM protests, as he was called to serve during them. Let's also refer to the perpetrators by what they should be named, by definition: terrorists.
|
|
|
Post by mayham81 on Jul 28, 2021 9:28:12 GMT -8
As bad as the riot was, there is one thing that worries me more. That is the obvious attempt by the Democrats to portray ALL their political opponents as, in essence, being as guilty as those who stormed the Capitol. That of course is rubbish. I can't imagine that, out of the 74 million Trump voters, more than a handful actually approve of what happened on Jan. 6th. AzWm Prominent republicans in the house and senate are trying to rewrite history on what happened that day as well as block this investigation at all costs. Jim Jordan even admitted to speaking to Trump on Jan 6th which is why he should have never been considered to sit on the committee since he may end up being called as a witness. Your comment about what worries you more is democrats using this as a political opportunity is kind of everything that's wrong with the priorities of the right at the moment. There is a big blind spot when the reaction to Cheney and Kinzinger from the right is to call them Pelosi republicans and punish them for being patriotic by trying to get to the bottom of what led up to that awful moment in our history. A big chunk of the party has been radicalized and the reaction from "sensible" people on the right is bull$#!+ false equivalencies because really all that matters is regaining power even if it weakens our democracy overall.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 31, 2021 13:39:31 GMT -8
This is horrifying.
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Aug 1, 2021 13:18:02 GMT -8
Big shock!! this guy, Jordan and a bunch of others were in on it!
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Aug 1, 2021 17:38:16 GMT -8
It might be just a little red flag if your own siblings despise you and think you are evil.
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Aug 2, 2021 8:17:50 GMT -8
Like any U.S. citizen, Ashli deserved equal justice under the law as did George Floyd, for example. If she was killed for just cause for her trespassing, property crime, and threat to the innocent within the Capital, then all her associates in crime could have been legally killed by the Capitol police that day. Are you saying that we should have had or could have had a Tiananmen Square moment on 1/6 and you are OK with that? Are you saying that to lament Ashli's fate and to have questions on the action of the policeman who shot her and the legal determination of her case afterward is wrong? In Seattle, Minneapolis & Portland, where rioters were attacking Government properties with police and others civilians potentially in harms way, are you saying the rioters there should have been mowed down? If not, what is unique about Ashli's case, other than being a rioter with the wrong political affiliation? Is the Capital somehow "Sacred Ground" with a different Justice System associated with it?
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 2, 2021 8:57:43 GMT -8
Like any U.S. citizen, Ashli deserved equal justice under the law as did George Floyd, for example. If she was killed for just cause for her trespassing, property crime, and threat to the innocent within the Capital, then all her associates in crime could have been legally killed by the Capitol police that day. Are you saying that we should have had or could have had a Tiananmen Square moment on 1/6 and you are OK with that? Are you saying that to lament Ashli's fate and to have questions on the action of the policeman who shot her and the legal determination of her case afterward is wrong? In Seattle, Minneapolis & Portland, where rioters were attacking Government properties with police and others civilians potentially in harms way, are you saying the rioters there should have been mowed down? If not, what is unique about Ashli's case, other than being a rioter with the wrong political affiliation? Is the Capital somehow "Sacred Ground" with a different Justice System associated with it? Here we go with the false equivalence. Non-starter for me. Yes, the Capitol is home to our body of government. It is vital to our continuity of government, more so than a courthouse in the middle of the night or another building in a random city that has no immediate impact on the federal government. The larger point here that you sidestepped in true delusional fashion is you have an actual member of Congress memorializing a terrorist. A person who was trying to climb through a broken window in the Capitol with serious mental health questions, an absolute danger to others in the building. The two situations have nothing to do with each other. No members of Congress were in danger in Minneapolis, Portland or anywhere else besides Washington D.C. Even GOP member Adam Kinzinger said so - He was deployed as an Air Force Guardsmen during the riots. The truth is a better recipe here.
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Aug 2, 2021 12:17:45 GMT -8
Like any U.S. citizen, Ashli deserved equal justice under the law as did George Floyd, for example. If she was killed for just cause for her trespassing, property crime, and threat to the innocent within the Capital, then all her associates in crime could have been legally killed by the Capitol police that day. Are you saying that we should have had or could have had a Tiananmen Square moment on 1/6 and you are OK with that? Are you saying that to lament Ashli's fate and to have questions on the action of the policeman who shot her and the legal determination of her case afterward is wrong? In Seattle, Minneapolis & Portland, where rioters were attacking Government properties with police and others civilians potentially in harms way, are you saying the rioters there should have been mowed down? If not, what is unique about Ashli's case, other than being a rioter with the wrong political affiliation? Is the Capital somehow "Sacred Ground" with a different Justice System associated with it? Here's what you don't get. There have always been anarchists and random street people who have joined a cause for an excuse to riot and cause mayhem. Would you like me to go over our history and show you the examples of the last 60 years?? Guess what, most don't even vote and none were wearing uniforms that said "Biden" or "Democrat". Bad news for your argument is that that people who attacked the Capitol Building were wearing uniforms and they said "trump" and MAGA... you've played your cards enough times to know you support these whacks. are you still sending money to my pillow guy and mango Mouselini?
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Aug 2, 2021 14:51:10 GMT -8
Like any U.S. citizen, Ashli deserved equal justice under the law as did George Floyd, for example. If she was killed for just cause for her trespassing, property crime, and threat to the innocent within the Capital, then all her associates in crime could have been legally killed by the Capitol police that day. Are you saying that we should have had or could have had a Tiananmen Square moment on 1/6 and you are OK with that? Are you saying that to lament Ashli's fate and to have questions on the action of the policeman who shot her and the legal determination of her case afterward is wrong? In Seattle, Minneapolis & Portland, where rioters were attacking Government properties with police and others civilians potentially in harms way, are you saying the rioters there should have been mowed down? If not, what is unique about Ashli's case, other than being a rioter with the wrong political affiliation? Is the Capital somehow "Sacred Ground" with a different Justice System associated with it? Here we go with the false equivalence. Non-starter for me. Yes, the Capitol is home to our body of government. It is vital to our continuity of government, more so than a courthouse in the middle of the night or another building in a random city that has no immediate impact on the federal government. The larger point here that you sidestepped in true delusional fashion is you have an actual member of Congress memorializing a terrorist. A person who was trying to climb through a broken window in the Capitol with serious mental health questions, an absolute danger to others in the building. The two situations have nothing to do with each other. No members of Congress were in danger in Minneapolis, Portland or anywhere else besides Washington D.C. Even GOP member Adam Kinzinger said so - He was deployed as an Air Force Guardsmen during the riots. The truth is a better recipe here. It seems the policeman just took a pot shot into a crowd of rioters. And why do you say that action should not be questioned? Because the Capital is associated with the Federal Government and Members of Congress were involved? Really? Equal protection under the law is one of our fundamental rights and it seems you say it is ok to suspend it when "more equal" citizens need protecting. Got it. Perhaps the policeman was armed with a mental health judging gun. I'm not saying the policeman in question is guilty of any crime but the Babbitt family deserved transparency. I can't think of another situation where such info would be withheld. For the left, the double standard is always the norm.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 2, 2021 15:40:42 GMT -8
Here we go with the false equivalence. Non-starter for me. Yes, the Capitol is home to our body of government. It is vital to our continuity of government, more so than a courthouse in the middle of the night or another building in a random city that has no immediate impact on the federal government. The larger point here that you sidestepped in true delusional fashion is you have an actual member of Congress memorializing a terrorist. A person who was trying to climb through a broken window in the Capitol with serious mental health questions, an absolute danger to others in the building. The two situations have nothing to do with each other. No members of Congress were in danger in Minneapolis, Portland or anywhere else besides Washington D.C. Even GOP member Adam Kinzinger said so - He was deployed as an Air Force Guardsmen during the riots. The truth is a better recipe here. It seems the policeman just took a pot shot into a crowd of rioters. And why do you say that action should not be questioned? Because the Capital is associated with the Federal Government and Members of Congress were involved? Really? Equal protection under the law is one of our fundamental rights and it seems you say it is ok to suspend it when "more equal" citizens need protecting. Got it. Perhaps the policeman was armed with a mental health judging gun. I'm not saying the policeman in question is guilty of any crime but the Babbitt family deserved transparency. I can't think of another situation where such info would be withheld. For the left, the double standard is always the norm. This isn't about directions on a map, it's about basic logic. Ashli Babbit was committing a crime, in fact multiple crimes. This wasn't a "pot shot" into a crowd. She was part of a group of insurrectionists that were armed, whose sole goal was to do everything in their power to overturn a fair, democratic election. They were there to inflict damage and harm people, not peacefully assemble and congregate. You can't strain yourself to think of any other situation? I can. Easily. Breanna Taylor. David Cameron was the least transparent person on Earth as that investigation was taking place, and Breonna Taylor didn't try to murder sitting members of Congress. This has nothing to do with equality under the law. It's not about transparency. It's about playing stupid games and winning stupid prizes. Comparing this in any way to George Floyd is blatant racism, ignorance and disgusting. One was under arrest, with his face down in the concrete, with a knee on his neck for over eight minutes. The other was part of a violent mob of terrorists who gained access to the House of Representatives after assaulting police officers. Nothing alike.
|
|
|
Post by azson on Aug 2, 2021 15:57:37 GMT -8
Here we go with the false equivalence. Non-starter for me. Yes, the Capitol is home to our body of government. It is vital to our continuity of government, more so than a courthouse in the middle of the night or another building in a random city that has no immediate impact on the federal government. The larger point here that you sidestepped in true delusional fashion is you have an actual member of Congress memorializing a terrorist. A person who was trying to climb through a broken window in the Capitol with serious mental health questions, an absolute danger to others in the building. The two situations have nothing to do with each other. No members of Congress were in danger in Minneapolis, Portland or anywhere else besides Washington D.C. Even GOP member Adam Kinzinger said so - He was deployed as an Air Force Guardsmen during the riots. The truth is a better recipe here. It seems the policeman just took a pot shot into a crowd of rioters. And why do you say that action should not be questioned? Because the Capital is associated with the Federal Government and Members of Congress were involved? Really? Equal protection under the law is one of our fundamental rights and it seems you say it is ok to suspend it when "more equal" citizens need protecting. Got it. Perhaps the policeman was armed with a mental health judging gun. I'm not saying the policeman in question is guilty of any crime but the Babbitt family deserved transparency. I can't think of another situation where such info would be withheld. For the left, the double standard is always the norm. You sound like you haven't even watched the video footage.
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Aug 2, 2021 18:07:39 GMT -8
Here we go with the false equivalence. Non-starter for me. Yes, the Capitol is home to our body of government. It is vital to our continuity of government, more so than a courthouse in the middle of the night or another building in a random city that has no immediate impact on the federal government. The larger point here that you sidestepped in true delusional fashion is you have an actual member of Congress memorializing a terrorist. A person who was trying to climb through a broken window in the Capitol with serious mental health questions, an absolute danger to others in the building. The two situations have nothing to do with each other. No members of Congress were in danger in Minneapolis, Portland or anywhere else besides Washington D.C. Even GOP member Adam Kinzinger said so - He was deployed as an Air Force Guardsmen during the riots. The truth is a better recipe here. It seems the policeman just took a pot shot into a crowd of rioters. And why do you say that action should not be questioned? Because the Capital is associated with the Federal Government and Members of Congress were involved? Really? Equal protection under the law is one of our fundamental rights and it seems you say it is ok to suspend it when "more equal" citizens need protecting. Got it. Perhaps the policeman was armed with a mental health judging gun. I'm not saying the policeman in question is guilty of any crime but the Babbitt family deserved transparency. I can't think of another situation where such info would be withheld. For the left, the double standard is always the norm. ps.. you don't give a f x x x about the "Babbitt Family"..just like you've probably lost 0 nights of sleep cause of abortion. At least be a little more real in your posts. Everything you post is telegraphed a mile away...
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Aug 3, 2021 7:42:31 GMT -8
It seems the policeman just took a pot shot into a crowd of rioters. And why do you say that action should not be questioned? Because the Capital is associated with the Federal Government and Members of Congress were involved? Really? Equal protection under the law is one of our fundamental rights and it seems you say it is ok to suspend it when "more equal" citizens need protecting. Got it. Perhaps the policeman was armed with a mental health judging gun. I'm not saying the policeman in question is guilty of any crime but the Babbitt family deserved transparency. I can't think of another situation where such info would be withheld. For the left, the double standard is always the norm. You sound like you haven't even watched the video footage. Democrat Government Lifers are withholding video evidence from the Babbitts but somehow CNN let you see everything necessary. Got it!
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Aug 3, 2021 7:46:54 GMT -8
It seems the policeman just took a pot shot into a crowd of rioters. And why do you say that action should not be questioned? Because the Capital is associated with the Federal Government and Members of Congress were involved? Really? Equal protection under the law is one of our fundamental rights and it seems you say it is ok to suspend it when "more equal" citizens need protecting. Got it. Perhaps the policeman was armed with a mental health judging gun. I'm not saying the policeman in question is guilty of any crime but the Babbitt family deserved transparency. I can't think of another situation where such info would be withheld. For the left, the double standard is always the norm. ps.. you don't give a f x x x about the "Babbitt Family"..just like you've probably lost 0 nights of sleep cause of abortion. At least be a little more real in your posts. Everything you post is telegraphed a mile away... "Passionate hatred can give meaning and purpose to an empty life." Eric Hoffer
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Aug 3, 2021 7:57:33 GMT -8
You sound like you haven't even watched the video footage. Democrat Government Lifers are withholding video evidence from the Babbitts but somehow CNN let you see everything necessary. Got it! Proof? Source?
|
|
|
Post by azson on Aug 3, 2021 8:34:27 GMT -8
You sound like you haven't even watched the video footage. Democrat Government Lifers are withholding video evidence from the Babbitts but somehow CNN let you see everything necessary. Got it!
|
|