|
|
Post by aztecwin on Nov 20, 2009 16:39:26 GMT -8
This is exceptionally important. Please listen to the speaker. What he has to say is of vital importance to us all. If you accept what the speaker says you might want to call the White House and your elected representatives. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddQvhdCyhe4If he signs this treaty, he will give Geo Soros what he wants, what Soros put Obama in place to do. |
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Nov 23, 2009 9:35:30 GMT -8
What treaty are you referring to?
I listened to Lord Haw Haw. He lost me when he said that our Constitution required us to cede our sovereignty when we signed the treaty. The guy knows nothing about the Constitution.
|
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Nov 23, 2009 12:17:27 GMT -8
What treaty are you referring to? I listened to Lord Haw Haw. He lost me when he said that our Constitution required us to cede our sovereignty when we signed the treaty. The guy knows nothing about the Constitution. He did leave out a very important step, that being the ratification process. His point is no less valid, but its chances are about like the Kyoto Accord which Clinton had go down 99-1 after he signed it. I think it is very important to see what the intent of the present administration is and not just their chance of getting it ratified. You will also note that there are many more liberals in Congress now than during the Clinton stint. |
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Nov 23, 2009 13:39:38 GMT -8
What treaty are you referring to? I listened to Lord Haw Haw. He lost me when he said that our Constitution required us to cede our sovereignty when we signed the treaty. The guy knows nothing about the Constitution. He did leave out a very important step, that being the ratification process. His point is no less valid, but its chances are about like the Kyoto Accord which Clinton had go down 99-1 after he signed it. I think it is very important to see what the intent of the present administration is and not just their chance of getting it ratified. You will also note that there are many more liberals in Congress now than during the Clinton stint. You still didn't answer on what "IT" is. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Nov 24, 2009 14:22:44 GMT -8
He did leave out a very important step, that being the ratification process. His point is no less valid, but its chances are about like the Kyoto Accord which Clinton had go down 99-1 after he signed it. I think it is very important to see what the intent of the present administration is and not just their chance of getting it ratified. You will also note that there are many more liberals in Congress now than during the Clinton stint. You still didn't answer on what "IT" is. "It" was in that link. Here is further discussion. It is about "One World Government". starturl.com/hedct |
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Nov 25, 2009 8:51:31 GMT -8
What treaty are you referring to? I listened to Lord Haw Haw. He lost me when he said that our Constitution required us to cede our sovereignty when we signed the treaty. The guy knows nothing about the Constitution. He did leave out a very important step, that being the ratification process. His point is no less valid, but its chances are about like the Kyoto Accord which Clinton had go down 99-1 after he signed it. I think it is very important to see what the intent of the present administration is and not just their chance of getting it ratified. You will also note that there are many more liberals in Congress now than during the Clinton stint. A quote from an AP story on Obama attending the conference. "The conference had originally been intended to produce a new global climate change treaty on limiting emissions of greenhouse gases that would replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. However, hopes for a legally binding agreement have dimmed lately, with leaders saying the summit is more likely to produce a template for future action to cut emissions blamed for global warming." |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Nov 25, 2009 13:38:40 GMT -8
He did leave out a very important step, that being the ratification process. His point is no less valid, but its chances are about like the Kyoto Accord which Clinton had go down 99-1 after he signed it. I think it is very important to see what the intent of the present administration is and not just their chance of getting it ratified. You will also note that there are many more liberals in Congress now than during the Clinton stint. A quote from an AP story on Obama attending the conference. "The conference had originally been intended to produce a new global climate change treaty on limiting emissions of greenhouse gases that would replace the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. However, hopes for a legally binding agreement have dimmed lately, with leaders saying the summit is more likely to produce a template for future action to cut emissions blamed for global warming." The recent revelations about the hiding of the truth about global warming has further dimmed any chance at what was being talked about. Now it appears that NASA has joined the parade of folks that have been "outed" in this scandal. I think that Cap and Trade is dead. |
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Nov 29, 2009 9:25:08 GMT -8
He did leave out a very important step, that being the ratification process. His point is no less valid, but its chances are about like the Kyoto Accord which Clinton had go down 99-1 after he signed it. I think it is very important to see what the intent of the present administration is and not just their chance of getting it ratified. You will also note that there are many more liberals in Congress now than during the Clinton stint. You still didn't answer on what "IT" is. Watch both of these videos. The one on the left is about this. www.paulmcguire.com/ |
|
|
|
Post by ptsdthor on Dec 23, 2009 14:06:39 GMT -8
Doesn't a payer have a slave/master relationship to a payee? Then now much US sovereignty is lost to new masters with a $100 Billion per year economy killing, money printing, generational theft entitlement for 3rd world dictators?
Do Dims actually think Obama & Hitlery were serious? Did you really lap up all the BS your liberal Profs in poli sci & world studies, etc spewed on you and take it seriously?
This Potemkin Presidency is lacking so much common sense, it is more than laughable. It is economically dangerous on a global scale. The global economy relies on the US economy to be solvent and strong. But alas, the leftists and their knucklehead supporters don't want our economy to be masculine, vibrant and expanding. They prefer government dependence for all and they are willing to let many of us suffer to forward that end.
What is the unemployment rate in real terms and what are they doing about it? Trying to figure out a way to pay $100 billion a year to 3rd World Dictators. Absolutely ridiculous (and dangerous).
|
|
