|
Post by aztecsiggy on Jul 9, 2015 10:59:58 GMT -8
SDSU makes it into the 40's. Does SDSU make it into the 30's as Phil Steele predicts. Regardless, I stoked about making it to the 40's and beyond?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2015 11:09:13 GMT -8
We better beat Cal now, eh?
|
|
|
Post by AccessBowlTime on Jul 9, 2015 11:17:41 GMT -8
We better beat Cal now, eh? Lol. I thought the same.
|
|
|
Post by aztech on Jul 10, 2015 17:29:23 GMT -8
We better beat Cal now, eh? Lol. I thought the same. Making it San Diego Stinking State 2.0 would be sweet. That would be unBearable in Bizerkley.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 10, 2015 17:49:47 GMT -8
#49 ULL. Must've gotten the stemming call to get that highly ranked
|
|
|
Post by tttrojan4life on Jul 11, 2015 23:58:30 GMT -8
K-State another P5 is #48.
|
|
|
Post by aztecryan on Jul 12, 2015 9:41:35 GMT -8
Is this going to be one of those rankings where they forget to rank us at all?
|
|
|
Post by csfoster on Jul 12, 2015 9:52:30 GMT -8
Is this going to be one of those rankings where they forget to rank us at all? I predict the low 30's. The reality is we should be ranked.
|
|
|
Post by McQuervo on Jul 12, 2015 15:09:07 GMT -8
Still cant believe Boise is forecasted to be the MWC Champions. Why, seems like they return few?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 14, 2015 11:46:26 GMT -8
Big 12 rival Cincinnati #45
We currently rank higher than 32 P5s
|
|
|
Post by sdcoug on Jul 14, 2015 12:11:32 GMT -8
Still cant believe Boise is forecasted to be the MWC Champions. Why, seems like they return few?
?? They return nearly everyone. The only real losses are their QB & RB, which are big, but whoever steps in at QB will inherit not only their entire returning O-line (among highest correlating factors with winning %), but all top receivers. Don't see them going 14-0 like this guy does, but they definitely should be the conference favorite. They have tradition & a sweet $$ package from the conference going for them, which helps overcome their JC perception (although the latter probably helps them with getting questionable guys in).
www.sbnation.com/college-football/2015/4/17/8430669/boise-state-football-2015-preview-schedule-roster
|
|
|
Post by McQuervo on Jul 14, 2015 12:54:55 GMT -8
Knew they lost 2 of the guys that would drive their offense. Perhaps I should have stated differently.
Thanks Doug!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2015 4:30:19 GMT -8
Minnesota at #44. That makes 33
|
|
|
Post by alamobruin on Jul 15, 2015 4:44:55 GMT -8
Minnesota at #44. That makes 33 Yes, but you can't count Minny. They are the most important "opponent" in college football.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2015 5:38:21 GMT -8
La TECH #43.
Can't believe we're coming in this high. We make the thirties, that'd be something. But, I question what a paper in Florida knows about SDSU that we don't.
|
|
|
Post by OCEOTL on Jul 16, 2015 6:19:34 GMT -8
2014 = 10-2 2015 = 13-0
They realize we have a great defense. We have a great running game.
And they rightfully assume that Smith beating out Jake, doesn't necessarily mean that Jake got worse.
Oh, and we have new play-callers.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2015 6:29:26 GMT -8
2014 = 10-2 2015 = 13-0 They realize we have a great defense. We have a great running game. And they rightfully assume that Smith beating out Jake, doesn't necessarily mean that Jake got worse. Oh, and we have new play-callers. 1. yes 2. yes 3. wrong. QB is a HUGE ? mark- not to mention O-line. 4. yes, but untested
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2015 6:30:42 GMT -8
La TECH #43. Can't believe we're coming in this high. We make the thirties, that'd be something. But, I question what a paper in Florida knows about SDSU that we don't. My question-exactly!
|
|
|
Post by OCEOTL on Jul 16, 2015 6:40:04 GMT -8
2014 = 10-2 2015 = 13-0 They realize we have a great defense. We have a great running game. And they rightfully assume that Smith beating out Jake, doesn't necessarily mean that Jake got worse. Oh, and we have new play-callers. 1. yes 2. yes 3. wrong. QB is a HUGE ? mark- not to mention O-line. 4. yes, but untested 2014 = 10-2 2015 = 13-0 True, but 3 and 4 GOTTA be MUCH better than last year. OLine serviceable.
|
|
|
Post by AccessBowlTime on Jul 16, 2015 8:21:24 GMT -8
2014 = 10-2 2015 = 13-0 They realize we have a great defense. We have a great running game. And they rightfully assume that Smith beating out Jake, doesn't necessarily mean that Jake got worse. Oh, and we have new play-callers. But we also still have Rocky Long, aka Mr. 7-9.
|
|