|
|
Post by pdraztec on Dec 12, 2016 10:13:35 GMT -8
According to Scout this morning.....Massaman Bogoyoka (sp?), 3-star OT,
6'6" 300lbs, rated the 5th best OT in Calif. He is from Bishop Alemany HS,
Mission Hills and made the commit on the 11th. Nice job.
Looks like we are securing the talent regardless of decision of Durant.
|
|
|
|
Post by originalshow00 on Dec 12, 2016 10:39:03 GMT -8
According to Scout this morning.....Massaman Bogoyoka (sp?), 3-star OT, 6'6" 300lbs, rated the 6th best OT in Calif. He is from Bishop Alemany HS, Mission Hills and made the commit on the 11th. Nice job. Looks like we are securing the talent regardless of decision of Durant. Durant is signed and is staying right?He is more of a player that could play right away at one of the tackle positions.This Bogoyoka kid is a good signing. |
|
|
|
Post by Boise Aztec on Dec 12, 2016 11:05:01 GMT -8
This guy is a bigtime athletic player who is only playing his second year after moving from Canada.... LA Times Article |
|
|
|
Post by wolfstartec on Dec 12, 2016 13:06:31 GMT -8
Sorry! The page you were looking for cannot be found. The page may no longer exist or may have moved to another web address. Try again to locate what you want by choosing a section from the navigation menu at left, viewing our Site Map or using the search box below. |
|
|
|
Post by wolfstartec on Dec 12, 2016 13:09:14 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on Dec 13, 2016 9:20:29 GMT -8
Nice get. I bet the staff knew Durrant was flimsy at best & made a major push for this guy.
|
|
|
|
Post by sdsu2000 on Dec 13, 2016 9:31:42 GMT -8
Another big body to open holes for our tiny talented backs.
|
|
|
|
Post by badfish on Dec 13, 2016 11:16:33 GMT -8
Nice get. I bet the staff knew Durrant was flimsy at best & made a major push for this guy. We've been on him since the beginning. Sucks we lost Durant, but this is a great get. |
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on Dec 13, 2016 13:33:01 GMT -8
Nice get. I bet the staff knew Durrant was flimsy at best & made a major push for this guy. We've been on him since the beginning. Sucks we lost Durant, but this is a great get. The downside of the "trade" is Durrant would be more likely to contribute right away while this kid will take a couple years to develop. The upside is with Durrant we'd only get 2, with 1 being a "learning" year most likely, whereas this kid will learn the system as a FR / RS FR, and hopefully be able to contribute for 3 years. Still think we need a JC OL. With our depth at TE (Wells, Houston, Warring) I'm wondering if we'll see the Brunskill-effect, and have another former TE become our Team Lineman of the Year, like Brunskill? Maybe Wells - dude is large & experienced in the trenches. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecsfan05 on Dec 13, 2016 21:38:24 GMT -8
According to Ruben Meza from Rivals this kid will be coming in in January. So early enrollee
|
|
|
|
Post by beadle on Dec 14, 2016 15:19:51 GMT -8
We've been on him since the beginning. Sucks we lost Durant, but this is a great get. The downside of the "trade" is Durrant would be more likely to contribute right away while this kid will take a couple years to develop. The upside is with Durrant we'd only get 2, with 1 being a "learning" year most likely, whereas this kid will learn the system as a FR / RS FR, and hopefully be able to contribute for 3 years. Still think we need a JC OL. With our depth at TE (Wells, Houston, Warring) I'm wondering if we'll see the Brunskill-effect, and have another former TE become our Team Lineman of the Year, like Brunskill? Maybe Wells - dude is large & experienced in the trenches. Couldn't see them moving one of those three tight ends as all three are offensive weapons. Given how bad our WRs are I'd love to see Rocky/Horton go with more of a Stanford/Michigan-type look with 2-3 tight ends on the field. Will help in run blocking and will give us better pass catching options than we have on the outside. Would keep people honest because of play action. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecfan1 on Dec 14, 2016 18:47:26 GMT -8
What "bad" WRs are you talking about? Why are they bad?
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecfan1 on Dec 14, 2016 18:51:06 GMT -8
We've been on him since the beginning. Sucks we lost Durant, but this is a great get. The downside of the "trade" is Durrant would be more likely to contribute right away while this kid will take a couple years to develop. The upside is with Durrant we'd only get 2, with 1 being a "learning" year most likely, whereas this kid will learn the system as a FR / RS FR, and hopefully be able to contribute for 3 years. Still think we need a JC OL. With our depth at TE (Wells, Houston, Warring) I'm wondering if we'll see the Brunskill-effect, and have another former TE become our Team Lineman of the Year, like Brunskill? Maybe Wells - dude is large & experienced in the trenches. Sure hope not. Wells is the best since Escobar. Warring is going to be special too. He is almost healed from his injury. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecfan1 on Dec 14, 2016 18:56:04 GMT -8
We've been on him since the beginning. Sucks we lost Durant, but this is a great get. The downside of the "trade" is Durrant would be more likely to contribute right away while this kid will take a couple years to develop. The upside is with Durrant we'd only get 2, with 1 being a "learning" year most likely, whereas this kid will learn the system as a FR / RS FR, and hopefully be able to contribute for 3 years. Still think we need a JC OL. With our depth at TE (Wells, Houston, Warring) I'm wondering if we'll see the Brunskill-effect, and have another former TE become our Team Lineman of the Year, like Brunskill? Maybe Wells - dude is large & experienced in the trenches. Coug is correct. You almost never see a true FR OL play at our level. I'm not taking the loss of Durant well. Kids dad was far more bullish on SDSU than the player it now appears. |
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on Dec 15, 2016 10:17:15 GMT -8
The downside of the "trade" is Durrant would be more likely to contribute right away while this kid will take a couple years to develop. The upside is with Durrant we'd only get 2, with 1 being a "learning" year most likely, whereas this kid will learn the system as a FR / RS FR, and hopefully be able to contribute for 3 years. Still think we need a JC OL. With our depth at TE (Wells, Houston, Warring) I'm wondering if we'll see the Brunskill-effect, and have another former TE become our Team Lineman of the Year, like Brunskill? Maybe Wells - dude is large & experienced in the trenches. Couldn't see them moving one of those three tight ends as all three are offensive weapons. Given how bad our WRs are I'd love to see Rocky/Horton go with more of a Stanford/Michigan-type look with 2-3 tight ends on the field. Will help in run blocking and will give us better pass catching options than we have on the outside. Would keep people honest because of play action. Truxton & Holder will continue to improve & should be pretty good outside; the 2 tall RS FR are going to be pretty good players (1 could have played significantly this year). I don't know if we'll be as bad at WR as you may think. We have 4 TE's, all of which bring varying talents. Warring is going to be the stud receiver, more so than Wells IMO and Houston is only going to get bigger/stronger. Add in Richardson who can spread the field (if only he had better hands) & you have 4 guys with 1 or 2 getting less PT. Wells is the dominant blocker from within those 4. Don't think it'd be a bad thing for one of them to pull a Brunskill. We ran 2 TE's quite often this year, and wouldn't be surprised if that continues. But not all 4 can play. |
|
|
|
Post by kozy on Dec 15, 2016 18:42:07 GMT -8
Chapman has not improved year over year. If he is the best we have, WR's and TE's don't matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by standiego on Dec 15, 2016 19:16:40 GMT -8
place where you great divide between P5 and G5 is HS OL coming into college . The top rated P5 teams get some high quality OL that can jump into the line up or be a reserve that gets PT . G5 schools usually need to develop their HS recruits .
Our QB not that easy to develop when we are running the ball the majority of the time and then throwing mostly on third down or if we are behind . Believe Rocky has said major priority next year will be to have a more balanced attack . Teams that are primarily rushing or those that are primarily throwing have problems when they face a quality D , who focus on taking away the main weapons . How many times did we face teams that load the box and the run . Also not easy getting WR's or QB's that want to have a strong air attack to come to SDSU . What WR that wants to be involved in an offense that really throws the ball is going to want to come here to block ?
|
|
