|
Post by AztecBill on Feb 26, 2014 17:51:02 GMT -8
There was never a lie! What is wrong with you dim wits? They were following the best intell that they had. If it proved wrong, still no lie. Want a lie? Think about obamakare and keeping your Doctor and the $2500 decrease in premiums. Yes, it was a lie. The intel they used was cherry picked to justify a war. As to Obamacare my 60 year old self-employed contractor client told me he is saving over $500 a month, with smaller copays and lower cap. He told me he is one happy conservative. Bill Clinton believed he had WMDs. That is easily forgotten by the left. Bill Clinton just recently in a position to "know" the current intel at the time. Your version is liberal fantasy vainly used to justify outright lies by Obama. He claims folks who were added to medicare because they became eligible due to age, not his program, and knows it because he has been told. Yet he continues to lie about the numbers using that data which is knowingly inaccurate. 4 Pinocchios is the correcet assesment by the Washington Post.
|
|
|
Post by aztec70 on Feb 26, 2014 18:16:09 GMT -8
www.salon.com/2007/09/06/bush_wmd/This is what I am talking about. There was information from the highest source in Iraq that our intelligence community knew. The White House chose to ignore it as it did not fit the scenario they wanted for WAR. I call that lying to the American people.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Feb 27, 2014 8:48:51 GMT -8
www.salon.com/2007/09/06/bush_wmd/This is what I am talking about. There was information from the highest source in Iraq that our intelligence community knew. The White House chose to ignore it as it did not fit the scenario they wanted for WAR. I call that lying to the American people. Two imaginary Senior CIA Officials? Who are they? What are their names? Salon? You are just so silly!
|
|
|
Post by tuff on Feb 27, 2014 9:18:54 GMT -8
WMDs, and Iraq's involvement in 9/11. The legal case for Iraq was their breaking of the terms of surrender. The reason for Iraq was WMD. Everyone thought WMD were in Iraq before the Bush's administration started talking about it. Clinton said he believed that too. Dem senators said we shouldn't attack because of WMD before Bush made the case. Bush believed it. Sadam used deception to make poeple believe it and suceeded. Saying it was a lie is twisting facts. This. And it's amazing how morons keep going back to the Bush days and not being in the NOW. The last I saw, we are still losing lives in muslimland.. Gitmo is still open. Fast and furious, the IRS, Benghazi, federal snooping are still open cases being stonewalled. And actions taken to tweak law without congress approval is going on daily. Obamacare is a bust, our military is shrinking and Harry Reid is an absolute idiot who should be put out to pasture. And it all goes back to our Liar in Chief.
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Feb 27, 2014 9:33:57 GMT -8
Can't those here on the 'right' post without Jr. High School name calling? Try acting like you actually went to college.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Feb 27, 2014 9:40:28 GMT -8
Can't those here on the 'right' post without Jr. High School name calling? Try acting like you actually went to college. There is a fine line between juvenile name calling and accurate labeling. Those on the right don't cross it while those on the left don't understand it.
|
|
|
Post by AlwaysAnAztec on Feb 27, 2014 9:46:23 GMT -8
Can't those here on the 'right' post without Jr. High School name calling? Try acting like you actually went to college. There is a fine line between juvenile name calling and accurate labeling. Those on the right don't cross it while those on the left don't understand it. Maybe an attempt at humor but I think you actually believe it.
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Mar 15, 2014 5:58:23 GMT -8
There is a fine line between juvenile name calling and accurate labeling. Those on the right don't cross it while those on the left don't understand it. Maybe an attempt at humor but I think you actually believe it. Don't want to start another thread so will stick this here. spectator.org/articles/58149/uninsured-obamacare-unaffordableIt is more about how the lie about the price of obamakare and the number of folks who have actually signed up. I wonder how many who did sign up have paid their premium. "The answer, of course, is that actual facts have little to do with the claims the President makes for Obamacare. It’s pretty obvious, for example, that the 4 million sign-up figure touted by his administration is fiction. The McKinsey survey makes it clear that the actual number is less than 500,000. The reality is that Obama’s health care bureaucrats aren’t bothering to track how many uninsured are obtaining coverage via Obamacare. When asked for that figure, the government official charged with implementing the program said, “That’s not a data point that we are really collecting in any systematic way.”"
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Mar 18, 2014 11:49:03 GMT -8
|
|
|
Post by aztecwin on Apr 3, 2014 6:31:42 GMT -8
|
|