|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jul 18, 2014 8:28:46 GMT -8
|
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jul 18, 2014 8:33:54 GMT -8
The article blames Global Warming for the lake being so high when the "consensus" just last year was that the lake would be forever lower due to (you guessed it) Global Warming.
They think we are very stupid or didn't read (or remember) what they wrote in the past.
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 18, 2014 9:06:25 GMT -8
It's not called Global Warming Bill, it's called "Climate Change". Certain areas may very well get colder. Places like Europe if the Gulf stream gets affected. |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jul 18, 2014 10:16:28 GMT -8
It's not called Global Warming Bill, it's called "Climate Change". Certain areas may very well get colder. Places like Europe if the Gulf stream gets affected. "Certain Places" like Earth. We haven't had any warming for 17 years and 10 months. This was predicted by climate realists and it happened. That is because CO2 has very little effect on the climate of the planet. Global warming advocates changed the name because they knew global warming is a scam that couldn't hold water long without a name change to placate the sheep who believe their lies. Every prediction their models made have been proven to be totally wrong. "If the gulf stream gets affected"? That hasn't happened and won't. That was pie in the sky speculation that has no scientific basis. Just like climate change. Global Warming is based upon increased CO2 and has some scientific basis. They just totally over sold it by adding a 3 times positive feedback without any scientific basis. But CO2 making things change that hadn't changed before is total scientific fraud. There is absolutely no basis for that. |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jul 18, 2014 10:21:08 GMT -8
Did you know the entire EU won't be going to the next climate convention that the UN has every 4 years. They just announced they have pulled out. It is falling apart. It will happen fast. No one wants to be left holding the bag.
|
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 18, 2014 15:58:28 GMT -8
It's not called Global Warming Bill, it's called "Climate Change". Certain areas may very well get colder. Places like Europe if the Gulf stream gets affected. "Certain Places" like Earth. We haven't had any warming for 17 years and 10 months. This was predicted by climate realists and it happened. That is because CO2 has very little effect on the climate of the planet. Global warming advocates changed the name because they knew global warming is a scam that couldn't hold water long without a name change to placate the sheep who believe their lies. Every prediction their models made have been proven to be totally wrong. "If the gulf stream gets affected"? That hasn't happened and won't. That was pie in the sky speculation that has no scientific basis. Just like climate change. Global Warming is based upon increased CO2 and has some scientific basis. They just totally over sold it by adding a 3 times positive feedback without any scientific basis. But CO2 making things change that hadn't changed before is total scientific fraud. There is absolutely no basis for that. Stephen Hawking is smarter than you and me. What's in it for him to go with the "Scam" as you say? |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jul 18, 2014 16:32:42 GMT -8
"Certain Places" like Earth. We haven't had any warming for 17 years and 10 months. This was predicted by climate realists and it happened. That is because CO2 has very little effect on the climate of the planet. Global warming advocates changed the name because they knew global warming is a scam that couldn't hold water long without a name change to placate the sheep who believe their lies. Every prediction their models made have been proven to be totally wrong. "If the gulf stream gets affected"? That hasn't happened and won't. That was pie in the sky speculation that has no scientific basis. Just like climate change. Global Warming is based upon increased CO2 and has some scientific basis. They just totally over sold it by adding a 3 times positive feedback without any scientific basis. But CO2 making things change that hadn't changed before is total scientific fraud. There is absolutely no basis for that. Stephen Hawking is smarter than you and me. What's in it for him to go with the "Scam" as you say? Not sure what he knows or has said. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 18, 2014 16:37:09 GMT -8
Stephen Hawking is smarter than you and me. What's in it for him to go with the "Scam" as you say? Not sure what he knows or has said. Haha..he "knows" a lot! Takes a longer, slower view, but reaches the same conclusion. Oh, and he refutes your 100 billion humans in the other direction... which is where I think we will end up eventually. |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jul 18, 2014 16:38:05 GMT -8
Not sure what he knows or has said. Haha..he "knows" a lot! Takes a longer, slower view, but reaches the same conclusion. Oh, and he refutes your 100 billion humans in the other direction... which is where I think we will end up eventually. Freeman Dyson said the opposite. What I’m convinced of is that we don’t understand climate ... It will take a lot of very hard work before that question is settledHe became interesting in climate science in the 1970s and knows a lot more about it than Hawking and is just as smart. |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jul 18, 2014 17:18:56 GMT -8
It's not called Global Warming Bill, it's called "Climate Change". Certain areas may very well get colder. Places like Europe if the Gulf stream gets affected. The theory is that the globe will warm. The theory is not that the globe will change. This whole "Climate Change" thing is tested language designed to make the theory more palatable to those who were turned off by "global warming". But that is the theory - the globe warms. It isn't happening since we are going into the negative phase of cycles that restrict warming. |
|
|
|
Post by uwphoto on Jul 18, 2014 18:28:55 GMT -8
Haha..he "knows" a lot! Takes a longer, slower view, but reaches the same conclusion. Oh, and he refutes your 100 billion humans in the other direction... which is where I think we will end up eventually. Freeman Dyson said the opposite. What I’m convinced of is that we don’t understand climate ... It will take a lot of very hard work before that question is settledHe became interesting in climate science in the 1970s and knows a lot more about it than Hawking and is just as smart. hey, so L. Ron Hubbard and Joseph Smith have lots of believers as well. |
|
|
|
Post by Aztec89 on Jul 18, 2014 20:12:16 GMT -8
Freeman Dyson said the opposite. What I’m convinced of is that we don’t understand climate ... It will take a lot of very hard work before that question is settledHe became interesting in climate science in the 1970s and knows a lot more about it than Hawking and is just as smart. hey, so L. Ron Hubbard and Joseph Smith have lots of believers as well. Tom Cruise and Jim Mc Mahon believe in Global Warming? Who knew? |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jul 18, 2014 22:09:37 GMT -8
Freeman Dyson said the opposite. What I’m convinced of is that we don’t understand climate ... It will take a lot of very hard work before that question is settledHe became interesting in climate science in the 1970s and knows a lot more about it than Hawking and is just as smart. hey, so L. Ron Hubbard and Joseph Smith have lots of believers as well. Exactly. |
|
|
|
Post by Aztec89 on Jul 19, 2014 5:36:31 GMT -8
Written by some Obama minion named Holly Agra, who advises the Government on Travel & tourism. No doubt, trolling her cruise boat for some Federal Funds, from the cruise boat Czar. Chicago has never seen extreme weather before? LOL. Mrs O'Leary's cow should kick another lantern over. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Jul 19, 2014 7:25:58 GMT -8
It's not called Global Warming Bill, it's called "Climate Change". Certain areas may very well get colder. Places like Europe if the Gulf stream gets affected. You are right on. We have a constantly changing set of factors that affect our weather. It runs in cycles, always has and always will. |
|
|
|
Post by AztecBill on Jul 29, 2014 8:54:13 GMT -8
I wonder how long it will be before we hear that a colder Arctic and increased sea ice was predicted by Global Climate Change.
|
|
