|
|
Post by joshjones1 on Nov 5, 2010 12:39:15 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Nov 5, 2010 13:38:18 GMT -8
Although Rupert Murdoch contributed $2m (£1.23m) to the Republicans and commentators from his Fox News network also made donations, papers such as the New York Times, National Public Radio and television channels such as CNN and MSNBC seek to maintain strict neutrality. Ok for republicans but not democrats.  |
|
|
|
Post by joshjones1 on Nov 5, 2010 13:41:51 GMT -8
Although Rupert Murdoch contributed $2m (£1.23m) to the Republicans and commentators from his Fox News network also made donations, papers such as the New York Times, National Public Radio and television channels such as CNN and MSNBC seek to maintain strict neutrality. Ok for republicans but not democrats. Well, it's not like a governing body is handing out the punishment. It's his employers policy and their choice. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Nov 5, 2010 13:50:07 GMT -8
Although Rupert Murdoch contributed $2m (£1.23m) to the Republicans and commentators from his Fox News network also made donations, papers such as the New York Times, National Public Radio and television channels such as CNN and MSNBC seek to maintain strict neutrality. Ok for republicans but not democrats. Did the part about breech for company rules escape you? Murdoch makes the rules for Newscorp while Olberman is a minion who is charged with following rules at his miserable little company. This is really pretty funny on a number of levels. |
|
|
|
Post by waztec on Nov 5, 2010 18:56:16 GMT -8
Although Rupert Murdoch contributed $2m (£1.23m) to the Republicans and commentators from his Fox News network also made donations, papers such as the New York Times, National Public Radio and television channels such as CNN and MSNBC seek to maintain strict neutrality. Ok for republicans but not democrats. Well, it's not like a governing body is handing out the punishment. It's his employers policy and their choice. So true. But 100,000 (sorry, it is 136,000 at this point) signatures gathered in five hours is a clue, to even the most dense, that MSNBC may pay in the only way that any Republican can be brought to tears, in their wallet. LOL |
|
|
|
Post by waztec on Nov 5, 2010 19:02:01 GMT -8
Although Rupert Murdoch contributed $2m (£1.23m) to the Republicans and commentators from his Fox News network also made donations, papers such as the New York Times, National Public Radio and television channels such as CNN and MSNBC seek to maintain strict neutrality. Ok for republicans but not democrats. Did the part about breech for company rules escape you? Murdoch makes the rules for Newscorp while Olberman is a minion who is charged with following rules at his miserable little company. This is really pretty funny on a number of levels. NBC can suspend who they want. But, they cannot suspend me when I stop tuning them in. LOL |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Nov 6, 2010 8:03:15 GMT -8
Did the part about breech for company rules escape you? Murdoch makes the rules for Newscorp while Olberman is a minion who is charged with following rules at his miserable little company. This is really pretty funny on a number of levels. NBC can suspend who they want. But, they cannot suspend me when I stop tuning them in. LOL What am I missing here? A dirt bag gets suspended by his slime bucket boss and you think anyone you can hurt their already minuscule viewership by tuning in who? Fox? |
|
|
|
Post by waztec on Nov 6, 2010 8:16:35 GMT -8
NBC can suspend who they want. But, they cannot suspend me when I stop tuning them in. LOL What am I missing here? A dirt bag gets suspended by his slime bucket boss and you think anyone you can hurt their already minuscule viewership by tuning in who? Fox? For the time being, I can watch what I want on television and I can choose to avoid MSNBC. I predict that the Republicans will attempt to change that and Comcast certainly will. Frankly, I don't care what happens to MSNBC. Olberman will find something else, because he has a following. And that following puts him in the top ten cable shows. I have watched Fox News and their programming is a direct insult to my intelligence. |
|
|
|
Post by uwaztec on Nov 6, 2010 8:19:20 GMT -8
NBC can suspend who they want. But, they cannot suspend me when I stop tuning them in. LOL What am I missing here? A dirt bag gets suspended by his slime bucket boss and you think anyone you can hurt their already minuscule viewership by tuning in who? Fox? Not an Olberman fan, but I think FOX has the market cornered on "dirt bags". Starting with Hannity, Coulter, Dick Morris....... Huckabee, Smith, Van Sustern are ok for me. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Nov 6, 2010 12:44:57 GMT -8
What am I missing here? A dirt bag gets suspended by his slime bucket boss and you think anyone you can hurt their already minuscule viewership by tuning in who? Fox? Not an Olberman fan, but I think FOX has the market cornered on "dirt bags". Starting with Hannity, Coulter, Dick Morris....... Huckabee, Smith, Van Sustern are ok for me. Where do you go for TV news? I get fascinated by some of the CSPAN programming. I have similar views about all the folks you mention but Hannity. He is very opinionated and could be tough to take if you were a liberal. The rest are pretty much as you say. |
|
|
|
Post by davdesid on Nov 6, 2010 16:58:55 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Nov 7, 2010 9:10:10 GMT -8
That is both funny and a reason he is gone. Watching that clip doubled my exposure to Olbermann since he left sports.  He is quite a "dog dooley". |
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Nov 7, 2010 22:35:58 GMT -8
He will be back Tuesday.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Nov 8, 2010 11:09:59 GMT -8
Good! That should further suppress the viewership on MSNBC. |
|
He is quite a "dog dooley".